Tennessee Democrat State Senator Stands on Desk, Fights with Sergeant at Arms After Republicans Pass New Congressional Map Eliminating Dem District

Tennessee's Republican-led Legislature passed a new congressional map that removes the state’s only majority-Black district, leading to protests from Democratic lawmakers.

• The new congressional map was approved by both the House and Senate, then signed into law by Governor Bill Lee.

• This redistricting eliminates a Memphis-based district held by Representative Steve Cohen and redistributes Democratic voters into more Republican-friendly areas.

• The changes align with a Supreme Court ruling on redistricting, giving the Republican Party a chance to secure more seats in upcoming midterm elections.

• Senator Charlane Oliver of the Democratic Party protested the decision by standing on a desk and engaging in a tug-of-war with the Senate Sergeant at Arms over a banner that stated, “No Jim Crow 2 Stop the Steal. ”

• The map also impacts the Nashville area by dividing it into five different districts, potentially diluting Democratic influence.

• Tennessee becomes the ninth state to adopt a new congressional map amidst ongoing national debates about gerrymandering following the Supreme Court's recent actions.

The adoption of this new congressional map has sparked significant political tension in Tennessee, particularly among Democratic lawmakers who see it as an attempt to undermine their representation. This situation highlights the contentious nature of redistricting in U. S. politics, especially concerning minority representation and partisan control. 

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/05/watch-tennessee-democrat-state-senator-stands-desk-fights/

When Global Order Begins to Fracture

The significant and quiet transformation in the global order, sparked by various geopolitical shifts, particularly involving the United States, Russia, and China. It highlights how existing diplomatic structures are eroding and outlines the implications of these changes on international relations.

1. Erosion of Stability

• The global stability that existed was largely based on prescribed limits and agreements, ensuring predictable rivalry among major powers.

• Current events, including tensions in Ukraine and the dissolution of the New START treaty, indicate a departure from this stability.

2. Shifting Alliances

• Historically, American strategy involved balancing relations with both Russia and China. However, current dynamics show a merging of interests between the two, with both nations striving to diminish U. S. global influence.

• This new relationship is not a formal alliance, but rather a pragmatic cooperation based on mutual geopolitical objectives.

3. The End of Arms Control

• The New START treaty, which regulated the number of nuclear weapons held by the U. S. and Russia, expired on February 5, 2026, without replacement or serious negotiation efforts.

• This absence of limits in nuclear arsenals marks the beginning of an unstable arms race, complicating military planning.

4. Testing U. S. Authority

• Russia has been testing the U. S. response in multiple regions, signaling a willingness to challenge U. S. influence outside traditional conflict zones.

• Examples include incidents near Venezuela, developments in the Arctic, and diplomatic posturing concerning Iran.

5. The Multipolar World

• The growing alignment between Russia and China reflects a strategic transition towards a multipolar world, where U. S. dominance in global affairs is increasingly contested.

• This shift may undermine the effectiveness of sanctions and destabilize international institutions.

6. New Challenges for U. S. Policy

• The U. S. now faces the unprecedented challenge of deterring two nuclear powers simultaneously, complicating military strategy and readiness.

• The fading boundaries of conflict and competition create a risk of miscalculations leading to crises.

7. Expansion of Competition

• Geopolitical competition is spreading beyond traditional areas into trade routes, digital infrastructure, and essential resources.

• States are focusing more on resilience than efficiency, preparing for enduring confrontations rather than short-term conflicts.

8. The Importance of Perception

• There is a significant gap between government assessments of international stability and public perception.

• If societies believe that current tensions are temporary rather than indicative of deeper systemic changes, they may be caught off guard by future crises.

9. Gradual Shift and Future Outlook

• Many ongoing shifts in the geopolitical landscape are subtle and may not be recognized until they manifest in more visible conflicts.

• Governments are slowly recalibrating their strategies, indicating a significant transition in how power is projected globally.

The article emphasizes that the current period is marked by a gradual unraveling of the structured stability that once governed international relations. As the global order shifts away from established protocols towards a more uncertain multipolar world, nations must navigate new complexities that challenge traditional assumptions about diplomacy, conflict, and power dynamics. This historic change is unfolding quietly, making it crucial for political leadership and public awareness to adapt. 

https://preppgroup.home.blog/2026/05/06/when-global-order-begins-to-fracture/

Globalism Is Totalitarianism

 Recent developments in various Western countries highlight a growing trend towards authoritarianism under the guise of globalism. Citizens are increasingly facing restrictions on their rights, while governments amplify their control in ways that contradict democratic principles.

1. Political Control Over Personal Ownership:

Germany is exploring laws to prevent individuals with dissenting political views from buying homes, effectively barring political opponents from property ownership.

2. Censorship of Criticism:

London’s Mayor is advocating for a “disinformation unit” to silence criticism. British police are more focused on policing speech than on addressing serious crimes.

3. Digital Surveillance and Identification:

European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen is promoting mandatory digital IDs that could eliminate online privacy and suppress dissent.

4. Diminished Safety and Protection:

Various European and North American authorities are prioritizing the discussion of “white supremacy” over tangible threats posed by terrorism, diverting attention from pressing security issues.

5. Erosion of Parental Rights:

In Canada, the government is pushing for educational policies that undermine parental rights in favor of state control over children’s identity matters.

6. Cultural and Demographic Changes:

A significant portion of the French population believes there is an ongoing demographic replacement, which many view as negative.

7. Censorship and Regulation of Expression:

In the Netherlands, local governments are banning advertisements for meat and fossil fuels as they extend censorship to various facets of public life.

8. Disservice to Citizens:

Politicians are portrayed as prioritizing illegal immigrants over the safety and rights of citizens, as seen in their responses to crime and public safety.

9. Emerging Totalitarianism:

Governments are increasingly censoring citizens, promoting discrimination based on race, and enforcing compliance through punitive measures.

10. Failure to Address Crises:

Instead of resolving issues like homelessness and crime, leaders focus on narratives that preserve their political power and suppress dissent.

The cumulative effect of these actions shows a troubling shift toward totalitarianism, where dissent is criminalized, and citizen voices are silenced. If globalism continues to threaten their freedoms, citizens may feel compelled to resist through more radical means. The current trajectory poses a stark challenge to individual liberties and democratic norms, forcing a necessary examination of governance within Western societies.

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2026/05/globalism_is_totalitarianism.html

Biden DOJ Was In Cahoots With SPLC As It Funded Extremist Groups, Former Official Admits

The Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) has been indicted for financial misconduct, allegedly using donor funds to pay informants within extremist groups, including the KKK, while publicly denouncing them. This case has raised questions about the involvement of the Biden administration's Department of Justice (DOJ) and FBI.

1. Indictment of SPLC: A federal grand jury indicted the SPLC for wire fraud and conspiracy, claiming they misled donors about the use of their contributions.

2. Funding Extremists: The SPLC reportedly used millions in donations to pay informants who were part of violent extremist groups while concurrently criticizing those groups publicly.

3. Government Awareness: Norm Eisen, a former official, suggested that since the DOJ and FBI were aware of SPLC’s actions, the wrongdoing may not be as serious. He requested the release of grand jury transcripts to clarify the agencies' knowledge.

4. DOJ Statement: Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche stated that the SPLC was "manufacturing racism" to justify its existence. Despite the SPLC's claims of keeping communities safe, the indictment paints a different picture.

5. Misrepresentation: The DOJ alleges that the SPLC opened fake bank accounts to disguise the true nature of their financial activities, misrepresenting how donated money would be used.

The SPLC's indictment raises significant concerns about fundraising ethics and transparency, especially regarding how donor money is allocated. The interaction between the SPLC and federal agencies underscores a complex situation where legal practices and moral obligations intersect. The investigation continues, with implications for both the SPLC's future and donor trust.

https://thefederalist.com/2026/05/07/biden-doj-was-in-cahoots-with-splc-as-it-funded-extremist-groups-former-official-admits/ 

FBI probing Senate Intel Democrats for possible classified leaks, spurred by NSA criminal referral

The FBI is investigating possible leaks of classified information by Democratic staff members of the Senate Intelligence Committee. This inquiry follows a criminal referral from the National Security Agency (NSA) related to an incident involving information leaked during the confirmation process of Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard.

• The NSA's criminal referral pertains to reports, including one from The New York Times, suggesting that Gabbard met with Hezbollah leaders during a trip to Syria in 2017. Gabbard has denied these claims.

• The NSA confirmed that a leak included accurate information from an intercept, but Gabbard did not meet with the individuals in question.

• Investigators have identified potential leakers among the Senate Intelligence Committee staff who accessed the intercepted information prior to the Times report.

• The FBI’s probe has expanded to include other leaks and media contacts associated with the Democrat members of the Senate Intelligence Committee.

• This investigation is part of a broader crackdown by the Trump administration aimed at addressing leaks of classified information, which has already led to significant indictments.

• Previous investigations into the Senate Intelligence Committee have also resulted in legal actions, such as the 2018 case against former security chief James Wolfe.

The FBI's investigation into potential leaks from Senate Intel Democrats underscores ongoing concerns over classified information security. This probe follows past scrutiny and legal actions against individuals involved in similar issues, highlighting the sensitive nature of information handling within government committees. 

https://justthenews.com/government/security/fbi-probing-senate-intel-democrats-possible-classified-leaks-spurred-nsa

Treasury Department Goes After Dark Money

On April 23, 2026, the US Treasury Department announced plans to revise Form 990, a return filed by tax-exempt organizations, to improve transparency around fiscal sponsorships and government funding. The aim is to address fraud and misconduct within nonprofit organizations, particularly those operating under complex fiscal sponsorship arrangements.

1. Overview of Treasury Department's Announcement:

• The IRS is revising Form 990 to ensure nonprofits disclose information about government contracts and fiscal sponsorship arrangements.

• Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent stated that this effort is to prevent fraud and hold wrongdoers accountable.

2. Understanding Fiscal Sponsorship:

• Fiscal sponsorship allows a nonprofit to extend its tax-exempt status to projects or organizations that align with its mission, usually for a fee.

• While this can support new charities lacking 501(c)(3) status, it can also be abused by obscure organizations to hide financial activities.

3. Current Lack of Transparency:

• Nonprofits can pass funding through umbrella organizations without filling out a separate Form 990, obscuring who controls and benefits from the funds.

• This lack of accountability raises concerns over how funds are used and who is really benefiting.

4. The Arabella Advisors Network:

• Arabella Advisors, a significant player in this space, coordinates various nonprofits that fund left-leaning initiatives.

• In recent years, this network managed nearly $1 billion in grants, often without disclosing funding sources or destinations.

5. Impacts of the Arabella Network:

• The Arabella network has been linked to significant political funding, exceeding totals raised by major political parties.

• The network allows "pop-up groups" to operate with little to no public accountability, complicating transparency further.

6. Role of Foreign Funding:

• Notably, foreign nationals have contributed to US political causes through these nonprofit structures, raising legal and ethical questions given existing restrictions on campaign financing.

7. Examples of Government Funding to Nonprofits:

• Federal dollars are being funneled to various left-leaning organizations, revealing a cycle where nonprofits dependent on government grants push for more funding and favorable policies.

• Instances exist where significant grants tied to government agencies have been directed towards organizations with clear political agendas.

8. Revolving Door and Political Connections:

• There's evidence of personnel moving between these nonprofit networks and government positions, illustrating a cycle where nonprofits may advocate for favorable government funding.

9. Restructuring in Response to Scrutiny:

• The restructuring of Arabella Advisors into new organizations reflects attempts to mitigate reputational risks while maintaining operations.

• Similar shifting among organizations like the Tides Foundation seeks to evade increased scrutiny as well.

The Treasury Department's initiative to revise Form 990 represents a significant step towards improving accountability in nonprofit financial practices. By targeting the opaque nature of fiscal sponsorships, the effort seeks to shed light on how vast sums of money are used in political activism and charity. Continued congressional investigations and public awareness are essential in addressing the systemic issues of transparency and accountability in the nonprofit sector. The recent movements by organizations warrant close monitoring, as they indicate an ongoing struggle regarding the influence of money in politics and the need for clearer oversight in nonprofit dealings. 

https://amgreatness.com/2026/05/08/treasury-department-goes-after-dark-money/

Medicaid Wasn’t Built For Man. Ohio Fraud Proves It.

The problems surrounding Medicaid fraud in Ohio, highlighting how the system's structure allows for exploitation by those with little regard for ethics or proper qualifications. It illustrates these issues through specific examples, emphasizing the challenges in policing such fraud.

1. Poor Conditions of Office Buildings:

The author describes a dilapidated building in Columbus housing Medicaid-funded healthcare businesses, hinting at the neglect and low standards associated with these operations.

2. Exploitation of Medicaid:

Investigative journalist Luke Rosiak reveals that many small healthcare companies are billing Medicaid for services while lacking proper qualifications. Even individuals with criminal records set up these LLCs and manage to collect substantial amounts from taxpayers.

3. Weak Oversight:

The current Medicaid system allows states to approve various service charges without stringent checks. Entrepreneurs can easily establish companies that bill for legitimate-seeming services without any oversight of their activities.

4. Fraudulent Billing Examples:

Specific cases, such as that of Mamusu Kanu and Alieu Conteh, illustrate the degree to which individuals exploit the system, charging hundreds of thousands for unfounded services to fictitious patients.

5. Lack of Accountability:

The author points out that many LLCs created to provide services lack proper employee training or legitimate purposes, as services are performed in private homes, making it challenging to track actual service delivery.

6. Demographic Issues:

There is mention of the influx of Somalians in Columbus involved in these businesses, though the problems are framed as systemic rather than specific to any demographic.

7. Political Ramifications:

The fraud has sparked political dialogue in Ohio, with officials like State Auditor Keith Faber using it as a campaign point. However, attempts to prosecute fraud may prove to be endlessly challenging.

8. Systemic Flaws:

The article concludes that the flaws in the Medicaid system make it ripe for abuse. The good intentions behind programs like Medicaid do not fully consider human nature, ultimately leading to significant financial misuse.

The examination of Medicaid in Ohio reveals significant weaknesses that permit widespread fraud. These issues highlight the inherent vulnerability within the program, as a lack of oversight and the ease of setting up fraudulent operations lead to the exploitation of taxpayer money. Addressing these systemic issues will require a nuanced approach that acknowledges the realities of human behavior rather than simply focusing on the individuals who exploit the system. 

https://spectator.org/medicaid-wasnt-built-for-man-ohio-fraud-proves-it/