When the Electoral College confirmed Donald Trump’s victory over Kamala Harris on December 17, many thought the certification would be straightforward. However, Democrats have a history of attempting to block Republican victories. The ongoing debate includes claims that Trump should not hold office due to Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, with some arguing he is an insurrectionist.
Some critics, like lawyers Evan Davis and David Schulte, labeled Trump as an “oath-breaking insurrectionist” in a recent piece, asserting that there is overwhelming evidence against him, despite the fact that he has never been charged with insurrection. They reference previous forums that allegedly labeled Trump as guilty, but these include his impeachment trial, which acquitted him, and other decisions that were later rejected.
Democratic Rep. Jamie Raskin expressed strong views on the role of Congress in possibly preventing Trump from taking office again, suggesting that Congress would be responsible for communicating disqualification to supporters on January 6, 2025. There are concerns that he and other left-leaning Democrats may try to disrupt the certification process again. The Electoral Count Reform Act of 2022, however, makes it harder for such disruptions to occur by requiring more members from both chambers of Congress to challenge electors.
Additionally, Evans and Schulte's claims seem to lack credible evidence, as they argue that because Trump was not formally charged, it would somehow invalidate the electoral votes. They misinterpret the law, claiming that voting for a disqualified candidate does not constitute a regular vote.
Furthermore, the ECRA aims to clarify the Vice President's role in determining elector disputes, indicating that Kamala Harris will not have sole power over these decisions during the certification process. Analysts note that the ongoing rhetoric around Trump continues to reflect a lack of critical reasoning among some of his detractors.
In summary, discussions surrounding Trump’s eligibility, particularly concerning Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, reveal significant divisions and strategies among Democrats in the face of ongoing electoral processes. The hope remains that absurd claims will not derail the electoral system.
https://spectator.org/will-dems-disrupt-certification-of-trumps-triumph/
No comments:
Post a Comment