STUNNING NEW EVIDENCE Reveals 68 Cities Where Dem-Funded GBI Strategies Sent Over 104 Packages Filled With MI Voter Registrations…Muskegon Was Only Where They Were Caught

 The allegations of widespread voter registration fraud in Michigan during the 2020 election, particularly focusing on the actions of Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson and the investigation into GBI Strategies, a company accused of facilitating fraudulent registrations. It critiques Michigan media outlets, claiming they downplayed the investigation's severity and failed to report comprehensively on the issue.

1. Media Involvement:

Major Michigan newspapers, like the Detroit News and Free Press, are accused of bias by enabling Benson's attempts to obscure the fraud investigation. The article claims that the media did not adequately investigate or report on the implications of the fraudulent voter registrations.

2. Jocelyn Benson's Leadership:

Benson is criticized for instructing Michigan clerks to ignore specific election laws, which allegedly compromised election integrity. This guidance coincided with the emergence of a significant investigation into voter registration fraud.

3. Investigation Background:

The investigation began in October 2020 when Muskegon City Clerk Ann Meisch noticed irregularities in voter registration applications, which led her to contact law enforcement. She identified suspicious patterns in the applications, including identical handwriting and nonexistent addresses.

4. Findings Against GBI Strategies:

Meisch reported the presence of a large number of fraudulent applications from GBI Strategies, which had different names and addresses delivered to the clerk's office. The company’s practices raised significant concerns about the integrity of the voter registration process across multiple cities in Michigan.

5. Systematic Fraud:

The article notes that the fraudulent registration scheme was not limited to Muskegon; it affected at least nine cities across Michigan. This was supported by USPS receipts revealing multiple packages sent across the state.

6. Political Implications:

The investigation is tied to significant political figures, including Senate candidate Gary Peters and President Biden, hinting at potential improprieties associated with their campaigns' dealings with GBI Strategies.

7. Clerks’ Awareness and Concerns:

Discussion among local clerks in a private Facebook group revealed that many were receiving similar batches of questionable registrations. Some clerks raised alarms but did not report the fraud to law enforcement.

8. Public Perception and Accountability:

Claims are made that the media and government officials, including Attorney General Dana Nessel, diminished the gravity of the fraud by suggesting it was an “attempted fraud” that was successfully thwarted. The article argues that no substantial proof exists to support such claims.

9. Lack of Follow-Up:

Despite raising these concerns, the Gateway Pundit claims it has not been contacted by the FBI or the Department of Justice regarding further investigation into the reported fraud.

The article paints a picture of electoral malpractice in Michigan, alleging that systemic fraud was overlooked by both state leaders and media outlets, while questioning the integrity of the electoral process during the 2020 election. The implications of these findings raise concerns about the fairness of elections and the responsibility of officials and media to protect voter integrity. The ongoing investigation leaves open questions about accountability and the mechanisms in place to prevent similar occurrences in the future.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/08/stunning-new-evidence-reveals-68-cities-where-dem/

Senate Panel Holds Fauci In Contempt For Refusing To Answer Questions

 Dr. Anthony Fauci has been held in contempt of Congress by the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee due to his refusal to answer questions about his involvement in funding controversial coronavirus research in Wuhan, China, and his management of the COVID-19 pandemic response.

The Committee voted 8-5 to refer the case to the Department of Justice for prosecution, bypassing a full Senate vote.

Committee Chairman Sen. Rand Paul accused Fauci of obstructing the investigation by invoking the Fifth Amendment when subpoenaed.

Sen. Gary Peters criticized the investigation as biased, claiming it selectively released information.

The Senate panel obtained a copy of Fauci's iPhone, which may provide further insights into his actions during the pandemic.

Fauci’s past hearings featured his refusal to answer key questions regarding research funding, virus origins, and public health policies.

Fauci's contempt charge highlights ongoing tensions regarding accountability for decisions made during the pandemic, with further investigations expected following the acquisition of his cell phone data.

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/senate-panel-holds-fauci-contempt-refusing-answer-questions

A Public Health Epidemic to Restrict Digital Rights

In recent years, there has been a growing concern about the impact of social media on the mental health of young people. This concern is leading to increased government involvement to reshape how individuals interact online, similar to past responses during public health crises. This summary discusses the legislative responses to perceived threats from social media, the effectiveness of these measures, and the disagreements among experts about the actual risks of social media to mental health.

1. Emerging Concern:

Since around 2012, rates of depression, anxiety, self-harm, and suicidality have increased among minors.

This correlates with the rise of smartphones and social media, prompting discussions about their potentially harmful impact on mental health.

2. Legislative Actions:

The proposed Kids Internet and Digital Safety Act (KIDS Act) aims to provide age-appropriate experiences on certain digital platforms, but it risks invasive data collection and verification of user identities.

Various states, including California and Texas, are considering or have implemented age-gating regulations requiring verification of users' ages.

3. Implementation Challenges:

Many age-gating measures could inadvertently compromise user privacy and anonymity on social media, leading to concerns about censorship and second-tier status for non-compliance.

Existing practices may not effectively prevent minors from accessing inappropriate content due to parental leniency and kids' resourcefulness.

4. Debate on Social Media's Impact:

Experts are divided on the extent to which social media harms youth mental health. Some argue it negatively affects vulnerable groups, while others suggest that the research linking social media to mental health issues is inconsistent and often low-quality.

Concerns about terminology within the studies, such as defining “social media addiction” and distinguishing its effects, complicate the understanding of social media’s impact.

5. Concerns About Data Privacy:

Proposals for stringent age verification methods involving biometric data and government IDs raise serious privacy issues.

Data breaches are also a concern, as companies collecting extensive user data are susceptible to leaks, potentially exposing sensitive user information.

6. Effectiveness of Regulatory Measures:

Many measures introduced are unlikely to effectively safeguard children against online threats. Parental oversight and age barriers may be easily bypassed.

Critics argue that many legislators’ actions are more an attempt to appear proactive than genuinely protective of youth.

7. Summary of Current Beliefs:

Claims of social media as a primary factor in young people’s mental health crises are not universally accepted within the scientific community. The bulk of research remains contested and lacks robust support.

There is a critical need for more definitive evidence before implementing sweeping regulatory measures affecting user freedoms online.

The emerging legislation targeting social media and its influence on youth mental health reflects ongoing social concerns but raises questions about personal freedoms and privacy. Critics argue that the evidence supporting claims of social media-induced mental health crises is not robust enough to justify such changes. As debates continue, it is crucial to evaluate the effectiveness and consequences of these regulatory efforts on both individual rights and minors’ safety in the digital landscape. 

https://brownstone.org/articles/a-public-health-epidemic-to-restrict-digital-rights/

More than 600,000 voter files ripped off Arizona site in 2020 by hacker, but DOJ didn't prosecute

 In the days leading up to the 2020 presidential election, Arizona's Maricopa County experienced a significant breach where a hacker accessed 633,000 voter registration files. Despite the hacker's confession, local and federal prosecutorial agencies decided not to pursue charges.

The breach was noted as the most significant security incident among U.S. cyber logs during the election period.

An unnamed hacker admitted to creating a computer script that exploited vulnerabilities in the county's voter registration systems, allowing access to sensitive data, including information about domestic violence victims and law enforcement.

The FBI conducted a thorough investigation which revealed that the hacker had accessed the system between October 21 and November 2, 2020.

Despite the hacker's admission, various attorney offices, including the U.S. Attorney's Office in Phoenix, declined to press charges, leading to the case's closure in May 2023.

The hacker discovered the vulnerability by entering his voter ID information and subsequently tested the system, discovering how to access different records.

Following the breach, Maricopa County officials claimed that the obtained data included only registration numbers, conflicting with the FBI's findings of over 900 records with sensitive information.

The FBI later traced the intrusion to the hacker's home in Fountain Hills, Arizona, where they seized multiple hard drives and computers.

The incident reflects serious concerns over voter data security and the implications of such breaches on future voting processes. The decision not to prosecute the individual raises questions about accountability in cybersecurity and the protection of sensitive voter information.

https://justthenews.com/government/courts-law/6amhundreds-thousands-voter-files-were-hacked-arizona-2020-doj-declined

The Permanent Underclass Is Already Here

San Francisco illustrates the complexities of modern America, being both a leading tech hub for artificial intelligence (AI) and a city grappling with visible issues like drug use, mental illness, and societal disorder. The growing concern surrounding a potential "permanent underclass" reflects fears related to AI automation replacing jobs and exacerbating poverty.

1. Permanent Underclass Concern:

A "permanent underclass" refers to a group facing long-term poverty due to automation. This term emerged in tech discussions, as AI advancements raised anxieties about job loss for those with lower cognitive skills.

The meme regarding escaping the "permanent underclass" emphasizes urgency among tech workers regarding job security, as noted by industry figures like Dario Amodei and Mustafa Suleyman.

2. Job Market Implications:

Although there are significant layoffs in tech, partly due to automation, there's debate over whether a job apocalypse is imminent. Unemployment rates, especially among college graduates, remain relatively stable.

Some tech leaders observe that AI may create new job categories rather than eliminate jobs altogether.

3. Social Anxiety Reflection:

The fear of a "permanent underclass" may stem from status anxiety among tech workers concerned about their financial future amidst rising automation.

Influential voices in Silicon Valley highlight fears of a widening gap where only a few elite benefit from technological advancements.

4. Reality of the Current Underclass:

In San Francisco, the existing underclass, often made up of homeless individuals struggling with addiction and mental health issues, raises awareness about societal neglect. This population experiences everyday despair, which contrasts sharply against the backdrop of technological progress.

5. Government Policies' Role:

San Francisco's approach to homelessness and addiction has included various policies that many argue have failed, keeping the status quo unchanged. Efforts to reform welfare, mental health services, and addiction treatment have not produced significant improvements.

Many experts and critics, such as Alex Barnard, suggest that California's support system often perpetuates dependency instead of promoting rehabilitation.

6. Recent Initiatives and Challenges:

New initiatives, like the opening of a sobering center to address drug use, face political backlash, indicating the complexities of reforming addiction-related issues.

San Francisco serves as a stark reminder of the realities tied to socioeconomic change, displaying both hope in technology and the specter of societal breakdown. The public's anxiety about an impending "permanent underclass" highlights the risks of neglecting those already vulnerable amidst rapid innovation. Without meaningful policy reform and effective interventions, there is a danger that future labor market upheavals could replicate or intensify current struggles faced by the city's marginalized communities. 

https://www.city-journal.org/article/san-francisco-permanent-underclass-ai-homeless-welfare

Judge Assails DOJ While Tossing Jan. 6 Seditious Conspiracy Case

 A federal judge criticized efforts to change the narrative surrounding the January 6, 2021, Capitol attack as he dismissed the seditious conspiracy case against the far-right Oath Keepers group at the request of the Trump administration. This decision marks a significant step in closing the cases related to the events of January 6.

The judge's dismissal follows Trump’s pardons and commutations last year, which released many individuals convicted of violent acts during the Capitol attack.

The Department of Justice sought to vacate the convictions of Oath Keepers founder Stewart Rhodes and others, creating a reversal from the Biden administration's stance that praised those guilty verdicts.

U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta expressed disappointment in having to comply with the administration's request, stating it undermines the seriousness of the January 6 events and the efforts of law enforcement and prosecutors.

The judge declared the conclusion of prosecutions related to January 6 as the “book now closed,” lamenting that this decision diminishes what occurred that day.

Rhodes, who received a commuted sentence after being convicted, labels himself a “political prisoner” and maintains he did nothing wrong. His legal representation expressed disappointment in the judge's remarks.

Trump claims the justice system treated January 6 defendants unfairly, saying that pardons were a means to correct a national injustice.

Overall, over 1,200 individuals were convicted for crimes related to January 6, with around 200 charged with assaulting law enforcement.

The dismissal of the Oath Keepers case and the pardons reflect a complex and contentious narrative surrounding the Capitol riots, raising debates about accountability and justice.

https://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/judge-assails-doj-while-tossing-jan-6-seditious-conspiracy-case/2026/08/05/id/1265219/

MS NOW Downplays El-Sayed's Ties to Terrorist-Sympathizer Hasan Piker

This week, Abdul El-Sayed was narrowly nominated as the Democratic candidate for the Michigan Senate. His campaign has already sparked significant media discussion and controversy, particularly regarding his associations.

El-Sayed’s nomination elicited immediate media coverage, particularly from MS NOW Reports, which started with his victory speech and moved to campaign strategies.

Republican opponent Mike Rogers criticized El-Sayed, implying a connection to extremist beliefs, specifically mentioning 9/11.

Vaughn Hillyard from MS NOW attempted to clarify that El-Sayed never made such statements but acknowledged El-Sayed's ties to Hasan Piker, a controversial figure who has made inflammatory comments.

Critics point out El-Sayed’s decision to campaign with Piker, raising concerns over his associations.

Political analysts like Larry Sabato defended El-Sayed while criticizing Republicans for their aggressive tactics, particularly regarding the distinction between socialism and communism.

As the campaign continues, El-Sayed’s associations could become a defining issue, with both media and opponents scrutinizing his connections to figures like Hasan Piker. The electoral battle is expected to be contentious as differing political ideologies clash. 

https://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/james-waterman/2026/08/05/ms-now-downplays-el-sayeds-ties-terrorist-sympathizer-hasan