President Biden's last-minute pardons have caused significant controversy, with critics arguing they are scandalous. Among these pardons is that of his son Hunter, who faced charges for federal gun violations and tax evasion. However, Hunter's pardon is not seen as the worst among the actions taken.
These pardons highlight a broader issue: that the purpose of pardons is to address individual cases individually, not to push policy changes. Some pardons, including those for a corrupt judge involved in the “Kids for Cash” scandal and an official linked to a massive fraud scheme, have raised eyebrows. Pardons have even been given to individuals accused of healthcare fraud that harmed patients.
Despite the serious nature of these pardons, Biden’s administration has not provided strong defenses. Instead, they claim the decisions were based on a general rule that applied to specific categories of offenders rather than on thorough case-by-case reviews. This approach is criticized for misusing the pardon power, which should not serve to implement political agendas.
Former President Obama’s granting of many pardons on his way out of office is mentioned as a cautionary tale for Biden. While the debate around drug legality continues, the power to change laws lies with Congress, not the President. The President’s role is to enforce existing laws, regardless of personal beliefs.
An example of potential abuse of pardoning power could involve a president categorically pardoning anyone who refuses to pay taxes, which would undermine the law. While the president has the legal right to pardon, using it to settle policy disputes is seen as crossing a line.
Pardons should be reserved for exceptional cases, such as those who have significantly changed their lives or those facing severe health issues. They should not be a method for settling disagreements between the President and Congress.
Democrats are urged to consider the implications of these actions and potentially take measures against Biden for his choices. Republicans are similarly warned against using pardoning power for blanket actions, especially in relation to individuals involved in the January 6 events, where a categorical pardon could be seen as legalizing unlawful actions instead of providing just mercy.
Overall, both parties are called to reflect on their responsibilities toward upholding laws and the overall integrity of the pardon system.
https://nypost.com/2024/12/21/opinion/hunters-pardon-is-bad-but-bidens-merit-mercies-are-worse/
No comments:
Post a Comment