Singham colludes with CCP to rewrite history of WWII to advance Xi Jinping’s ‘new world order’

 Neville Roy Singham, a wealthy businessman known for his pro-CCP activism, is accused of working with the Chinese Communist Party to alter perceptions of World War II. His efforts aim to undermine the traditional narrative that credits the Allied forces, particularly the United States and the United Kingdom, with defeating fascism. Singham argues for a "restorationist" view of history that supports Xi Jinping's vision for a new global order.

1. Singham's Background and Goals:

• Neville Roy Singham leads a network that funds far-left activist groups both in the U. S. and abroad.

• He has publicly criticized the Western narrative of WWII, calling it a "lie" created to support American dominance in global politics.

• Singham claims that the actual victory over fascism was achieved through "socialist leadership" and the sacrifices of the Soviet and Chinese people.

2. Revisionist Historical Claims:

• Singham’s report asserts that the Allied contributions to WWII were overstated while minimizing Soviet and Chinese efforts.

• He denies the moral differences between prominent figures like Adolf Hitler and Winston Churchill, arguing that both led actions with genocidal implications.

3. Stalin and the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact:

• Singham attempts to excuse Stalin’s non-aggression pact with Hitler, framing it as a necessary strategy rather than complicity in Nazi aggression.

• He simplifies the complexities of Soviet actions during the war, suggesting that their actions were purely defensive.

4. Disputed Contributions of the Chinese Communists:

• Singham inflates the role of Mao Zedong and the CCP in resisting Japanese forces, despite evidence that the Nationalist forces led by Chiang Kai-shek bore the brunt of the fight.

• Various historical analyses argue that the CCP was largely inactive during major battles against Japan, focusing instead on consolidating their power.

5. Misrepresentations of Allied Strategies:

• Seeking to portray the Western Allies negatively, Singham distorts the motivations behind actions like the Munich Agreement and the use of atomic bombs.

• He frames Churchill's policies and decisions as collusion with fascism rather than strategic military actions aimed at defeating Nazi aggression.

6. Historical Context and Critique:

• Singham's alignment with the CCP and his radical views have drawn scrutiny and calls for investigation from various political groups in the U. S.

• The portrayal of historical events as unfavorable for Allied powers is seen as a strategic move in favor of a narrative that supports the CCP’s goals of global influence.

Neville Roy Singham's partnership with the Chinese Communist Party to modify the historical understanding of WWII poses a significant challenge to traditional narratives. His attempts to frame the Allies as largely responsible for fascism's rise, while portraying communist figures as heroes, aim to support Xi Jinping’s ambitions for a revised global power structure. These claims have met with considerable backlash from historians and political analysts who view them as unfounded and dangerous distortions of history.

https://justthenews.com/government/security/singham-colludes-ccp-undercut-us-victory-wwii-advance-xi-jinpings-new-world

News roundup:

 Iran forbids its sports teams from traveling to ‘hostile’ countries

Judge temporairly blocks Pentagon’s ‘supply chain risk’ designation for Anthropic

Trump says he’ll sign order directing DHS to pay TSA workers as shutdown drags on

Pentagon weighs sending 10,000 more combat troops to the Middle East

Energy execs say they’re trying to address anger over rising electric bills

Trump extends deadline for Iran negotiations

Experts Warn of Growing Stockpile Vulnerability Among U.S. Allies, Despite over 90% Iranian Missiles Intercepted

The Oscars Are Leaving Hollywood

Researchers Discover ‘Cocaine Sharks’ in the Bahamas

Cartel Gunmen Kidnap Eight Workers Along Mexican Border State Highway

Climate executive warns California ‘functionally bankrupt,’ $1T shortfall could shake nation

Bars could stay open until near dawn in key state for America 250 as ‘noise’ warnings surface

Treasury to place Trump’s signature on paper currency to mark nation’s 250th anniversary

Threat from Chinese hackers moved FCC to ban all foreign internet routers

Singham colludes with CCP to rewrite history of WWII to advance Xi Jinping’s ‘new world order’

Appeals court rules illegal immigrants can be detained without bond

Justice Department opens investigations into three medical schools over alleged race-based admission

California moves to scrap Cesar Chavez Day after horrific rape allegations

The Education Department is poised to lose its longtime HQ

After a year of Trump’s Washington, private sector prepares for some Democratic power

Senate Strikes Overnight Deal To Pay TSA Agents In Bid To End Airport Chaos

Iran Sparks International Outrage, Turns 12-Year-Olds into Expendable Tools Of War

Russia Bombs Iconic Centuries-Old Christian Landmark

European Leaders Now Know Trump Was Right: Iran Was an Imminent Global Threat

 On March 20, 2026, Iran launched two missiles at the U. K.-U. S. military base on Diego Garcia, highlighting the serious threat posed by Iran’s missile capabilities. This event forced European leaders to reconsider earlier assumptions about Iran's military ambitions, particularly concerning their missile range and nuclear weapons program.

• Missile Attack on Diego Garcia: Iran attempted to attack the remote military base, which is over 4,000 kilometers from Iran. The failure of this strike, along with one missile being intercepted, exposed lies from Iran about their missile ranges.

• Misleading Claims by Iran: Former Iranian leader Ali Khamenei had repeatedly claimed that Iran's missiles could only reach targets within 2,000 kilometers. The strike on Diego Garcia underscored that Iran was developing far-reaching missiles capable of threatening cities in Europe.

• Shift in European Perspectives: The missile attack forced Western European leaders to confront the reality that Iran not only lied about missile capabilities but also about its nuclear ambitions. This supported former President Trump’s assertion that Iran posed an imminent global threat.

• Past Denials in Europe: For many years, European leaders dismissed evidence of advancements in Iran’s missile technology, erroneously believing Khamenei's claims and the narratives surrounding the 2015 nuclear deal (JCPOA) led by President Obama.

• Evidence of Deception: Investigations and the Iran Nuclear Archive, showing Iran's continued efforts in nuclear weapons development post-2003, exposed the regime's dishonesty. Iran faced censure for failing to cooperate with nuclear inspections.

• Current Concerns: Recent missile attacks by Iran across the Middle East suggest that they have positioned missiles capable of reaching Europe, exacerbating fears among European capitals about inadequate defenses against such threats.

The events surrounding Iran's missile attack have shifted the understanding of threat assessments in Western Europe. European leaders are now recognizing the validity of past warnings regarding Iran’s military capabilities. There is a growing urgency for them to unite with the United States and Israel to actively counter the dangers posed by the Iranian regime and to take measures that empower the Iranian people towards reclaiming their nation.

https://amgreatness.com/2026/03/27/european-leaders-now-know-trump-was-right-iran-was-an-imminent-global-threat/

Yet Another Reason Why Wind And Solar Electricity Generation Will Never Work To Run An Economy

 The challenges of relying on wind and solar power for electricity generation, particularly focusing on issues of intermittency and synchronization necessary for maintaining a stable electrical grid.

1. Transition to Renewable Energy: There is a broad societal push to move away from fossil fuels towards clean energy sources like wind and solar, which are seen as morally superior and cost-effective. Reports indicate that electricity from these sources is now cheaper than that from fossil fuels.

2. Intermittency Problem: A significant challenge with wind and solar power is their intermittency, meaning they do not produce energy consistently. This requires backup generation or extensive energy storage systems (like batteries), which can significantly increase the cost of electricity.

3. Synchronization and Inertia: Another major issue with transitioning to wind and solar power is the need for synchronization in the power grid. Traditional power plants maintain a stable frequency (50 Hz in Europe, 60 Hz in the U. S.) through heavy rotating components that resist changes in frequency. This inertia is crucial for preventing blackouts.

4. Difference in Power Generation: Conventional power stations (fossil fuel, nuclear, hydro) create alternating current (AC) directly. In contrast, wind and solar generators produce direct current (DC) that is converted to AC via inverters, which cannot maintain frequency stability on their own.

5. Limitations of Inverters: Current inverters are "grid following" and cannot generate the necessary power waveforms. There are ongoing efforts to develop "grid forming inverters" that could solidify this function, but they are not yet operational and face significant technical challenges.

6. International Examples: The situation in Scotland reflects these challenges. While they have adopted extensive wind generation, they rely on just two conventional power plants for grid stability. Plans to close these plants pose risks of blackouts. A similar situation occurred in Spain in April 2025 when a lack of inertia led to widespread blackouts due to voltage control issues.

The move towards wind and solar power presents significant technical hurdles related to grid stability and cost. Understanding these complexities is crucial to developing reliable energy strategies that can effectively replace conventional power sources while maintaining a stable electrical grid. The discussion encourages further exploration of the issues raised, particularly through presentations like Kathryn Porter’s on Scotland’s energy crisis.

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2026/03/26/yet-another-reason-why-wind-and-solar-electricity-generation-will-never-work-to-run-an-economy/

Atlanta, TSA, and a Test Case for Interventionist Non-Intervention

 After attending the 2026 Austrian Economics Research Conference, the author faced an extensive wait due to a partial government shutdown affecting TSA operations at the Atlanta airport. This experience, lasting over five hours, reveals the implications of government intervention in service provision, particularly through the lens of Austrian economics.

1. The Airport Experience:

• The author and fellow travelers experienced long wait times due to a shortage of TSA staff caused by a federal funding disruption. While many missed flights and faced significant delays, the atmosphere among travelers was surprisingly civil, fostering a sense of camaraderie.

2. Root Causes:

• The staffing issues stemmed from many TSA workers calling out due to working without pay amidst the partial government shutdown. Reports indicate that a significant percentage of TSA agents were absent, leading to longer security lines.

3. Atlanta's Unique Challenges:

• The Atlanta airport, being one of the busiest worldwide and a central hub for Delta Air Lines, faced compounded delays due to high passenger volume, especially during peak travel times. Coordination issues and reduced staffing magnified the impact of large passenger surges.

4. Interventionist Non-Intervention Concept:

• This theory suggests that government interventions create inefficiencies even in scenarios where they appear to do nothing. Through coercive taxation and service monopolization, the government can fail to deliver promised services, leading to systemic issues like those experienced at TSA.

5. Economic Analysis:

• In a free market, inefficiencies like those seen with TSA would likely not occur. The profit motive in private enterprise encourages efficient service; hence, a market-based system would provide better responsiveness and adaptability.

• The fundamental disconnect between service payment and delivery in government services can lead to systemic inefficiencies, increasing wait times and operational issues.

6. TSA as a Case Study:

• The TSA serves as an example of a government monopoly devoid of competition. In contrast to private businesses, which must remain accountable to customer demands, government services often lack immediate consequences for poor performance, leading to complacency.

7. Partial Non-Delivery of Services:

• While TSA did eventually provide service, the delays experienced mean that they effectively failed to meet passenger needs promptly. This situation contrasts starkly with how private services would operate, where service failure results in immediate market consequences.

8. Political and Economic Implications:

• The lack of competition and accountability in government services means inefficiency becomes a norm. Suggestions for reform often involve private management of such services, as government monopoly on essential services may hinder effectiveness.

The author's experience at the Atlanta airport highlights how government monopolies like TSA can lead to service failures due to a lack of accountability and efficiency. The concept of interventionist non-intervention illustrates that bureaucratic structures can inadvertently create widespread inadequacies in public service delivery. Addressing these inefficiencies could involve re-evaluating government control over such essential services, allowing for competition and responsiveness typical of private markets.

https://mises.org/mises-wire/atlanta-tsa-and-test-case-interventionist-non-intervention

More Is Revealed As Pakistani FM Blows Up that Iranian/Liberal Media Narrative About 'Talks' With US

Recent discussions between Iran and the United States have raised questions, especially following Iranian denials of their existence while simultaneously confirming indirect talks.

• Iran's Foreign Minister, Abbas Araghchi, denied direct talks with the U. S., although messages are being relayed through Pakistan, implying negotiations are occurring.

• Former CIA Director John Brennan expressed trust in Iran over Trump, highlighting media speculation about peace talks.

• The U. S. has communicated 15 points for discussion to Iran, while countries like Turkiye and Egypt support these initiatives.

• Trump acknowledged that negotiations are happening, emphasizing Iran's fear of internal consequences from their people for pursuing a deal.

• Notable figures in these negotiations include Araghchi and Parliament Speaker Mohammad Ghalibaf, both of whom have been temporarily spared from potential threats due to their involvement in discussions.

While Iran denies direct negotiations with the U. S., indirect talks through mediators indicate ongoing diplomatic efforts, emphasizing the need for dialogue and stability in the Middle East. 

https://redstate.com/nick-arama/2026/03/26/now-pakistan-fm-blows-up-that-iranian-and-liberal-media-narrative-about-talks-n2200660

Iran Earning $139 Million a Day From Oil as Hormuz Crisis Locks Out Rivals

Trends in the market, and developments related to oil supply and geopolitical influences. The data reflects recent fluctuations in oil prices and key events impacting global oil production and export.

1. Current Oil Prices: As of the latest updates, various oil prices are as follows:

• WTI Crude: $96.00 (+1.61%)

• Brent Crude: $109.80 (+1.64%)

• Murban Crude: $116.00 (+3.73%)

• Natural Gas: $3.068 (+2.30%)

• Heating Oil: $4.316 (+0.99%)

• Gasoline: $3.165 (+1.10%)

2. Ongoing Geopolitical Tensions:

• Iran is capitalizing on the ongoing crisis by exporting oil that remains unaffected by blockades. Despite the conflict, Iran's daily oil revenue is estimated at $139 million, which reflects an increase from previous averages.

• U. S. waivers on Iranian oil sales are having an impact, driving the price of Iranian crude closer to Brent prices, which previously offered significant discounts.

3. Market Reactions:

• There are signs that the escalation of conflict in the Middle East, including drone strikes and war activities, is affecting global oil supply chains.

• Other nations, including Iraq, are feeling economic impacts due to interruptions in oil exports through crucial routes like the Strait of Hormuz.

4. Supply and Demand Dynamics:

• There is a noted resilience in Iranian oil exports amidst the geopolitical crisis, with Iran benefiting from elevated global crude prices that have risen above $100 per barrel.

• Analysts predict significant reductions in supply if conflicts continue, with forecasts indicating that prolonged disruptions could eliminate 14 million barrels per day from global supply.

5. Regional Developments:

• In Australia, cyclones have caused outages in significant LNG projects, exacerbating supply issues.

• Japan is shifting some energy policies, possibly moving from LNG reliance to coal, amidst planning for second emergency oil releases.

6. Predictions and Concerns:

• Energy analysts warn of potential job impacts due to unpredictable oil market fluctuations, as markets anticipate further disruptions related to geopolitical events.

7. Prices Affected by Events:

• Despite the crises and conflicts, the broader oil market is fluctuating, with spikes in prices influenced by specific news events, including government strategies to maintain energy security.

8. Future Trends:

• As the situation evolves, it is essential to monitor oil prices closely due to their unpredictability amidst ongoing conflicts. An understanding of the dynamics in the Strait of Hormuz and other critical shipping routes remains crucial.

The current oil market is heavily influenced by geopolitical tensions, particularly concerning Iran and other oil-producing nations. Prices have surged due to supply disruptions, and forecasts indicate that continued conflict could severely impact global oil availability. Stakeholders are advised to remain aware of changes in the oil landscape as these factors will play a critical role in future pricing and supply stability. 

https://oilprice.com/Latest-Energy-News/World-News/Iran-Earning-139-Million-a-Day-From-Oil-as-Hormuz-Crisis-Locks-Out-Rivals.html