The 83 Percent Solution: Why a Bill That Nearly Every American Wants Can't Pass the Senate

  By Staff

The numbers are staggering. By every major poll, the American public overwhelmingly supports requiring proof of citizenship to vote. Pew Research says 83 percent. Gallup says 84 percent. Harvard Harris says 81 percent. Even among Democrats, support hovers between 47 and 71 percent depending on how you ask the question. The SAVE America Act, which would mandate exactly that along with voter ID requirements, is quite possibly the most popular piece of legislation to hit Congress in a generation.

It still can't pass.

The bill cleared the House in February. It has been sitting in the Senate ever since, stonewalled by a Democratic caucus that refuses to provide the votes needed to overcome the 60 vote filibuster threshold. Senate Majority Leader John Thune has admitted publicly that he sees no path forward. Chuck Schumer has declared the bill dead on arrival. And so a proposal backed by more than four out of five Americans languishes while the politicians who claim to represent those Americans block it with procedural tricks their own voters don't support.

The disconnect between what Democratic voters want and what Democratic senators deliver is not an accident. It is a feature of a system where the people who fund campaigns and the people who vote in them want different things. The donor networks, the activist foundations, the dark money groups that bankroll Democratic reelection efforts are ideologically committed to minimal voting restrictions. A senator who crosses them loses funding. A senator who obeys them faces no real consequence at the ballot box because the general electorate, despite supporting voter ID in massive numbers, will not single issue vote on it the way the activist base will. The primary threat from the left is real. The general election threat from the center is not. The math is cold and the outcome is predictable.

The New Jersey case illustrates exactly why the public is so united on this issue. Governor Mikie Sherrill admitted that a DMV software error registered roughly 6,600 noncitizens to vote between June 2023 and June 2024. At least 400 of them actually cast ballots. Meanwhile, Department of Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin has identified over 250,000 noncitizens on voter rolls across just four states: California, Nevada, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania. A Canadian national was arrested for voting illegally in American elections since 2008. These are not hypotheticals. These are documented cases that the public can see with their own eyes.

The media has done its part to obscure the popularity of the SAVE Act. The coverage pattern is consistent: frame the bill as "controversial," quote voting rights groups calling it "voter suppression," bury the polling numbers deep in the story if they appear at all. You will not see a cable news chyron reading "71 percent of Democrats support voter ID." That fact does not serve the narrative. Instead the public gets "partisan deadlock" and "Trump's election priority," as if this were some fringe obsession rather than the settled will of the overwhelming majority of the country.

The irony is terminal. The Democratic leadership claims it is protecting democracy by blocking a bill to secure elections. But democracy is not just the act of casting a ballot. It is the public's belief that those ballots are counted honestly. When 83 percent of the country wants citizenship verification and a handful of senators can ignore them indefinitely, the public does not shrug and move on. It loses faith in the entire enterprise. Every noncitizen registration, every software glitch, every illegal vote that goes unaddressed is another nail in the coffin of institutional legitimacy.

This is how systems collapse. Not in one dramatic rupture but through a thousand small betrayals that accumulate until nobody believes in the rules anymore. The Democrats blocking the SAVE Act think they are winning a political fight. What they are actually doing is proving their own critics right, demonstrating to the American people that the system is rigged and their voices do not matter. When trust evaporates, the institutions that depended on it evaporate with it.

The bill will pass eventually, because reality has a way of asserting itself. The only question is whether it passes through legislation or through the implosion of the very political order that refused to listen to the people it claims to serve. The 83 percent are not going to change their minds. They are going to change their minds about whether this system deserves to survive.

Sources:

Pew Research Center (2025) — 83% support voter ID https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2025/08/14/voter-id-support-2025/

Gallup — 84% support voter ID, 83% support proof of citizenship https://news.gallup.com/poll/403210/americans-support-voter-id-laws.aspx

Harvard CAPS/Harris — 81% favor voter ID https://thehill.com/hilltv/rising/4268678-harvard-harris-poll-voter-id-support/

I&I/TIPP Poll — 64% directly support the SAVE Act, 47% of Democrats say it's a "good idea" https://tippinsights.com/two-thirds-back-save-act-to-require-voter-id-and-support-is-bipartisan-i-i-tipp-poll/

Heritage Action battleground state polling — 65-71% support proof of citizenship https://www.dailysignal.com/2026/02/24/what-supermajorities-of-likely-voters-in-battleground-states-say-about-save-america-act/

Rasmussen — 75% support voter ID https://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/general_politics/january_2025/75_support_voter_id

National Pulse summary of multiple polls showing 83%+ support for voter ID and proof of citizenship https://thenationalpulse.com/2026/03/12/data-save-america-act-wildly-popular-amongst-americans-which-means-democrats-hate-it-obviously/

CNN — Thune and White House trade jabs over stalled SAVE Act, Schumer says "the SAVE Act isn't going anywhere" https://www.cnn.com/2026/07/23/politics/trump-thune-jabs-save-act-hnk

Deseret News — Thune says "no path" to 60 votes, Democrats "consistently blocked it" https://www.deseret.com/politics/2026/07/19/is-congress-running-out-of-time-for-save-act/

AOL/Newsmax — Bill stalled, filibuster the main obstacle, possible shutdown fight looming https://www.aol.com/articles/save-act-pass-senate-latest-165803000.html

ABC News — New Jersey registered 6,600 noncitizens due to DMV software error, at least 400 voted https://abcnews.com/Politics/republicans-point-new-jersey-voting-glitch-final-push/story?id=134994636

National Pulse — DHS Secretary Mullin identified 250,000+ noncitizens on voter rolls across four states, Canadian national arrested for voting illegally since 2008 https://thenationalpulse.com/2026/03/12/data-save-america-act-wildly-popular-amongst-americans-which-means-democrats-hate-it-obviously/

PolitiFact — Fact check attempting to undermine the 83% figure by arguing the poll predates the bill and that support drops when the bill is named specifically https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2026/apr/17/restoration-of-america/SAVE-America-Act-voter-ID-citizenship-poll/

Jack Smith on the Ropes

Jack Smith, a former special counsel, is under scrutiny as Congressional investigations and a potential criminal referral are directed at him. This follows accusations that he made false statements to Congress regarding access to text messages of members of Congress.

Smith has been characterized in the media as calm and nonpartisan, but his recent actions suggest otherwise as Republicans target him.

His upcoming legal challenges are highlighted, including a referral from House Judiciary Committee Chairman James Jordan, accusing him of misleading Congress about obtaining text messages from lawmakers.

After receiving evidence that Smith's office accessed text messages belonging to 44 members of Congress, Jordan noted discrepancies in Smith's sworn testimony, which may constitute false statements.

Smith's defense team, comprising high-profile lawyers, claims this referral represents an attempt to misuse the justice system against him, asserting that he acted fairly within his duties.

Some Democrats, including Senator Richard Blumenthal, have voiced concerns about Smith's actions, highlighting issues regarding the handling of privileged communications.

The article discusses the broader implications of Smith's investigations, particularly regarding potential violations of Congress's constitutional protections and the chaotic environment surrounding Trump's past administration.

Smith's situation is complicated as he faces accusations of misconduct while attempting to defend his reputation in the media. The Referral on misleading statements remains with the Department of Justice, leaving uncertainty about the future of both Smith and his investigations. 

https://www.declassified.live/p/jack-smith-on-the-ropes?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=1666532&post_id=208584343&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=6dl2nb&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email

The Climate Crazy, It’s Still With Us

 A recent editorial highlights ongoing debates and controversies surrounding climate change and international regulations regarding greenhouse gas emissions. It reflects on a significant ruling from the International Court of Justice and the shift in media attention towards climate reporting.

International Court of Justice Ruling: One year ago, the court ruled that all nations must protect the environment from greenhouse gases.

Critique of Climate Activism: The editorial argues that the focus of climate advocates is less about the environment and more about anti-capitalist agendas.It mentions a decline in aggressive climate reporting, with media organizations cutting back on dedicated climate teams, suggesting that public interest in climate alarmism is waning.

Citing Experts: Steven Hayward and young meteorologist Chris Martz are referenced for their insights.Hayward focused on a decline in climate change movement momentum, while Martz provided statistics showing a decrease in days of extreme heat in the U. S. over the past decades.

Skepticism Towards Climate Narratives: The article emphasizes a skepticism towards the claims of global warming.It counters alarmist narratives with data showing fewer hot days over time, particularly in the U. S., arguing this contradicts the central claims of climate change proponents.

Political Implications: The piece predicts that any future Democratic leadership will likely adhere to the U.N. court's environmental standards, while expressing skepticism about any commitment to these initiatives by Republican leaders, including Donald Trump.

Public Perception and Media's Role: The editorial posits that as the media moves away from sensational climate reporting, public perception is shifting, with a growing skepticism towards climate change messaging.

The commentary articulates a viewpoint that challenges the prevailing climate change narrative, pointing to a perceived decline in alarmism and raising questions about the motivations behind climate activism. It emphasizes the importance of data in understanding climate trends and political responses to international climate agreements. 

https://issuesinsights.com/2026/07/27/the-climate-crazy-its-still-with-us/

The Full Risk–Benefit Balance Behind the First Covid-19 Vaccine

 The recent termination of the COVID-19 Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) by Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. prompts a reassessment of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine's risk-benefit profile. A detailed analysis from a pivotal trial reveals that while the vaccine reported a 95% efficacy against symptomatic COVID-19, a closer examination uncovers significant concerns regarding both its benefits and potential risks.

1. Efficacy vs. Safety

The 95% efficacy claim is based solely on laboratory-confirmed symptomatic cases collected over about 44 days in a trial involving 43,548 participants.This rate stems from 8 Covid-19 cases in the vaccine group compared to 162 in the placebo group.

The trial did not assess asymptomatic infections, person-to-person virus transmission, or the vaccine's long-term effects.

2. Absence of Transmission Evidence

Pfizer executives later acknowledged there was no data on whether the vaccine reduced virus transmission at the time it was authorized.

Despite mandates and systems intended to limit virus spread, the evidence supporting the vaccine's role in reducing COVID-19 transmission was lacking.

3. Study Findings on Symptoms

The trial recorded 3,410 suspected symptomatic cases, showing only a 12.2% reduction in those cases for vaccine recipients.

Vaccine side effects often mirrored COVID-19 symptoms, complicating the ability to assess the net benefit in overall symptoms.Reports indicated 4,484 adverse events in vaccine recipients compared to 1,095 in placebos.

4. Serious Outcomes and Mortality

The trial reported only one severe Covid-19 case in the vaccine group versus nine in the placebo group, a difference that lacked statistical significance.

Over 43,000 participants did not show meaningful protection against severe disease or death, raising critical questions about the vaccine’s impact.

5. Safety Concerns

Participants in the vaccine group reported higher instances of serious adverse events compared to placebo, with 103 serious events recorded during a specified safety window.

The trial findings highlighted a risk-benefit analysis that skewed towards potential harm as more severe adverse events were documented in vaccinated individuals.

6. Public Health Context

The trial did not evaluate whether a public health emergency was justifiable, limiting its ability to gauge the pandemic's severity against potential benefits.

Severe COVID-19 cases represented a small share of the overall illness burden tracked during the study duration.

The analysis of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine trial highlights a complicated risk-benefit balance that was largely unaddressed. The reported 95% efficacy does not convincingly demonstrate overall clinical advantages when compared to adverse effects. A closer examination of all available data at the time of authorization casts doubt on claims of substantial benefits from vaccination. This reassessment underscores the necessity for transparency and comprehensive evaluation in future public health emergencies to prevent similar oversights.

In summary, the pivotal trial did not sufficiently establish that the benefits of the Covid-19 vaccine outweighed its risks, pointing to significant issues with how efficacy and safety data were communicated and understood. As public health policies evolve, future responses must learn from these complexities regarding emergency authorizations. 

https://brownstone.org/articles/the-full-risk-benefit-balance-behind-the-first-covid-19-vaccine/

The Founding Before Capitalism

 Historian Gordon Wood emphasizes that the Founding Fathers, including Thomas Jefferson, Benjamin Franklin, and John Adams, laid the groundwork for American society without being modern capitalists. As America approaches its 250th anniversary, there’s a trend of applying contemporary capitalist ideas to these figures, which Wood argues is misguided.

1. Historical Context: The Founders were men of a preindustrial age. They did not possess modern economic concepts such as comparative advantage or creative destruction. Their accomplishments were more about moral and political missions rather than economic ambitions.

2. Republican Virtue: The Founders focused on republican virtues and sought to dismantle British hierarchical systems. Their aim was not to promote capitalism but to establish a society based on equality, as echoed in Jefferson's assertion that "all men are created equal. "

3. Property Ownership: While property was essential to the Founders, they viewed it traditionally, as a means of individual authority and independence, not merely for profit-seeking. Jefferson highlighted the role of widespread property ownership in a republic, promoting civic virtue over economic gain.

4. Commercial Activities: Although they were engaged in entrepreneurial pursuits, their involvement was not driven purely by profit. Franklin, for instance, distanced himself from business to align with the principles of republicanism and gentlemanly conduct.

5. Moral Aristocracy: The Founders envisioned a society led by a moral elite well-versed in liberal arts, untouched by selfish profit motives. Despite their aristocratic ideals, they enabled common citizens to seek material advancement, inadvertently sparking economic growth.

The Founding Fathers’ contributions were significant and transformative, leading to an economic revolution without being defined by capitalist ideals. Their legacy speaks to the importance of character in leadership, which allowed a dynamic society to flourish. Wood argues that the Founders' values stand on their own merit and do not require modern reinterpretation to be appreciated.

https://spectator.org/the-founding-before-capitalism/

DSA Co-Chair to Fox News: We Want to Abolish Everything and Seize Corporations

  On July 26, 2026, Megan Romer, the co-chair of the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA), participated in an interview with Shannon Bream on Fox News. The discussion revealed the DSA's controversial positions and their approach to using the Democratic Party for ballot access, clarifying misconceptions about their platform.

1. Ballot Access Strategy:

Romer admitted that the DSA uses the Democratic Party primarily for ballot access, stating, "It's a ballot line." This suggests that they leverage the Democratic infrastructure while advocating for policies outside the traditional Democratic platform.

2. Response to Democratic Critics:

When asked about criticism from former DNC chair Jaime Harrison regarding DSA candidates' disdain for the Democratic Party, Romer emphasized the challenges third parties face in accessing ballots.She maintained that their candidates are supported by voters who seek alternatives.

3. Key Policy Positions:

In a rapid-fire segment, Romer confirmed numerous positions held by the DSA:

Abolishing the Senate, the presidency, and the Supreme Court.

Abolishing ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement) and borders, with plans for eventual amnesty for illegal immigrants.

Defunding the Pentagon and abolishing many prisons, proposing government or public ownership of most large corporations.

4. Abolition of Prisons:

Bream questioned Romer about the implications of abolishing prisons, especially for serious crimes like rape and murder.Romer acknowledged that some individuals may not function well in society but suggested that solutions should focus on safety rather than punishment, without committing to long-term imprisonment for violent offenders.

5. Migration and Economic Responsibility:

Romer attributed illegal immigration to U.S. policies that destabilize other nations, proposing that the best way to reduce immigration is to improve conditions in those countries. She indicated that providing legal pathways would eventually help integrate immigrants into society.

6. Future of Congress:

Romer described a vision for a unicameral legislature instead of the current bicameral system, calling the Senate an "anachronistic institution."

The interview highlighted the DSA's radical positions and their strategy of utilizing the Democratic Party for electoral access. Megan Romer's candidness shed light on the party's goals, which challenge conventional political structures and concepts of governance. This candid discussion of the DSA's platform and intentions contrasts sharply with the media's portrayal of socialism, emphasizing a pressing need for transparency in political discourse.

https://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/jorge-bonilla/2026/07/26/dsa-co-chair-fox-news-we-want-abolish-everything-and-seize

Bombshell Biden memo plotted last-minute de facto amnesty for over 3 million invaders

 Updates on a variety of topics that reflect current societal issues, political debates, and notable events. The articles cover immigration policies, technological advancements, social controversies, and pressing concerns about safety and governance.

1. Education Controversies:

Arizona State University (ASU) has introduced "influencing" as a college major, which is viewed as a troubling development given the perception of universities producing debt-ridden graduates with leftist views.

2. Political Climate:

A detailed report reveals a memo from Biden's administration planning to grant de facto amnesty to over 3 million foreign nationals late in his term, facilitating protections through Temporary Protected Status (TPS).

The memo, tied to potential immigrant protections from various countries, faced backlash as it was perceived as attempting to bypass the will of American voters who favor stricter immigration controls.

3. Border Security Issues:

Reports show a significant decrease in migrant encounters at the southern border, credited to stricter policies by the Trump administration.The figure dropped to the lowest in decades.

Critics point to the dangers posed by uncontrolled immigration, highlighting tragic incidents involving illegal immigrants that resulted in violent crimes, including murders and assaults.

4. Public Safety Concerns:

A Secret Service official raised alarms regarding an increase in assassination attempts, noting that the threat level has escalated.

The apparent safety risks linked to illegal immigration are underscored by reports of individuals committing heinous acts, which have raised public outrage and calls for accountability from elected officials.

5. Technological Advancements in Warfare:

The introduction of advanced AI-driven robots for military applications is discussed, suggesting a coming shift in warfare dynamics as technology rapidly evolves.

6. Public Sentiment on Immigration:

There is growing frustration among Americans regarding the perceived failure of immigration policies, particularly those enabling illegal entry and the influence of administrative actions seen as catering to non-citizens over citizens.

7. Dystopian Themes:

Aspects of dystopia are illustrated through various articles, addressing societal breakdowns, the spread of misinformation, and governance failures leading to civil unrest and chaos.

The content reflects a conservative critique of current American political and social landscapes, focusing on immigration, education, and public safety. Concerns about governance priorities and public safety issues dominate discussions. The articles signal a call to action regarding immigration policies and advocate for a return to stricter law enforcement and accountability from politicians. The overarching concern remains focused on the implications of these policies on the safety and well-being of American citizens. 

https://modernity.news/2026/07/25/if-this-isnt-treason-what-is/