Monday, September 28, 2026

White House Pool Feed

 

White House Pool Feed


Email Alerts

Get every pool update in your inbox

An email each time the RAV team posts from the White House or the road.

Subscribe

Taxpayer-Funded NGO Wants to Remake Missouri Through Immigration

 The International Institute of St. Louis has plans to address Missouri's declining population by increasing immigrant resettlement. This strategy is supported largely by taxpayer funding and includes various benefits aimed at attracting new residents.

The International Institute of St. Louis aims to reverse population decline in Missouri, particularly in St. Louis and Springfield, by promoting immigrant resettlement.

Their strategic plan highlights the need for financial independence and sustaining the organization through political and economic changes.

The institute received approximately $33.3 million in government grants in 2024, making up about 80% of its total funding.

The Afghan Support Program offers incentives for families to relocate to St. Louis, including rent assistance, gift cards, bus passes, and help accessing public benefits like SNAP and Medicaid.

A successful case is noted where a family received a $20,000 business grant after relocating through the program.

The Move2STL initiative provides relocation support to U.S. citizens and green-card holders, with a focus on Hispanic and Asian American professionals to fill workforce gaps and improve regional diversity.

The organization operates the Missouri Office of Refugee Administration, managing federal funds for various refugee programs while seeking to reduce its dependence on government grants by exploring alternative revenue streams.

There are calls for increased transparency regarding program budgets and the impact on existing local communities.

The International Institute of St. Louis is advocating for a demographic shift in Missouri through immigration, backed by substantial public funding. The debate continues about the implications of these initiatives for current residents and the region’s demographic needs.

https://nataliegwinters.substack.com/p/revealed-taxpayer-funded-ngo-wants?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=3382126&post_id=216635415&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=6dl2nb&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email

Anti-Trump Group Rehearsed an Election Crisis. Now It’s Launching a 15-State Midterm Operation.

The Interfaith Alliance is implementing a nationwide operation aimed at addressing potential election crises, explicitly highlighting concerns about interference from the Trump administration. This initiative includes various training programs and activities across 15 states.

Mock Crisis Exercise: The Interfaith Alliance conducted a rehearsal for an election crisis, preparing local religious leaders to address threats identified as coming from the Trump administration.

Training and Funding: The organization is investing $200,000 in local election protection efforts and running a six-week training program for communities.

Components of the Campaign: The program includes voter registration, support at polling places, and a focus on funding local organizers. It is partnered with other groups like the League of Women Voters and Protect Democracy.

National Tour: A bus tour will start on October 6, visiting cities including Omaha, Milwaukee, and Detroit to promote election engagement and awareness.

Nonviolent Resistance: Interfaith Alliance is preparing religious leaders for nonviolent action in response to potential election pressure, emphasizing mobilization and public support for election officials.

The Interfaith Alliance's operation aims to train and support religious communities against perceived election threats, particularly from the Trump administration, while promoting nonpartisan involvement in the electoral process. The initiative includes funding, training, and a proactive approach to ensuring fair elections. 

https://nataliegwinters.substack.com/p/anti-trump-group-rehearsed-an-election?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=3382126&post_id=216382495&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=6dl2nb&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email

Why Do The Defenders Of Capitalism Never Have Any Money?

The surprising lack of financial support from wealthy individuals who benefit from capitalism to defend the system. It contrasts the financial backing of leftist ideologies with the insufficient funding for pro-capitalism efforts, noting that a robust defense of capitalism is necessary to maintain economic freedom.

Funding Disparity: The political left is well-funded by wealthy individuals, including well-known figures like George Soros and Michael Bloomberg, who support anti-capitalist agendas. In contrast, proponents of free markets often operate on limited resources.

Need for Support: The writer emphasizes that those who have thrived under capitalism should contribute more to defend it. Financial backing from successful capitalists could counteract the sizable donations flowing into leftist political efforts.

Republican Funding: While Republicans are investing heavily to secure victories in midterm elections, they are not consistently reliable defenders of capitalism. There is a call for a unified effort among capitalists to articulate and advocate for the benefits of free enterprise.

Intellectual Defense Required: The article argues that think tanks and media outlets dedicated to defending capitalism are essential in combating misinformation. Wealthy individuals should recognize this need and contribute to these causes to ensure that the values of capitalism are propagated.

Capitalism's Unique Value: It highlights the historical success of capitalism in promoting prosperity and eliminating poverty, compared to other systems like socialism, which are termed as relying on greed and envy.

The Importance of Advocacy: The writer warns that if capitalists do not actively fight for their interests, they risk losing the wealth and freedoms afforded to them under capitalism. It is essential to defend this system from leftist attacks that could jeopardize its future.

The article concludes by stressing the crucial role of wealthy capitalists in advocating for their own interests and the broader system of capitalism that has allowed for unprecedented wealth and prosperity. It suggests that greater financial engagement from successful individuals is necessary to maintain a robust defense against leftist ideologies that threaten capitalism. Supporting independent journalism and advocacy groups can enhance these efforts to safeguard economic freedom. 

https://issuesinsights.com/2026/09/28/why-do-the-defenders-of-capitalism-never-have-any-money/

Voting Democrat – or Staying Home – Won’t Lower Gas Prices

The rising fuel prices in the context of the upcoming midterm elections, focusing on the political strategies of the Democrat and Republican parties regarding energy policy and affordability.

1. Current Fuel Prices

As of September 2026, fuel prices are nearing an average of $4.50 per gallon, causing significant concern for American families.

The rising costs are attributed to ongoing issues related to the conflict in Iran and historical decisions made by political leaders.

2. Democrat Party's Stance

Democrat candidates are prioritizing fuel prices as a central issue in their campaign messaging, blaming the current situation on the Republican policies.

There is skepticism regarding how effective a Democrat-led government would be in reducing these prices based on their past record.

3. Republican Party’s Response

Republicans highlight that voting Democrat historically led to higher fuel prices and that current frustrations surrounding the cost of living and gas should prompt voters to reconsider.

The article recalls the period before Democrat control when prices were lower under the Trump administration, emphasizing the contrast in energy policies.

4. Historical Context of Fuel Prices

Gas prices were above $5 per gallon in 2022 when Democrats controlled the government, with price increases starting before the war in Ukraine.

After Biden took office, policies affecting fossil fuel production were initiated, such as revoking the Keystone XL pipeline permit.

5. California as a Case Study

California’s gas prices average $6.24 per gallon, the highest in the nation, attributed to state policies and taxes.

The state's approach to environmental regulations and the recent collapse of refining facilities has exacerbated fuel costs.

6. Economic Impact on Households

High inflation rates recorded in 2022 saw significant increases in everyday household expenses, prompting Republicans to implement tax cuts to alleviate the burden.

The Democrats opposed these tax cuts, raising questions about their commitment to improving financial conditions for families.

7. Voter Considerations

Voters are urged to critically evaluate the plans proposed by candidates for reducing fuel costs and other economic issues.

The article suggests that voters should scrutinize the sudden focus on affordability from Democrat candidates after ignoring these matters during their term.

The discussion presents a critical examination of the political landscape regarding fuel prices and affordability as the midterms approach. Both parties are utilizing current economic frustrations to advocate for their policies, emphasizing the need for voters to analyze past actions and proposed solutions carefully. 

https://amac.us/newsline/voting-democrat-or-staying-home-won-t-lower-gas-prices

Ketanji Brown Jackson Throws a Fit as Supreme Court Backs SAVE Voter Verification

 The Supreme Court recently upheld the use of the SAVE (Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements) database by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) for voter verification. This decision sparked a dissent from Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, highlighting her growing conflict with the Court's majority.

The Supreme Court ruled that the DHS can continue to use the SAVE database for voter verification, allowing states to confirm that their voter rolls include only American citizens.

This action follows an executive order from President Trump, which permitted approximately half of U.S. states to access the database.

A lower court, led by a Biden-appointed judge, had previously deemed the sharing of this database unconstitutional.

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson expressed strong disagreement with the majority's ruling through a detailed 12-page dissent, labeling it a misinterpretation of legal precedents and statutes.

Jackson criticized the majority's reasoning and suggested they overlooked crucial balances in legal decision-making, using analogies she referred to as simplistic.

Since her appointment, Jackson has drawn criticism for her confrontational style and has been vocal about her dissatisfaction with the Court's handling of its emergency docket, implying it favors certain litigants, like Trump.

She has previously suggested that the Court's emergency docket be used less frequently to avoid unfair advantages in urgent legal matters.

Historical context shows that the Supreme Court had to intervene due to numerous lawsuits from lower courts against Trump’s policies, which often issued nationwide injunctions beyond their jurisdiction.

In a previous case, Trump v. CASA, the Court limited federal courts' powers to enact broad injunctions, but continued judicial defiance has kept the issue at the forefront.

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson's dissent on the SAVE voter-verification ruling reflects a significant and ongoing ideological divide within the Supreme Court. Her stance and criticisms indicate her role as a contentious figure among her peers, particularly concerning issues of judicial authority and the interpretation of laws related to immigration and voting rights.

https://spectator.org/ketanji-brown-jackson-throws-a-fit-as-supreme-court-backs-save-voter-verification/

Seattle’s Grocery Store Debacle

 Seattle is facing significant issues with grocery store availability, influenced by rising crime rates and a city budget deficit. This summary examines the city's response to the problem and the underlying factors affecting grocery stores in the area.

1. City Budget Challenges: Seattle is dealing with a budget deficit projected to reach hundreds of millions over the next three years, equivalent to about 10% of its revenue. In response, the city has allocated $1.7 million to support struggling independent supermarkets.

2. Government Initiatives: The funding aims to help grocery stores stay afloat amid an increasing number of closures. Earlier, former Mayor Bruce Harrell mentioned the possibility of creating government-operated supermarkets to combat "food deserts," areas lacking easy access to grocery stores.

3. Criticism of Corporate Motives: Mayor Katie Wilson has been vocal against large grocery chains, attributing store closures to corporate greed rather than neighborhood safety issues. Her public statements during her campaign included blaming corporations for abandoning low-income communities.

4. Reality of Grocery Store Closures: Many grocery stores have closed, particularly in crime-ridden neighborhoods. In the 1970s and 1980s, crime led to the disappearance of stores in many U.S. cities, including Newark and sections of New York City. However, as crime rates decreased in the 1990s, grocery stores returned to urban areas.

5. Rising Crime Concerns: Recent increases in crime, exacerbated by relaxed penalties for offenses like shoplifting, have caused a resurgence of store closures. In Seattle, businesses have been leaving the city due to increasing homelessness and crime, impacting the retail market.

6. Criticism of Current Leadership: Business leaders in Seattle have expressed concern about public safety and urged the mayor to take immediate action. There is a reported lack of public confidence in the city’s plans for addressing safety issues, with only 34% of residents feeling assured about the current strategy.

Seattle's grocery store situation illustrates a complex interplay between crime, public safety, and city policy. While the city attempts to provide financial support for independent stores, the broader issues of crime and community safety remain unaddressed, leading to further deterioration of the grocery landscape in the city. как Seattle voters reassess the impact of current policies, changes may be necessary to resolve the ongoing crisis.

https://www.city-journal.org/article/seattle-budget-deficit-food-grocery-stores