Evette Faces New Attack Ad, Campaign and Reporting Offer Conflicting Accounts

 

By Staff

With less than three weeks until South Carolina’s June 9, 2026 partisan primaries, Lieutenant Governor Pamela Evette is the target of a new attack advertisement that accuses her of being a habitual liar, reigniting questions about past campaign messaging, her company’s ties to diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) work, and the activities of allied dark money groups.

The ad, described in local reporting, opens with a staged polygraph scene and the line, “In South Carolina, a lie is a betrayal,” before declaring that “with Pamela Evette, it’s a habit.” It alleges Evette ran and then pulled an advertisement claiming an endorsement from former President Donald Trump. The spot also criticizes Evette for profiting from DEI training through the Upstate firm she founded, Quality Business Solutions (QBS), and accuses Evette and allied groups of dishonest tactics directed at four‑term Attorney General Alan Wilson.

The ad says Evette ran an ad claiming Trump endorsed her and subsequently removed it after being caught.

It accuses Evette and QBS of promoting and selling DEI programming, including marketing services that could be used to meet diversity spending goals.

The spot further alleges Evette aligned dark money groups have misled the public and targeted Attorney General Alan Wilson with falsehoods.

Reporting and documentary record

Local reporting reproduces the ad’s text and describes its polygraph imagery and concluding tag line, “Pamela Evette just broke the lie detector.”

A prior investigative article documents QBS’s history of offering DEI‑related services and marketing material cited by critics. That piece also outlines timelines of ownership and promotional activity for the company.

Separately, local outlets reported that Patriots for South Carolina, a political group supporting Evette, was the subject of an IRS complaint alleging the organization had claimed qualified state or local political organization status and had not filed certain South Carolina reports it said it would file. Public confirmation or IRS action on that complaint was not available in the reporting.

Campaign response and disputes

Evette’s campaign pushed back strongly. Campaign manager Megan Finnern said opponents specifically supporters of Attorney General Alan Wilson are responsible for the misleading advertising, and denied that Evette ever claimed Trump’s endorsement or pulled any ad about it. The campaign also asserted Evette has opposed DEI initiatives.

Independent local coverage noted contention over ads that implied endorsements by Gov. Henry McMaster and Trump, local reporting indicates at least one ad was removed after criticism, though sources differ on who produced or authorized the ads and on whether explicit endorsement claims were made by Evette’s campaign.

Points of corroboration and evidentiary gaps

The contents of the attack ad and the campaign response are documented in multiple local reports, including visual descriptions and quoted lines from the spot.

QBS material referencing DEI programming and related services appears in archived marketing and in reporting, but there is dispute over whether those materials reflect Evette’s actions or the practices of QBS after she divested control; timelines of ownership and when specific materials were posted are consequential and contested.

The IRS complaint concerning Patriots for South Carolina is reported by local outlets, however, public IRS confirmation or additional independent reporting on the complaint’s status or outcome was not found in available sources.

Major national fact checking organizations had not published rulings on the specific claims as of this reporting; independent verification of a pulled ad explicitly claiming a Trump endorsement is limited to state and local coverage and statements from involved campaigns and groups.

What remains unresolved

Whether Evette herself authorized or ran an ad that explicitly claimed a Trump endorsement, and whether such an ad was later pulled, cannot be independently confirmed from available public archives; Evette’s campaign denies the allegation.

The extent to which DEI related marketing by QBS should be attributed to Evette personally depends on the timing of postings and the date she transferred ownership; reporting shows pro DEI material associated with QBS but includes campaign claims that she divested before some content appeared.

The status and implications of the IRS complaint against Patriots for South Carolina remain unclear in public records cited by local reporting.

The ad adds intensity to a crowded GOP primary in South Carolina, where questions about endorsements, outside spending and political messaging have become central political flash points. As the June 9 primary approaches, voters and watchdogs will be watching for additional documentation archived ads, campaign disclosures, PAC filings and any regulatory actions that could confirm or refute the competing claims.

If you’d like, I can attempt to locate archived video of the contested ads, pull QBS marketing snapshots with dates, or search for state PAC filings and IRS records to pursue the unresolved items.

Sources:

https://www.live5news.com/2025/09/26/sc-lt-gov-pamela-evettes-campaign-responds-calls-take-down-ads/

https://www.fitsnews.com/2025/09/29/pamela-evettes-pac-pulled-henry-mcmaster-endorsement/

https://www.fitsnews.com/2026/05/20/crossroads-2026-pamela-evette-blasted-in-new-lie-detector-ad/

Dirty Brad Raffensperger Loses GOP Gubernatorial Primary in Peach Tree State Shellacking!

Brad Raffensperger, the Georgia Secretary of State, lost significantly in the Republican gubernatorial primary, finishing third and failing to advance to the runoff. His political career in Georgia is effectively over as he faces scrutiny over his actions during the 2020 elections.

1. Election Results:

• Brad Raffensperger ranked third in the Republican primary, losing to Burt Jones and Rick Jackson, who will proceed to the runoff.

• This marks a significant defeat for Raffensperger and signals a shift in support among Republican voters in Georgia.

2. Controversies:

• Raffensperger became a controversial figure after accusations of lying regarding a phone call with President Trump after the 2020 election, leading him to receive praise from liberal media.

• A report indicated that Raffensperger's office illegally recorded a conversation with Trump in January 2021 without proper consent, violating Florida's two-party consent law.

3. Illegal Activities:

• Jordan Fuchs, Georgia’s Deputy Secretary of State at the time, improperly recorded the call and later deleted the audio, which was later recovered from the "trash" folder on her computer.

• The contents of the call were allegedly misrepresented when a leaked version was provided to the Washington Post, containing false quotes attributed to Trump.

4. Impact of Actions:

• Following the unauthorized leak, the Washington Post identified Fuchs as their anonymous source for the misleading story about Trump, further damaging Raffensperger's reputation.

• Voter backlash culminated in Raffensperger's primary loss, and predictions suggest he may seek a role within Democratic circles after leaving office.

Brad Raffensperger's political career suffered a major blow with his defeat in the GOP primary in Georgia. His previous controversies concerning the 2020 election, particularly the unauthorized recording and misrepresentation of his interactions with President Trump, contributed to his diminished support. As he exits the political stage in Georgia, speculation surrounds his potential future alignment with Democratic groups. 

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/05/dirty-brad-raffensperger-loses-gop-gubernatorial-primary-peach/

This Midterm Season, the American Dream is on the Line

The 2026 midterm elections are crucial for the future of the American Dream. The Joint Economic Report from Congress reveals serious financial issues that could affect working families, retirees, and younger generations. This report exposes the consequences of current political management and emphasizes the need for responsible economic reforms.

1. Economic Challenges:

• The U. S. faces significant demographic and fiscal challenges, including a national debt of $39 trillion and peacetime deficits around 6% of GDP.

• Rising national debt leads to higher borrowing costs and threatens financial security for households and businesses.

2. Democratic Leadership Critique:

• The report criticizes Democratic policies for increasing unsustainable spending and ignoring the fiscal consequences.

• Democratic spending patterns are seen as prioritizing transfers from working-age individuals to the growing elderly population, exacerbating economic inequality.

3. Healthcare Spending Crisis:

• Healthcare spending is a major factor in the fiscal crisis, making up over 28% of federal expenditures.

• This unsustainable model is causing severe financial strain on families, with taxpayers and patients losing out under current policies.

4. Medicare's Imminent Crisis:

• Medicare is at high risk due to an aging population, with one trust fund expected to run out in a decade.

• Policymakers must seek reforms that balance affordability for seniors with financial sustainability.

5. Labor Force and Immigration Needs:

• A decline in birth rates has stalled population growth, putting further pressure on the economy.

• Attracting skilled immigrants is essential to boost the economy and provide a balanced workforce.

6. Call for Economic Growth:

• The report suggests that expanding the tax base and encouraging innovation are key to addressing fiscal issues.

• Republican candidates are urged to focus on economic solutions rather than traditional tax-and-spend policies.

The 2026 Joint Economic Report serves as a critical reminder of the impending consequences of current practices in governance and economics. With the American Dream at stake, it is essential for voters and lawmakers to confront these issues directly. Ignoring the realities presented in the report could lead to diminished living standards and broken promises for future generations. Leaders and candidates must advocate for economic growth and sustainable policies to restore hope for a brighter future. 

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2026/05/this_midterm_season_the_american_dream_is_on_the_line.html

Data Center Animosity Reflects Legit Concerns AI-Mongers Don’t Care About Humanity’s Interests

 The debate about artificial intelligence (AI) is intensifying, particularly concerning its impact on society and the role of AI data centers. Recent events, especially among young graduates and community opposition, reflect a rising fear about the future implications of AI.

1. Graduates' Reactions to AI:

• Graduates from various universities have expressed strong opposition to AI during commencement speeches. For instance, Eric Schmidt, a former CEO of Google, faced boos when praising AI at the University of Arizona, showing a reluctance among young people to embrace an AI-dominated future.

• This backlash indicates a deeper fear among graduates that their newly acquired skills may soon become obsolete due to AI advancements.

2. Community Opposition to AI Data Centers:

• A Gallup survey revealed that 70% of Americans oppose local AI data centers, indicating a noticeable distrust towards these massive facilities controlled by large corporations.

• Local residents are concerned about the environmental and financial impacts of these data centers, often subsidized by local governments. Recent reports show that 48 projects involving substantial investments have been delayed or blocked due to community opposition.

3. AI's Ethical and Moral Implications:

• The debate raises concerns about the future of humanity in an AI-positive landscape. People fear that the advancements in AI may benefit the wealthy and powerful, leaving ordinary individuals worse off.

• Pope Leo XIV plans to address these critical issues in his upcoming encyclical, focusing on AI's effect on human dignity, societal structures, and the labor force, akin to his predecessor's concerns during the Industrial Revolution.

4. Potential Risks in Warfare:

• AI's role in military applications raises significant ethical questions. Pope Leo XIV recently warned against using AI in warfare, citing a tragic incident during the Iran war where AI-operated targeting led to civilian casualties.

• He emphasizes the need for accountability to ensure that technology does not absolve humans of responsibility for decisions made in combat situations.

5. Vatican's Approach to AI:

• The Vatican has established a study group on AI to evaluate its potential risks and implications for humanity.

• Pope Leo XIV argues for the view of AI as a tool, not as an independent entity, highlighting the ongoing struggles to comprehend AI's challenges and the necessity to control it effectively.

The growing skepticism towards AI reflects deep-seated fears about its potential impact on society and individual human dignity. With communities increasingly resisting AI developments and the Vatican emphasizing the preservation of human integrity amid technological advancements, it is evident that a widespread discourse on the ethical and moral implications of AI is crucial. As we navigate this uncharted territory, the focus remains on ensuring that technology serves humanity and does not overshadow it.

https://thefederalist.com/2026/05/19/data-center-animosity-reflects-legit-concerns-ai-mongers-dont-care-about-humanitys-interests/

Michigan Senate leader asks DOJ to investigate Whitmer over $20 million fraud scheme

Michigan Senate leader Aric Nesbitt has requested the U. S. Justice Department to investigate Governor Gretchen Whitmer regarding her possible involvement in a significant fraud case connected to a $20 million grant.

• Charges Filed: Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel announced 16 felony charges against Fay Beydoun, 62, who is accused of misusing a grant intended for a business accelerator.

• Political Connections: Beydoun is described as a close ally and political donor to Governor Whitmer. Nessel also shares a close friendship with Beydoun.

• Senate Leader's Statement: Nesbitt criticized Whitmer's connections, arguing that such relationships potentially bias the investigation. He stressed the need for accountability, stating if Whitmer is found complicit, she must face legal consequences.

• Call for Independence: Nesbitt urged acting Attorney General Todd Blanche to seek an independent investigation into the matter, citing a unique crisis of oversight in Michigan that undermines trust in state-level authorities.

• Current Status: As of now, Governor Whitmer has not commented on the investigation request or the allegations against Beydoun.

The request for federal inquiry highlights concerns over transparency and accountability within Michigan’s government, especially regarding the governor’s potential involvement in the fraud scheme linked to her ally. 

https://justthenews.com/government/state-houses/michigan-senate-leader-asks-doj-investigate-whitmer-over-20-million-fraud

Will Spencer Pratt Realign California?

California is facing significant governance challenges under its current political leadership. Spencer Pratt, a new candidate in the Los Angeles mayoral race, has emerged as a disruptor, bringing a different approach to campaigning and addressing voter concerns.

• Governance Failures: California's elected officials have contributed to widespread chaos, unsafe neighborhoods, and business decline. The state suffers from chronic budget deficits despite high taxes. Issues such as homelessness and drug addiction plague communities without effective government intervention.

• Status Quo Candidates: The major candidates for mayor, including incumbent Karen Bass and challenger Nithya Raman, propose similar strategies that have failed in the past, perpetuating a cycle of decline. Their policies focus on providing resources without demanding accountability or sobriety from those receiving assistance, leading to public frustration.

• Spencer Pratt's Campaign: Spencer Pratt's candidacy introduces a new dynamic to the election, as his campaign is distinguished by creative, viral video content that addresses these urgent issues in a direct manner. His ads utilize shock value while conveying a deeper message about political indifference among California's leaders.

• Viral Video Impact: Videos created in support of Pratt highlight the disconnect of politicians from the realities faced by everyday Californians. They portray elected officials, such as Bass and Newsom, as out-of-touch elites enjoying a lavish lifestyle while the public struggles with basic safety and well-being.

• The Role of Independent Creators: Many of the impactful ads did not originate from Pratt's official campaign but were instead developed by independent creators who resonate with Pratt's message. This grassroots support has magnified his campaign’s reach and effectiveness.

• Contrasting Campaign Strategies: Compared to wealthy candidates like Tom Steyer, who employs traditional, high-budget campaign strategies, Pratt’s low-cost, innovative approach stands out. His ads challenge the norm and promote a clear message: California's leadership priorities need to change or the state will continue to deteriorate.

Though it remains uncertain whether Spencer Pratt can win the mayoral race or whether candidates aligned with the established political order will continue to dominate, his campaign signals a potential shift in California's political discourse. Pratt has effectively utilized new campaigning tools and strategies, which may redefine how political messages resonate with voters in the future. Whether or not immediate change happens, his presence in the race indicates that the current political climate in California may be evolving. 

https://amgreatness.com/2026/05/20/will-spencer-pratt-realign-california/

17,000 Homes Evacuated Due to Fire Risk as LA Mayor Bass Leads Race

The current political landscape regarding the Los Angeles mayoral race, particularly focusing on Mayor Karen Bass amidst ongoing issues such as wildfires and public opinion.

• Recently, 17,000 homes were evacuated due to the Sandy Fire, while Mayor Bass faces criticism for her handling of the situation.

• Polls indicate that only 31% of voters view Bass favorably, with 56% holding an unfavorable opinion of her.

• Bass, despite her low approval ratings, may still win due to a lack of viable opposition and established voting patterns among her supporters.

• Her main challenger, Nithya Raman, struggles to gain traction against the backdrop of Bass’s incumbency and recent endorsements.

• On the Republican side, Spencer Pratt is making headlines with viral ads, though he is up against a limited Republican base in LA.

• Historical patterns suggest that voters often stick with familiar politicians, leading to the possibility of Bass retaining her position even with public discontent.

Overall, while public sentiment towards Mayor Bass appears largely negative, traditional voting habits may hinder her opponents, potentially allowing her to win the upcoming election despite substantial criticism. 

https://www.frontpagemag.com/17000-homes-evacuated-due-to-fire-risk-as-la-mayor-bass-leads-race/