Disenfranchising the Nonexistent and Illegal Voters

I got a response which certainly anticipates the Democrats' talking points: "Disenfranchising voters is not what conservatives do."

It's what Democrats do by diluting their votes time and again with illegal and nonexistent voters.

To fail to do so is to ensure that we will never have free, honest elections again and legal voters voting in accord with relevant laws will be disenfranchised while illegal and nonexistent voters will win.

Reynolds, which established the "One person, one vote" doctrine, is the seminal case on voter dilution.

Article VII sec 14 could be construed as violating the "One person one vote." In that event, the sheer magnitude of the number of mail-in ballots would not be a basis to disregard not only this provision of the Pennsylvania Constitution but also the "One person, one vote" doctrine established by Reynolds, one of the bedrock decisions of the U.S. Supreme Court.

In the Petition, Petitioners allege that the Act of October 31, 2019, P.L. 552, No. 77, which added and amended various absentee and mail-in voting provisions in the Pennsylvania Election Code,1 is unconstitutional and void ab initio because it purportedly contravenes the requirements of the Pennsylvania Constitution.

Specifically, pursuant to Article XI, Section 1, a proposed constitutional amendment must be approved by a majority vote of the members of both the Pennsylvania House of Representatives and Senate in two consecutive legislative sessions, then the proposed amendment must be published for three months ahead of the next general election in two newspapers in each county, and finally it must be submitted to the qualified electors as a ballot question in the next general election and approved by a majority of those voting on the amendment.
 

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2020/11/disenfranchising_the_nonexistent_and_illegal_voters.html