I have been a lifelong Republican. I did not not vote for Lindsey Graham in the primary. I did not agree with every vote he cast. I never doubted that he fought for what he believed. When he passed away suddenly on July 11, Governor McMaster made his decision by asking his sister Darline to finish out his term. It was a respectful gesture. Let his sister close out his unfinished business, while giving the people of South Carolina time to choose who they wanted to represent them in Washington come November.
What I will not accept is what has followed. The political class deciding who we should elect. Tim Scott. Drew McKissick. Donald Trump himself. One after another, they lined up to tell us, that Darline Graham should be handed the seat. Not because she earned it. Not because she's the most qualified Republican in South Carolina. Because she is Lindsey Graham's sister. That is the entirety of their argument and they expect us to go along. I have nothing against Darline Graham personally. By all accounts she has served our state honorably as Commissioner for the Blind and across nearly three decades in various agencies. She may be a fine public servant. Being somebody's sibling is not a qualification for the United States Senate. A last name is not a résumé. Kinship is not a mandate. And yet here they stand. The very people we elected, acting as though this seat now belongs to the Graham family by some unwritten right of succession. Their arrogance is breathtaking. They have passed through the crucible of public scrutiny and emerged with power. Now they believe that power entitles them to select our representatives for us. That is not how this works. The people of South Carolina get to vote. This year we celebrate 250 years since America broke away from a king. We fought a revolution, bled for it, died for it, to reject that power flows through bloodlines. We do not hand public office down from one relative to another, like some kind of aristocratic estate. We do not treat the United States Senate like a family business to be bequeathed. That is not what we fought for. It is the reason this country destroyed that aristocratic estate. Let the people decide. We fought for that right. South Carolina has no shortage of good Republicans. Men and women who have worked hard, built businesses, served their communities, led with conviction and earned the respect of the people through their own sweat and merit. Every single one of them deserves the same fair shot, without the political establishment putting its thumb on the scale and telling us who we ought to coronate. A United States Senate seat is not a family heirloom. It belongs to the people of South Carolina. Not to a party machine. Not to a political dynasty. To the people. On August 11, a special primary will be held and I hope my fellow Republicans will make their voices heard. Let us choose the person who earned the job, not the person who happened to be born into the right family. That is the difference between a republic and a monarchy. I for one, did not sign up for a monarchy.
It's becoming increasingly difficult to discern fact from fiction, and unfortunately the media has a strong bias. They spin stories to make conservatives look bad and will go to great lengths to avoid reporting on the good that comes from conservative policies. There are a few shining lights in the media landscape-brave conservative outlets that report the truth and offer a different perspective. We must support conservative outlets like this one and ensure that our voices are heard.
Monday, August 3, 2026
Dr. Birx Does Damage Control, Throws Fauci Under the Bus After Disastrous Hearing
In a recent development following a Senate hearing, former White House COVID Task Force Coordinator Dr. Deborah Birx publicly criticized Dr. Anthony Fauci for his silence regarding the COVID-19 response. The hearing, marked by Fauci's refusal to answer questions, has reignited discussions about the management of the pandemic.
1. Senate Hearing Performance: Dr. Fauci, the former director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), appeared before the Senate Homeland Security Committee but invoked the Fifth Amendment 111 times, refusing to comment on his actions during the pandemic.
2. Birx's Accusations: Following the hearing, Birx stated on Newsmax that blue states had "overclosed" and that their decisions were influenced by political factors, especially during the presidential election year. She suggested that states acted excessively to demonstrate their seriousness about COVID-19.
3. Historical Context: Birx, who previously recommended stringent safety measures such as multiple mask-wearing, faced scrutiny for her own actions when she was caught traveling for Thanksgiving while advising others to stay home.
4. Legal Repercussions: In light of their actions during the pandemic, several states have accused both Dr. Fauci and Dr. Birx, along with other health officials, of serious crimes including murder and medical coercion.
5. Controversial Figures Identified: The referral letters detailed a range of individuals linked to the controversial management of COVID-19, including other prominent health officials.
The fallout from the Senate hearing continues as criticisms arise about the decisions made during the pandemic. Birx's comments signal a growing divide and accountability among health leaders. This issue remains significant as it probes the interplay of public health decisions and political motivations during a health crisis.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/08/dr-birx-does-damage-control-throws-fauci-under/
Foreign Company With China Ties Is Behind Noncitizen Voter Registration Errors Across America
There has been a significant problem in New Jersey involving the registration of 6,600 noncitizens to vote, which has been attributed to software errors from a French biometrics company connected to investments in China.
1. Software Vendor: IDEMIA, a French company owned by Advent International, was responsible for the software handling voter registration data.
2. Error Description: New Jersey Governor Mikie Sherrill stated that a serious software error allowed noncitizens to register despite indicating they were not citizens.
3. Company Background: IDEMIA specializes in biometric systems and has numerous federal contracts, including those with the TSA and Department of Defense. They have partnered with New Jersey's Motor Vehicle Commission for over 40 years.
4. Advent International: The controlling private-equity firm, Advent, has invested over $1.8 billion in Greater China and has connections to local investors, including ties to the family of former Chinese president Jiang Zemin.
5. Future Changes: Advent plans to sell IDEMIA to Amadeus, a Spanish company, for €1.2 billion, which will include its biometric operations.
The situation highlights issues regarding the integrity of voter registrations and the complex international ties behind the software managing these systems, raising concerns about accountability in electoral processes.
Is Trump’s Flat Voter Favorability In August Bad News For GOP’s Midterm Hopes?
In August 2026, new I&I/TIPP polling revealed that President Donald Trump's voter favorability remained largely unchanged, raising questions about the potential impact on the Republican Party's midterm election prospects.
1. Favorability Ratings:
In August, 39% of voters viewed Trump favorably, while 52% viewed him unfavorably, with a slim 5% not familiar enough to form an opinion.
This contrasts slightly with July’s figures, where 40% were favorable and 52% unfavorable. The numbers showed a small increase from June, where only 37% had a favorable opinion.
2. Voter Demographics:
Among Republican voters, Trump's favorability was robust at 75% favorable versus 19% unfavorable.
Democratic views were starkly opposed, with only 13% favorable and 81% unfavorable. Independent voters were more critical as well, showing 28% favorable compared to 61% unfavorable.
3. Job Approval Ratings:
Overall, 38% of voters approved of Trump's presidency, with 52% disapproving. This shows a marginal improvement compared to July's 38% approval and 54% disapproval.
Approval among Republicans dipped slightly from 75% to 73%, but rose among Democrats from 9% to 12% and among independents from 27% to 29%.
4. Leadership Evaluation:
When evaluating Trump's leadership, 38% described it as “very strong” (21%) or “strong” (17%), while 44% deemed it “very weak” (33%) or “weak” (11%).
Democratic voters were overwhelmingly critical, with only 15% rating his leadership as strong.
5. Overall Leadership Index:
Trump's Leadership Index score for August was 43.6, indicating below-neutral performance. Republicans rated his score at 77.9, while Democrats rated it at just 16.0.
6. Performance Grades:
A third of voters assigned Trump A or B grades for his overall performance in August, which was consistent with July but lower than earlier months.
Strong scores came from Republicans at 65% but were only 13% from Democrats and climbed to 26% among independents.
7. Policy Strengths and Weaknesses:
Trump's highest ratings came for “Handling immigration and border security” (40%) and “Restoring America’s core values” (35%).
His lowest scores were in economic management, particularly “Handling inflation and the cost of living” (27%) and “Handling the economy” (30%).
While Trump's favorability ratings have held steady amidst international tensions and domestic issues, the slight changes in voter perceptions suggest challenges for the Republican Party heading into the midterm elections. The polling indicates that Trump's leadership may not reflect a strong consensus among the general electorate. As significant issues like high inflation and international conflicts remain in focus, voter sentiment may prove crucial for the party's future. The upcoming elections will be a critical test of whether Trump's base can successfully mobilize enough support to maintain congressional control.
A Romp through the Fauci Diaries: Fame Turns to Shame
Senator Rand Paul released Anthony Fauci's diaries from the Covid years. These diaries, spanning over 1,100 pages, provide an inside look at the decisions Fauci made during the pandemic and the political maneuvering involved. The text serves both as a reflection on Fauci's journey and an indictment of the broader societal impacts of government, media, and scientific responses to the pandemic.
1. Nature of the Diaries: The diaries are not purely private reflections but rather a glimpse into Fauci's motivations and struggles during the pandemic. They reveal a candid portrayal of events and decisions that shaped public health policy.
2. Fauci's Vanity and Candid Insights: While the diaries contain self-aggrandizing accounts, they also expose the detrimental effects of lockdowns and health policies on individuals and society, particularly affecting children.
3. Political Theater Over Science: The author argues that many decisions made by Fauci were more about political messaging than scientific evidence. His records show a tendency to prioritize public image over objective scientific findings.
4. Chaos in Vaccine Rollout: The diaries detail significant disarray during the vaccine rollout, illustrating that the formulas could not keep up with emerging virus mutations. This chaos contributed to public skepticism regarding the efficacy of the vaccines.
5. Fauci’s Obsession with Fame: Throughout the diaries, Fauci expresses a deep concern for maintaining his social standing and public image, often distractingly focusing on being admired and invited to prominent events.
6. Disconnection from Consequences: The diaries do not overtly acknowledge the public suffering resulting from decisions made during the pandemic, creating a disconnect between Fauci’s experiences and the reality faced by the American population.
7. Pivotal Moments of Realization: Various entries in the diaries reflect pivotal moments when Fauci appears to realize the implications of his decisions, particularly in relation to public trust and the consequences of the lockdowns.
8. Political Relationships: Fauci's interactions with key political figures, including Trump and members of the CDC, highlight tensions and alignments that influenced Covid policies. His reflections show a blend of loyalty and subversion.
9. Shift in Messaging: Throughout the pandemic, Fauci and the CDC adapted recommendations to align with the evolving understanding of the virus, revealing confusion and inconsistency which affected public perception.
10. Calls for Accountability: The release of the diaries sparks a conversation about accountability in public health, suggesting a need for transparency regarding the decisions made during the pandemic and their long-lasting effects.
The Fauci diaries, while composed of often self-serving reflections, open a window into the political and societal upheaval during the Covid pandemic. They illustrate a journey filled with ambition and delusion while exposing the systemic issues in handling public health crises. This document may serve as a crucial resource for understanding the past and ensuring accountability moving forward. Readers are encouraged to engage with the content deeply, reflecting on their own pandemic experiences in light of Fauci's accounts.
https://brownstone.org/articles/a-romp-through-the-fauci-diaries-fame-turns-to-shame/
The Election Questions Democrats Won’t Answer
On July 16, President Trump delivered a speech addressing concerns about noncitizens influencing American elections. Following his speech, New Jersey Governor Mikie Sherrill revealed that over 6,600 noncitizens were registered to vote in the state, with 400 having voted in past elections.
Trump’s claims about noncitizen voter fraud were dismissed by Democrats as false.However, evidence from New Jersey suggests otherwise, as many noncitizens were found on voter rolls.
DHS Secretary Markwayne Mullin stated there might be up to 19,500 noncitizens registered in New Jersey.
Gov.Sherrill announced an investigation but has not allowed the Department of Justice to review voter rolls.
Despite finding noncitizens who cast votes, Gov.Sherrill said there is no evidence that these votes affected election outcomes, which critics dispute given close election margins in recent years.
Other states, including Wisconsin and Nevada, have faced election-related issues, such as ballot errors and discrepancies in voter lists, raising concerns about election integrity.
Questions arise regarding Democrats' resistance to transparency in elections and measures like voter ID, which could prevent noncitizen voting.
The discourse around noncitizen voting remains contentious. It raises critical questions about election integrity and the rights of American citizens in determining their political future. All candidates should be accountable for their stance on noncitizen voting.
Why Republicans May Defy Midterm History
As the 2026 midterm elections approach, predictions suggest that the Republican Party may not maintain its House majority. Despite historical trends that show the president's party often loses seats, there are several factors that could work in favor of the GOP this year.
Financial Advantage: Republicans currently enjoy a significant fundraising edge, with a reported cash advantage of about half a billion dollars over Democrats.This includes a combined total of $1 billion available from the Republican National Committee and associated groups, while the Democratic National Committee struggles with debt and cash shortages.
Redistricting Benefits: Recent mid-decade redistricting has resulted in a more favorable election map for Republicans, potentially increasing their House seats by 10.The number of competitive swing seats has decreased, making it more challenging for Democrats to reclaim the House.
Strategic Campaign Management: The Republican campaign for the midterms is being led by some of the same political strategists who successfully guided President Trump's 2024 campaign.Their experience may prove crucial in navigating the electoral landscape.
Outside Financial Support: Influential endorsers, like Elon Musk, are also contributing significantly to Republican efforts, with plans to spend up to $120 million on campaigning, focusing on grassroots initiatives to mobilize voters who typically do not participate in non-presidential election years.
Democratic Challenges: The Democratic Party faces substantial operational challenges, including financial disarray and the requirement to win a large percentage of swing seats to regain control of the House.Their current campaign strategies have been hampered by funding limitations and logistical inefficiencies.
While historical patterns suggest that Republicans might face difficulties in midterm elections, the combination of financial advantages, strategic management, and favorable redistricting creates a scenario where the GOP could potentially defy these odds. The upcoming elections will test the abilities of both parties to leverage their respective strengths and address their weaknesses.
https://spectator.org/why-republicans-may-defy-midterm-history/
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)