The alleged lies spread by Liz Cheney and the January 6th Committee regarding the Capitol events of January 6, 2021. It also describes Cheney’s recent recognition and the investigations surrounding her actions during and after her congressional term.
1. Recognition Amid Controversy: Liz Cheney received the Presidential Medal of Freedom from President Biden, despite being referred for criminal charges related to witness tampering.
2. Allegations of Witness Tampering: A House report claims Cheney communicated with witness Cassidy Hutchinson without her lawyer, suggesting attempts to influence testimony.
3. Claims of Insurrection: The article argues that the term "insurrection" used to describe the events at the Capitol is misleading, as no defendants were charged with this crime.
4. Hyperbolic Statements: Cheney claimed in her memoir that democracy was nearly lost that day, but Congress resumed session hours later, indicating continuity of government was not compromised.
5. Trump's Role Mischaracterized: The Committee asserted that Trump incited the insurrection and was enthusiastic about the violence, but evidence presented contradicts these claims.
6. Allegations of Violence and Conduct: Testimonies regarding Trump trying to hijack a limousine to reach the Capitol and dismissing the need for National Guard support are challenged, with evidence suggesting otherwise.
7. Nature of the Demonstrations: Additional footage presented by Tucker Carlson offered a different perspective on the demonstrations, which were portrayed as excessively violent by the Committee.
8. Misreporting of Officer Deaths: The article highlights a New York Times correction regarding the cause of death for Officer Sicknick, disputing the narrative that he died due to rioter attack.
9. Accusations Against Barry Loudermilk: Congressman Loudermilk was accused of giving reconnaissance tours; however, the FBI cleared him of wrongdoing.
10. Legitimacy of the Committee: The article questions the legitimacy of the January 6th Committee, pointing out the lack of bipartisan representation and suggesting its focus was on targeting private citizens rather than investigating the Capitol riot.
The article argues that claims made by Liz Cheney and the January 6th Committee regarding the Capitol riot are misleading and lacks substantive evidence. It calls into question the narrative of insurrection and emphasizes the need for a more nuanced understanding of the events and their aftermath.
No comments:
Post a Comment