Historians Set Record Straight on 5 Events That Shaped America

As America approaches its 250th anniversary, historians are working to correct widespread misconceptions about pivotal moments in early American history. Historians Jeff Bloodworth, Stanley Schwartz, and Anna Vincenzi emphasize the importance of understanding the Founding Fathers and events like the Boston Tea Party, Paul Revere's ride, and the origins of the American Revolution in more nuanced ways.

1. The Boston Tea Party:

● The event on December 16, 1773, involved colonists dumping tea into Boston Harbor in protest against the British Parliament's Tea Act.

● Contrary to modern belief, the Tea Act lowered tea prices; however, it reinforced existing taxes and symbolized a lack of representation, leading colonists to feel their British citizenship was undermined.

● The protest was more about asserting rights than the taxation itself. The backlash from Britain post-Tea Party was more impactful than the protest itself, spurring the formation of the First Continental Congress.

2. Paul Revere's Ride:

● The traditional narrative depicts Revere as a lone rider, but he was part of a group alerting colonists about British troop movements.

● Historical accuracy suggests Revere warned of "the regulars" coming, not "the British," as colonists still considered themselves British citizens.

● Revere’s successful warning was a collaboration among members of a secret intelligence group, shaping the efforts that led to the Revolution.

3. The Shot Heard 'Round the World:

● The battles at Lexington and Concord marked the start of the Revolutionary War. Historians recognize that the exact shooter of the first shot remains debated, but both battles were pivotal milestones.

● The confrontations arose from British attempts to suppress colonial resistance, showcasing the tension between the colonists and British authority. The revolution was initially about rights more than independence.

4. The Nature of the American Revolution:

● Historians argue that the Revolution began more as a defense of existing rights rather than a quest for independence.

● Colonists were motivated by preserving rights granted under British governance, which they felt were being undermined by the Crown's actions. Independence was not a primary objective initially.

5. Founding Documents and Their Contributors:

● Thomas Jefferson did not single-handedly write the Declaration of Independence; it was a collaborative effort involving multiple contributors.

● Though often credited, figures like James Madison and Alexander Hamilton were part of a larger group that shaped the Constitution, which involved significant compromises from many delegates.

6. Slavery and the Founding Fathers’ Views:

● The argument that all Founding Fathers were pro-slavery is a misconception. The debate over slavery was complex, with some opposed to it while others supported or accepted the institution.

● Many Founders embedded ideas of equality in the nation's foundational texts despite the prevailing norms of their time.

Understanding these foundational events and figures requires moving beyond simplistic interpretations to recognize their complexity and the context in which they occurred. As the 250th anniversary of America approaches, reflecting on historical truths is essential to appreciate the country's origins fully and accurately. The historians' efforts to clarify these events serve to encourage a more balanced view of American history and its formative challenges and triumphs.

https://www.theepochtimes.com/article/historians-set-record-straight-on-5-events-that-shaped-america-6046394?utm_source=partner&utm_campaign=ZeroHedge 

What Happened to the 56 Signatories of the Declaration of Independence

 On July 4, 2026, the United States commemorates the 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence. While only 56 men signed the document, their sacrifices varied greatly. This summary highlights the fates of these signers and the significant impact of their commitment to American independence.

1. General Consequences for Signers:

● Five signers were captured by enemies.

● Twelve lost their homes due to destruction.

● Seventeen lost their fortunes during the conflict.

● None renounced their support for independence willingly.

2. Notable Signers:

● Thomas Jefferson: The principal author, he faced capture during his governorship and later served as ambassador, secretary of state, vice president, and president.

● Ben Franklin: Contributed to the Declaration's wording and served as ambassador to France, advocating for unity among the colonies.

● John Adams: An early advocate for independence, he narrowly avoided capture during a diplomatic mission and eventually became the second president.

● Richard Henry Lee: Authored the resolution for independence and faced attacks on his property during the war.

● Caesar Rodney: Travelled 80 miles while ill to vote for independence.

● John Hancock: The first signer, he financed the Revolution while facing property destruction from British troops.

● Thomas McKean: Fought in the war and became a key leader afterwards, ultimately signing the Declaration years after the initial signing.

3. Unique Cases Among Signers:

● Richard Stockton: Initially renounced his signature under duress but later reaffirmed his loyalty.

● George Walton: Captured during a battle but survived to serve in several political roles.

● Francis Lewis: His estate was destroyed, and his wife was captured, leading to her demise from stress after her release.

● John Hart: Fled from British troops despite his wife being gravely ill.

4. Final Years and Death:

● Charles Carroll: The last surviving signer, he lived until 1832 and emphasized the importance of civil and religious liberties in his later reflections.

The signers of the Declaration of Independence each faced significant challenges and sacrifices, ranging from personal loss to financial ruin, in their unwavering support for American independence. Their stories represent a testament to the commitment that led to the founding of the United States, with each signer contributing uniquely to the nation's history and legacy.

https://www.theepochtimes.com/us/what-happened-to-the-56-signatories-of-the-declaration-of-independence-6056663

No, The Framers Would Have Hated the Wealth Tax

Jonathan Turley argues against the idea that America's Founding Fathers would have supported wealth taxes, specifically a proposed Billionaire’s Tax. He criticizes statements by leaders like California Governor Gavin Newsom, who claim the Constitution aligns with wealth redistribution.

1. Founders' View on Wealth: Turley asserts that the Framers of the Constitution were against wealth redistribution and aimed to protect property rights. James Madison emphasized safeguarding the rights of the wealthy minority against the majority.

2. Madisonian Democracy: According to Turley, the political structure set up by the Framers was designed to prevent the concentration of political power, not wealth. They were proponents of capitalism and free markets, as reflected in their writings and economic philosophy.

3. Influence of Enlightenment Thinkers: The Founders were influenced by Enlightenment philosophers like John Locke, who believed in natural rights to property. This belief is echoed in foundational documents such as the Virginia Declaration of Rights.

4. Constitutional Protections: The Constitution includes provisions that protect property from government seizure, such as the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment. Turley argues that the structure of the Constitution makes a federal wealth tax unconstitutional.

5. California’s Wealth Tax Debate: Governor Newsom's support for a national wealth tax is seen as a political strategy to distract from California's failure to implement a state Billionaire’s Tax, especially as wealthy individuals leave the state to escape high taxes.

6. Economic Consequences: Turley warns that wealth taxes could lead to significant economic issues, including increased corruption in tax assessment, litigation, a reduction in investments, and a migration of wealthy individuals to states or countries with lower taxes.

7. Future Political Implications: The article outlines concerns that if Democrats gain control and pack the Supreme Court, they could push through taxes and measures that would otherwise be unconstitutional. This could eventually lead to more individuals facing wealth taxes, further threatening property rights.

Ultimately, Turley concludes that wealth taxes are politically appealing but economically detrimental. He stresses that these proposals contradict the intentions of the Framers, who sought to create a system that protects property rights rather than enables wealth redistribution. The future may see further attempts to levy wealth taxes, but such actions would diverge from the foundational principles of American democracy established by the Founders. 

https://jonathanturley.org/2026/07/05/no-the-framers-would-have-hated-the-wealth-tax/#more-246512

The Fourth of July, Ben Franklin, and the Celebration of a Free Press

The importance of free speech in America, particularly during the celebration of the Fourth of July. It highlights the contributions of Benjamin Franklin to the establishment of a free press.

● The First Amendment of the U. S. Constitution protects free speech and free press, making it a fundamental American value.

● As America celebrates its 250th Fourth of July, it is important to reflect on the thoughts of the Founding Fathers regarding the media.

● Benjamin Franklin played a key role in creating a free press through the Junto Club, which he founded in 1727 with a group of tradesmen and artisans to discuss moral and political issues.

● Franklin embarked on a media venture, overcoming competition and building a media conglomerate that included a newspaper, magazine, and almanac.

● His early endeavors laid the groundwork for modern media operations, showcasing his insight into content creation and distribution.

● Today, America enjoys a diverse media landscape, and despite criticisms of various outlets, this freedom remains a privilege.

As we celebrate Independence Day, it is vital to recognize the importance of a free press in America, which allows citizens to express and share their views freely. Franklin's contributions remind us of the invaluable nature of this freedom. Happy Fourth of July! 

https://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/jeffrey-lord/2026/07/04/fourth-july-ben-franklin-and-celebration-free-press

What happened to British Gen. Cornwallis after his Yorktown surrender — the final battle of the Revolutionary War?

 British General Charles Cornwallis surrendered at the Siege of Yorktown in October 1781, marking a significant point in the American Revolutionary War. This summary outlines what happened to him after this defeat.

1. Parole Document: Cornwallis signed a parole document nine days after his surrender, which permitted him to return to Britain under the condition he would not engage in military action against the U. S. again.

2. Surrender Details: Cornwallis did not surrender in person; instead, he sent his second in command to fulfill this duty. American General George Washington and French forces effectively surrounded and besieged Cornwallis’ troops, leading him to recognize his untenable position.

3. Military Engagement: The siege began on October 6, 1781, and culminated with Cornwallis' surrender on October 19 after joint American and French forces stormed British defenses.

4. Post-War Career: After returning to England, Cornwallis was well-received and later served as governor-general of India from 1786 until his death in 1805.

5. Formal Peace Treaty: The Revolutionary War formally ended nearly two years later with a treaty that recognized U. S. independence.

Cornwallis faced a significant defeat at Yorktown but later continued his career in military and governmental roles, living notably until 1805. The significance of his surrender played a crucial part in the establishment of American independence.

https://www.theblaze.com/news/what-happened-to-british-gen-cornwallis-after-his-yorktown-surrender-the-final-battle-of-the-revolutionary-war

Standing Room Only: Dr. Will Bolt Packs the Marion Opera House with Tale of the Swamp Fox South Carolina Bulletin

MARION, S.C. If you weren’t at the Marion Opera House Thursday night, you missed something special and you weren’t alone in that regret. The historic venue was filled to capacity as Dr. Will Bolt, chair of the Department of History at Francis Marion University, delivered a lively and masterful presentation on the life and military career of Gen. Francis Marion, the legendary Swamp Fox of the American Revolution.

Dr. Bolt spoke for roughly an hour, weaving the story of Marion’s guerrilla campaigns against British forces in the South Carolina back country with both scholarly rigor and an engaging wit that had the crowd laughing as often as they were leaning forward in their seats.

The audience a genuine cross section of Marion County, from longtime residents to students and history buffs rewarded the presentation with sustained applause, a clear signal that Bolt had struck the right balance between education and entertainment.

The lecture explored not just Marion’s military tactics but the man himself. His leadership, his character, and the legacy that now graces both the city and the university that bear his name.

Dr. Bolt holds the Suzanne Lucas and Benjamin Pratt Gasque Chair in History at Francis Marion University, where he also serves as department chair. A scholar of early American history, he has written extensively on the founding era and has built a reputation for making colonial and Revolutionary history accessible without dumbing it down a rare gift in academic circles.

His appearance was part of the City of Marion’s ongoing community events series, hosted at the beautifully restored Marion Opera House downtown.

The overwhelming turnout standing room only speaks for itself. The community clearly wants more programming like this.

If you’d like to see additional lectures and historical presentations brought to Marion, the organizers encourage residents to contact the HMRA (Historic Marion Revitalization Association) and let them know. Public enthusiasm is what turns a one off success into a regular series.

https://samueleburns.substack.com/p/standing-room-only

‘Too Big to Rig’: Inside the Left's 2026 Election Machine.

A coalition of progressive organizations is preparing for the 2026 midterm elections using a framework focused on defending democracy, safeguarding elections, and responding to misinformation. This extensive network aims to mobilize millions in funding and resources, focusing on all aspects of the electoral process from voter education to legal support.

1. Formation of the Election Machine:

● A diverse alliance of over 200 organizations, under the banner of "democracy defense," is collaborating to ensure a significant voter turnout and address misinformation surrounding elections.

● Funding and resources are being allocated towards various initiatives, including voter education, campus organizing, and legal defenses.

2. Protect Democracy’s Report:

● Protect Democracy, a prominent group, claims the current political environment poses threats to fair elections, accusing the Trump administration of deploying federal resources to disrupt electoral processes.

● The organization promotes the need for journalists, influencers, and election officials to be proactive in addressing perceived governmental disinformation and preparing for potential threats.

3. Engaging Young Voters:

● The “Gen Z Election Defense Toolkit” aims to empower young voters through educational resources and mobilization efforts targeted at campuses.

● Recommendations include organizing voter registration drives and monitoring misinformation.

4. Movement Voter Fund Initiatives:

● The Movement Voter Project advocates for a large-scale, nonpartisan push to engage voters, emphasizing long-term organizing efforts beyond the elections.

● A detailed five-phase plan outlines strategies for building organizational capacity, training volunteers, ensuring election integrity, and maintaining narrative control throughout the election cycle.

5. ACLU and Common Cause's Roles:

● The ACLU is investing over $24.5 million in legal support to safeguard elections, preparing volunteers to respond to election threats.

● Common Cause is focusing on deploying volunteers for poll monitoring and managing misinformation, coordinating closely with election officials.

6. Healthcare Engagement in Civic Participation:

● Vot-ER's Community Civic Engagement Program harnesses the influence of community health centers to facilitate voter registration and turnout, utilizing innovative outreach methods like text reminders.

7. Legal Support for Election Officials:

● The Center for Election Innovation & Research (CEIR) is establishing a legal strategy to aid election officials, alongside its existing support network for legal challenges faced by election workers.

8. State-Level Initiatives:

● Maryland's passage of SB 141 reflects a push towards legally addressing election misinformation. The law allows for reporting, correction, and legal proceedings against misinformation dissemination.

The comprehensive strategies being employed by progressive organizations highlight a significant effort to influence the 2026 elections through preemptive measures, including legal, educational, and organizational frameworks. The coordination across different sectors aims to address the complex challenges of election misinformation and promote voter participation while laying the groundwork for sustained electoral engagement. 

https://nataliegwinters.substack.com/p/too-big-to-rig-inside-the-lefts-2026?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=3382126&post_id=204527382&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=6dl2nb&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email