China Is Building AI Models of American Voters. Why?

 Chinese institutions are developing complex models to understand American voters. These models analyze who voters are, what they believe, and how they may respond to various political messages. By scrutinizing Chinese research and projects, it is clear that these efforts go beyond just polling and involve sophisticated simulations of the U.S. electorate.

1. Development of Voter Models:

Fudan University collected a vast amount of social media data (over 171 million posts) to create a simulated voter pool.

These simulations assign political and demographic labels, simulating presidential election results in various states. The latest model reportedly predicted outcomes of 47 out of 51 state contests accurately.

2. Political Message Testing:

Research teams created synthetic voters to test political messages within key swing states. They developed profiles using demographic information and ran experiments to gauge reactions to specific political proposals, such as income tax changes.

3. Modeling Support for Trump:

Research at Shanghai Jiao Tong University aimed to understand the characteristics of Trump supporters. This study highlighted the significance of identity anxieties as strong predictors of support for Trump, linking findings to potential implications for China's U.S. policy.

4. Expanded Research Methods:

Other Chinese universities are adopting similar methodologies. For instance, Wuhan University converted survey responses into AI personas to predict electoral outcomes and simulate voting behaviors for the upcoming elections.

5. Political Warfare Implications:

Documents from Chinese tech companies indicate that the development of these models is part of a broader strategy for cognitive warfare, aiming to enhance understanding of American public opinion and political behavior.

Chinese institutions are not just monitoring American voter sentiment; they are actively creating detailed models to anticipate and influence U.S. electoral outcomes. With applications ranging from academic research to potential cognitive warfare tactics, understanding these developments raises critical questions about their impact on U.S.-China relations and future electoral politics. The investigation into these activities reveals an urgent need for awareness of how such sophisticated approaches to voter modeling are employed.

https://nataliegwinters.substack.com/p/exclusive-china-is-building-ai-models?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=3382126&post_id=211379415&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=6dl2nb&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email

Dr. Fauci’s Deception Was Always in Plain Sight

 In March 2020, during the early stages of the Covid pandemic, Sharyl Attkisson observed significant discrepancies in the information provided by Dr. Anthony Fauci. While he warned the public that Covid was much deadlier than the flu, he also published a scientific article suggesting a different conclusion. This led to questions about the reliability of information from health authorities and media coverage during the pandemic.

1. Contradictory Statements: Fauci claimed in public that Covid was “ten times deadlier than the flu.” However, in his published work in a scientific journal, he mentioned that Covid could be comparable to a severe flu season, suggesting a much lower mortality rate.

2. Lack of Oversight: Attkisson questioned why the scientific community and media did not notice and address these contradictions, while she, as a non-expert, did.

3. Attempts to Engage: Attkisson approached Fauci for clarification through email but received an automated response. She also contacted the New England Journal of Medicine for further understanding about Fauci's conclusions, but her inquiries were largely ignored.

4. Media Challenges: During her investigation, the New York Times published a report that Attkisson views as defamatory. After she pointed out factual inaccuracies and hired a lawyer, the Times eventually issued corrections, acknowledging mistakes related to her reporting.

5. Public Communication: Attkisson highlighted how Fauci provided more alarming death rates in public statements compared to his scholarly writings. This inconsistency raised concerns about the reliability of public health messaging and the implications of drastic variations in mortality rates.

6. Mathematics of Mortality Rate: Accurate calculation of Covid mortality rates is crucial. Attkisson noted that while officials often reported death rates based on confirmed cases, a more accurate figure should consider the wider population, including asymptomatic individuals.

7. Evolving Understanding of Covid-19: Scientists, including Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, argued that many estimates of Covid mortality could be inflated and that a better understanding of the virus’s true impact would emerge from thorough studies.

8. Future Research: Bhattacharya and colleagues aimed to conduct comprehensive studies to better estimate the fatality rate and understand how many people might have developed immunity without knowing they were infected.

Sharyl Attkisson's observations about Dr. Fauci's mixed messages in the early days of Covid-19 reveal a complex interaction between scientific communication, media reporting, and public understanding. The discrepancies in mortality rates between public statements and scholarly articles, along with challenges in accurately reporting on Covid, underscored the difficulties in managing the pandemic narrative. Further research into infection rates and fatality will be essential for refining our understanding and response to future public health crises.

https://sharylattkisson.substack.com/p/dr-faucis-deception-was-always-in?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=2579146&post_id=212091484&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=6dl2nb&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email

Top Fauci adviser’s plea deal provides possible roadmap for further conspiracy prosecutions

 Recently, Dr. Anthony Fauci's former senior adviser, Dr. David Morens, accepted a plea deal related to a scheme aimed at evading public records laws. The case revolves around efforts to conceal communications concerning coronavirus research grants. This plea could impact others involved in the conspiracy.

1. Plea Deal Details: Morens pleaded guilty to conspiracy, admitting to colluding with others to hide agency records pertaining to a National Institutes of Health (NIH) grant that funded coronavirus research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China.

2. Significance of the Grant: The grant, canceled by the NIH after the COVID-19 pandemic began, has been scrutinized due to allegations suggesting that the lab may have been the source of the virus. This raised concerns as President Trump highlighted his awareness of the grant in April 2020.

3. Identity of "Company 1": Although not named in the plea, "Company 1" is identified as EcoHealth Alliance, an organization involved in controversial research at the Wuhan lab, headed by Peter Daszak. Morens' actions led him to evade Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests about this research.

4. Conspiracy Implications: The plea agreement suggests that Daszak could also face legal troubles, as Morens called him "Co-Conspirator 1" without revealing his name. It details how Morens and his co-conspirators used personal emails to manage communications that should have been publicly accessible.

5. Concealment of Records: Morens and his co-conspirators made efforts to keep records concealed from FOIA requests and communicated illicitly regarding the information on EcoHealth's grants.

6. Gifts and Rewards: There were reports of gifts being exchanged, including wine from Daszak to Morens, as a token of appreciation for Morens' actions favoring EcoHealth.

7. Scientific Commentary: As part of Morens' involvement, he authored a scientific opinion suggesting that COVID-19 emerged from natural sources rather than a laboratory, which was intended to benefit EcoHealth and Daszak.

8. Federal Actions Against EcoHealth: In 2024, the Department of Health and Human Services suspended funding to EcoHealth Alliance and disbarred it from federal grants for repeated violations of grant terms. Earlier, the NIH had notified EcoHealth of non-compliance with agreement conditions.

The plea deal by Dr. Morens sheds light on a broader conspiracy involving attempts to obscure vital records related to COVID-19 research funding. As the situation unfolds, other individuals, including Peter Daszak, may face legal consequences stemming from this conspiracy to evade transparency under FOIA laws. The ramifications of these events continue to evolve as investigations persist into the origins of the pandemic and the role of involved parties. 

https://justthenews.com/index%2ephp/government/courts-law/top-fauci-advisors-plea-deal-provides-possible-roadmap-further-conspiracy

Woke 2.0 and the False Promise of Socialist Division

 American politics is undergoing significant changes, with a shift from an era characterized by Woke 1.0 to a more confrontational Woke 2.0. While both movements aim to redefine individual agency, they do so with different tactics and ideologies that threaten traditional American values and the notion of personal accountability.

1. Transition from Woke 1.0 to Woke 2.0:

Woke 1.0 focused on language control and institutional compliance, peaking around 2024.

Woke 2.0 is described as more aggressive, advocating anti-capitalist politics and street-level disruptions, moving away from corporate allyship towards open confrontation.

2. Core Beliefs of Both Movements:

Both phases undermine the idea of individual agency by promoting the belief that one’s fate is determined by external societal forces, fostering a victim mentality and dependency on state solutions.

3. Threat to American Values:

The prevailing culture of grievance threatens the American principle that hard work and individual character determine success. Reclaiming belief in personal initiative is essential for restoring faith in the American Dream.

4. The Democratic Socialists of America (DSA):

The DSA capitalizes on cultural grievances to advance a radical agenda, advocating for a new constitution, the abolition of the Senate and Electoral College, and increased state control over industries. They frame capitalism as responsible for societal issues, moving towards an agenda that includes aggressive government intervention.

5. Class Warfare and Economic Misconceptions:

The DSA promotes class warfare, diminishing the role of free enterprise and encouraging dependency on governmental control. This perspective misunderstands wealth creation, suggesting it is a finite resource rather than something generated through innovation and entrepreneurship.

6. Migration of Political Ideals:

A shift in the political center over decades has normalized extreme ideas that were previously fringe, including the nationalization of industries. Historical politicians like John F. Kennedy are seen as now too centrist for today’s political landscape.

7. Lessons from History:

History consistently shows that state control leads to the decay of individual freedoms and economic ruin, as seen in examples like Eastern Europe and Venezuela.

8. American Success Stories:

Many individuals have risen from challenging backgrounds through hard work and resilience, contradicting the narratives of systemic barriers. Examples include Clarence Thomas, Oprah Winfrey, Tope Awotona, and others who achieved success through self-reliance and determination.

9. Call for Unity and Responsibility:

The path forward requires unity and a focus on personal skills and accountability rather than division based on class or identity. Citizens are encouraged to reclaim the American Dream through personal responsibility and practical solutions, fostering an environment where capitalism thrives.

America's principles of liberty and personal initiative are under threat from radical ideologies that foster victimhood and dependency. It is crucial to defend free-market capitalism, reject collectivism, and recommit to individual responsibility and hard work. Citizens must engage actively in the political process and promote a vision of unity and self-reliance to ensure the survival of the American Dream for future generations.

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2026/08/21/woke_20_and_the_false_promise_of_socialist_division_154432.html

‘Democratic Party’ and ‘DSA’ Are Now Officially Synonymous

 The Democratic Party in the U.S. has increasingly aligned itself with the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA), suggesting that the two are becoming synonymous. The article examines the leftward shift of the Democratic Party and highlights key policies that illustrate this change.

1. Word Variety and Political Labels:

The author expresses appreciation for the acronym “GOP” for the Republican Party and points out that “DSA” has become a fitting abbreviation for the Democratic Party due to its radical left direction.

2. Moderate Democrats' Shift:

The 2020 presidential primaries revealed that even candidates labeled as “moderate” held views significantly to the left, proposing policies that were more progressive than those of past Democratic candidates.

3. Key Progressive Issues:

Two pivotal issues are identified as representative of the DSA's influence on the Democratic Party:

Medicare for All: There appears to be a supposed divide within the Democratic Party over universal healthcare, yet many Democrats, including leaders, support this agenda, indicating strong alignment with socialist ideals.

Billionaire Tax: The proposed “billionaire tax” is another major topic, with broad support among Democrats for raising taxes on the wealthy. Divisions over this issue appear to be more about tactics among labor unions rather than fundamental disagreements.

4. Contradictions Within Leadership:

The article critiques House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, who publicly opposes certain aspects of the DSA agenda while still supporting fundamental progressive policies that align closely with socialist principles. The leadership's stances often seem contradictory as many still back universal healthcare.

5. Support for Wealth Tax:

Calls for a wealth tax are common among leftist Democrats, with different versions of the tax being proposed, indicating that the party is increasingly embracing these principles rather than opposing them.

6. Diverse Support for Progressive Measures:

Among various Democratic proposals related to wealth taxes, there is considerable internal support, suggesting that the divide is less about the acceptance of these ideas and more about specific implementation strategies.

The author concludes that the Democratic Party has effectively become synonymous with the DSA. The systemic adoption of socialist policies suggests a long-term shift in the American political landscape, positioning the Democratic Party more on the far left than it has been historically. The article argues that this evolution reflects a broader acceptance of radical ideas within mainstream Democratic politics, underscoring the diminished distinction between the Democratic Party and the ideology promoted by the DSA. 

https://issuesinsights.com/2026/08/21/hurrah-commentators-finally-have-a-word-variety-counterpart-to-gop-dsa/

The coming irrelevance of the Strait of Hormuz: The end of the British Economic Choke Point

 A significant transformation is occurring in the geopolitical landscape of the Middle East, particularly regarding the Strait of Hormuz. This change involves a decrease in its strategic importance, increased economic isolation for Iran, and a move away from British dominance over international naval trade.

1. Diminished Significance of the Strait: U.S. officials, including Treasury Secretary Scott Bessant, state that the Strait of Hormuz is losing its status as a crucial geopolitical chokepoint. This shift indicates a move towards economic isolation for Iran.

2. Trump's Economic Warfare: President Donald Trump announced measures to impose severe economic sanctions on Iran, warning that countries supporting Iran could face significant consequences. He described these actions as an unprecedented economic blockade that would prevent goods from entering or leaving Iranian ports.

3. Strategy of Isolation: The strategy to isolate Iran focuses on cutting off its financial networks, including its use of cryptocurrencies, to limit funding for its regional proxies. This approach intends to weaken Iran's capabilities without engaging in direct military conflict.

4. New Energy Dynamics: Alternative oil production and transport routes are being developed, alongside increased extraction by Gulf states and U.S. collaboration with Venezuelan oil production. This reflects a push to secure energy supplies outside the Strait of Hormuz, thus reducing its relevance.

5. Iran's Loss of Control: Reports indicate that Iran has lost significant control over the Strait, with most oil transits now occurring via alternative routes. The United Arab Emirates (UAE) has halted commercial activities with Iran, severing vital economic ties and contributing to Iran's isolation.

6. End of British Colonial Influence: The current geopolitical shift signals the decline of British imperial dominance over global naval chokepoints, traditionally centered around the Strait of Hormuz. The U.S. is positioning itself to take a leading role in global energy security.

7. Regional Cooperation: Middle Eastern nations are exploring collaborative relationships with the U.S., moving away from dependency on Iran. This signals a potential for a more economically stable and conflict-free region.

The transformation surrounding the Strait of Hormuz represents a significant shift in geopolitical power dynamics in the Middle East. As Iran's influence wanes and new energy strategies emerge, the Strait is becoming less of a focal point for global trade and conflict. Overall, this evolution suggests a period of enhanced cooperation among sovereign nations, with the potential for greater economic growth in the region under U.S. leadership. 

https://hannenabintuherland.com/usa/the-coming-irrelevancy-of-the-strait-of-hormuz-the-end-of-the-british-choke-point/

The Deception of Polls – Real and Fake

 As Election Day approaches, the world of polling has come under scrutiny for inaccuracies and deceptive practices. Recent incidents have revealed how easily polls can be manipulated, raising concerns about their reliability and the impact they have on public perception and electoral outcomes.

1. Fabricated Polls and Social Experiments:

Median Strategies admitted its polls in Wisconsin and Los Angeles were completely fabricated, claiming it was a "social experiment" to explore how misinformation spreads in political discourse. This highlights the lack of accountability in polling practices and the ease with which false information can circulate.

2. Manipulation by Polling Firms:

The Public Sentiment Institute (TPSI) overstated support for Florida gubernatorial candidate James Fishback by altering the responses of participants to reflect a higher support level. This manipulation raises ethical concerns about transparency in polling, especially when the polls are funded by the candidates themselves.

3. Impact of Fake and Misleading Polls:

Misleading or fabricated polls can significantly influence public perception. They can create a "bandwagon effect" where voters may back a candidate simply because they appear to be leading in a poll, regardless of actual voter intention. This distortion can also shape media narratives, potentially unjustly boosting a candidate's ability to fundraise and gain momentum.

4. Polling Accuracy Challenges:

In Wisconsin, polling was widely inaccurate partly due to sample demographics and methodology. Polls may struggle if they over-represent certain age groups, as seen when younger voters skewed results. There’s also the issue of late changes in voter preference that can happen after final polls are released, leading to misleading conclusions.

5. Language and Questioning Bias:

The way survey questions are worded can greatly affect the outcomes. Polling firms do not always adhere to consistent or objective questioning standards. For example, different phrasings regarding a candidate's approval can lead to vastly different approval ratings, making it crucial to interpret results with caution.

6. Importance of Sample Selection:

The accuracy of polls also depends heavily on the sample size and how respondents are chosen. Polls based on registered or likely voters tend to provide more reliable data than those sampling the general population. Reliable polling should aim for a minimum sample of at least 1,000 likely respondents to reduce error margins.

The landscape of political polling is fraught with challenges, including potential manipulation and a lack of transparency. As the election draws near, it is essential for the public to critically evaluate poll results and understand the underlying factors that can influence their accuracy and interpretation. An informed electorate can better navigate the complexities of political information and make decisions based on credible data rather than misleading narratives. 

https://www.libertynation.com/the-deception-of-polls-real-and-fake/