The identity and implications of "Witness 2," revealed to be Gavin Wilde, an anti-Trump intelligence officer involved in the 2019 Ukraine impeachment proceedings. This witness played a significant role in supporting allegations against former President Donald Trump, connecting him to both the Russiagate investigation and subsequent claims related to Ukraine.
1. Identity of Witness 2:
• The unnamed "Witness 2" in the Ukraine impeachment documents is confirmed to be Gavin Wilde.
• Wilde previously worked with the National Security Agency (NSA) and the National Security Council (NSC).
2. Involvement in Impeachment:
• His claims were integral to the whistleblower complaint that accused Trump of pressuring Ukraine to investigate Joe Biden's family.
• Witness 2 provided critical information that prompted the Intelligence Community Inspector General (ICIG) to advance the whistleblower's allegations.
3. Connection to Anti-Trump Sentiment:
• Wilde has publicly expressed anti-Trump views and has linked Trump’s actions to Russian propaganda.
• His prior affiliations with prominent anti-Trump figures, such as Peter Strzok, come to light, raising questions about his objectivity.
4. Impact of Discredited Intelligence Assessments:
• Wilde participated in the controversial January 2017 intelligence assessment alleging Russian interference in the 2016 elections, which has since been criticized for using flawed intelligence.
• His cooperation with the whistleblower was influenced by what he described as a moral obligation to the truth and democracy.
5. Key Testimonies and Memos:
• Declassified memos from Atkinson reveal that Witness 2 helped shape the narrative around the whistleblower complaint.
• Despite being a significant source, Witness 2 had not directly read the transcript of the Trump-Zelensky call, which undermines claims about his statements being based on firsthand knowledge.
6. Perspectives on the Trump-Zelensky Call:
• Witness 2 claimed to interpret the call as a solicitation for help in the upcoming election, yet he admitted there was no explicit mention of such a quid pro quo.
• His conclusions seem to rely on personal inferences rather than factual evidence from the transcript.
7. Further Links and Collaborations:
• Wilde is currently associated with organizations that have a history of anti-Trump rhetoric and continues to contribute to discussions on Ukraine and Russian interference.
• He and Ciaramella, another key figure in the whistleblower complaint, share collaborations on research and commentary within think tank circles.
The revelation of Gavin Wilde as "Witness 2" sheds light on the significant yet controversial role of certain individuals in the Ukraine impeachment proceedings against Trump. His connections to previous intelligence assessments and the anti-Trump narrative raise questions about bias in the inquiries that may have impacted significant political events. The complexity of witness testimonies and motivations underscores the contentious nature of the investigations surrounding Trump’s presidency and America's foreign policy.
https://justthenews.com/accountability/whistleblowers/ided-witness-2-helped-ukraine-whistleblower-worked-strzok-wrote-2016