Matthew Graves Is Not Stepping Aside with Dignity – He’s Running from Justice that He Knows Awaits Him

 Matthew Graves, the resigned U. S. Attorney for the District of Columbia, leaves a legacy of corruption and partisanship at the Department of Justice (DOJ). His time in office was marked by targeting President Trump, his allies, and conservative citizens, leading to widespread criticism. Graves' resignation comes as the new Trump administration prepares to hold officials accountable for their misuse of power. Rather than stepping down honorably, he is fleeing from justice he knows he deserves.

Graves transformed the DOJ into a tool for political warfare during the Biden administration. Instead of enforcing the law fairly, he aimed to suppress dissent and protect the Biden family from scrutiny. He targeted Trump and his associates, prosecuting Steve Bannon for contempt of Congress and pursuing similar charges against Peter Navarro. Graves also attacked Roger Stone through politically motivated actions that aimed to undermine Trump's political movement and silence opposition.

He aggressively prosecuted those involved in the January 6 events, handing out severe sentences to non-violent participants while ignoring the violence from leftist protests. This approach resembled past efforts to undermine conservative activism, like the Lois Lerner Tea Party scandal. While attacking conservatives, Graves also shielded the Biden family from accountability regarding various scandals involving Hunter Biden, allowing investigations to stall and protecting Joe Biden from scrutiny related to his son's dealings.

Graves' wife, Fatima Goss Graves, a radical activist, also had significant influence in the DOJ. As the leader of the National Women’s Law Center, she promoted leftist agendas that matched the priorities of the Biden administration. She received funding from organizations known for their radical views and criticized efforts to pack the Supreme Court to weaken its conservative majority.

Together, Matthew and Fatima Graves operated within powerful circles of the left, using public service as a platform for activism. With Pam Bondi set to take over as Attorney General, there are expectations of a significant change in the DOJ's approach. Bondi has vowed to address the misconduct of the previous administration, pledging to investigate and prosecute those who abused their power.

Graves’ resignation reveals an attempt to escape the consequences of his actions, but Bondi's commitment to accountability suggests that his legacy of corruption will not be overlooked. His actions have tainted the DOJ, and as the Trump administration works to restore its integrity, those who enabled and engaged in this corruption will face justice. The era of accountability for the DOJ is now beginning.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/12/matthew-graves-is-not-stepping-aside-dignity-hes/

Are Plant-Based Meat Alternatives Healthy?

 A study has raised questions about the health impacts of plant-based meat alternatives (PBMAs), which are often considered ultra-processed foods. This summary looks at the findings of the study and the insights of health experts regarding PBMAs.

• Health Concerns: The study in Food Frontiers found that PBMAs are linked to potential health issues like increased depression, inflammation, and high blood pressure, but no clear risks were established. PBMAs might also reduce the risk of conditions like irritable bowel syndrome, obesity, and diabetes.

• Nutritional Composition: PBMAs often contain higher sodium, added sugars, and unhealthy fats compared to less processed foods. This may contribute to their negative health effects due to additives and preservatives commonly found in PBMAs.

• Disruption of Gut Communication: Experts like Helen Taylor argue that synthetic ingredients in PBMAs can interfere with gut-brain communication, potentially leading to health issues.

• Diverse Opinions Among Experts: There is no agreement among health professionals. Some advise fully avoiding PBMAs due to their lack of nutrients and presence of artificial ingredients, while others say moderate consumption can be acceptable.

• Complete Avoidance Perspective: Taylor emphasizes avoiding PBMAs, suggesting that real food, like grass-fed meat or whole-food vegetarian options, is better for health.

• Moderation Perspective: Catherine Gervacio states that consuming PBMAs occasionally can be fine if balanced with whole, minimally processed foods.

Unprocessed Plant-Based Meal Ideas

Health professionals encourage cooking at home as a healthier alternative to PBMAs. Here are some practical tips and meal ideas:

• Batch Cooking: Prepare beans, lentils, or grains in bulk for convenience.

• Planning Ahead: Make meals in advance and store them for easy access.

• Time-Saving Tools: Use kitchen gadgets like instant pots or blenders to streamline cooking.

• Mix and Match: Keep prepped ingredients ready for quick meal assembly.

• Flavor Enhancement: Use spices and herbs to add taste to meals.

Meal Suggestions

• Breakfast:

• Overnight oats with plant-based milk and seeds.

• Avocado toast with baked beans for fiber and protein.

• Yogurt parfait with granola and berries.

• Lunch:

• Hummus and veggie sandwich on whole-grain bread.

• Pesto panini with grilled tempeh.

• Tofu and veggie wraps for a protein-rich option.

• Dinner:

• Rice with channa masala and curried cauliflower.

• Quinoa bowl featuring roasted vegetables and tempeh.

• Tacos made with pinto beans and fresh toppings.

The health impacts of PBMAs continue to be a topic of debate. While some experts recommend avoiding them completely, others suggest that occasional consumption can fit into a balanced diet. Preparing homemade, plant-based meals is a healthier alternative, providing nutrients and flavor without the risks associated with ultra-processed foods. 

https://www.theepochtimes.com/health/are-plant-based-meat-alternatives-healthy-5780215?utm_source=partner&utm_campaign=ZeroHedge

A Conspiracy to Overthrow the 2024 Elections

 Eight years ago, some Hollywood figures encouraged Electoral College representatives not to vote for Trump, labeling him unfit before election results were certified. Their aim was to convince enough Republican electors to drop Trump’s electoral count below 270. During this time, there were death threats against electors and protests in Democrat-led states, but these efforts failed, resulting in Trump's inauguration on January 20, 2017.

Currently, the Democrats seem less overt in their attempts to undermine Trump’s presidency, possibly to avoid hypocrisy after spending years alleging he incited an insurrection during his presidency. They seem to accept that they cannot defeat Trump’s return in 2025 but some still believe they must try.

A recent article in The Hill cites Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, arguing that Trump could be disqualified from holding office due to insurrection against the Constitution. The authors reference Trump’s second impeachment trial where he was accused of inciting insurrection, although they ignore that the Senate did not convict him.

They also cite a ruling from the Colorado Supreme Court that aimed to remove Trump from the ballot based on the 14th Amendment, yet the U. S. Supreme Court ruled in favor of Trump, stating that states do not have the authority to enforce Section 3 for federal offices like the presidency. The authors contend the Supreme Court's inaction allows Congress to reject electoral votes when they convene, declaring it a nonreviewable political question.

They suggest that Congress should reject Trump’s electoral votes under the Electoral Count Act, which states that a petition signed by 20% of both Houses can contest votes if they were unlawfully certified. The consequence of this would mean that if Trump’s votes were not counted, Kamala Harris could possibly be elected president, despite losing both the Electoral College and popular vote.

Additionally, the authors reference testimonies from the January 6th House Select Committee, which they claim were misleading. They conclude that Democrats must act against counting Electoral College votes for a person disqualified by the Constitution.

The article criticized lacks persuasiveness and misrepresents facts, as Trump's significant recent victory reflects a public rejection of the claims made against him. The self-righteousness of arguing for an insurrection based on supposed insurrection claims shows a disconnect from reality.

The Hill is called out for publishing an inaccurate piece that could be intended to generate outrage and traffic, though it has not published opposing viewpoints regarding the fairness of the 2020 elections or related issues. The conclusion drawn is that The Hill represents a pro-Democrat agenda, contributing to a conspiracy against the 2024 elections, reflecting the thoughts of Democrats. They are seen as striving for credibility among their political allies rather than presenting factual information. This serves as a warning that Democrats continue to seek ways to hinder Trump’s potential return, indicating the necessity for vigilance among Trump and his team. 

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2024/12/a_conspiracy_to_overthrow_the_2024_elections.html

Foreign Adversary ‘Likely’ Responsible For Havana Syndrome, Whistleblower Accuses CIA of ‘Coverup,’ ‘Gaslighting’

 A former Intelligence officer has accused the CIA of misleading victims of Havana Syndrome, a debilitating health condition reported by U. S. personnel since 2016. In an interview with journalist Catherine Herridge, the whistleblower, identified as "Alice," claimed her career-ending injuries were caused by a foreign directed energy weapon and expressed concern that the CIA is covering up the truth regarding the syndrome.

The House Intelligence Committee's recent report implies that a foreign adversary is likely behind some cases of Havana Syndrome, contradicting previous conclusions from the Intelligence Community and the U. S. Senate, which downplayed foreign involvement, suggesting that the cause is more likely to be natural or psychological. Despite these conclusions, many victims believe they were targeted by high-power microwave weapons.

Alice shared her own experience of a health incident while serving in Africa, describing strange sounds and severe symptoms that led to her diagnosis of traumatic brain injury. She feels the CIA's dismissal of such experiences is a betrayal and has created a demoralizing environment for agents. She also spoke about the impact of the CIA's actions on her personal life, stating that she has witnessed colleagues suffer and lose their battles against health issues linked to their service.

A leaked government letter acknowledges that the injuries experienced are real, countering claims that they result from psychosocial factors. Alice suspects that Russia is behind the attacks and criticized the CIA's response as inadequate, claiming that their official assessment does not meet basic standards of investigation. She called for the agency to acknowledge the reality of these incidents to protect other agents in the future.

Alice expressed hope for accountability and change within the CIA, urging the Trump administration to overhaul the intelligence analysts responsible for the flawed reports. She emphasized the need for responsible acknowledgment of experienced injuries to continue effective operations and prevent further harm to personnel in the field.

https://amgreatness.com/2024/12/30/report-foreign-adversary-likely-responsible-for-havana-syndrome-whistleblower-accuses-cia-of-coverup-gaslighting/

Climate Anxiety: Manufactured Hysteria Masquerading as Science

 A recent article published in The Lancet Planetary Health claimed that climate change is causing significant mental health issues among U. S. adolescents and young adults. This summary outlines the study's findings, methodological issues, and the implications of its conclusions regarding climate anxiety.

• Survey Overview: The study surveyed 15,793 young Americans aged 16 to 25, focusing on their feelings and attitudes about climate change.

• Findings:

• 85% of respondents reported being at least moderately worried about climate change.

• 57. 9% felt “very” or “extremely” worried.

• 42. 8% believed climate change negatively affected their mental health.

• 38. 3% stated that climate change disrupts their daily lives.

• 72. 8% indicated a likelihood to vote for candidates supporting aggressive climate policies.

• Methodological Concerns:

• The survey was conducted using a convenience sample which may not represent the broader population accurately.

• There was a lack of verification for self-reported exposure to severe weather events.

• The sample did not adjust for the actual political distribution in the U. S. , potentially skewing results toward progressive views.

• Emotional Manipulation:

• Critics argue that the phrasing of survey questions may have prompted dramatic responses, reflecting pre-existing narratives rather than actual experiences.

• The role of media and educational systems in shaping these fears was not adequately addressed, raising questions about the true sources of climate anxiety.

• Political Agenda:

• The study's findings are interpreted as support for aggressive climate policies, with accusations directed at corporations and governments for neglecting youth concerns.

• The study was funded by the Avaaz Foundation, raising questions about bias and motivation behind the research.

While the study highlights significant concern among youth regarding climate change, its methodological flaws and reliance on self-reported data undermine its credibility. The pervasive fear surrounding climate change may stem more from intense media narratives and educational influences than from direct experiences with climate phenomena. Further, the framing of the research appears to serve a political agenda rather than providing a balanced view of the issues. It encourages young people to critically assess these narratives and seek factual clarity amidst the alarmist messaging.

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2024/12/30/climate-anxiety-manufactured-hysteria-masquerading-as-science/

The Media’s Deception of Parents

 Numerous mainstream media outlets are misleading American parents about the law concerning Covid-19 vaccines. A Vermont Supreme Court ruling stated that a six-year-old boy was vaccinated against his parents' explicit instructions, but the court found that the family could only pursue a federal claim that requires proof of severe harm or death. Other claims related to parental rights and informed consent were completely dismissed. However, many media reports claim the opposite, spreading misinformation.

The Associated Press published a misleading piece titled "Fact Focus: Vermont ruling does not say schools can vaccinate children without parental consent. " The actual ruling confirmed that state law claims against immunized defendants cannot proceed due to federal law immunity. A law professor incorrectly supported this with the claim that the ruling only confirmed that federal law preempts state lawsuits. This mischaracterization is inaccurate, as the court ruled that even specific allegations of willful vaccination are preempted by federal law.

In this court case, the Vermont Supreme Court determined that all state tort claims related to the vaccine administration were barred, regardless of intent. This includes claims of battery and emotional distress. Media outlets such as USA Today echoed similar false narratives, claiming that the ruling does not allow schools to "force-vaccinate. " However, the reality is that the ruling provides no distinction between accidental and intentional vaccinations, leaving parents with no legal recourse.

Vermont Governor Phil Scott has provided cash rewards to schools based on vaccination rates, raising further concerns among parents about potential pressures to vaccinate students. The comments made by school officials regarding vaccination rates were deemed irrelevant by the court, as they were protected under the federal PREP Act. Even disparaging statements toward parents or children didn't affect the court's decision due to the immunity granted under this federal law.

In a further misleading claim, USA Today reiterated that the court's ruling only addressed civil liability in the case of mistaken vaccinations, presenting it inaccurately as though the incident was definitively unintentional. The dismissive claim undermines the parents' argument that the vaccination could have been conducted deliberately; they were denied the opportunity to present evidence and cross-examine witnesses.

The ruling also completely bars claims of battery related to vaccines, whether or not there was intent to harm. Instead of providing clear definitions, the court’s conclusion leaves parents with fewer rights if vaccinations are administered against their wishes. This means Vermont parents could face significant legal barriers if their child is vaccinated without their consent.

Despite the media's portrayal, the ruling affects the legal rights of parents severely. Claims that traditionally would allow rehabilitation for intentional actions, such as a child being vaccinated against parental wishes, no longer stand, limiting parents' ability to seek justice. The media's portrayal of the Vermont case has been heavily criticized for misrepresenting its implications and misinforming the public about their rights.

The Vermont Supreme Court ruled that an individual family could not sue their child’s school after a vaccination error during a school clinic. The court claimed state law claims were preempted by the federal PREP Act. Plaintiffs could have only pursued administrative claims under the PREP Act or federal suits for willful misconduct, which they did not do.

Despite the complexities of the situation, some legal commentators have misrepresented the ruling as simple and clear, ignoring the significant implications for parental rights. If the Vermont ruling stands, parents may be unable to sue in cases where their children are vaccinated without consent unless there’s clear severe harm. This reality poses a profound concern for parental rights and child safety in the context of school vaccinations.

As schools administer vaccines under the protection of the PREP Act, the decision creates an unsettling environment for parents. If a child can be vaccinated against parental wishes without legal consequences, this raises questions about trust in public schools and the accountability of journalists who mislead the public about these critical issues.

https://brownstone.org/articles/the-medias-deception-of-parents/

Elon Musk v. MAGA: H-1B Visas, Foreign Workers, Big Tech, and America First

 Elon Musk, like many others in the tech industry, faces a clash with MAGA supporters over issues like H-1B visas and foreign workers. Both groups recognize that the progressive left poses a threat to their freedoms, albeit in different contexts. For tech entrepreneurs, the threat is to their innovative and economic freedom, while MAGA supporters view it as a threat to their identity and way of life.

The tech industry is filled with individuals who are not fully acquainted with American values and perspectives. They see the advantages of America but lack a deep understanding of its foundational principles. Meanwhile, the Biden administration's pressure on tech companies has made these entrepreneurs uneasy. They resisted government interference until their businesses seemed at risk, prompting some to reach out to Trump and reconsider MAGA's views.

The cultural and economic overlap between MAGA and the tech world is minimal, as MAGA is concerned with preserving traditional American values, while the tech industry prioritizes profits and innovation. MAGA views America as built on Christian principles and unique ideals that are now in jeopardy. They believe in foundational values such as forgiveness, equality, personal autonomy, and environmental care. They argue that these ideals have fostered the freedoms and opportunities that characterize American life.

The conflict over H-1B visas highlights the divide between MAGA and the tech industry. Many tech companies rely on cheaper foreign labor, but this practice can undermine American workers' job prospects and wages. MAGA opposes the H-1B system, viewing it as an unjust way of importing lower-wage workers while disregarding qualified American applicants. They argue for American jobs and education, advocating for a fair job market without favoritism toward foreign workers.

Americans feel frustrated by being labeled as racist for wanting secure job opportunities and a level playing field in their own country. Many share stories of losing jobs or facing unfair competition due to policies favoring diversity hiring or H-1B workers. They seek to reclaim their opportunities that they believe should be rightfully accessible to them.

Tech leaders like Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy have put forth arguments in favor of foreign workers, suggesting that American families should work harder to compete. However, this perspective clashes with traditional American values that focus on well-rounded development and fostering creativity in children rather than rigid tutoring or competition. MAGA supporters believe that American upbringing should include a variety of experiences alongside academic achievement, which contributes to broader skill sets.

Americans want their children to have the opportunity to achieve the American Dream without discrimination based on race, gender, or other factors. This desire for equality and fairness fuels the MAGA movement, as they reject the idea that they are racist for wanting a more equitable society for American citizens.

Even Musk acknowledged that the H-1B program needs reforms, citing concerns over its current structure. It's seen as a system that potentially exploits foreign workers while disadvantaging Americans. Calls for raising salaries and making hiring foreign workers less financially appealing have emerged as potential solutions.

The left often promotes division among races and ideologies, making control of the nation easier. MAGA supporters desire a unified, strong America where families can thrive and achieve their aspirations. They believe that American happiness and success stem from core values and moral principles that guide behaviors and decisions.

Musk and other influential figures have the capacity to help foster an America that emphasizes freedom and opportunity for all, rather than promoting measures that could lead to further division and inequality. MAGA's vision for America is rooted in deep-seated values and aspirations for a prosperous future, which should resonate with all Americans, including those in the tech industry. 

https://spectator.org/musk-v-maga-h1b-visas-big-tech-america-first/

Venezuelan prison gang crime, arrests confirmed in 22 U.S. states

 Of the over 14 million illegal border crossers reported during the Biden administration, some members of the violent Venezuelan Tren de Aragua (TdA) prison gang have entered the U. S. Police records confirm that TdA-related crimes have occurred in 22 U. S. states, including Arizona, California, Florida, Texas, and more. The gang is known for serious crimes such as murder, kidnapping, extortion, and drug trafficking, and is linked to over 100 investigations nationwide.

The U. S. Department of Homeland Security is searching for 600 suspected TdA members currently in the U. S. Local police reports have yet to confirm their presence in every state, but federal agencies have issued bulletins to help identify them. In the West, arrests have been made in several states, including New Mexico where fugitives wanted for murder and kidnapping in Texas were caught. In California, crimes by illegal border crossers involve thefts connected to a South American theft group, but police have not confirmed any ties to TdA.

In the Midwest, arrests include violent crimes in Illinois and Indiana, and there were recent cases in North and South Dakota. In the Gulf states, TdA members have been involved in sex trafficking operations in Louisiana and Texas. In Texas, the governor declared TdA as a foreign terrorist organization. In the Southeast, several arrests were made for serious felonies, including terrorism charges in North Carolina.

In the Northeast, TdA members have been arrested for various violent crimes. There is confusion on social media linking TdA to other groups, but authorities are still investigating. Both TdA and South American theft groups commit crimes but have different methods and focuses, and they all illegally entered the U. S. under the Biden administration.

https://www.thecentersquare.com/national/article_d2d3521a-c6b7-11ef-bc06-fb8e3b4e84e6.html

11 Dead in ‘Safe and Effective’ Bird Flu Vaccine Trial as Big Pharma Races to Roll Out Jabs

 Serious safety issues have arisen after 11 people died during trials for the bird flu vaccine AUDENZ™, which was promoted as “safe and effective” by the FDA. These deaths, reportedly covered up by mainstream media, have raised doubts about whether lessons from the contentious COVID-19 vaccine rollout are being learned. With increasing alarm regarding a potential bird flu pandemic, pharmaceutical companies and health authorities are fast-tracking H5N1 vaccine development, which has sparked further safety concerns.

Dr. Leana Wen, a public health advocate, has urged the Biden administration to speed up vaccine authorization to strengthen national defenses. She emphasized that delays could leave the country unprepared for serious risks. Critics, however, argue that the hurried development of AUDENZ™ reflects the same errors made during the COVID-19 vaccine launch, where lack of transparency in safety testing led to a loss of public trust and an increase in adverse events.

The UK has ordered five million doses of the AUDENZ™ vaccine as part of their pandemic readiness strategy, with other countries expected to follow. However, the trial’s results are concerning, as, besides the 11 deaths, participants also showed increased troponin T levels, indicating possible heart damage. Moreover, the trial's limited monitoring period of just a few weeks raises questions about the long-term safety and effectiveness of the vaccine.

Dr. Richard Bartlett criticized the short observation period, stating it is insufficient for assessing long-term effects. He also highlighted that AUDENZ™ only provides protection against the specific H5N1 subtype, raising issues if the virus mutates. Dr. Bartlett insisted that the public deserves comprehensive information before significant vaccine distribution begins.

The current push for bird flu vaccines has brought back memories of the rapid COVID-19 vaccine rollout, which many believe prioritized speed over safety. Adverse events reported during that period, including myocarditis and blood clots, have fueled skepticism towards health authorities. Dr. Bartlett remarked that the mistakes from the COVID-19 vaccine rollout should have taught that rushing safety protocols leads to severe consequences.

While pandemic preparedness is vital, it cannot compromise rigorous safety measures or ethical practices. Critics argue that elite global players and pharmaceutical companies exploit public fear, fueled by continuous media alarmism, to forward their agendas, coercing the public to accept hastily developed vaccines with little transparency.

Dr. Wen's urgent call to action coincides with increasing pressure on the Biden administration from pharmaceutical companies. However, a change in administration could impact vaccine policies, especially with the expected scrutinization under a potential Trump administration and figures like Robert F. Kennedy Jr. being placed in significant health roles. 

https://thepeoplesvoice.tv/11-dead-in-safe-and-effective-bird-flu-vaccine-trial-as-big-pharma-races-to-roll-out-jabs/

Jimmy Carter Was Never a Good Man

 Outgoing President Joe Biden encouraged incoming President Donald Trump to take lessons in "decency" from former President Jimmy Carter. While Biden initially aimed to be compared to Presidents Franklin D. Roosevelt and John F. Kennedy, he now seems content to be seen as a second version of Carter. Despite the media's insistence that Biden is a good man and that Carter was, too, both men share a record of unpopularity and controversies related to their families, but not a reputation for decency.

Jimmy Carter campaigned on a promise of honesty and competence, but he was involved in corruption, particularly concerning his brother, Billy Carter. Billy, a drunk who mismanaged the family business, engaged in foreign influence activities and was linked to a bank scandal involving improper loans. The media often dismissed the connections between these scandals and Jimmy Carter, even as he publicly supported his brother's actions.

Following his presidency, Jimmy Carter maintained ties with various dictators, meeting with numerous oppressive leaders. He expressed admiration for them and seemed to ignore their violent actions. Notably, Carter met with Hamas, claiming they wanted peace with Israel, despite violent actions occurring shortly thereafter.

Carter's legacy includes promoting corrupt governments while pretending to be a humanitarian leader. His organization, the Carter Center, monitored foreign elections but also supported leftist takeovers, leading to widespread issues in countries like Venezuela. His actions extended far beyond normal lobbying practices, including urging foreign leaders to oppose the U. S. and announcing positions on behalf of America.

Carter's humanitarian image was marred by scandals, including handling sexual harassment cases within Habitat for Humanity. He also pardoned individuals for serious crimes, raising questions about his judgment and values. Despite these serious critiques, Carter crafted an image of moral superiority, claiming his actions stemmed from trust and forgiveness.

Biden, in his presidency, has also faced criticism for leniency towards criminals, drawing parallels to Carter's past. Both presidents have navigated complex legacies filled with controversy while presenting themselves as virtuous figures. The comparison highlights a troubling pattern of leaders perceived as morally ambiguous despite presenting a facade of decency. Ultimately, the article presents a harsh view of both men, suggesting their legacies are not rooted in the good they claimed to pursue but rather in compromises that undermined their stated values.

https://www.frontpagemag.com/jimmy-carter-was-never-a-good-man/

Another Food Processing Plant Catches Fire: One Dead, Several Injured After Midnight Explosion at Tyson Poultry Plant

 A fire occurred at a Tyson Foods poultry plant in Georgia, resulting in one death and multiple injuries. The incident took place overnight, with the explosion killing a woman who was asleep in a truck parked near the facility. The fire lasted about three hours. The union representing plant workers reported that a boiler exploded.

Tyson Foods expressed condolences to the victim's family and friends, stating they are investigating the cause of the fire while ensuring the safety of their employees. The victim was identified as Bajarma Batozhapov, 61, from Las Vegas. Two others were hospitalized due to injuries from the explosion, and a wall collapsed onto the truck cab.

Reports indicate that during the Biden administration, at least 18 major fires have occurred in food industry facilities, all officially categorized as accidental or inconclusive. A comprehensive list exists of 103 plants across the U. S. that have been destroyed, damaged, or affected by accidental fires, diseases, or other reasons. 

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/12/another-food-processing-plant-catches-fire-one-dead/

The Dems Aren’t Finished Hatching Schemes to Keep Trump From Taking Office

 Throughout the 2024 campaign, Democrats argued that voting for Kamala Harris was essential to prevent Donald Trump from taking office, claiming he posed a danger to democracy. Critics describe this narrative as unfounded and attribute the tactics of accusing opponents of their own wrongdoing to the Biden-Harris administration, which has taken measures against opposition to its policies. Following a significant electoral defeat, Democrats are allegedly still devising plans to obstruct Trump's return.

Political analyst Mark Halperin warns that efforts to stop Trump from assuming office will increase as his inauguration approaches. He compares this prediction to the certainty of the sunrise. The notion that progressive individuals may likely want to suppress dissent is also cited by David Horowitz. Halperin emphasizes that these predictions serve as an expected response, considering the current political climate.

Recent articles by liberal attorneys suggest Congress can still block Trump on January 20 by rejecting electoral votes, invoking the 14th Amendment based on claims of insurrection, despite Trump not being charged with such actions. Critics point out that the argument lacks grounding, as Trump has not committed any act of insurrection, nor has he faced charges.

The continued discussion around the 14th Amendment indicates ongoing attempts by leftists to find ways to prevent Trump's presidency. Halperin suggests that these discussions come as a reaction to the surprising election results and may become more common as January 20 approaches.

Halperin raises concerns about why such articles are published, acknowledging that they potentially reflect a mindset shared by many. Nevertheless, the argument about insurrection has not gained traction in the past, as Trump has not been accused or convicted of leading or supporting an insurrection.

The fear among some commentators is that the political landscape is highly politicized, allowing schemes against Trump to possibly unfold without significant pushback from institutions like the military or justice system. Observers note that the media may praise any attempts to prevent Trump from taking office, framing them as heroic actions to protect democracy.

While it is suggested that these actions could occur, there are doubts about their likelihood. The anticipation of ongoing resistance against Trump raises concerns about the robustness of American democracy and highlights a struggle against continuous attempts to undermine political opposition. It appears that the left is not ready to concede defeat in the ongoing political battle as they remain vigilant against Trump and his supporters.

https://pjmedia.com/robert-spencer/2024/12/28/be-warned-the-dems-arent-finished-hatching-schemes-to-keep-trump-from-taking-office-n4935494

Is the Market Economy Inherently Unstable, Or Is Government the Culprit?

 Following in the footsteps of John Maynard Keynes, many economists believe that we cannot fully trust a market economy, viewing it as unstable. They argue that without intervention, the market could fail and thus require government and central bank management to stabilize it. According to this view, spending is the engine of income generation, where one person's spending becomes another person's income. Therefore, during a recession, it is seen as the government's role to encourage more spending to stimulate economic growth.

However, this Keynesian perspective overlooks the issue of funding. Funding comes from prior production, meaning that for consumption to occur, goods must first be produced and saved. Using a simple example, if a baker makes ten loaves of bread and consumes two, the remaining eight loaves can fund the purchase of shoes from a shoemaker. This shows that consumption cannot drive growth on its own; instead, it notably depends on prior production and savings. Capital accumulation, which allows for further production and consumption, also relies on prior savings.

Introducing money does not fundamentally change the nature of funding; it merely facilitates the exchange of goods. Money itself is not consumable and does not replace consumer goods. While spending money can stimulate consumption, it does not guarantee real economic growth. Commonly, it is thought that the demand for goods is limited by the money supply, but in reality, it is shaped by consumer preferences and the available production. More goods can be demanded with increased production, not just more money.

Government does not create real wealth; it can only redistribute it by taxing wealth-generating individuals. Thus, when government spending increases, it can actually weaken the overall wealth-generating capacity in the economy. If private savings are adequate, they may support government activities alongside real wealth generation. However, if savings are inadequate, government spending can crowd out private investment and hinder growth.

Economic adjustments, often seen as negative events like recessions, are actually reallocations of resources according to consumer priorities after periods of market distortion due to mismanaged money and credit. Allowing free market operations typically yields better outcomes. Historical precedents, such as actions taken by Lenin, indicate that acknowledging market mechanisms can help avert economic disasters.

To remedy economic issues effectively, entrepreneurs should be allowed the freedom to allocate resources based on consumer demand. Thus, the best stimulus plan is to permit the market to function without interference. Contrary to popular belief, expansive fiscal and monetary policies do not help the economy; instead, they often prolong inefficient activities while draining resources from productive ones.

After years of poor monetary and fiscal management, the current economic situation cannot be improved by more easy money. A “do nothing” approach by the government and Fed can enable true wealth-generators to reorganize, save, produce, and exchange more effectively. This also means that unproductive entities would need to reorganize or diminish, aligning economic activities with consumer needs.

In conclusion, government spending and easy money policies from the Fed do not foster genuine economic growth. Instead of bolstering the economy, they may weaken its foundations. Should consumption alone suffice for economic growth, global poverty would already be eliminated. Past government and central bank intervention seemed to work due to prior private production and savings. Once these foundations weaken, the illusion of effectiveness vanishes, and aggressive government actions only exacerbate economic challenges. Without needing Keynesian interventions, the optimal approach is for both the government and Fed to cease meddling in economic processes.

https://mises.org/mises-wire/market-economy-inherently-unstable-or-government-culprit

US Treasury says Chinese hackers stole documents in 'major incident'

 Chinese state-sponsored hackers breached the U. S. Treasury Department's computer security in a major incident this month, stealing documents. The hackers accessed unclassified documents by compromising the third-party cybersecurity provider, BeyondTrust. They gained access to a key used for a cloud-based service that provides technical support, allowing them to override security and access Treasury Department user workstations.

The incident has been attributed to a China state-sponsored Advanced Persistent Threat (APT) actor. The Treasury Department was informed of the breach by BeyondTrust on December 8 and is working with the U. S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) and the FBI to evaluate the impact.

China's foreign ministry denied responsibility for the breach, stating it opposes hacker attacks and criticizing U. S. claims. BeyondTrust acknowledged the security incident, saying they took steps to address it and notified affected customers and law enforcement. A cybersecurity expert remarked that this breach fits a pattern of Chinese groups abusing trusted third-party services.

https://www.reuters.com/technology/cybersecurity/us-treasurys-workstations-hacked-cyberattack-by-china-afp-reports-2024-12-30/

Chinese EV Maker BYD Using Imported Slave Labor in Brazil

 The Brazilian government has stopped issuing work visas to Chinese electric vehicle manufacturer BYD after local authorities rescued 163 Chinese nationals from a factory being built in Camaçari, Bahia. These workers faced conditions labeled "analogous to slavery," as reported by Reuters.

BYD, linked to the Chinese Communist Party, is constructing a plant on land previously owned by Ford, which ceased operations in Brazil in 2021. The Public Prosecutor’s Office in Brazil announced on December 23 that construction had been halted due to an investigation showing that BYD, via a contractor named Jinjiang Group, employed many Chinese workers under poor conditions.

Inspectors found that these workers lived in unsanitary conditions and were subjected to exploitative practices, including giving up their passports and having a large portion of their wages withheld under threat of punishment if they tried to leave. This situation has been classified as "forced labor," a recognized form of modern slavery.

During a recent virtual hearing, Brazilian officials stated that the rescued workers were victims of "international human trafficking. " If irregularities in the investigation are confirmed, authorities plan to revoke the residence permits of the Chinese workers. Reports indicate that the Justice Ministry asked the Foreign Ministry to halt visa issuance to BYD ahead of the investigation's public disclosure.

Temporary work visas in Brazil are typically issued when local labor is unavailable, but it was asserted that this was not the case with the Jinjiang workers. BYD has invested $620 million in the Bahia factory, which has become a symbol of the increasing ties between China and Brazil.

In response to the allegations, Jinjiang Group denied the claims of enslavement and stated that the labeling of their workers as such was inaccurate. They claimed there were translation misunderstandings and expressed feelings of indignation over the accusations. A BYD representative echoed these sentiments, accusing foreign forces and media of attempting to tarnish the image of Chinese brands and strain China-Brazil relations.

https://www.breitbart.com/latin-america/2024/12/30/report-chinese-ev-maker-byd-using-imported-slave-labor-in-brazil/

Prolific January 6 Prosecutor U.S. Attorney Matthew Graves Resigns

 On Monday, U. S. Attorney for the District of Columbia Matthew Graves announced his resignation, effective January 16, just before President-elect Trump takes office. Many conservatives viewed Graves' departure positively, as he had been a central figure in the aggressive prosecutions of individuals involved in the January 6 events, leaving behind a legacy many see as the weaponization of the DOJ against political dissent.

Graves, appointed by President Biden, became known for overseeing the DOJ’s significant efforts to prosecute those charged with the Capitol breach. His statement highlighted that approximately 1,600 individuals were charged, with nearly 1,100 already sentenced. Over 170 trials took place, with the DOJ winning more than 99% of them, including notable seditious conspiracy convictions.

Under Graves’ leadership, the DOJ's prosecutions of the Capitol breach resulted in more than 1,600 charges, an unparalleled response for a single event. He managed many of these cases as a priority. Over 332 defendants faced a unique charge related to obstructing official proceedings, which was later dismissed by the Supreme Court. More than 1,000 individuals were convicted, many receiving severe sentences for non-violent actions, raising concerns about the fairness of these proceedings.

Tragically, several defendants, including Matthew Perna, died by suicide, with their cases often linked to the DOJ’s use of serious enhancements in sentencing. In light of this, Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene introduced H. R. 7540, aimed at ensuring fair trials for protestors. She criticized Graves for his actions and argued that he should be held accountable for his decisions impacting families. Greene emphasized the disparity in prosecution, noting that violent acts by left-wing groups like Antifa went largely unpunished, contributing to perceptions of unequal justice.

Graves’ resignation signifies a controversial period in the DOJ's history, reflecting the need to restore trust in the justice system. A recent poll indicated that only 35% of Americans have confidence in the judiciary, showing a significant drop in faith over the past four years. Bridget M. Fitzpatrick will take on the role of Acting U. S. Attorney following Graves’ exit, as the DOJ faces the challenge of rebuilding its credibility.

https://redstate.com/brutalbrittany/2024/12/30/prolific-january-6-prosecutor-us-attorney-matthew-graves-resigns-n2183760

Jack Smith Hands Trump Documents Case in Florida to US Attorney’s Office

 Jack Smith has transferred the classified documents case against Trump to the US Attorney's Office in Florida. He withdrew his appeal related to the case on December 30, 2024. Smith indicated that the Special Counsel's office referred the case to the United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, which is now involved.

Previously, Smith had asked a federal appeals court to put a stop to the classified documents case against Trump. This request follows another one to pause the January 6 case against Trump. In July, Smith had appealed a decision made by Judge Cannon, who dismissed the classified documents case, citing issues with the special counsel's appointment and funding.

In June 2023, Trump was indicted with 37 federal counts concerning the storage of presidential records at his Mar-a-Lago estate, which was under Secret Service protection. Trump faced 31 counts related to the Espionage Act for retaining national defense information and six additional process crimes connected to discussions with his lawyer.

Judge Cannon dismissed the entire case, instructing that it should be closed. The dismissal was based on claims of unconstitutional elements, including the appointment process by US Attorney Merrick Garland and the unlimited funding given to Smith without Congressional consent. While Smith had previously appealed Cannon's dismissal, he ultimately decided to pass the case to federal prosecutors.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/12/just-jack-smith-hands-trump-documents-case-florida/

Biden Furious at Merrick Garland Because He Didn’t Work Harder to Lock Up Donald Trump Before the Election

President Biden is upset with Attorney General Merrick Garland for not doing more to prosecute Donald Trump before the election. Biden reportedly feels regret over stepping back from the 2024 presidential race, believing he could have defeated Trump. He also questions his decision to appoint Garland, feeling that the Justice Department took too long in prosecuting Trump while aggressively pursuing investigations into his son, Hunter Biden.

Garland appointed a special counsel to investigate Trump shortly after he announced his candidacy for the 2024 election. In June 2023, Trump faced 37 federal counts related to storing presidential records, and in September 2023, he was charged in connection with the January 6 events, including various conspiracy-related counts. However, these cases weakened after a Supreme Court ruling granted immunity to U. S. Presidents for acts performed while in office.

Biden is frustrated that Garland did not act quickly enough against Trump, believing that if the Justice Department had pursued charges sooner, it might have led to a politically harmful trial for Trump before the election. Some Democrats share this view, while others blame delays on the Supreme Court and a judge appointed by Trump. Garland's delay in prosecuting Trump and the urgency of prosecuting Hunter Biden have led to Biden's discontent with the Justice Department's actions.

Mike Davis, a former clerk for Justice Neil Gorsuch, has called for Trump’s upcoming administration to investigate what he perceives as the Justice Department's misuse of power against Trump, describing the conspiracy against rights charge as serious. He claims that Biden's team has admitted to engaging in legal and electoral interference against Trump.

Biden's private comments regarding his dissatisfaction with Garland and the Justice Department’s performance highlight growing concerns over political fairness and justice in the current political climate. The narrative suggests that fast action against Trump might have altered the political landscape leading up to the election, showcasing the complex and often contentious relationship between the DOJ and political figures. 

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/12/biden-furious-merrick-garland-didnt-work-harder-lock/

Federal Prosecutors Involved in Trump Witch Hunts and January 6 Cases Flee DOJ, Fear They will Go Bankrupt

Federal prosecutors involved in cases against Trump and related to January 6 are leaving the Justice Department at a high rate. Many prosecutors, particularly those working for Jack Smith, are worried about the threat of bankruptcy if Trump’s Justice Department investigates them for their actions.

Since Trump’s re-election, there is a growing sense of uncertainty within the Justice Department, as he and his team consider firing employees and tightening control over the department. This has prompted many prosecutors and agents, who may be at risk due to their involvement in high-profile cases involving Trump, to contemplate leaving their positions. Some have sought advice from Attorney General Merrick Garland and senior officials, who have encouraged them to remain for the government's stability and their specific expertise.

Law firms report receiving an unprecedented number of job applications from Justice Department lawyers. Unlike typical transitions that mostly affect political appointees, this situation is affecting many career employees. Jack Smith’s team of prosecutors is preparing for possible repercussions from a renewed Trump administration, leading them to review their communications to avoid any legal issues.

Concerns have been raised about whether they might destroy evidence related to misconduct or anti-Trump bias. Recently, Jack Smith requested to dismiss both federal cases against Trump. Some high-level officials within various federal agencies fear that anyone who has opposed Trump could face prosecution in the future.

Reports indicate that Jack Smith’s prosecutors are also anxious about financial security and are looking for ways to protect their assets. Some junior investigators have reached out to legal advisors about potential actions to shield their finances in case of investigations by a Trump-led Justice Department. There is a sense of dread among these officials regarding possible revenge inquiries if Trump’s administration retaliates against those involved in Trump-related investigations. 

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/12/federal-prosecutors-involved-trump-witch-hunts-january-6/

Sugar Juice & Fraud Propped Up Failing Biden Economy – Ed Dowd

Former Wall Street manager and financial analyst Ed Dowd has shared insights on how the Biden Administration has supported a struggling economy during the 2024 election year. He believes that "crisis level spending" and significant "fraud" have been employed to create a false sense of economic stability. Dowd compares current spending, which reached an 8% deficit to GDP, to the 10% deficit during the Great Financial Crisis of 2008-2009, questioning the absence of a real crisis beyond electoral motivations. The administration's spending was aimed at ensuring re-election, borrowing from the future by increasing government jobs and allowing illegal immigration, which he estimates added 10 million to 15 million immigrants in the past four years, further straining the economy.

The influx of illegal immigrants and resulting government spending are characterized as unproductive. Dowd suggests President Trump’s future policies would reverse this economic "sugar juice," expecting mass deportations and diminished government spending to follow. He notes the unsustainability of current economic practices and predicts a revolt in bond markets. Dowd attributes the masking of economic issues to misleading data, stating that employment figures were exaggerated by 1. 25 million jobs, leading to erroneous decisions by corporations and the Federal Reserve.

He anticipates downward revisions of GDP numbers and increased pain in 2025 due to these misjudgments and a general slowing global economy. He emphasizes that certain strategies must be enacted under a potential Trump administration for a recovery, hinting at a need for quick implementation. Despite his concerns, Dowd encourages gold investments and suggests holding cash.

Additionally, Dowd warns of increasing humanitarian and health issues possibly linked to COVID-19 vaccinations, reporting a significant rise in new disabilities and cancer cases among younger workers. He believes that the health insurance industry will see rising costs as claims increase. He discusses broader implications on healthcare due to these issues.

The interview featuring Dowd is part of a series with Greg Hunter, aimed at providing detailed economic analysis. Visitors to the site can access Dowd’s updated book and new economic reports on his personal website. Various comments from readers offer personal insights, reflecting on their experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic, questions related to Trump’s role in the vaccination discourse, and concerns about future geopolitical situations. The discussions illustrate a community engaged with the broader implications of public health policy and government fiscal actions. 

https://usawatchdog.com/sugar-juice-fraud-propped-up-failing-biden-economy-ed-dowd/

Inflammaging: How Chronic Inflammation Accelerates Aging and What You Can Do About It

As we age, our bodies can develop a condition called chronic low-grade inflammation, referred to as inflammaging. This condition speeds up the aging process and raises the risk of various age-related diseases, including heart problems, diabetes, and cognitive decline. However, research suggests that we can counteract inflammaging through straightforward lifestyle changes. Increasing high-quality protein intake, ensuring sufficient sleep and sunlight, and achieving daily step goals are some effective strategies. Recognizing the causes of inflammation and taking steps to reduce it can enhance quality of life in later years.

Inflammation is a natural response to injury or disease, but it becomes problematic when it persists over time. Chronic inflammation can last for many months or years, often due to factors like ongoing infections, autoimmune issues, and unhealthy lifestyle choices. This long-lasting inflammation can weaken our health, vitality, and lifespan. Key contributors to inflammaging include cellular senescence, or the aging of cells, and mitochondrial dysfunction, where the energy-producing parts of the cell do not function properly, leading to the generation of free radicals that encourage inflammation.

Aging also decreases immune function, which can impair the body’s ability to remove damaged cells and increase inflammation. Gut health is important as well; changes in gut bacteria can lead to "leaky gut," allowing toxins to enter the bloodstream and trigger inflammation. Lifestyle factors such as inactivity, poor diet, stress, smoking, and environmental toxins can worsen inflammation and speed up aging.

If chronic inflammation is ignored, it can lead to serious health problems, including heart disease, metabolic conditions, neurodegenerative diseases, and reduced life quality. It may also contribute to mood disorders. Symptoms of inflammaging can include digestive issues, brain fog, difficulty losing weight, low energy, and persistent aches and pains.

To combat inflammaging, a mix of dietary and lifestyle changes is necessary. Focusing on high-quality protein sources, such as lean meats, fish, and legumes, is vital. Aiming for an anti-inflammatory diet with plenty of vegetables and healthy fats, like omega-3s from fish, is also recommended. Regular exercise can help manage inflammation, with a goal of about 30 minutes of moderate activity most days of the week.

Maintaining gut health is crucial; consuming prebiotic and probiotic-rich foods can promote good bacteria. Additionally, getting enough high-quality sleep supports the body's repair mechanisms, while managing stress through mindfulness practices may help lower inflammatory responses. Adequate sun exposure is important for vitamin D production, which helps regulate inflammation.

Some dietary supplements might be helpful, especially if nutrient intake is low. Regular health check-ups can monitor inflammation markers and provide personalized strategies to tackle inflammaging effectively. By adopting these lifestyle changes, we can reduce the chronic low-grade inflammation associated with aging, leading to a healthier and more fulfilling life as we grow older. 

https://www.theepochtimes.com/health/inflammaging-how-chronic-inflammation-accelerates-aging-and-what-you-can-do-about-it-5775995?utm_source=partner&utm_campaign=ZeroHedge&src_src=partner&src_cmp=ZeroHedge

The Top 10 Hoaxes The Propaganda Press Peddled In 2024

 In 2024, there was a significant amount of misinformation circulated by corporate media regarding political events and figures. This summary highlights ten notable examples of perceived media exploitation of facts surrounding Donald Trump, Joe Biden, and related controversies.

1. Bloodbath Comment: Trump warned of an "economic bloodbath" for the auto industry if Democrats won, which media misrepresented as a threat of actual violence.

2. War on SCOTUS: The New York Times fabricated a story about Justice Alito regarding an upside-down American flag, mischaracterizing it as unethical despite Alito's clarification.

3. Biden's Cognitive Decline: The media attempted to downplay Biden’s cognitive issues, claiming viral videos were fake until his poor debate performance forced them to acknowledge it.

4. Project 2025: Media portrayed The Heritage Foundation's conservative roadmap as a dangerous plan, despite Trump stating he was not affiliated with it and its policy recommendations being established conservative views.

5. Kamala Harris's Role: Following discussions of replacing Biden with Harris, media minimized her failures in handling border issues, asserting that she was never officially labeled as the “border czar. "

6. Trump's Arlington Cemetery Visit: NPR criticized Trump for visiting Arlington at the request of Gold Star families, accusing him of politicizing the event when families rejected this narrative.

7. Biden's "Garbage" Comment: After Biden referred to many Trump supporters as "garbage," media scrambled to mitigate backlash, with arguments suggesting it was due to a stutter.

8. Trump’s Comments on Liz Cheney: Trump criticized Cheney for her military views, which the media twisted to imply he called for her execution.

9. Assassination Attempts Against Trump: Media largely ignored or downplayed two assassination attempts on Trump, framing them as mere "incidents" while glossing over the suspect's Democratic ties.

10. The Atlantic's Claims: The Atlantic published a hit piece alleging Trump expressed admiration for Hitler's generals and difficulties with a soldier's funeral expenses, despite evidence against the claims.

Throughout 2024, media outlets engaged in multiple misinformation campaigns that distorted the truth surrounding political events and individuals. These examples illustrate a continuous pattern of media manipulation aimed at influencing public perception in favor of certain political agendas.

https://thefederalist.com/2024/12/30/the-top-10-hoaxes-the-propaganda-press-peddled-in-2024/

A Spiteful Biden Adds to His Failed Legacy

President Joe Biden is described as showing spitefulness, attributing it to his health issues, while serving as the President of the United States. The Democrats aimed to obstruct Trump’s presidency during the 2020 election, which followed a global pandemic. They blamed Trump for COVID-19, exploited racial tensions from the George Floyd riots, and promoted Biden and Harris as a unifying ticket. Despite the mainstream media's clear bias, untested voting methods during the pandemic contributed to a narrow Biden victory, which many consider a problematic outcome.

The upcoming 2024 election feels like a rescue mission for the presidency and the nation, as Trump and conservative candidates received clear victories. Despite this, Democrats and the media aimed to preserve Biden's unpopular agenda, not for its quality but due to its liberal nature and as a rejection of Trump. Biden's recent actions are viewed as spiteful, particularly in trying to hinder Trump's influence.

One notable action is Biden’s attempt to sell off steel meant for the border wall, in direct contrast to the public's desire to secure the border. He is offering these materials at a significantly reduced price to slow the wall's construction. Biden also extended the opportunity for federal workers to work from home until 2029, diverging from Trump's push for accountability in government jobs. Furthermore, Biden aims to hire 1,500 Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) officials at substantial salaries, despite evidence showing DEI may not be effective in government settings.

Additionally, Biden intends to allocate another $4. 5 billion for student loan forgiveness, which goes against recent Supreme Court decisions. He is also planning substantial funding for the Environmental Protection Agency to advance his Green New Deal agenda. Other Democratic politicians, like California Governor Gavin Newsom, are taking measures to protect illegal immigrants and pass legislation against internal combustion engines, reflecting a broader leftist agenda.

Trump's team is hopeful that the Congressional Review Act, established to prevent outgoing administrations from undermining incoming ones, may help mitigate the hurdles set by Biden's actions. Overall, Biden's presidency is characterized as a term with spiteful actions that challenge the incoming administration’s ability to govern effectively. 

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2024/12/a_spiteful_biden_adds_to_his_failed_legacy.html

Insidious Bill “Genocide” Gates and his investor cohorts plan to CHOP DOWN billions of TREES and BURY THEM in order to fix “climate change”

 Bill Gates has raised over $6 million to fund a controversial plan aimed at fighting climate change by cutting down and burying trees, known as "Breakthrough Energy. " Critics argue this initiative led by Gates and supported by organizations like Stripe is irrational and harmful, claiming it may serve as a cover to reduce the global population.

Gates suggests that thinning out 70 million acres of Western forests over the next ten years will cut carbon dioxide levels. However, many believe this approach will do little for humanity and challenge the logic behind reducing forest resources, which are vital for various human needs. Critics call the idea of burying trees to improve air quality nonsensical and indicative of a destructive agenda.

The central claim is that this effort might enhance carbon offsets while bringing no real benefit to human life. The initiative purportedly aims to keep carbon dioxide out of the atmosphere by burying dead trees, mirroring beliefs that such act could offer long-term environmental benefits.

Concerns are raised about this plan being marketed as a business opportunity rather than a solution to genuine environmental issues. Those backing it, including Kadama Systems, are seen as part of a wider trend that prioritizes profit over environmental health and human sustainability. Critics describe this as a dangerous form of "fake science. "

In summary, the scheme to chop down and bury trees as a method to combat climate change has elicited considerable backlash. Many see it as part of an outrageous agenda possibly aimed at reducing the human population while claiming to serve environmental interests. The proposal is viewed as an attack on both nature and humanity's future, gathering skepticism from various groups concerned about the impacts of such initiatives on the planet and society.

https://www.naturalnews.com/2024-12-29-gates-cohorts-cut-down-bury-trees-co2.html

Battle for Speaker of the House Heats Up

 Musk causes uproar for backing Germany’s far-right party

Musk, Ramaswamy spar with Trump supporters over H-1B work visas
15 injured after Brightline train collides with fire truck in Florida
Mexico creating app for migrants to send alerts if detained by US immigration agents
MAGA’s new DEI fight
Trump calls federal judge’s decision on border wall “major, crucial WIN”
GOP “playing with fire” if Johnson removed as speaker, Rep. Lawler says
2 dead after search for Sasquatch in Washington national forest
Eric Schmitt blasts ‘abuse’ of H-1B visa program, says Americans ‘shouldn’t train their foreign replacements’
China directs largest military build-up since 1930s Nazi Germany, expert warns, citing Pentagon report
Are your smart home cameras spying on you? Study reveals shocking data grabs
‘Gate lice’ and ‘seat squatters’ among 2024’s most viral travel trends
OpenAI beefs up Washington presence with a pitch for energy and security
Bird flu mutations raise fears of a broader outbreak
Florida for sale? Environmentalists worry that state’s conservation lands face uncertain future.
Trump’s Silicon Valley Advisor Pick Pits MAGA Loyalists Against Tech Bros Led By Musk, Ramaswamy
Plane Crashes Into South Korean Airport Fence Leaving At Least 179 Dead
Costco Embraces DEI As Other Companies Move In Opposite Direction

Will Dems Disrupt Certification of Trump’s Triumph?

When the Electoral College confirmed Donald Trump’s victory over Kamala Harris on December 17, many thought the certification would be straightforward. However, Democrats have a history of attempting to block Republican victories. The ongoing debate includes claims that Trump should not hold office due to Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, with some arguing he is an insurrectionist.

Some critics, like lawyers Evan Davis and David Schulte, labeled Trump as an “oath-breaking insurrectionist” in a recent piece, asserting that there is overwhelming evidence against him, despite the fact that he has never been charged with insurrection. They reference previous forums that allegedly labeled Trump as guilty, but these include his impeachment trial, which acquitted him, and other decisions that were later rejected.

Democratic Rep. Jamie Raskin expressed strong views on the role of Congress in possibly preventing Trump from taking office again, suggesting that Congress would be responsible for communicating disqualification to supporters on January 6, 2025. There are concerns that he and other left-leaning Democrats may try to disrupt the certification process again. The Electoral Count Reform Act of 2022, however, makes it harder for such disruptions to occur by requiring more members from both chambers of Congress to challenge electors.

Additionally, Evans and Schulte's claims seem to lack credible evidence, as they argue that because Trump was not formally charged, it would somehow invalidate the electoral votes. They misinterpret the law, claiming that voting for a disqualified candidate does not constitute a regular vote.

Furthermore, the ECRA aims to clarify the Vice President's role in determining elector disputes, indicating that Kamala Harris will not have sole power over these decisions during the certification process. Analysts note that the ongoing rhetoric around Trump continues to reflect a lack of critical reasoning among some of his detractors.

In summary, discussions surrounding Trump’s eligibility, particularly concerning Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, reveal significant divisions and strategies among Democrats in the face of ongoing electoral processes. The hope remains that absurd claims will not derail the electoral system. 

https://spectator.org/will-dems-disrupt-certification-of-trumps-triumph/

Doctor And Former Planned Parenthood President Who Said COVID-19 Unvaccinated Should Be Forced To Stay In Their Homes Presses Biden Administration For Bird Flu Vaccines

 We may receive compensation from affiliate partners for some links on this site. Read our full Disclosure here.

Doctor Leana Wen, a former health commissioner of Baltimore and past president of Planned Parenthood, appeared on CBS's "Face The Nation" and expressed concerns about bird flu. Wen urged the Biden administration to make rapid testing available for bird flu and to ask the FDA to authorize an existing H5N1 vaccine. She compared this situation to past fears during COVID-19.

According to Wen, the government should learn from COVID-19 and recognize that a lack of testing does not mean the virus is not present. She noted that there is already a developed vaccine against H5N1 and mentioned that the administration has contracted to produce nearly 5 million doses. However, she criticized the government for not moving forward with FDA authorization for the vaccine.

Wen's comments during the COVID-19 pandemic were also highlighted, where she suggested that unvaccinated people should be treated similarly to intoxicated drivers and should not be allowed to leave their homes. She made statements implying that the vaccinated should not bear the consequences of others' choices not to vaccinate and noted that vaccination was associated with certain privileges in America, such as the right to travel.

Recently, concerns about bird flu have escalated, particularly in California, where Governor Gavin Newsom declared a state of emergency following reported cases in dairy cows. This declaration was due to a significant number of dairy cows testing positive for bird flu, leading to statewide monitoring.

A further investigation by the CDC confirmed the first severe case of H5N1 bird flu in the U. S. , where a patient had contact with infected birds. Despite this, the CDC stated that the overall risk to public health remains low. There has been no detected transmission from person to person regarding this strain of bird flu.

The outbreak is linked to a mutation of the H5N1 virus that may affect humans more readily than previous versions that primarily impacted birds. The CDC reported a connection between a severe human case in Louisiana and contact with a backyard poultry flock. There have been a total of 61 reported human cases of H5 bird flu in the United States.

Wen mentioned that mutations allowing the virus to bind better to airway receptors could make a person susceptible to both bird flu and seasonal flu simultaneously. She suggested that there might be more undiscovered H5N1 cases in the U. S. due to insufficient testing.

https://100percentfedup.com/popular-fast-food-chain-closes-first-restaurant-75/

Wipe Away as Much of Joe Biden’s Legacy as Possible

Joe Biden’s legacy is viewed negatively. Many believe he has been rejected by the American people, who prefer his opponent from 2020 over him. The writer claims that Biden's presidency had only one positive outcome: enabling Jimmy Carter to see someone perform worse than him in office. The writer feels Biden's accomplishments are minimal, similar to the Detroit Lions' lack of Super Bowl appearances, while noting that the Lions still have hope.

As Republicans gain control of the White House, House, and Senate, their goal is to reverse Biden's policies, particularly those related to COVID-19 relief funds that remain unspent. Reason Magazine reported in April that nearly $100 billion meant for state and local governments was still unused. The writer suggests that the Trump administration should instruct these governments to stop using funds and warns that future federal support will be reduced for any misused money.

The writer urges action against unspent funds from the “Inflation Reduction Act,” recommending an immediate repeal due to the substantial future spending obligations it creates. They highlight that increased costs for seniors under this act are detrimental and criticize the Democrats for using inflation as a cover for these policies.

There’s concern that Republicans may only hold power for a short time, and if they do not swiftly counter the Democrats' actions, their opportunity will be wasted. The message is clear: bold and immediate action is crucial. 

https://www.frontpagemag.com/wipe-away-as-much-of-joe-bidens-legacy-as-possible/

Another Biden Parting Outrage

Recently, President Joe Biden commuted the sentences of 37 out of 40 federal death row inmates, changing their sentences from death to life imprisonment without parole. This decision was made just before his upcoming trip to Italy, where he will meet Pope Francis. In his statement, Biden expressed a principled stance against the death penalty and wanted to prevent the next president from resuming executions, clearly referring to President-elect Donald Trump.

Biden's actions appear politically motivated. He commuted the sentences of prisoners involved in heinous crimes while choosing not to commute the sentences of three high-profile killers: Dylann Roof, Robert Bowers, and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, who were all involved in racially or religiously motivated mass murders. Biden argued that he believes in stopping federal executions, except in cases involving terrorism and hate crimes. He seemed to base his choices on the public visibility and political implications of each case.

Many Americans hold divided views on the death penalty. Generally, most people have supported it throughout history. Presently, a majority53%favor the death penalty according to Gallup polls. The cases of the prisoners on federal death row are complex, with many convicted of terrible acts. They have undergone the legal process and received appropriate sentences.

Biden's decisions seem to stem from a need to navigate political pressures. He has faced criticism for previous clemency acts and aimed to avoid further political fallout from these pardons. Following the commutations, Republican Senator Tom Cotton criticized Biden’s rationale, arguing that it reveals a lack of principled opposition to the death penalty since the most controversial cases were not commuted. Overall, Biden's decisions regarding these sentences seem more about political expediency than a clear moral stance against the death penalty. 

https://www.frontpagemag.com/another-biden-parting-outrage/