Why Does the COVID Vaccine Persist In The Body?

The COVID vaccines have been shown to persist in patients' bodies for up to 700 days or more, raising concerns about their production process. The text discusses the trade-offs involved in many societal decisions, noting that finding a satisfactory solution often involves balancing the benefits and downsides of different approaches. It describes how biases can affect public perception of these solutions and highlights common tactics used by governments to push policies, such as downplaying negatives, overwhelming public support quickly, or coercively enforcing compliance.

In the realm of medicine, the text discusses the challenge of achieving a balance between sensitivity and specificity in diagnosis. It uses examples like COVID PCR tests, which prioritized sensitivity but sacrificed specificity, leading to many false positives. This concept extends beyond medicine to the justice system, where varying approaches to the death penalty illustrate the difficulty of creating a system that protects both the public and innocent individuals. The text also emphasizes how difficult it can be to find an appropriate dose for medications, as different individuals may respond uniquely to drugs.

The article outlines three key takeaways: finding a balance between conflicting positions is challenging, rushed solutions can create major future issues, and many vaccine-related problems align with this framework. It proposes that the immune system is complex and often misunderstood, as research focuses more on profitable pharmaceuticals than on true understanding. The immune system is described as having two responses: the innate and adaptive responses, which work together to eliminate pathogens.

Vaccination aims to prepare the immune system to respond effectively to infections, allowing for a quicker response if exposed to a microbe. Governments promote vaccination to control diseases and present themselves as protecting public health. However, when issues arise, they often double down on vaccine policies rather than reassess their value.

For vaccines to function, they must produce an antigen without infectious organisms being present. This requires growing the organism and then either killing it or otherwise manipulating it to create the antigens. The challenges of this process result in various risks, including autoimmunity and ineffective responses due to rapid pathogen evolution. The text details several historical instances of vaccine production problems, highlighting how decisions made under pressure, such as the use of insufficiently inactivated viruses or contaminated elements, have led to significant public health crises.

Examples include the Salk polio vaccine, which caused infections due to improper inactivation, and the contamination of polio vaccines with SV40, a cancer-causing virus. It discusses failures in response to perceived threats, leading to negative outcomes in emergency vaccines, like the rushed 1976 flu vaccine that caused many injuries.

The complexities of vaccine production continue, as seen in the anthrax vaccine developed for military use and the challenges faced with the DTP vaccine, which had a high rate of failure and injury. The article concludes that there is a consistent pattern of prioritizing speed to market over safety in vaccine development, especially during emergencies, with the vaccine industry confidently relying on government assurances of safety and effectiveness while being shielded from legal liabilities. 

https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/why-does-the-covid-vaccine-persist