Harmeet Dhillon on DOJ Suing Multiple States and DC Over Access to Voter Rolls: “We Have Found at Least 350,000 Dead People Currently On the Voter Rolls”

On April 19, 2026, Harmeet Dhillon, U. S. Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights, discussed the Department of Justice's (DOJ) lawsuit against 29 states and the District of Columbia regarding access to voter rolls. During an interview on "Sunday Morning Futures" with host Maria Bartiromo, Dhillon addressed concerns about election integrity and the findings related to the current state of voter rolls.

1. Voter Roll Lawsuit:

• The DOJ is suing 29 states and D. C. for failing to provide access to voter rolls as mandated by the Civil Rights Act of 1960.

• About one-third of states have complied or reached settlements, while litigation continues with the remaining jurisdictions.

2. Findings on Voter Rolls:

• After reviewing approximately 60 million voter records, the DOJ discovered over 350,000 deceased individuals still listed on the voter rolls.

• Additionally, around 25,000 individuals with no citizenship records have been referred to Homeland Security.

3. Accountability for Election Issues:

• Bartiromo raised concerns about the lack of accountability regarding the Russia Collusion narrative, asking why no one has faced consequences.

• Dhillon explained that thorough investigations take time but stressed the DOJ's commitment under Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche to address these matters.

4. Implications of Election Results:

• When questioned about potential interruptions to investigations if Republicans lose seats in the House, Dhillon affirmed that they will continue their work regardless of election outcomes.

• She emphasized that the DOJ has a duty to ensure public confidence in U. S. elections.

The DOJ under Harmeet Dhillon is actively pursuing access to voter rolls to address election integrity issues, revealing significant discrepancies, including deceased individuals on the rolls. Despite political fluctuations, the DOJ remains committed to its investigations and ensuring the integrity of elections in the United States. 

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/04/harmeet-dhillon-doj-suing-multiple-states-dc-access/

Gabbard’s Declassified Documents Are Just The Tip Of The Iceberg

This summary explores recent developments regarding Trump's impeachments, ongoing political battles, and the implications of declassified documents released by Tulsi Gabbard. It articulates how these documents reflect a larger pattern of political maneuvers involving intelligence agencies and political operatives.

1. Declassified Documents by Tulsi Gabbard:

• Recent releases unveil that the 2019 impeachment of Trump was based on rumors, anonymous tips, and a deliberate narrative orchestrated by intelligence officials and Democrats.

• The allegations against Trump are shown to lack substantial evidence, confirming claims that the impeachment process was flawed and politically motivated.

2. Connection to Past Events:

• The impeachment efforts are presented as a continuation of past struggles against Trump, notably the failed Mueller investigation related to Russian collusion.

• This pattern of attacks, which dates back to incidents such as Benghazi, suggests a coordinated plan involving officials protecting one another through disinformation and legal maneuvering.

3. Implications for Accountability:

• The document releases challenge the media's ability to frame these events as mere conspiracy theories, revealing a deeper connection among multiple political scandals.

• This situation aligns with the characteristics of a criminal enterprise, raising potential legal consequences for those involved, particularly in light of investigations underway in Florida concerning key figures like Comey and Brennan.

4. Cultural and Ideological Dimensions:

• The piece discusses broader ideological battles, particularly involving religious institutions and figures like the Pope, linking these to historical tactics deployed by the KGB to manipulate religious contexts for political aims.

• It highlights how modern challenges from globalist influences affect American institutions and public opinion, emphasizing the need for moral clarity in leadership, particularly in religious contexts.

5. Call to Action:

• The article encourages individuals to take ownership of their democratic responsibilities, emphasizing that participation is crucial to countering external influences and restore trust in institutions.

The release of Gabbard's documents marks a potentially significant turning point in revealing the intricacies of political maneuvers against Trump. Observers are urged to understand that these events are not isolated but part of a sustained effort by various forces to secure power and reshape societal values. As these complexities come to light, a real opportunity for accountability and justice may be on the horizon, necessitating active participation from the American public to uphold democratic principles. 

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2026/04/gabbard_s_declassified_documents_are_just_the_tip_of_the_iceberg.html

Five stories Democrats told during Trump’s 2019 Ukraine impeachment have fallen apart

Recently, significant evidence has surfaced that undermines the narrative surrounding the 2019 impeachment of President Donald Trump, particularly relating to Democrats' claims. GOP leaders are advocating for the expungement of the impeachment votes due to information that counters the original accusations, primarily focusing on the credibility of key whistleblowers and the processes surrounding the impeachment.

1. House Republicans' Push to Expunge Impeachment:

• Prominent Republicans, including House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan, are calling to nullify the 2019 impeachment vote against Trump.

• This movement gained momentum following the release of corroborating memos by former Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard, which raised doubts about the initial whistleblower’s credibility.

2. Credibility of the Initial Whistleblower:

• The initial whistleblower, CIA analyst Eric Ciaramella, is described in the memos as having "potential for bias" and having provided false information regarding Trump’s actions towards Ukraine.

• Gabbard criticized the handling of the whistleblower's information by the intelligence community's watchdog, Michael Atkinson, suggesting it was misused.

3. Biden's Role in Ukraine's Prosecutor Firing:

• A key allegation against Trump involved then-Vice President Joe Biden's threat to withhold U. S. aid to Ukraine to secure the firing of Prosecutor General Viktor Shokin, who was investigating Hunter Biden's company, Burisma.

• New evidence indicates that officials from the State Department had praised Shokin for his anti-corruption efforts, contradicting claims made by Biden and other Democrats during the impeachment.

4. Hunter Biden's Influence on U. S. Policy:

• Testimonies revealed that Hunter Biden’s position on Burisma, a company under investigation for corruption, conflicted with U. S. anti-corruption messages.

• Documents obtained years later showed that Hunter Biden's board membership undermined U. S. policy objectives, contradicting earlier statements made by State Department officials.

5. Biden Family's Ties to Foreign Earnings:

• During the impeachment, Joe Biden asserted that neither he nor his family benefited financially from Hunter’s foreign business dealings.

• However, new investigations revealed substantial financial transactions between the Biden family and foreign entities, indicating that they leveraged their family name for business benefits.

6. Connections to Previous Investigations:

• Recent disclosures also imply links between the Ukraine whistleblower’s situation and earlier inquiries into alleged Russian interference in U. S. elections.

• The released memos provide insights into the motivations and political contexts influencing the actions of key figures within the intelligence community during both the impeachment and the prior investigation.

The release of new evidence and testimonies has significantly undermined several key narratives surrounding the 2019 impeachment of Donald Trump. As demands grow among some Republicans to expunge the impeachment from records, discussions continue regarding the implications of the findings on political accountability and the integrity of the impeachment process itself. 

https://justthenews.com/accountability/political-ethics/democrats-ukraine-narrative-has-gone-reverse-gop-seeks-expunge

News roundup:

 8 children fatally shot in Louisiana domestic violence incident: Police

Humanoid robot sprints to victory in Beijing, beating human half-marathon record

Dems kick off 5-city fight to host 2028 convention

US takes Iran-flagged ship into custody, Trump says

Kash Patel Vows to Sue The Atlantic — ‘I’ll See You in Court’

Companies Are Selling Workers’ Private Messages and Emails as AI Training Data

Report: Nearly 10% of Babies Born In the U.S. Under Biden Administration Were ‘Anchor Babies’

Three University of Iowa Students Injured When Shots Fired During Iowa City Brawl

North London Synagogue ‘Firebombed’ in Latest Anti-Jewish Attack in Britain

Court Rules Construction of Trump’s Ballroom Can Proceed

Two US Embassy personnel killed in ‘accident’ in Mexico, ambassador says

Hezbollah ‘human shield’ strategy behind Lebanon ambush, bomb detonation – Macron drawn in

Legacy media trust hits new low with Swalwell story latest example of protecting Dems

Feds arrest Iranian woman at LAX for allegedly brokering weapons sales for Islamic regime

Trump ally diGenova tapped to lead DOJ probe into Brennan over Russia probe origins

Illinois lawmakers seek to eliminate state diversity commission

Report: Public school in VA prioritizes student awareness of race, power, privilege

Billionaire Tom Steyer saturating California airwaves with $115M of ads for governor’s race

Multiple people shot during large fight at outdoor mall near the University of Iowa

Tucker Carlson’s son exits JD Vance’s press team amid escalating feud between dad, Trump

Staggering number of booze deliveries Eric Swalwell charged to campaign — including Vegas bender

Jordan Peterson battling serious neurological injury as daughter reveals year of ‘hell’

UAE official: More than 90% of Iran’s targets were civilian infrastructure

Trump says US-Iran talks to continue Monday in Pakistan

Battleground Republicans are starting to worry about the Senate

Maher Clashes With Jake Sullivan After Most Senate Dems Turn On Israel

How Did Young Dems Rank Israel, Iran, And China?

Pope Leo Addresses ‘Narrative’ Suggesting He And Trump Are At War

What to know about tariff refund site that launches Monday

Montana Supreme Court Allows Trans People to Have IDs That Match ‘Gender Identity’

Barack and Michelle Obama’s film production company reportedly leaving Netflix to go independent

Three anti-Trump immigration protesters face trial after federal judge refuses to dismiss case

Chicago Public Schools declare May 1 a ‘day of civil action’ for students

Trump’s historic rating with seniors boosted by tax deductions

The Democrats Are Becoming More Extreme

 Recent shifts within the Democratic Party indicate a trend towards increasingly radical positions. A closer look reveals that this extremism is evident in major cities across the United States, where dissatisfaction with elected officials is leading to the election of even more extreme candidates.

1. Political Landscape in Major Cities:

• Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass is struggling with only 24% approval, trailing candidates from the Democratic Socialists of America.

• In New York City, Mayor Zohran Mamdani has a 43% approval rating after just 100 days in office, with many residents believing the city is on the wrong track.

• In Chicago, the new Mayor Brandon Johnson has extremely low approval ratings and could be replaced by someone even more radical, such as Alderman Byron Sigcho Lopez.

2. Candidate Profiles:

• Various candidates across states exhibit extreme views:

• Graham Platner in Maine has a history of controversial statements and associations.

• Abdul El-Sayed in Michigan advocates for abolishing ICE and has collaborated with supporters of extremist ideologies.

3. Voter Disillusionment:

• There is a worrying trend of voters feeling that their concerns are not addressed, leading to increased abstention from elections, particularly in areas dominated by Democratic party control.

• Gerrymandering has led to a lack of competitive political races, further entrenching extremist views within the party.

4. Disconnect Between Party and Voters:

• Many voters are increasingly disillusioned with what they perceive as a lack of viable choices due to a shift towards far-left policies.

• Democrats have moved away from moderate stances, failing to connect with a wider audience and instead focusing on core radical principles.

5. Erosion of Political Accountability:

• The political dynamics are consolidating, with fewer competitive races as Democrats win through primaries that favor extreme leftists — creating one-party states.

• Extremist policies are becoming mainstream, with calls to abolish ICE and other radical changes gaining traction among party candidates.

6. Impacts of Urban Politics:

• Urban areas are struggling with rising crime, affordability issues, and worsening education systems.

• Policies presented by the left often promise solutions to social problems but tend to exacerbate them, ultimately benefiting radical agendas rather than the communities they affect.

7. Challenges for Republicans:

• Republican candidates face difficulties in articulating their positions effectively in blue areas and often fail to challenge leftist ideologies.

• There is a need for a renewed approach to address the failures of left-wing policies and offer alternative solutions that connect with disaffected voters.

The Democratic Party is shifting towards more extreme leftist positions, resulting in a political landscape where dissatisfaction among voters is prevalent. Instead of appealing to a wider electorate, the party's focus has become narrowed by radical ideologies. This transition poses significant challenges for both the party and the broader political environment, as disillusioned voters increasingly withdraw from participating in elections. The cycle of political extremism in urban settings suggests a deepening crisis, which needs to be addressed for the health of democracy and effective governance.

https://www.frontpagemag.com/the-democrats-are-becoming-more-extreme/

NY Gave 53% of CDLs to Aliens: Sec. Duffy Could Revoke Their Power to Issue CDLs

The U. S. Department of Transportation (DOT) has taken action against New York for issuing a large number of commercial driver’s licenses (CDLs) to foreign nationals illegally. Secretary of Transportation Sean Duffy announced the possible revocation of New York's ability to issue CDLs unless compliance measures are implemented.

• An audit revealed that 53% of CDLs issued to foreigners in New York were done so illegally.

• The DOT had previously granted New York four months to comply with regulations but states' officials did not take corrective actions.

• As a result, the DOT withheld $73 million in federal funds from New York and warned that further withholding could occur.

• The investigation uncovered fraudulent CDL schools that provided licenses without proper curriculum or training.

• Duffy criticized the New York state government for prioritizing political goals over public safety and has made similar threats towards California, which is reportedly delaying the cancellation of 17,000 illegally issued licenses.

• California's Governor Gavin Newsom claimed a class-action lawsuit was the reason for the delay, but Duffy refuted this, stating that deadlines must be met to ensure safety on the roads.

• The actions taken by both states are framed as part of a broader "globalist agenda," with concerns emphasized around the potential risks posed to American drivers and the integrity of the licensing process.

The situation highlights a significant conflict between state actions regarding commercial driver’s licenses and federal regulations aimed at ensuring safety on U. S. roads. The potential consequences for failing to comply with federal laws include substantial funding losses and administrative penalties. 

https://www.independentsentinel.com/ny-gave-53-of-cdls-to-aliens-sec-duffy-could-revoke-their-power-to-issue-cdls/

SNAP errors, Medicaid costs drive Mass. safety net surge | Bay State Briefing

A recent study from the Fiscal Alliance Foundation reveals serious issues with Massachusetts’ social safety net, highlighting fraud and inefficiency that affect its financial stability.

• Medicaid spending has climbed to 25% of the state budget.

• Enrollment in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) has risen by 40% in the past decade, now serving 1.1 million individuals.

• The SNAP error rate is 14.1%, surpassing the national average and other New England states, with the USDA aiming for a 6% error rate.

• In 2024, nearly $30 billion was spent on welfare programs, with a significant portion financed directly by state taxpayers.

• Critics argue the welfare system has expanded uncontrollably, moving away from its goal of promoting self-sufficiency.

• State officials dispute the study's claims, stating it uses outdated data and incorrectly links payment errors to fraud.

• Republican candidates for governor are criticizing the current administration's management of these programs, citing waste and fraud.

• Calls for reform emphasize the need for improved oversight and accountability in welfare spending.

The study has sparked important discussions about the effectiveness of Massachusetts’ welfare programs and the urgency for reforms to improve efficiency and safeguard taxpayer funds. 

https://www.masslive.com/politics/2026/04/study-snap-errors-medicaid-costs-drive-mass-safety-net-surge-bay-state-briefing.html