Wednesday, January 8, 2025

Trump Presser: Why We Should Not be Subsidizing Canada to the Tune of $200 Billion

I am very excited about President-elect Donald J. Trump returning to the Oval Office. Many genuine political reporters feel the same way. After years of Biden-Harris, it has become clear that there are not many trustworthy political reporters left. What real political reporters want from politicians, especially the president, is accurate information and insights that can be analyzed and reported without misinformation and manipulation.

During Trump's press conference at Mar-a-Lago, he provided a lot of information and points to comment on. He was well-prepared and engaged, particularly during the question-and-answer session, which lasted 22 minutes. He covered various topics, including January 6, potential pardons, foreign matters like the Panama Canal and Greenland, and discussions about Russia, Ukraine, and Elon Musk. After his initial remarks, a reporter posed a challenging question about making Canada the 51st state, referencing a statement from a Canadian politician.

The reporter’s follow-up question concerned using military force against Panama, Greenland, and Canada. Trump responded with his characteristic sharpness. He pointed out that the relationship between Canada and the United States is better addressed through economic means rather than military action. He emphasized that the U. S. spends a significant amount to protect Canada, and he questioned the value of this expenditure, stating that the U. S. does not need many of Canada's products like cars and lumber.

Trump criticized the trade deficit with Canada and talked about how certain states could produce what they need domestically instead of relying on Canada. He mentioned that when he met Justin Trudeau, he questioned the economic support the U. S. provides to Canada and hinted that they might not be able to survive without it.

The reporter attempted to interrupt Trump, but he continued to elaborate on his point, breaking it down simply. Trump insisted that Canada should not rely on U. S. support indefinitely and expressed frustration with contributing to a trade deficit with other nations like those in the European Union as well.

The broad theme here is why many Americans prefer Trump’s return over a possible Kamala Harris presidency. Trump appears to provide straightforward and credible answers concerning the economy and national interests, which resonates with many voters. He expressed the need for economic changes to address the U. S. national deficit and improve the country's strength for future generations.

Trump's ability to engage in unscripted exchanges and lay out clear ideas is a significant factor contributing to his support, especially when compared to the lack of transparency and clarity from the current administration. 

https://redstate.com/jenniferoo/2025/01/07/trump-presser-why-we-should-not-be-subsidizing-canada-to-the-tune-of-200-billion-n2184059

No comments: