Special Counsel: Hunter Biden Was Not Selectively Prosecuted

On December 2, 2024, special counsel David Weiss's office stated that there was no evidence of selective prosecution in the case against Hunter Biden. This response was made in filings to a federal judge in Delaware, asserting, “There has never been any evidence of vindictive or selective prosecution in this case. ” In another filing in California, prosecutors repeated that there was never evidence supporting allegations of selective prosecution. This follows President Biden's announcement of a pardon for Hunter, which he claimed was necessary due to his son being “selectively, and unfairly, prosecuted. ”

Prosecutors highlighted that multiple judges, including those appointed by Biden, have previously dismissed similar claims from Hunter Biden. They noted that Hunter Biden pleaded guilty to tax charges in California and was convicted of gun-related offenses in Delaware. The president's pardon covers any offenses Hunter has committed from January 1, 2014, through December 1, 2024, including those related to Weiss’s charges.

Hunter Biden's attorneys informed federal judges in both California and Delaware that the pardon should lead to the dismissal of the indictments against him. They referenced legal precedents stating that when a pardon is issued, it generally leads to the dismissal of the pending indictments and the halting of future proceedings.

In contrast, prosecutors challenged this interpretation, requesting judges to close the dockets without dismissing the charges, meaning the records would still be available. They maintained that although a pardon is an act of mercy, it does not erase the existence of charges or acknowledge any allegations of improper motives behind the prosecution. They noted that no court has supported Hunter Biden's claims of selective prosecution and that his request to dismiss the indictment lacks legal backing.

David Weiss served as the acting U. S. attorney for Delaware during the Trump administration and was appointed by Attorney General Merrick Garland in 2023 to investigate Hunter Biden. Weiss ended up bringing charges approved by grand juries in both Delaware and California.

President Biden also mentioned that he would not have issued the pardon if a plea deal between Hunter and prosecutors had been accepted. This deal would allow Hunter to plead guilty to two misdemeanor tax charges while avoiding punishment for a felony gun charge. However, U. S. District Judge Maryellen Noreika rejected this plea agreement upon discovering additional conditions. On Tuesday, she indicated her intent to dismiss Hunter Biden's case given the president's pardon but sought the government's input. Meanwhile, Judge Mark Scarsi, overseeing another case, has yet to comment on the pardon or dismissal request. 

https://www.theepochtimes.com/us/special-counsel-no-evidence-shows-hunter-biden-selectively-prosecuted-5769542?ea_src=frontpage&ea_cnt=a&ea_med=lead-story-0-title-0

As Many as 200,000 Ukrainian Soldiers Have Deserted

 Ukrainian soldiers are increasingly deserting their posts, causing significant issues for the government in Kiev. Reports suggest that as many as 200,000 soldiers have deserted, with some Ukrainian officials stating that many troops are tired and facing severe shortages. Many have left their combat positions, which has made defensive lines weaker and led to territorial losses according to military commanders and soldiers.

The issue of desertions is growing, with prosecution rates for soldiers who do not report for duty rising sharply. In 2022, around 9,000 were prosecuted for desertion, which increased to 24,000 in 2023. By 2024, the number of prosecutions reached about 50,000 within just the first nine months. However, the actual numbers might be higher, as some officials speculate that the figure could be as high as 200,000. Many believe this problem stems from soldier fatigue as the conflict continues.

Kiev is also struggling with a substantial shortage of manpower due to both casualties and desertions. Reports indicate that the military lost a net total of 4,000 soldiers along the front lines in September alone. To address these shortages, the White House has suggested that Ukraine consider lowering the minimum age for military service to 18.

https://libertarianinstitute.org/news/as-many-as-200000-ukrainian-soldiers-have-deserted/

Mexico Stops 2 Migrant Caravans After Trump Tariff Threat

Days after Donald Trump stated that Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum agreed to stop migration into the United States or face a 25% import duty, Mexico responded by breaking up two migrant caravans. These caravans had around 4,000 people at their highest number. Some migrants were bused to southern cities in Mexico, while others received transit papers for 20 days of travel.

Migrant rights activist Luis García Villagrán suggested that Mexico's actions were part of an agreement with the U. S. President. Senator Joni Ernst thanked Trump for his efforts to secure the border, stating that the era of open borders is over.

The first caravan started near the Mexico-Guatemala border on November 5, coinciding with Trump's election. It traveled approximately 270 miles in four weeks before being dismantled in Tehuantepec, Oaxaca. Migrants reported being taken to various locations, including Acapulco, Morelia, and Oaxaca City.

The National Immigration Institute stated that migrants voluntarily accepted bus rides to places with medical assistance and where their migrating status would be reviewed, indicating they preferred this over risking their journey.

The second caravan reached the town of Tonala in Chiapas state, where authorities offered transit visas to the migrants. Additionally, Mexico's Supreme Court approved an injunction to create a public registry of detained migrants filed by the Jesuit Refugee Service and the Alaíde Foppa Legal Clinic. 

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/mexico-stops-2-migrant-caravans-after-trump-tariff-threat

Influential retired FBI leader says agents back Kash Patel as next director: ‘He's the right fix’

After President Biden pardoned his son, Kash Patel's likely nomination as FBI Director aligns with the Trump team's goal to revamp an agency seen as prioritizing politics over crime fighting, according to a retired FBI supervisor, Jeff Danik. Patel is supported by many agents due to his national security background and the need for leadership changes that reflect this perspective. Danik states that Patel is fully qualified for the role and brings a well-rounded skill set from his prior experiences as a public defender, prosecutor, counterterrorism director, and chief of staff.

Danik highlights Patel's unique qualifications stemming from both his significant professional achievements and his personal experiences with the system. Patel received awards during the Obama administration for his national security work, including prosecution efforts against terrorists in Uganda. This recognition adds credibility to his background as he seeks the FBI position.

Danik's support is notable because he is respected within the FBI community. He suggests that many current agents are eager for change and willing to support Patel's nomination. He points out the complexity of the bureaucracy in the FBI and reinforces the idea that the agency's issues lie predominantly within a small group of high-ranking officials. These officials are accused of allowing political factors to interfere with investigations. Danik emphasizes that working agents are dedicated and often face challenges from those in senior positions.

Democrats and the media are reportedly trying to block Patel's nomination, suggesting he may misuse the FBI against political opponents. Opinions from various commentators have ranged from asserting Patel's unqualified nature to claiming he poses a threat to press freedoms. Past administrations, including Biden's and Obama's, have also faced criticism for attempting to unmask reporters’ sources, highlighting a complex relationship between government and media.

The Trump transition team plans to refocus the discussion on Patel's qualifications rather than negative media portrayals, aiming to emphasize his commitment to restore integrity at the FBI and protect First Amendment rights. However, Patel's nomination hinges on the resignation or dismissal of the current FBI Director, Christopher Wray.

FBI whistleblower Steve Friend has also endorsed Patel, suggesting that a shift in leadership is necessary for the agency's integrity. He called for the end of a performance bonus system that supposedly encourages poor practices. Other commentators, like Mike Davis, advocate for Patel's confirmation and have urged Wray to step aside to facilitate this process.

Overall, Patel's nomination is surrounded by debate over his capabilities and the broader implications for the FBI and its operations within a politically charged environment. 

https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/all-things-trump/influential-retired-fbi-leader-says-agents-back-kash-patel-next

Will Big Food be the Next Big Tobacco?

The processed food industry is preparing for a significant conflict as lobbyists and consultants seek to oppose potential reforms led by Robert F. Kennedy Jr. , who aims to change policies regarding processed foods, particularly targeting junk foods in schools. Obesity is a major concern in America, especially among children, and is linked to rising cases of diabetes and other health issues, a situation exacerbated by the prevalence of ultra-processed foods high in sugars, salts, and fats, along with harmful additives.

Kennedy’s focus on ultra-processed foods highlights their association with serious health problems such as type 2 diabetes and heart disease. If Kennedy's reforms succeed, food manufacturers may face increased costs and need to adapt to new regulations. Consumers might be willing to pay more for healthier processed food, which could pose challenges for manufacturers if they do not adapt to the changing market demands.

The food industry could learn from the past struggles of the tobacco industry, which initially resisted regulation but ultimately faced significant losses due to public health awareness efforts. Currently, food manufacturers find themselves at a crossroads where they can either resist change or engage in discussions with Kennedy to create healthier options for consumers.

Moreover, allegations of "corporate capture" of the FDA and potential conflicts of interest due to the relationship between industry and government are raised. The article suggests that prioritizing unbiased research and educating consumers would be more beneficial than strict regulations or taxes.

Manufacturers are encouraged to advocate for food reforms rather than oppose them, proposing a collaborative approach to introduce gradual, impactful changes. While many Americans still consume junk food regularly, there’s an awareness of its health risks among younger generations.

Consumers need to manage their intake more wisely, especially parents regarding their children's diets. Kennedy's proposals should include consumer education, as the dangers of additives and preservatives in food need highlighting. The challenge lies in creating safer foods without overly stringent regulations.

There exists a unique opportunity for the food industry and RFK Jr. to cooperate in a way that benefits public health and the market. As public perceptions of food evolve, especially among younger people, the question remains: Is it wiser for manufacturers to resist change rather than embrace it? 

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2024/12/will_big_food_be_the_next_big_tobacco.html

High Court of Kenya suspends Bill Gates’ special privileges and immunity

The High Court of Kenya has suspended special privileges and immunities that were granted to the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF) and its employees. These privileges were issued in October 2024 but faced legal challenges due to concerns over accountability and national sovereignty. A judge temporarily halted these advantages during the ongoing legal process, citing potential harm to public interest and constitutional principles.

The privileges allowed BMGF to engage in various legal activities without facing typical legal repercussions, raising alarms among critics who argued that this presented a troubling lack of accountability. The Law Society of Kenya filed a legal challenge against the government, questioning the legality of the immunity granted to a private foundation. The High Court's decision to suspend these privileges means these operations are now under greater scrutiny.

Justice Bahati Mwamuye’s ruling prohibits BMGF from enjoying any of its previously granted immunities while also requiring the collection of related documentation for court responses. The case is set for further mention in February 2025. Critics of the Gates Foundation view the granted privileges as an alarming maneuver to protect its operations from legal oversight.

Several experts express concern about the implications this decision could have on other nations in Africa, fearing it might set a precedent where wealthy organizations receive special legal protection, undermining local sovereignty. The ongoing situation reflects broader concerns regarding the influence of powerful entities in national governance and law.

Public health experts have criticized the immunity, suggesting it enables unsafe practices under the guise of philanthropy. Some argue that entities like the Gates Foundation leverage their financial clout to manipulate policies in their favor, potentially harming local populations and legal autonomy. The Foundation’s investments in various sectors in Africa, including healthcare and agriculture, have also drawn scrutiny for failing to deliver promised improvements and instigating conflicts with local agricultural interests.

Furthermore, the Foundation’s involvement with digital identification systems raises ethical concerns about privacy and control. Critics allege that this aids in a larger agenda by powerful organizations to exert control over populations through various means, including the promotion of vaccines.

In summary, the High Court's action highlights growing tensions around the privileges granted to powerful foundations like BMGF, raising essential questions about legal protections, national sovereignty, and the actual impact of their activities on local communities. The situation calls for ongoing attention as it unfolds, with implications that reach beyond Kenya's borders, potentially affecting how similar organizations operate throughout Africa and beyond. 

https://expose-news.com/2024/12/03/high-court-of-kenya-suspends-bill-gates-special/

National Grid & The Hornsea Battery

“We do not believe any group of men adequate enough or wise enough to operate without scrutiny or without criticism. We know that the only way to avoid error is to detect it, that the only way to detect it is to be free to inquire. We know that in secrecy error undetected will flourish and subvert”. – J Robert Oppenheimer.

This text discusses the issues surrounding battery storage and the National Grid in the context of wind power in the UK. The author, Paul Homewood, criticizes the National Grid for misleading the public about the effectiveness of batteries in dealing with wind energy intermittency. The Hornsea 3 project will have a capacity of 2. 9 GW, but the planned 600 MWh storage will only last for a mere 12 minutes when wind energy is absent. The real purpose of the storage is to stabilize the grid frequency due to the variability of wind energy, not to serve as a backup during power shortages.

Homewood argues that the costs associated with such storage options will not be covered by the companies like Oersted, but ultimately be passed on to the consumers. He expresses concern that the National Grid misrepresents these storage projects as solutions to the challenges posed by wind power reliability. Various comments highlight the high costs of battery energy storage systems (BESS) and their inefficiencies.

The text also mentions the significant waste of wind power in the UK due to the grid's inability to handle the excess energy, leading to over £1 billion in costs for turning off wind farms. Operators like SSE are being paid to not generate energy because the grid is not equipped to manage the increased output from expanded wind farms.

There is commentary about how energy systems often favor gas plants over wind farms when demand fluctuates, leading to wasted renewable energy. The contributors criticize the current energy policies, suggesting they are outdated and not in line with the country's renewable energy goals. Issues are raised regarding the safety and practicality of large battery systems, particularly related to their energy storage capacity and the potential dangers associated with battery malfunctions.

In conclusion, the continuing reliance on wind energy, without adequate infrastructure or battery storage that truly meets renewable energy needs, raises doubts about the UK's ability to achieve its net zero targets and effectively stabilize the energy grid, especially in the face of changing demand and supplies. The concerns reflect skepticism about the government’s energy strategies and the fundamental economics of transitioning to renewable energy sources. 

https://notalotofpeopleknowthat.wordpress.com/2024/12/01/national-grid-the-hornsea-battery/

Well, Then, by All Means, Let’s Put Hunter Under Oath Now

Hunter Biden has been pardoned by his father, President Joe Biden, for various offenses against the U. S. that he may have committed. This includes possible crimes dating back to January 1, 2014, when Hunter joined the board of Burisma, a Ukrainian natural gas company. The support for Ukraine amid ongoing conflict raises questions about U. S. involvement and aid given to a country with dubious governance.

Despite Joe Biden's previous claims that he wouldn't pardon his son, the pardon has now opened the door for potential congressional accountability regarding Hunter’s business dealings. With a new Congress coming in, there is an opportunity for an inquiry into the alleged influence-peddling activities of the Biden family. Hunter and his uncle James should be called to provide testimony regarding their actions and business dealings.

It is crucial that any inquiry focuses not on prosecution but on creating laws to prevent corruption and influence-peddling that undermines democracy. There should be thorough examination and questioning of Hunter Biden, particularly about the sources of his income, which includes millions from Romanian interests, and possible connections to serious issues like drug trafficking.

The pardon, aimed at protecting Hunter from political consequences, may also serve as a barrier to accountability for the presidency and its family. The system should be transparent, free from corruption, and open to scrutiny by Congress. Without thorough investigation, the concerns about the ethical conduct of influential political families can continue unchallenged.

The article highlights the need for full accountability, transparency, and reform to restore integrity in Washington, especially concerning influence-peddling. Hunter Biden’s cooperation with inquiries should be mandated, and there should be consequences for non-compliance to ensure a proper examination of the Biden family's dealings. The goal is to ensure that the U. S. remains a free republic where families of powerful politicians cannot profit at the nation's expense without facing the repercussions of their actions.

The conversation surrounding Hunter Biden's activities and the justice system's politicization has significant implications for future governance and must be addressed. This is an opportunity for Congress to investigate and push for reforms that can restore public trust in the governmental system. 

https://spectator.org/lets-put-hunter-under-oath-now/

Putin Exposes WEF’s $45 Billion Bounty on Donald Trump’s Head

 The global elite are worried about President-elect Donald Trump and their plan to take him down before he assumes office on January 20. Russian President Vladimir Putin has warned that there may be an imminent threat to Trump's life, with an insider claiming a bounty has been placed on him by the World Economic Forum. As Trump prepares to confront the Deep State and globalist powers, questions arise about whether he will succeed or be silenced.

The Trump transition team has reported that several incoming Cabinet members have received bomb threats and have been targeted in harassment incidents known as swatting, which can be dangerous due to the unexpected arrival of armed police. Trump has survived two attempted assassinations and now faces a real threat backed by powerful globalists.

Putin's warning emphasizes the seriousness of the threats facing Trump, suggesting that there are forces at work aiming to neutralize him before he takes office. The global elite are said to be fearful of Trump’s presidency because he challenges their control and exposes their manipulation of the system.

Reports also indicate that people worldwide are rising against the elite. In Romania, Calin Georgescu has gained significant political traction, while protests in Poland oppose globalist influence. People in other countries view Trump's presidency with hope, as they believe it signals a change in the global power dynamic.

The article concludes by urging readers to wake up to the unfolding reality and recognize that the elites feel their power is threatened. It suggests that the public's awakening could lead to drastic actions from the globalists to maintain control. The People's Voice encourages readers to subscribe to their channel for more information and analysis surrounding these events.

https://thepeoplesvoice.tv/putin-exposes-wefs-45-billion-bounty-on-donald-trumps-head/

Speaker Mike Johnson Fights Back Against Radical Gender Ideology

I traveled around the country as an elite swimmer for over a decade and never imagined a world where men would be allowed in female-only bathrooms and locker rooms. I knew these separate spaces were meant for my privacy and safety. However, as I talked about my experience competing against a man in the pool, I realized how distorted our nation's understanding of sex has become.

It has progressed to a point where even groups that were once "pro-woman" have rejected basic concepts of femininity and womanhood. Earlier this year, the National Women’s Law Center, an organization that was founded to support women, filed a brief opposing my legal action against the NCAA, arguing that the definition of "woman" should include men.

When leading "pro-woman" groups spread falsehoods about basic biology and favor men over women, we need brave leaders who speak out against these changes. Recently, Speaker of the House Mike Johnson did just that, making headlines by acknowledging a simple truth that would have been unremarkable just a few years ago: Men are men, women are women, and men cannot become women. He emphasized that the government should safeguard the privacy, safety, and opportunities of both men and women.

For most of congressional history, this idea was well understood and rarely stated. However, in today's world where traditional definitions of sex have merged with shifting concepts of "gender identity," Speaker Johnson’s remarks had a significant impact.

His comments came during the orientation for newly elected members of Congress, including Sarah McBride, a man who identifies as a woman. I know Speaker Johnson, and he is principled and faithful. A few months ago, he organized a panel about Title IX that included me, former Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos, Rep. Virginia Foxx, and Heather Higgins from the Independent Women’s Forum. He clearly opposed the Biden administration’s attempts to redefine "sex" to include "gender identity" under Title IX.

Last week, Speaker Johnson once again took a stand on the vital issue of protecting women. He used his authority over Capitol facilities to ensure that single-sex facilities remain separated by biological sex, safeguarding women's spaces.

This is not an attack on Rep. McBride, as some media outlets have claimed. Speaker Johnson acknowledged that McBride is a duly elected member of Congress deserving of dignity and respect. However, Rep. McBride is also a victim of modern gender ideology, which asserts that men can become women and misleads those with gender dysphoria to think the issue is physical rather than psychological. The treatments available can lead to sterility, loss of sexual function, and other irreversible medical issues.

The Independent Women’s Forum has documented stories from de-transitioners who have undergone procedures that left lasting damage to their bodies after being advised to take puberty blockers and undergo surgeries. Many of these individuals now face intense regret and physical harm, but their warnings have been met with hostility from the left-leaning media and activists who criticize Speaker Johnson for supporting women.

We need to stop the madness of gender ideology for the sake of protecting the privacy and safety of women and girls, as well as the health of future generations. Every American who cares about the safety of their daughters, nieces, sisters, or cousins must speak out against the false narratives that confuse men and women. Speaker Johnson is advocating for women by taking a stand to keep men out of women's bathrooms in the House, and I hope his actions encourage leaders around the nation to follow suit. 

https://granitegrok.com/national/2024/12/speaker-mike-johnson-fights-back-against-radical-gender-ideology

Nancy Pelosi Seeks to Stage Another Coup In the Democratic Party

Former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is reportedly planning another power move within the Democratic Party after her involvement in the ousting of President Joe Biden. According to a report by the New York Times, Pelosi is working to replace Rep. Jerry Nadler as the top Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee. She is encouraging Rep. Jamie Raskin to challenge Nadler, who has not yet made a public announcement about his potential candidacy. However, the close friendship between Nadler and Raskin poses a challenge to this plan.

Raskin is known for being a loyal Democrat, having been associated with several controversial matters, including unfounded claims about Russian interference during Donald Trump's presidency. He has also expressed intentions to not certify a potential Trump victory in the 2024 elections. Pelosi seems concerned that the current Democratic leadership might not be capable of effectively confronting Trump and his supporters in Congress.

Currently, Nadler is actively campaigning to retain his position, highlighting his role in the impeachments of Trump. He is seen as dedicated to his job, and Raskin is noted for his skills in spontaneous debates, which could add to the competition. Democratic leaders are remaining neutral for the moment regarding this internal tussle.

Additionally, with Jim Jordan, the current chair of the House Judiciary Committee, being a Trump ally, any Democratic initiatives to obstruct investigations will have to navigate through his committee. Older representatives like Raúl Grijalva and David Scott are also facing opposition from younger candidates looking to take their places.

In Jonathan Alter’s book, it is stated that Pelosi was frustrated by the outcome of Biden's withdrawal from the race, believing she bore the blame for it. This time around, she is reportedly approaching the effort to replace Nadler with more caution. 

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/saraharnold/2024/12/01/nancy-pelosi-orchestrating-a-shake-up-of-democratic-leadership-n2648478

Outlet Linked To Trump Impeachment Is Majority-Funded By U.S., Bombshell Reveals

A new investigation has shown that the Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project (OCCRP), a major entity in investigative journalism, is primarily funded by the U. S. government. This outlet has played a significant role in political matters, including the impeachment of President-elect Donald Trump. The report notes that OCCRP has received over 52% of its funding from U. S. federal agencies, amounting to at least $47 million since it started in 2008, with more funds already committed.

The findings come from various sources, including budget reports and discussions with OCCRP leaders, revealing a strong reliance on U. S. financial support. Drew Sullivan, co-founder of OCCRP, insisted that while the U. S. government funds the organization, it does not control editorial decisions. However, he acknowledged that the government can veto important personnel choices, raising concerns about OCCRP’s independence.

OCCRP has made a notable impact through its reporting, exposing corruption in countries such as Russia and China and fostering governmental transitions in several nations. The organization collaborates with major media outlets like The Washington Post, The New York Times, and The Guardian, which strengthens its reports but may lead to criticism due to its funding situation.

Former collaborators are reconsidering their partnerships; for example, Germany’s NDR has halted future collaborations after learning about the level of U. S. support. Although OCCRP often investigates corruption abroad, critics argue that it seldom examines issues within the United States.

With operations in over 60 countries and more than 200 journalists, OCCRP has been involved in significant investigations like the Panama Papers and reports on financial corruption. The organization aims to tackle complex stories that cross international borders.

OCCRP's inquiries into Rudy Giuliani’s actions in Ukraine were crucial during President Trump’s impeachment. This has led to questions about whether U. S. funding influenced OCCRP’s focus, especially due to the investigations’ political implications.

Some, like Georg Eckelsberger from the Austrian magazine Dossier, acknowledged being aware of OCCRP’s funding from the U. S. government but maintained that it had no influence on the objectivity and quality of the journalistic work produced. 

https://trendingpoliticsnews.com/just-in-outlet-linked-to-trump-impeachment-is-majority-funded-by-u-s-bombshell-reveals-mace/

RFK Jr. Targets Big Pharma’s Most Powerful Tool

With Robert F. Kennedy Jr. set to lead President-elect Donald Trump’s U. S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Big Pharma is facing challenges as its main source of funding is at risk. One of Kennedy's early actions would focus on pharmaceutical advertising, specifically the direct-to-consumer (DTC) ads for prescription drugs, which are only allowed in the U. S. and New Zealand.

Kennedy plans to issue an executive order to ban these pharmaceutical ads on television as part of his Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) initiative. He stated that banning pharmaceutical advertising on TV could help address the chronic disease epidemic, pointing out that the U. S. has the highest disease rate and drug costs. This ban would disrupt the influence of Big Pharma on mass media, which has heavily supported corporate media advertising.

An analysis suggests that Big Pharma’s drug sales could decrease significantly due to a DTC ban, as the return on investment for such ads is substantial. MediaRadar reported that DTC advertising reached nearly $7 billion in 2023. The UK-based research firm Intron Health considers Kennedy’s proposed ban a significant threat. Additionally, Kennedy has called for a review of recent FDA guidelines requiring clear warnings of drug side effects in ads.

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/saraharnold/2024/12/01/rfk-jr-targets-big-pharmas-most-powerful-tool-n2648453

The “Price Stability” Myth Undermines Our Economy and Well-Being

For most commentators, a "stable price level" is seen as essential for economic stability. When consumer demand increases for one product over another, such as potatoes compared to tomatoes, the price of the favored product, potatoes, rises. Businesses need to be aware of these changes to avoid losses and make informed production decisions based on relative price changes. Economists argue that without a stable price level, it becomes difficult for businesses to understand demand shifts and make appropriate choices, leading to misallocation of resources and weakening economic fundamentals. Therefore, central banks are tasked with achieving "price stability" to help businesses recognize relative price changes.

Central banks, like the Federal Reserve, aim to keep inflation at around 2% each year, believing that any significant departure from this rate signifies instability. This belief is rooted in the idea that money is neutralalterations in the money supply only affect the overall price level, not relative prices among goods and services. For example, if the price of apples and potatoes is set, introducing money does not change their relative pricing; it simply allows for easy transactions in dollars.

If money supply doubles and prices double, a seller can still use the dollar amount they receive to buy the same amount of goods. However, this assumption is problematic. When new money is introduced, the first recipients benefit while others may not as prices begin to rise unevenly throughout the economy. Those who receive money later face rising prices and may be able to afford less, highlighting that increases in the money supply lead to a redistribution of wealth and alter demand for various goods.

The new dynamics from inflationary money supply increases cannot be sustained without ongoing growth in the supply, creating an unsustainable economic structure. The Federal Reserve’s policies to stabilize the price level involve increasing the money supply, which disrupts the natural allocation of resources since money injections are not neutral.

Prices are influenced by both real and monetary elements, meaning that sometimes, even with strong money growth, prices may not rise as expected. This can mislead economists into believing that price stability implies a healthy economy. Historically, such oversights have caused economists to miss signs of potential economic downturns. The idea of establishing a general "price level" is also flawed, as it is not possible to meaningfully determine a singular purchasing power of money in transactions across diverse goods without recognizing their unique values.

In conclusion, while many believe that "price stability" is crucial for economic well-being and efficient resource use, the Federal Reserve's pursuit of this stability through monetary policy undermines economic fundamentals. Instead of enforcing price stability, allowing free market fluctuations and maintaining sound money would enable businesses to respond accurately to consumer demands. 

https://mises.org/mises-wire/price-stability-myth-undermines-our-economy-and-well-being

This Town Just Banned American Flags and the U.S. Constitution at City Council Meetings.

 The town of Edison, New Jersey, has banned the display of items like American flags and the U. S. Constitution during city council meetings, claiming these displays are disruptive. This ban was implemented through a new local ordinance that also restricts how long residents can speak at meetings. Many residents believe the city is trying to silence concerns about how tax dollars are spent and issues of public safety. Maryann Hennessey, an Edison resident, expressed her frustration, stating that considering the American flag a prop is offensive and disrespectful.

During one meeting, Joel Bassoff was removed after he waved an American flag while speaking, with the council president affirming the rules against such displays. The new rules also prohibit residents from wearing costumes or masks without medical justification and allow for the removal of speakers deemed disruptive or too loud. Other residents questioned why the council is penalizing everyone for the actions of just a few, suggesting that this approach only increases anger and determination among citizens. Sue Malone-Barber pointed out that this conflict is making the situation worse for everyone involved.

https://thenationalpulse.com/2024/12/02/this-town-just-banned-american-flags-and-the-u-s-constitution-at-city-council-meetings/

Judge Enforces Subpoena Against ActBlue, Advancing Fundraising Probe Against Dems.

 A Wisconsin court decision is increasing scrutiny on ActBlue, a major Democratic fundraising platform. Judge Brad D. Schimel from Waukesha County Circuit Court approved a subpoena requiring ActBlue to explain claims made by GOP consultant Mark Block about unauthorized donations using his email identity. This legal action is part of a wider investigation led by Congress and 19 state attorneys general. The judge rejected ActBlue’s claims that complying with the subpoena would be too burdensome and allowed Block and his legal team from the America First Policy Institute (AFPI) to seek discovery to uncover potential fraud related to unauthorized donations from Block's old email associated with various liberal campaigns.

ActBlue's attempts to challenge the subpoena, mainly on behalf of a contributor named Bernard Cain, were unsuccessful. Judge Schimel stated that ActBlue functions as a contribution conduit and stressed the need for transparency in this matter. Block filed legal action this fall, claiming his identity was misused in a possible conspiracy exploiting ActBlue under civil racketeering laws. The investigation has also identified numerous questionable transactions on the platform, with House investigators issuing a subpoena amid inquiries into possible illegal foreign funding. ActBlue has consistently denied any wrongdoing.

https://thenationalpulse.com/2024/12/02/judge-enforces-subpoena-against-actblue-advancing-fundraising-probe-against-dems/

Why Hunter’s Pardon Could Expand Accountability for Biden Family

 President Joe Biden's pardon of his son, Hunter Biden, may impact the potential for accountability regarding the Biden family, as suggested by government watchdogs. This pardon allows Hunter Biden to testify without invoking his Fifth Amendment rights against self-incrimination. He was previously convicted on gun and tax charges, which could have led to substantial prison time.

The president's pardon covers any crimes Hunter may have committed from January 1, 2014, to December 1, 2024. Critics, like Mike Davis, argue that this situation could lead Congress to subpoena Hunter Biden, emphasizing that the issues at hand extend beyond personal misconduct to significant allegations involving the President.

Investigations by House committees have uncovered bank records pointing to numerous shell corporations owned by Biden family members that were allegedly conducting overseas business possibly linked to Joe Biden’s political actions. These findings raised concerns about potential corruption during Biden's time as vice president. Although the House committees made criminal referrals regarding Hunter and his brother James Biden, the decision to impeach was not pursued.

Hunter Biden's testimony could reveal further details about the family's influence-peddling activities. If he refuses to cooperate with Congress, he could face contempt charges. It has also been suggested that the incoming Trump administration consider its own investigations into the Biden family and previous federal inquiries.

Legal experts have debated the implications of the broad nature of Biden's pardon. Questions arise regarding its constitutionality and whether it effectively absolves Hunter of any potential future charges. Despite the pardon preventing federal criminal prosecution, critics emphasize it doesn't clear the Bidens from wrongdoing.

Hunter may now have to openly discuss his father's potential involvement in controversial dealings in China and Ukraine. If he doesn't testify truthfully, he may face perjury charges. The situation has also drawn attention to the investigations conducted by IRS whistleblowers, which alleged preferential treatment toward Hunter Biden during legal inquiries.

The chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee remarked on the perceived advantages Hunter Biden has enjoyed under the current administration, suggesting that the pardon is indicative of a continuing pattern of avoiding accountability for the Biden family's actions, which he claims President Biden was aware of.

Overall, Hunter Biden's legal status following the pardon puts immense pressure on him to clarify his family's dealings while potentially implicating political leaders in broader issues of ethics and legality.

https://www.dailysignal.com/2024/12/02/why-hunters-pardon-could-expand-accountability-for-biden-family/

DNC Finance Committee Member Calls for Audit of Kamala Harris Campaign: ‘People Became Millionaires’

Last week, Lindy Li, a Democrat big donor and former member of the DNC finance committee, criticized the Kamala Harris campaign for a large sum of missing campaign funds. She stated that no one is taking responsibility for this disappearance and is now requesting an audit to trace where the money went. Li pointed out that some individuals connected to the campaign have become millionaires almost instantly, implying that it appears some insiders were benefiting at the expense of the campaign.

James Carville has also called for an audit of the Harris campaign, reinforcing Li's concerns. They argue that the Democratic Party will struggle to raise funds until there is transparency about the missing money. Li highlighted that there are conflicts of interest and emphasized the need for a detailed financial review beyond what federal election reports provide. She expressed that voters and donors must trust the party again, pointing out past issues, like Obama’s debt in 2012 and how it affected Hillary Clinton’s campaign.

Li believes there is no reason for these consultants to have made large fortunes from the campaign. She insists the campaign's funds should have focused on engaging voters in battleground states and addressing vital issues like inflation, rather than enriching well-connected individuals in the Democratic Party. She called for answers regarding why certain people became multimillionaires and stated that small donors to the campaign those who contributed smaller amounts out of belief in Harris should feel cheated. 

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/12/dnc-finance-committee-member-calls-audit-kamala-harris/

House Select Committee on Coronavirus Releases Report on Social Distancing, COVID-19 Vaccine Mandates

 The House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic has released a 520-page report following a two-year investigation into COVID-19 policies, including social distancing, mask mandates, and vaccine mandates. The report details the origins of the pandemic and examines how federal laws and funds were used in response to it.

Rep. Brad Wenstrup explained that the committee aimed to create a comprehensive after-action report to improve future pandemic responses. Throughout the investigation, the committee conducted 38 interviews, held 25 hearings, and reviewed over a million pages of documents.

The report found that the six-foot social distancing guideline lacked scientific support. It stated that this practice became a significant policy during the pandemic, with the CDC establishing the six-foot distance as a standard on March 22, 2020. Notably, Dr. Anthony Fauci acknowledged that there were no solid scientific standards backing this rule and distanced himself from the decision, attributing it to the CDC.

The report criticized the justification for this impactful COVID-19 policy, noting that it seemed to emerge without scientific trials or discussions among leadership. It stressed that such significant decisions should be based on science that can be communicated to the public.

Regarding mask use, the report indicated that the CDC and the Biden Administration selectively used data to argue that masks were entirely effective. The report emphasized that the CDC's role should include conducting thorough clinical trials to ensure the best research underlines their guidelines.

The report highlighted that mask mandates for K-12 students caused harm, noting that many countries did not recommend masks for young children due to low risks and potential negative effects on their development.

Additionally, the report stated that COVID-19 vaccine mandates lacked scientific basis and resulted in significant negative consequences: people lost jobs, healthcare and education sectors were weakened, military readiness suffered, and trust in public health declined. While five major federal vaccine mandates have been revoked, their impacts will persist.

The report criticized the mandates for ignoring natural immunity, assessing risks from the virus and vaccine, and recognizing that vaccines do not stop the virus's spread. It pointed out that federal officials overemphasized the vaccines' effectiveness, portraying unvaccinated individuals as the source of ongoing issues. The report accused the Biden Administration of failing to adhere to available evidence while claiming to follow scientific guidance.

Moreover, the report noted that herd immunity is supported by public health leaders, yet there was a coordinated effort to overlook natural immunity's significance. Lastly, it indicated that the COVID-19 vaccine did not fulfill prior promises of stopping the spread of the virus.

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2024/12/02/house-select-committee-report-social-distancing-covid-19-vaccine-mandates/

There’s a YUGE silver lining in the Hunter Biden pardon…

 After much speculation, President Biden pardoned his son, Hunter Biden, which raised a lot of anger over perceived elitism and injustice. Critics argue that this move protects the Biden family's alleged criminal activities and demonstrates a double standard in the justice system, as Hunter's serious crimes are seemingly overlooked while others face harsh penalties for lesser offenses.

Despite earlier assurances from Democratic leaders that Hunter would not receive a pardon, the decision came as no surprise to many who believe it was always part of Biden's plan. The media's previous claims that Biden would not pardon Hunter are considered by some to be misleading and contribute to the perception of the media as untrustworthy.

The text also highlights a belief that Hunter Biden's pardon could have implications for former President Trump's potential pardons of individuals involved in the January 6 events. Supporters argue that Hunter's actions pale in comparison to those facing legal consequences for their participation in the Capitol riots, thus creating a case for broader pardons that align with the notion of correcting injustices.

Overall, while acknowledging the perceived privilege that Hunter enjoys, some commentators see an opportunity to address other injustices in the political system, particularly concerning the treatment of January 6 prisoners. They urge supporters to use Hunter's pardon as a rallying point to advocate for justice and fairness in the broader legal context.

https://revolver.news/2024/12/yuge-silver-lining-in-the-hunter-biden-pardon/

EXPOSED: The globalists who control the legacy media

 

NewsCorp and the Murdoch family control Fox and National Geographic while Sony controls an incredible amount of music, television, movies, and more.

In 2024, 90% of media is owned by six large global corporations, down from 50 companies controlling 90% just 40 years ago. Glenn Beck describes this as the media-industrial complex and highlights the influence these conglomerates have on information. Companies like National Amusements oversee CBS, MTV, and Nickelodeon, while Disney, led by Bob Iger, controls ABC and Marvel Studios among others. TimeWarner, with CEO Jeff Bewkes, manages CNN and HBO, and Comcast runs NBC and MSNBC. NewsCorp, under the Murdoch family, owns Fox, and Sony has significant stakes in music and film.

Beck emphasizes that these six corporations collectively control almost everything consumed daily and are valued at nearly $500 billion. He points out that despite investment efforts from these big companies, competition from smaller outlets is rising, suggesting their strategies are failing. He warns that the impact of this media consolidation is harmful.

To combat this situation, Beck advocates for greater competition and independent media options. He calls for an end to the partnership between the government and these large media companies, urging for no government bailouts or startups in the media sector. He believes that allowing the market to function without cronyism will improve the media landscape. Beck mentions that this plan aligns with Donald Trump’s vision. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MauAFUofcVk&t=123s

Not Lawfare. Justice.

The estimated half a billion tax dollars spent by the DOJ over the past four years to pursue Donald Trump and his supporters demands accountability. And consequences. President-elect Trump promises to hold officials responsible for the perceived erosion of trust in the legal system due to their actions. After his victory, anti-Trump commentators have requested a ceasefire on legal battles, mistakenly believing the public wants to move on from these issues.

Andrew McCarthy, a legal analyst, criticized any plans to investigate wrongdoing linked to Trump's criminal cases, stating that the focus should remain on Congress and the DOJ inspector general instead. He expressed concern over calls by Steve Bannon for investigations into judges and prosecutors involved in the January 6 cases, suggesting that the DOJ should not probe into their actions without proof of severe misconduct like bribery or perjury.

Critics argue that McCarthy has not witnessed the treatment of January 6 defendants in Washington courts, which often denies them due process rights, and his remarks dismiss evidence of biased convictions. McCarthy has also defended actions of the DOJ while ignoring significant errors and abuses during special investigations like the Mar-a-Lago raid.

He previously praised Cassidy Hutchinson's testimony during Congressional hearings, although it was later debunked, casting doubt on the integrity of the entire inquiry. Lastly, he brushed off concerns about the DOJ's financial expenditures related to these prosecutions, yet many believe the public deserves to know the total cost of those investigations.

There is growing frustration regarding the extensive resources used for the January 6 investigation, which involves numerous agents and relocation of staff. Some estimate the annual cost of the investigation could be around $100 million, raising questions about the fiscal management of these efforts. The notion of “ending lawfare” is questioned in light of the substantial tax dollars spent by the Biden administration to pursue political opponents.

Trump and Republican leaders are encouraged to resist pressures to overlook these issues, emphasizing that the suffering caused by the DOJ must have consequences for those responsible. The piece highlights a belief that investigative efforts into alleged misconduct should continue rather than be dismissed due to claims of economic hardship. 

https://www.declassified.live/p/not-lawfare-justice

Study Finds Plant-Based Food Additive Associated With Increased Insulin Resistance

A new study indicates that carrageenan, a food additive derived from red seaweed, may pose health risks, particularly for overweight individuals. The study reveals that consumption of carrageenan is linked to increased insulin resistance and inflammation. Researchers found that overweight participants exposed to carrageenan showed lower insulin sensitivity and higher levels of inflammation markers compared to those who did not consume the additive.

The research, published in BMC Medicine, was a controlled trial involving 20 healthy young males who were given either 250 mg of carrageenan or a placebo twice daily for two weeks. Although overall insulin sensitivity did not significantly differ among all participants, it was noted that overweight individuals experienced negative effects from carrageenan exposure, including lower insulin sensitivity, increased brain inflammation, and elevated inflammatory markers.

Moreover, carrageenan was associated with increased intestinal permeability, meaning substances could more easily enter the bloodstream from the digestive system. The study also indicated that immune cells were activated, increasing the release of pro-inflammatory proteins from white blood cells due to carrageenan. Researchers emphasized the need for more research to understand the long-term health effects of carrageenan and similar food additives, especially for populations at risk for Type 2 diabetes.

Carrageenan is commonly found in processed foods, dairy products, and plant-based milks. To avoid it, registered dietitian Stephanie Schiff advises sticking to whole foods that are as close to their natural state as possible. She mentioned that if a food contains unfamiliar or hard-to-pronounce ingredients, it is likely processed and may contain carrageenan. Although the U. S. FDA approves carrageenan, it offers no nutritional benefits.

Schiff further suggests a whole-food, plant-based diet to avoid carrageenan and unhealthy additives, recommending alternatives such as gellan, locust bean, guar, and xanthan gums that do not carry the same health risks. She notes that simply purchasing organic products does not guarantee they are free from carrageenan. The typical diet in the West may include 250 mg to 2-4 g of carrageenan daily, and it's noted that it is the fourth most commonly consumed food additive among pediatric patients with Crohn’s disease.

Despite the opposition from the National Organic Standards Board, the USDA allows carrageenan in organic food. Schiff also pointed out other food additives of concern, including sodium nitrite, which is linked to cancer risk; high-fructose corn syrup, associated with obesity and diabetes; trans fats, which increase the risk of heart disease; and monosodium glutamate (MSG), known to cause reactions in sensitive individuals.

The study urges awareness about the potential health consequences of carrageenan and calls for more research into food additives that may seem harmless but could contribute to significant health issues. 

https://www.theepochtimes.com/health/study-finds-plant-based-food-additive-associated-with-increased-insulin-resistance-5768322?utm_source=partner&utm_campaign=ZeroHedge&src_src=partner&src_cmp=ZeroHedge

Birthright Citizenship: The 14th Amendment Does Not Apply to Illegal Aliens

America is dealing with a serious issue regarding the deportation of illegal alien families, which relates to "birthright citizenship. " This term reflects whether a child born in the U. S. to illegal parents automatically becomes a U. S. citizen, labeled as an "anchor baby. " The argument suggests that the answer should be "No. " The need for the U. S. to maintain strict control over its borders is emphasized, noting that illegal aliens should not bypass the law. According to English common law, a child born in the U. S. to "hostile occupiers" does not automatically gain citizenship. The 14th Amendment was created to address issues of slavery and establishes citizenship criteria that do not extend to those who entered the country illegally.

Former President Donald Trump has stated that the Biden administration has weakened border control, resulting in a significant influx of illegal aliens, estimated to be at least eight million. Trump supports mass deportations, a plan backed by Tom Homan, who has indicated that entire families can be deported together. However, Democrats may legally challenge this, especially when an American citizen child is involved, raising questions about the implications of "birthright citizenship" in these cases.

The history of birthright citizenship is rooted in English common law, which has influenced U. S. law. A landmark case from 1608, known as Calvin’s Case, determined that children born in England could be excluded from citizenship if they were born to foreign invaders. This principle applies to the children of illegal aliens in the U. S. Citizenship questions surrounding slavery came to a head with the Dred Scott case, leading to the 14th Amendment, which established a two-part test for citizenship.

The 14th Amendment states that anyone born or naturalized in the U. S. and under its jurisdiction is a citizen. However, the debate over its interpretation is complicated. The Supreme Court's 1898 decision in United States v. Wong Kim Ark confirmed citizenship for children born to legal residents, but it does not apply to children of illegal aliens. A later case in 1985 merely acknowledged citizenship without establishing any new constitutional law.

The 14th Amendment should be understood within its historical context, as it was intended to address the situation of former slaves, not to grant citizenship to children of illegal immigrants. Believing that it fundamentally modified long-standing legal principles regarding citizenship is considered unreasonable. The claim that illegal aliens' children should automatically receive citizenship contradicts the idea that each nation has the inherent right to determine its citizenship criteria. When discussions about birthright citizenship for the children of illegal aliens intensify, skepticism towards those advocating for it is advised. 

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2024/12/birthright_citizenship_the_14th_amendment_does_not_apply_to_illegal_aliens.html

Yes, Mexico Knows Exactly What It Is Doing

Mexico is aware that an open border, the breakdown of U. S. immigration laws, and the emigration of many of its citizens to America serve its own interests. In a recent discussion between President-elect Donald Trump and the newly elected Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum, Trump believed they agreed to secure the U. S. border. However, Sheinbaum later stated that Mexico would never propose closing the border, highlighting Mexico's long-established policy benefiting from an open U. S. border.

For many years, Mexico has developed a one-sided relationship with the U. S. , claiming it is a mutual benefit while leveraging historical grievances. Polls show that while about 60% of Mexicans have a positive view of the U. S. , the annual illegal crossings suggest otherwise. Mexican leaders have explained the illegal immigration as benefiting the U. S. , stating that it provides labor. However, many Americans view Mexico negatively due to the consequences of this illegal immigration.

Despite arguments that Mexican emigrants provide valuable labor to the U. S. , the reality is that a majority of Mexican citizens would prefer to live in the U. S. rather than Mexico. The U. S. remittances sent back to Mexico further complicate the issue, as these funds support a significant portion of Mexico's economy. Trump has suggested imposing tariffs on Mexican imports or taxes on remittances to protect U. S. interests and potentially fund border security.

The ongoing flow of people from Mexico, and now Central and South America, parallels historical migrations for better opportunities, avoiding social unrest in their home country. Drug cartels also significantly impact both economies, with cartels benefiting from the demand in the U. S. for drugs, including fentanyl, which causes numerous U. S. fatalities.

Past Mexican presidents often made contradictory statements regarding migration and U. S. influence, with current and former leaders sometimes encouraging voting patterns in the U. S. against Republicans, who appear more likely to enforce stricter immigration policies. There’s an irony in that those who flee Mexico often come from areas viewed as emblematic of historic grievances over lost territories in the U. S. , while many Mexicans favor living in the U. S.

As the population of Mexican-Americans grows, they are likely to lean more toward supporting border security rather than open borders. This realization is shifting how negotiations between the U. S. and Mexico may unfold in the future. Mexico benefits from the current situation of the open border and hopes for continued leniency from the U. S. administration. However, increasing chaos related to drug trafficking, human trafficking, and violence may lead American voters to rethink their stance on this relationship.

The challenges posed by this open border policy will continue to affect future discussions between the two nations. There is a growing understanding in America that they must address the problems stemming from illegal border crossings and the associated costs, which may change the current dynamics with Mexico. The rhetoric from Mexican leaders needs to align with the economic realities and the threats their policies create for both nations going forward.

https://amgreatness.com/2024/12/02/yes-mexico-knows-exactly-what-it-is-doing/

European elites are destroying Europe – again

The most pronounced downturn in Germany’s postwar history. The report surveys auto, chemical, and engineering sectors crucial to the German economy and cites high energy costs as the detrimental factor. However, the Western media, even in supposed in-depth reports like the Financial Times, are careful not to spell out the obvious cause of Europe’s economic collapse: the U. S. -led proxy war in Ukraine and the consequent damage in Europe’s relations with Russia. Media reports deplore a jobs massacre in Germany’s industrial giants like Volkswagen and Thyssenkrupp without explaining the cause as if the calamity is somehow random misfortune. As if that is not bad enough, the incoming Trump administration is lining up heavy tariffs on exports from Europe as well as China, Canada, and Mexico. That will be a coup de grâce for the European economies delivered by its American ally. Europe is in this appalling predicament – facing economic ruin amid a potential military conflagration – all because it has been misled by people like Ursula von der Leyen, Josep Borrell, France’s Macron, Germany’s Scholz (and Angela Merkel before him), and Netherlands former premier Mark Rutte, who is now the gung-ho head of NATO calling for more European weapons to Ukraine. Many others can be named from the Nordic countries, Poland, and the Baltic states. Rather fittingly, the European elitist political class has a long and vile history of Russophobia, going back to collaboration with Nazi Germany in its genocidal aggression against the Soviet Union.

The tragedy of Europe is not something mysterious or ill-fated. It is the direct result of elitist rulers who have assiduously conducted policies that harm European citizens. These charlatan leaders are shameless in their Russophobia and surrogacy for U. S. -led Western imperialism – even to the point of killing their own people through economic devastation or worse – world war. The conflict in Ukraine is solvable through negotiations and dialogue that acknowledges the historical causes. From Russia’s point of view that pertains to NATO’s treacherous expansionism since the end of the Cold War. But this is the deep dilemma facing Europe. Not one of the politicians (apart from a few honorable exceptions) is capable of thinking or acting independently because they are ideological slaves. Rational diplomacy and respect for democracy and peace are beyond these political degenerates. Their complicity in a bankrupt system of Western imperialism makes them incapable of doing the right thing for humanity. That’s why the vile history of wars keeps repeating. They and their corrupt, warmongering system must be swept aside. 

https://strategic-culture.su/news/2024/11/29/european-elites-are-destroying-europe-again/

Joe Biden did not just pardon Hunter: he pardoned himself.

Joe Biden recently pardoned his son, Hunter Biden, for any crimes he may have committed from January 2014 to December 1, 2024, which has raised many questions. This pardon, considered unprecedented in scope, seems to protect both Hunter and Joe from legal repercussions stemming from their alleged misuse of political connections for financial gain. The timing of the pardon coincides with Hunter’s involvement in activities such as joining the board of the Ukrainian company Burisma and receiving significant payments from foreign oligarchs.

Biden's reasoning for the pardon, claiming to protect Hunter from legal charges related to a gun form and unpaid taxes, is questioned due to the broad range of crimes covered by the pardon. The incidents involving Hunter's gun application and tax issues occurred years ago, making the choice of the start date for the pardon suspicious. Critics argue that Joe Biden's actions shield himself rather than solely focusing on his son's well-being.

Although some supporters claim that this pardon was an act of love, the text argues that using his son as a front for influence peddling while exploiting foreign connections is abusive rather than caring. The narrative suggests that Joe Biden has a history of manipulating family and personal tragedies for political gain, which continues with this pardoning decision.

Throughout his presidency, Joe Biden has denied involvement in Hunter’s business dealings and has previously stated he would not pardon him. However, just days before Hunter's sentencing, he issued the pardon, contradicting his earlier promises. Critics highlight that Joe Biden’s administration has been marked by corruption linked to his family.

The Constitution does grant presidents the power to pardon, but critics stress that this authority should not be used to cover up corrupt actions. The implications of this pardon extend beyond Hunter, suggesting that other members of the Biden family could also be implicated in corruption involving foreign money. In light of these issues, speculation arises that Joe Biden might consider pardoning himself as his presidency comes to an end. 

https://www.frontpagemag.com/biden-pardons-son-and-co-conspirator/

This Crime Wave Is Really Starting To Get Out Of Hand

The current crime wave in the U. S. is attributed to policies that have allowed many immigrants, including criminals, to enter the country without proper screening. Areas like New York City are seeing significant increases in crime, leading citizens to demand more police presence. Residents of the Upper West Side have reported feeling unsafe due to rising robberies and carjackings.

Statistics reveal nearly 60,000 illegal migrants in New York City are criminals or facing charges. The lack of prosecution for non-violent crimes has emboldened criminals to act without fear, as confirmed by a police detective who noted this pattern. In some cases, violent offenders are quickly released back into the community, causing severe consequences, like in one instance where an immigrant with a criminal history attempted to kidnap and rape someone shortly after being released.

Unrestricted migration has led to a rise in transnational gangs involved in drug trafficking and home invasions. Recently, NFL players’ homes have been targeted by organized crime rings, prompting the league to issue security alerts. These gangs gather information about when the players are away from home to commit burglaries, focusing on items like cash and jewelry.

With a record number of immigrants residing in the U. S. 46. 2 million as of 2022the country appears to be in a state of transformation that contributes to the growing crime issue. The author questions when this cycle of crime will end and emphasizes the increasing danger that citizens face. The situation highlights a failure to address the link between immigration policy and public safety.

The text also mentions other resources and publications by the author, emphasizing preparation for future challenges. It concludes with a call for faith and hope in troubled times. The importance of personal safety and community action is implied, asking readers if they feel safe in their neighborhoods and how they plan to protect themselves. 

http://endoftheamericandream.com/this-crime-wave-is-really-starting-to-get-out-of-hand/

Bankers, Fed Origins, and World War I

 The push for central banking in America was central to the Progressive movement, framed as a way to combat banking monopoly and stabilize the financial system. Key voices pointed out that this drive, while marketed as reform, actually established a form of monopoly under the guise of fighting against it. Prior to the creation of the Federal Reserve, banking elites in New York were dissatisfied with existing systems, feeling they lacked adequate centralization and control over money and credit. Their main complaint was “inelasticity,” meaning they were unable to expand money and credit sufficiently.

Competition from non-national banks was seen as a threat to their financial supremacy. The banking landscape shifted significantly from the 1870s to 1913, with a growing number of non-national banks that created pressure on national banks. This shift undermined New York's status as the financial hub. The Panic of 1907 led to a unified call for central banking, as banks desired a system that could bail them out when needed. They sought a central bank that could regulate the economy and stabilize the financial system.

World War I offered a great opportunity for the newly established Federal Reserve to expand its powers. During the war, it doubled the money supply, which concealed the costs of military actions through inflation rather than taxation. This increased the Federal Reserve’s influence and helped solidify the federal government’s control over the economy. Additionally, Wall Street banks gained tremendous financial benefits as they became key players in financing war-related industries.

The banking sector, fearing financial loss if the Allies lost the war, advocated for U. S. entry into the conflict. They believed that control over financing would allow them to shape post-war peace agreements. The Federal Reserve’s origins and the role it played during World War I lesson that the system was not created to eliminate monopoly but to establish control under the guise of reform. It was the competition from state and private banks that prompted the call for centralization rather than a genuine need to curb monopoly.

The creation of the Federal Reserve was presented as a solution to the economic turmoil caused by banks and government through their previous inflationary policies. Central banking, thus, became a mechanism for concealing the costs of government projects, particularly during wartime, allowing for increased government centralization. During World War I, financial institutions found new opportunities for profit and pushed for U. S. involvement to mitigate losses and ensure loan repayments from Allies.

The conclusion drawn from the history of the Federal Reserve and World War I includes several points: the formation of the Fed arose not from a lack of competition but from too much of it, the partnership between banks and government further exacerbated the issues, central bank actions masked the costs of war, and wartime dynamics enabled greater government control. Ultimately, financial interests sought to secure their investments and profits through U. S. involvement in the war, showcasing the intertwined nature of banking and state interests.

https://mises.org/mises-wire/bankers-fed-origins-and-world-war-i

87% of Terror Suspects Stopped by U.S. Border Agents in 2024 Came from Canada

 The National Post of Canada reported that, according to U. S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), 87 percent of the "terror suspects" stopped at the U. S. land border in 2024 came from Canada. The term "terror suspect" refers to individuals listed in the American "Terrorist Screening Dataset (TSDS)," which includes people facing legal action for terrorism, confirmed members of terrorist groups, and those with family ties to terrorists. Being on this list does not confirm that they are terrorists. These individuals attempted to enter the U. S. legally, unlike those crossing the border illegally.

The high percentage of TSDS-listed individuals caught at the Canadian border raises national security concerns, especially when compared to the attention focused on the southern border with Mexico. The National Post noted that President-elect Donald Trump recently mentioned considering a 25-percent tariff on goods from Canada and Mexico to address issues related to mass migration, drug trafficking, and transnational crime. In the last fiscal year, 358 individuals on the terror watchlist were stopped at Canadian crossings, compared to only 52 at Mexican crossings.

In 2022, Canada accounted for 82 percent of the 380 terror suspects stopped at U. S. land borders, and in 2023, this figure rose to 86 percent of 564 suspects overall. The American list of potential terrorists is broad, including individuals who associate with terrorist groups and those with family ties to suspected terrorists. A single error in this identification process can have serious consequences, as noted by the Department of Justice.

While the report focuses on individuals legally trying to enter the U. S. , it is separate from the issue of illegal immigration from Canada. U. S. border patrol agents have reported a significant rise in illegal crossings recently, with one agent describing the situation as a "flood. " Approximately 19,000 people were arrested attempting to cross illegally in fiscal year 2024, which is equal to the total of all arrests from the previous 17 years combined.

President-elect Trump addressed immigration concerns at the Canadian border via a message on Truth Social, alarming Canadian officials with his tariff threat. He stated that on January 20th, he would enact a 25-percent tariff on all imports from Canada and Mexico until drug trafficking and illegal immigration were controlled. Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau did not react strongly to Trump's threat but indicated he had a positive conversation with him and expressed hope for a resolution. Trudeau’s lack of urgency in the face of Trump’s threats drew criticism from various Canadian political figures, including Conservative Party leader Pierre Poilievre.

Poilievre condemned Trump's tariff threat as "unjustified" and criticized Trudeau for being unprepared to handle the situation. He called for a clear plan to prioritize Canada's economy and security amidst the migration issues. Poilievre mentioned potential risks posed by the presence of many illegal residents in Canada, suggesting it could lead to retaliatory actions from the U. S. against these individuals.

In response, Canadian Immigration Minister Marc Miller challenged Poilievre to obtain the necessary security clearance for immigration briefings instead of merely demanding answers. Trudeau announced earlier in November that he intended to tighten immigration policies that had previously been too lenient. He highlighted issues with educational institutions that used international students as revenue sources and noted bad actors exploiting vulnerable immigrants with false promises.

https://www.breitbart.com/immigration/2024/11/29/report-87-of-terror-suspects-stopped-by-u-s-border-agents-in-2024-came-from-canada/

Hakeem Jeffries: 'MAGA' Supporters Are the ONES Threatening Democrats

A leading Democratic figure is blaming “MAGA” Republicans for threatening Congressional Democrats during Thanksgiving, shortly after members of President-elect Donald Trump’s cabinet received bomb threats at their homes. Congressman Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) accused Trump supporters of using violent threats, including bomb threats and swatting, a method of making fake emergency calls to provoke police responses.

Jeffries asserted that House Democrats will not be intimidated by violent threats, highlighting the need for Congress to ensure maximum protection for all members and their families. He described threats of violence against elected officials as unacceptable in a civilized society but did not mention that several Trump cabinet members were also targeted with threats.

Many of Trump’s cabinet picks, like Pete Hegseth for Secretary of Defense and Tulsi Gabbard for National Intelligence, received violent threats linked to pro-Palestinian messages. There is an ongoing narrative that the Democratic Party incites violence through its rhetoric and then shifts the blame onto “MAGA” supporters when violent incidents occur. The left-wing media has often portrayed Trump in a negative light, while blaming Republicans when violence touches the Democratic side, such as an assassination attempt on the incoming president during a rally.

This incident is not unique, as Trump and his administration have faced various threats, including assassination attempts and information leaks from Iranian hackers during Trump's 2024 campaign. Former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe noted that such threats are not surprising for those in high-profile roles.

Democrats feel threatened by Trump’s administration as his cabinet choices show a strong loyalty to him at a time when other Republicans have distanced themselves. These individuals are perceived as committed to disrupting traditional norms within government departments and targeting corrupt practices. Trump's appointments reflect a strategy to surround himself with loyal supporters who did not doubt his ability to run for president again despite legal troubles, signaling his determination to change the status quo in Washington. 

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/saraharnold/2024/11/29/hakeem-jeffries-maga-supporters-threatened-congressional-dems-after-trumps-cabinet-faces-threats-n2648390

Bill Clinton Claims He Knew Nothing About Epstein

Bill Clinton recently announced a new memoir titled "Citizen," reflecting on his life post-presidency and addressing various controversies, including his ties to Jeffrey Epstein. In the book, Clinton expresses lingering anger over Hillary's loss in the 2016 election, attributing blame to Russia, the New York Times, and James Comey. He admits that he struggled to sleep for two years after the election and acknowledges the impact of his anger on those around him.

Clinton also insists he had no involvement in Epstein's criminal activities and regrets traveling on Epstein's plane, stating it was not worth the years of questioning he faced afterward. He claims he did not know about Epstein's crimes and cut off contact with him after Epstein's first arrest in 2005. Additionally, Clinton claims he was unaware that his involvement in the Marc Rich pardon tied to donations was wrong.

The memoir's key theme appears to be a repeated assertion of ignorance about significant events, prompting criticism of its depth. While some commentators point out the hypocrisy in his claims, suggesting disbelief in his narrative, Clinton’s defense revolves around his assertions of innocence and lack of knowledge regarding his controversial associations.

The article concludes that the memoir, which could have been titled "Denial," does not offer substantial insights or accountability, as Clinton seems to be reiterating a familiar defenseclaiming ignorance of the actions surrounding him. 

https://www.frontpagemag.com/bill-clinton-claims-he-knew-nothing-about-epstein/

Biden slammed by his own party after shock U-turn decision to pardon son Hunter: 'Put his family ahead of the country'

Elon Musk and other critics have challenged President Biden's recent decision to pardon his son Hunter, with accusations of hypocrisy and prioritizing family over the country.

Biden's controversial decision to pardon Hunter has drawn criticism from both Republicans and Democrats alike, with Colorado Governor Jared Polis expressing disappointment. He accused Biden of prioritizing family over the country's best interests, warning of a damaging precedent. The backlash included sharp comments from Republican figures, who labeled the move corrupt and hypocritical, given Biden’s previous statements against pardoning his son.

As Hunter Biden faced upcoming sentencing, Biden defended the pardon by asserting that Hunter was unfairly treated compared to others in the justice system, arguing that charges against him stemmed from political motivations. Discontent within the Democratic Party is evident, with some members feeling that Biden’s actions undermine party integrity and might strengthen Trump's political position.

The response to the pardon from various political figures has been largely critical, with accusations of a two-tier justice system and calls for accountability regarding the Biden family's alleged corrupt activities. Former Attorney General Eric Holder, however, stated that the pardon was warranted and indicative of a double standard in the judicial process. Amidst the political turmoil, Hunter Biden responded to the pardon by highlighting his struggles with addiction and his ongoing efforts to maintain sobriety, pledging to make amends for his past mistakes. 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14147035/Joe-Biden-Hunter-Biden-pardon-Democrats-reaction.html

The World Is Healing: Trump Is Already Negotiating Peace, Tariffs, and Immigration Deals

President Trump is effectively viewed as the President of the United States again. The world has already begun to see the transition from President Biden's administration to Trump's, unless Biden takes significant actions like handing over nuclear weapons to Ukraine.

Recent developments include Trump's discussions with the President of Mexico and Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's visit to Mar-a-Lago, indicating growing international engagement with Trump. Additionally, Trump is working towards a hostage deal with Hamas before he officially resumes office, showing promise in securing a ceasefire with Hezbollah, even if some violations might occur. There also appears to be progress on the Gaza conflict and hostage negotiations.

Trump is facilitating a ceasefire between Ukraine and Russia that doesn't mean abandoning support for Ukraine, unlike previous expectations. If he achieves this before January 20th, it could represent a significant accomplishment compared to the Biden administration's efforts over three years. Ukraine's President Zelenskyy has adjusted his expectations regarding territory, while Putin believes Trump can lead to a favorable negotiation, suggesting that Trump aims for an immediate ceasefire rather than cutting off Ukraine’s support.

In his recent messaging, Trump highlighted what he sees as the potential resolution for the Ukraine conflict while nominating General Keith Kellogg as his special envoy for Ukraine and Russia. Kellogg has a detailed peace plan, describing the war as an avoidable crisis stemming from Biden's policies. The plan aims for a ceasefire to stop fighting and encourage negotiations, which underscores Trump's deal-making focus.

The global perception seems to be shifting away from Biden, as international actors prepare for a Trump presidency and seek early negotiations with him. If Biden stays back and allows Trump to secure important agreements before assuming office, he can claim credit for any positive outcomes, although this may not be widely believed. 

https://hotair.com/david-strom/2024/11/30/the-world-is-healing-trump-is-already-negotiating-peace-tariffs-and-immigration-n3797466

The Times, They Are A-Changin', and Mexico Gets It, Breaking Up Two Illegal Immigrant Caravans

President-elect Donald Trump has not yet taken office, but his election has already affected the situation in Mexico. Recently, Mexican immigration authorities broke up two small groups of migrants heading to the U. S. , according to activists. Some migrants were transported to cities in southern Mexico, while others received transit papers, allowing them to continue their journey.

This action follows Trump’s threat to impose a 25% tariff on Mexican goods unless Mexico does more to reduce migration to the U. S. However, the effectiveness of this measure is unclear since some migrants were still allowed to proceed. There is already concern regarding this issue, with Trump stating that Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum has committed to halting unauthorized migration. Sheinbaum also confirmed on social media that migrants are being cared for before reaching the border.

Activist Luis García Villagrán suggested that breaking up the caravans may be due to an agreement between the U. S. and Mexican presidents. Trump has already spoken with the Mexican president about migration.

The topic of illegal immigration was significant in the recent election. Trump and his campaign partner JD Vance focused on stopping illegal immigration, promising to close borders and enforce mass deportations, addressing a long-standing legal and humanitarian crisis.

Interestingly, the narrative also highlights U. S. leadership. While Joe Biden still retains the formal title of president, it seems that Trump is stepping into a role of influence in negotiations with other nations. He is already engaging with world leaders and encouraging them to take actions aligned with his priorities, as evidenced by Mexico's recent actions. This suggests that the international community is responding more to Trump than to Biden during this transitional period. 

https://redstate.com/wardclark/2024/12/01/the-times-they-are-achanging-and-mexico-gets-it-breaking-up-two-illegal-immigrant-caravans-n2182659

Your private call and text data was just stolen by China because it hacked US government’s illegal surveillance tool that spies on us all

 The telecommunications industry is facing a major security breach that allegedly involves a hacking group associated with the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), known as "Salt Typhoon. " Senator Mark R. Warner, the chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee, has described this incident as the worst telecom hack in U. S. history. The breach allowed hackers to steal data meant for U. S. law enforcement, which has reportedly ended up in the hands of Beijing officials.

Salt Typhoon gained access to telecom systems that enabled them to listen to live audio calls through exploited "trust" connections. While only about 150 people were directly impacted, it is estimated that millions had their call and text records compromised, which could be used for further surveillance. The telecom industry was aware of this cyberattack since at least September and started informing the government about it.

Senator Warner likened this attempt to previous high-profile hacks like those of the Colonial Pipeline and SolarWinds, stating that the hackers remain active. Washington is viewing this breach as an espionage operation rather than a threat to infrastructure. Salt Typhoon even hacked into a government system that logs law enforcement wiretap requests, though it appears they did not compromise the wiretapping activity itself.

While U. S. wiretapping is seen as lawful, the government is less accepting of Chinese involvement in such activities. The breach included unencrypted communications, while end-to-end encrypted messages, like those sent via Signal, remain secure. The Biden administration has not released extensive details, but the FBI and CISA have confirmed that they have identified the hackers and that affected telecom companies include AT&T, T-Mobile, and Verizon.

Senator Warner has warned that this incident is part of a broader effort by China to infiltrate telecom systems globally and steal vast amounts of data. Media reports also suggest that key political figures, including Trump and his associates, have been targeted by these hackers, although the incidents occurred months before the latest election.

The Chinese government has denied any involvement in the hack, claiming they do not engage in infiltrating foreign computer systems.

https://www.naturalnews.com/2024-11-29-your-private-call-text-data-stolen-china.html

What is the Administrative State?

Last week, I mentioned that Donald Trump would focus on dismantling “the administrative state” during his second term. Similar to his first term, he would use various methods to weaken the governmental structures in place. One strategy could be relocating some government functions outside of the liberal atmosphere of Washington, D. C.

I see Washington as a significant barrier to reducing the power of the administrative state. It’s a heavily Democratic city, which I believe is dysfunctional, and its location makes it too partisan. Thomas Jefferson sought a neutral site for the capital, but Washington is no longer neutral. While the city has beautiful landmarks that should be preserved as tourist sites, I believe government power should be moved elsewhere.

I doubt this relocation will happen, meaning that vigilance from Trump's supporters will need to be stronger. Governing from Washington will be difficult for Trump, similar to how difficult it would have been for Dwight Eisenhower to lead the Normandy invasion without supporting planners.

Trump’s team might consider some symbolic gestures, like holding the inauguration outside of Washington. There's no constitutional mandate for the inauguration site. Past inaugurations, like Lyndon B. Johnson's on Air Force One, show that it can happen elsewhere. Considering locations like Mar-a-Lago in Palm Beach or hosting a ball in Butler, PA could help remember significant moments in Trump's history.

The problems with Washington are not just partisan; they also relate to the constant expansion of government. Regardless of political affiliation, Washington seems to grow larger. While Republicans claim to favor small government, they often support increasing government size. Democrats do too but don't pretend to advocate for limited government.

This time, a new initiative, the Department of Government Efficiency, led by Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy, aims to reduce costs. They propose cutting $2 trillion from government spending, which may seem ambitious. Musk has previously shown he can significantly reduce staff and improve organizations like Twitter.

However, their strategy for cost-cutting remains unclear. Opposition will be fierce, but we will see if their efforts succeed.

In discussions about what the “administrative state” entails, a friend suggested it might just be a complicated term for government activities. However, I believe it represents the growing power of unelected bureaucrats who operate outside of direct governmental checks. This represents a shift away from sovereignty, where bureaucracy rather than the people holds power.

The administrative state operates covertly; it’s not recognized and lacks official acknowledgment, violating constitutional norms by forming a “fourth branch” of government. Edmund Burke noted similar issues during the reign of George III, where democratic forms hid essentially undemocratic activities, a concept that applies to our current administrate dynamics.

The stealthy nature of the administrative state often leads to hostility against free speech and a reliance on censorship to suppress dissent. This culture fosters distrust in essential societal institutions, even as claims about democracy abound. Ultimately, the administrative state undermines democracy; it must be dismantled to restore true accountability. 

https://amgreatness.com/2024/12/01/what-is-the-administrative-state/

Recent Paper Shows Little Ice Age, Climate Driven By A Number Of Natural Driving Factors

The Little Ice Age, which lasted from about 1250 to 1860, was an important climatic event. It significantly impacted the Franklin expedition, which aimed to find the Northwest Passage but failed due to ice conditions. Key climate drivers during this period included volcanic activity and low solar activity. Research shows that while winters were often extremely cold, many summers experienced warm and dry conditions. A 2022 study analyzed how temperatures changed from the Medieval Climate Anomaly to the Little Ice Age, highlighting that the LIA was likely the coldest period in the last 8000 years, driven largely by many cold winters and several volcanic eruptions.

The study's findings indicate that the beginning of the LIA varied between hemispheres, and the overall drop in temperature can be linked to these natural phenomena. The reduction in solar energy during significant Grand Solar Minima also played a role, contributing to shifts in ocean circulation patterns. Extreme weather events during this time showed mixed correlations to these climate drivers, with notable links to years following large volcanic eruptions.

The Industrial Revolution began around the mid-19th century, changing landscapes and economies dramatically. Modern meteorology started to take shape during this period, especially due to lessons learned from severe weather events. A recent study attributed 51% of LIA's conditions to volcanic activity, while factors like the North Atlantic Oscillation and the Interdecadal Pacific Oscillation were also significant contributors.

It's important to understand that natural climate variability existed historically, and ideas about a "pre-industrial" climate should be approached cautiously. The complexity of climate events underscores that there should be no romanticized views of the era before industrialization. Observations on human life during that time, such as lower life expectancies, reflect that transitions to modernity were not without challenges. The discourse around climate change often includes discussions about the accuracy of historical temperature records and the roles of various climate factors. It’s crucial to consider how natural phenomena, alongside human activity, contribute to our current climate understanding. 

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2024/12/01/recent-paper-shows-little-ice-age-climate-driven-by-a-number-of-natural-driving-factors/

New report shows nearly 70% of Biden admin's education enforcement targeted Christian and career colleges

A report reveals that nearly 70% of the Biden administration's enforcement actions in education have focused on Christian and career colleges, even though these institutions serve less than 10% of U. S. students. According to the American Principles Project (APP), this trend highlights a pattern of the government targeting faith-based institutions. APP Policy Director Jon Schweppe criticized the government for using federal power against political opponents.

Several prominent Christian universities, such as Grand Canyon University (GCU) and Liberty University, have faced significant scrutiny and penalties from the Department of Education (ED). The report indicates that the fines imposed on these Christian colleges far exceed those levied on other institutions, particularly major fines against GCU for allegedly misleading students about the costs of its programs.

In a House Appropriations Committee meeting, Education Secretary Miguel Cardona criticized GCU, claiming it preyed on first-generation college students. Furthermore, the report pointed out that 12 Christian colleges faced excessive penalties or bans from federal student aid without similar actions taken against the Ivy League schools.

The APP states that the average fine for a Christian institution for a Clery Act violation was approximately $815,000, compared to about $228,571 for other public and private institutions. A recent legal win for GCU highlighted the issue of the ED denying its nonprofit status, which was later found to be based on incorrect standards by the courts.

Despite claims from the APP, a spokesperson from the Department of Education stated that the schools' religious affiliation or nonprofit status has no impact on the enforcement actions they take. Their priority is to protect safety and academic opportunities for all students, arguing that the APP's report distorts the information available from the Department. 

https://www.foxnews.com/media/new-report-shows-70-biden-administrations-education-enforcement-targeted-christian-colleges