Sen. Mike Lee Reveals MAJOR Progress on SAVE America Act After Pressure on RINO Thune — HYBRID “Talking Filibuster” Set to Be Implemented

 Senator Mike Lee has announced significant advancements regarding the SAVE America Act. He reported that pressure on Senate leadership has led to discussions about a new filibuster strategy aimed at advancing the legislation.

1. Progress on Legislation: Senator Lee shared an update indicating that there has been major progress in the push to enact the SAVE America Act due to mounting pressure on Senate leadership.

2. Filibuster Strategy: Lee described the strategy as a "hybrid talking filibuster. " This approach requires Democrats to actively speak on the Senate floor to oppose the bill, possibly extending for hours or days.

3. Support for the Bill: The SAVE America Act enjoys significant public backing, with 85% of Americans supporting measures such as voter ID requirements.

4. Comments from Senator Lee: Lee expressed guarded optimism about the legislative progress and highlighted his collaborative efforts with Senate Leader John Thune and his staff.

5. Next Steps: Lee emphasized the importance of keeping the SAVE America Act on the Senate floor for thorough debate before moving forward with cloture, which is a procedure to end debate.

Senator Mike Lee is rallying support for the SAVE America Act, noting a shift in the Senate's approach to debating the bill. He encourages continued pressure to ensure the proposed hybrid talking filibuster is utilized effectively, thereby allowing ample time for discussion on the significant issues the bill addresses. 

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/03/sen-mike-lee-reveals-major-progress-save-america/

Iran War Exposes America’s Unfixed Supply Chains

 The ongoing war in Iran has highlighted significant weaknesses in America's industrial and military supply chains. Current challenges affect not only military capabilities but also essential commodities, such as fertilizer, raising concerns about food security.

1. Military Supply Chain Problems:

The war has revealed that the U. S. military, despite its vast budget, lacks sufficient munitions for sustained combat. America’s military runs on a supply model that prioritizes contractor profitability over readiness. This has resulted in a scenario where essential weapons and munitions are in short supply.

2. Impact of the Strait of Hormuz Closure:

The Strait of Hormuz, crucial for oil and fertilizer shipments, is effectively closed, leading to soaring fertilizer prices during key agricultural periods. Although the U. S. has natural resources for fertilizer production, the industry has been consolidated and is now dominated by only a few firms.

3. Concentration of Military Contractors:

The military industry has seen a reduction from numerous contractors to just five major companies. This concentration raises concerns about the willingness and ability of these firms to rapidly meet military demands. Recent meetings between the White House and defense contractors aimed to discuss increasing production; yet, existing facilities are not equipped for drastic ramp-ups.

4. Component Shortages and Rare Earth Minerals:

Crucial components for weapons, particularly rare earth minerals used in missile guidance systems, are in limited supply. The U. S. has only a short-term stock of these minerals, primarily sourced from China, which has leverage over their production due to a near monopoly.

5. Financial Priorities Over Military Preparedness:

Military contractors have prioritized stock buybacks and profitability over investments in production capacity. This misallocation of resources contributes to the rapid depletion of ammunition and weaponry during conflicts.

6. Long-Term Industrial Policy Issues:

The reliance on global supply chains for military and industrial needs poses risks to national security. Historical decisions to outsource production have weakened the industrial base, hindering the U. S.'s ability to respond effectively in military contexts.

7. Dependency on Foreign Resources:

The U. S. military’s dependency on foreign materials has created vulnerabilities in times of geopolitical tension. With the current conflicts and potential trade negotiations with China centered around rare earth exports, this reliance could significantly constrain military operations.

The war in Iran has illuminated critical flaws in America's military readiness, primarily rooted in outdated supply chains, insufficient stockpiling of essential materials, and the concentration of military production. If the U. S. is to maintain its military strength and operational capacity, substantial changes to industrial policy and investment in domestic production are necessary. The current approach not only undermines military effectiveness but also endangers broader economic stability and national security. Immediate action is essential to reverse these trends, restore self-reliance, and safeguard against future conflicts. 

https://prospect.org/2026/03/12/iran-war-trump-military-america-israel-ukraine-bombs-supply-chains/

Mamdani Proposes Massive Estate Tax Exemption Cut From $7M To $750K, Among Other Tax Increases

 New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani has proposed major tax changes to address the city's projected $5.4 billion budget deficit for the upcoming fiscal year. This includes cutting the estate tax exemption significantly and raising various tax rates.

1. Estate Tax Changes: The mayor wants to reduce the estate tax exemption from over $7 million to $750,000 and increase the top tax rate from 16% to 50%.

2. Business Taxes: Mamdani plans to raise the corporate tax rate to 10.8% for financial firms and 10.62% for others, potentially generating $1.75 billion annually. He also proposes limiting a tax credit for pass-through entities, which could yield around $700 million.

3. Income Tax Increase: There is an advocacy for increasing the local income tax rate for residents earning over $1 million, estimated to bring in $3 billion each year.

4. Real Estate Taxes: Additional proposals target high-end real estate, suggesting a 1% surcharge on homes over $5 million and taxes on large cash purchases, which could generate $1.2 billion.

5. Sales Tax on Precious Metals: Mamdani supports removing the sales tax exemption on gold bullion, potentially adding $300 million to the city budget.

Despite these proposals, the estate tax changes may not be included in current budget negotiations, as they haven’t been supported by the state legislature or Governor Hochul. Concerns about long-term budget deficits remain, leading to Moody’s negative outlook on the city's credit rating, suggesting possible challenges ahead for New York City's finances.

https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/mamdani-proposes-massive-estate-tax-exemption-cut-7m-750k-among-other-major-tax-increases

Foundations For Liars: Bill Clinton’s Stains On Philanthropy

 The controversies surrounding Bill Clinton and his eponymous foundation, highlighting serious concerns regarding financial transparency and compliance with legal requirements.

1. Accounting Failures: Bill Clinton's foundation is criticized for not meeting strict accounting and regulatory standards. Important financial filings are incomplete or misleading, indicating potential misuse of charitable funds.

2. Lack of Transparency: The foundation’s documents do not clarify how personal expenses, like travel for the Clinton family, were reimbursed by the foundation. This omission raises questions about the true nature of its charitable activities.

3. Regulatory Breaches: Clinton's foundation allegedly failed to comply with New York state regulations which mandate independent audits of nonprofit organizations. Key financial statements from 1997 to 2004 are missing, despite being essential for public trust.

4. Testimony and Credibility Issues: Recent testimonies by Bill Clinton before the House Oversight Committee show inconsistencies, undermining his credibility and revealing a pattern of deception regarding his charitable involvements.

5. Political and Personal Conflicts: The intertwining of politics and personal gain is evident, as significant fundraising efforts coincided with Clinton’s political ambitions, conflicting with the foundation's stated charitable goals.

6. Investigative Scrutiny: A close examination of Clinton’s claims regarding his work in philanthropy from 2001 onward reveals insufficient evidence and accountability for the stated contributions, particularly concerning the “Clinton Global Initiative. ”

The article concludes that Bill Clinton's foundation has not upheld its supposed mission of charity, raising ethical and legal questions about its operations. The lack of compliance with financial regulations and the nature of personal gains associated with the foundation cast doubt on its legitimacy as a charitable organization. As investigations continue, concerns about the credibility of Clinton's philanthropic efforts remain a significant issue.

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2026/03/foundations_for_liars_bill_clinton_s_stains_on_philanthropy.html

The ‘Religion of Peace’ Sure Likes to Kill and Maim

The recent incidents of Islamic terrorism in the United States following military actions against Iran's regime. It highlights various attacks, connects them to broader themes of immigration and societal response, and expresses concern regarding the implications of these events on American culture and safety.

1. Recent Attacks: The article details several violent incidents attributed to Islamic extremists, including:

• A shooting in Austin, Texas, where a gunman killed three and injured many others. The shooter had ties to Iran and claimed allegiance to Islamic beliefs.

• An attempted bombing in Manhattan by two Muslim men who targeted a protest against Islamic influence, pledging allegiance to ISIS.

• A shooting at Old Dominion University in Virginia, where an individual with a history of supporting terrorism attacked an ROTC class, resulting in one death and serious injuries.

• Another attack on a synagogue in Michigan involving a car packed with explosives.

2. Government and Public Response: The article criticizes the responses from politicians and public figures, suggesting they often focus more on condemning those opposing Islamic extremism than the extremists themselves. It notes a lack of adequate response to the frequent manifestation of violence, hinting at a societal desensitization to such threats.

3. Concerns Over Immigration: The author raises questions about naturalizing immigrants who may hold extremist views and suggests that the U. S. might face larger problems from individuals already within its borders rather than external threats. The criticism extends to policies perceived as too lenient on unvetted immigrants.

4. Comparisons to the U. K.: The article draws parallels between the situation in the United States and those in the United Kingdom, suggesting that similar patterns of societal change and government response can be observed. It implies that the U. K. has increasingly marginalized its native culture in favor of accommodating immigrant communities.

5. Cultural Reflections: The author argues that the cultural and governmental responses to Islamic extremism, including the portrayal of ‘Islamophobia’ as a significant issue, reflect a society struggling with its identity and values in the face of foreign influences.

The article presents a concerning view of the relationship between Islamic extremism and U. S. immigration policies, claiming that current approaches to these issues threaten American societal norms. With rising incidents of terrorism, the author questions whether the U. S. is prepared to confront these challenges effectively, echoing fears that these pressures may lead to a dangerous future as seen in other countries. 

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2026/03/the_religion_of_peace_sure_likes_to_kill_and_maim.html 

Federal judges keep disqualifying Trump prosecutors, sparking concerns about judicial overreach

 Federal judges have been challenging the authority of President Donald Trump's appointed U. S. Attorneys, causing a national debate regarding who has the final say in selecting federal prosecutors. This situation raises questions about judicial involvement in executive branch staffing decisions and the implications for law enforcement activities.

1. Judicial Intervention: Several federal judges have ruled against Trump’s appointments, stating that such actions threaten the executive branch's ability to function independently. Critics argue these rulings signify excessive judicial interference in executive matters.

2. Constitutional Concerns: Supporters of the judges assert they are upholding the Constitution, particularly the Senate's role in confirming executive appointees. This conflict has involved all three branches of government due to the implications of these decisions.

3. Case of Alina Habba:

• Trump appointed Alina Habba as interim U. S. Attorney for New Jersey. Legal limitations state interim positions can last only until a Senate confirmation or for a maximum of 120 days.

• When the Senate did not confirm her appointment, the administration tried to extend her role by classifying her as a "Special Attorney. " This was challenged in court.

• U. S. District Judge Matthew Brann ruled that Habba exceeded her authority, enforcing adherence to the 120-day limit and leading to her resignation in late 2025.

4. Judicial Rulings Against Appointments:

• Following Habba's case, Brann ruled that subsequent appointments made by Attorney General Pamela Bondi also lacked legal authority. He cautioned that any ongoing prosecutions under this unlawful leadership might be dismissed.

5. Controversy in Virginia:

• Lindsay Halligan was nominated and designated as interim U. S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia. Shortly after her appointment, she secured indictments against notable figures, including former FBI Director James Comey.

• A judge subsequently ruled her appointment violated the law, leading to the dismissal of charges against Comey and others, prompting Halligan to resign.

6. Impact on Trump’s Agenda: The judges' decisions significantly affect Trump’s law enforcement efforts and ability to pursue investigations against political adversaries, thereby reshaping the administration’s prosecutorial landscape.

The ongoing disqualification of Trump's prosecutors by federal judges illustrates a complex legal conflict that revolves around executive authority and judicial oversight. As these rulings continue to impact key law enforcement initiatives, they also highlight tensions between branches of government concerning the appointment and authority of federal prosecutors.

https://justthenews.com/government/courts-law/judges

Surf, Turf, and Another Media Meltdown

 A recent media uproar about lavish food expenditures for military personnel, labeling it a "surf-and-turf scandal. " The piece argues that this scandal is a manifestation of ongoing anti-Trump sentiment within the media, despite his administration's achievements.

• Media Outrage: The media criticized high spending on luxury food items for troops, comparing it unfavorably to government waste elsewhere. However, it was noted that similar spending has occurred for years and that previous administrations, including Obama’s, did similar things.

• Vendor Changes: There was a shift in food supply contracts for the Department of Defense (DOD) that may explain the timing of the media's outrage. Two companies lost their monopoly on food supply contracts.

• Counterarguments: The article presents critiques of the media's claims. It highlights that some allegations, like those claiming GOP member Pete Hegseth used excessive funds for personal meals, were easily debunked.

• Trump's Achievements: The piece emphasizes the progress of Trump’s administration on various fronts, such as immigration and energy production. It lists a series of accomplishments associated with his leadership that it claims are significant and transformative for America.

• Iranian Conflict: It discusses Trump’s strategies concerning Iran, alleging that significant military actions have dismantled Iran’s capabilities. The author predicts a shift towards peace in the Middle East following the resolution of conflicts involving groups like Hezbollah and Hamas.

• Future Outlook: The article suggests that if Trump's policies succeed, there may be broad political benefits for Republicans, including gaining control in future elections. It also expresses confidence in recovery from economic downturns and improved conditions in war-impacted areas post-conflict.

The article concludes that despite ongoing media criticism, Trump's administration is on a positive path, achieving significant goals, and that future political and economic improvements appear likely. The author expresses a belief that the media's ongoing negative narratives will ultimately backfire as Trump continues to fulfill his promises to the American people. 

https://amgreatness.com/2026/03/15/surf-turf-and-another-media-meltdown/