According to a variety of news reports, Jensen testified to the authenticity of the infamous Hunter Biden laptop which she said contained evidence of Hunter's drug and gun purchases.
The second is the other evidence from the laptop that implicates both Hunter and Joe in illegal influence peddling.
The bigger problem with the letter is the other side of what Hunter's laptop would show in any trial of Hunter or Joe on influence-peddling charges.
The laptop contains hundreds of documents that Senate Republicans said in 2022 are evidence that Hunter Biden was selling influence - i.e., access and possibly bribes to his father - to affect U.S. foreign policy.
A jury could easily decide that was a corrupt official act by Joe Biden apparently brought about to conceal Hunter Biden's illegal influence peddling.
Hunter's "Business partners" in China have evaded U.S. congressional investigations because congressional subpoena powers do not extend overseas.
The question remains: did he profit from that transaction or did he just do it as a means of quashing Shokin's investigation, which would inevitably lead to Hunter's evident corruption? It also begs the question of how and why Joe Biden met with Chinese "Businessmen" who were Hunter's partners.
Hunter Biden is expected to stand trial for tax evasion in September.
Will the FBI again testify to its veracity? That evidence would probably be more than enough to convict Joe, Hunter, and James.
No comments:
Post a Comment