The Biodefense Oligarchy and Its Demographic Defeats

Some years ago, during calmer times, naval officers held meetings online to study Thucydides, focusing on the history of the Sicilian Expedition from the Peloponnesian War. The lesson from Athens is significant: factions believed invading Sicily was essential for victory, resulting in great loss when the attempt failed. The expedition led to the formation of an oligarchy that eventually caused Athens' decline. A similar situation arose over twenty years ago, as biowarfare threats prompted a shift of biodefense control from the military to the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), which then began working closely with the pharmaceutical industry. This merger created a powerful, unaccountable system that became evident during the Covid response. Profit motives led to questionable decision-making, reminiscent of Athens' choices.

The biodefense oligarchy grew, driven by the constant need for funding due to advances in biotechnology from adversaries. This system reinforced itself and lacked valid evaluations of its necessity. As the Covid pandemic struck, the narrative framed it as a war, leading to increased power and resources for this oligarchy, alongside a disconnection from the military's role in assessing biothreats. The growing bureaucracy increasingly appeared in a state of conflict with the public, leading to a breakdown of trust.

Historical parallels show the emergence of a dominant credentialed class aligned with the government during the pandemic, while significant opposition arose from the public. The expansion of power in wartime led to a societal imbalance, with an increasing number of people rebelling against government measures. Recent political events echo conflicts seen in ancient Athens, highlighting ongoing tensions within modern governance.

America's equivalent of the Sicilian Expedition is the handling of the Covid pandemic, where the consequences of poor decisions are becoming evident. Initial losses from the virus itself, primarily affecting older individuals, lead to more painful outcomes from vaccines administered later on. Unfortunately, the demographic losses are not properly recognized or accounted for, with a noticeable shortage in manpower across various sectors now affecting military readiness. Morally, individuals grappling with health issues related to vaccines feel unable to openly discuss their concerns, leading to further societal distress.

The situation is exacerbated by indirect risks associated with mRNA vaccines and broader immunity challenges posed through the introduction of modified spike proteins. A comprehensive evaluation of risk must occur to understand long-term ramifications fully. Grounded decisions to uncover the origins of SARS-CoV-2 and assess the damage caused by vaccines are crucial for informed policymaking.

Critics arguing against transparency only amplify the importance of recognizing the magnitude of these mistakes. Ongoing assessments and lessons drawn from past experiences can help restore accountability and vitality in governance. The moral and physical injuries sustained during this ordeal highlight the necessity for society to engage in honest self-reflection and recognition of its challenges for future progress. 

https://brownstone.org/articles/the-biodefense-oligarchy-and-its-demographic-defeats/