Why January 10? January 9, 2018, was the date a single California judge, William Alsup of the Northern District of California, issued an unprecedented injunction on Trump's order merely countermanding Obama's illegal amnesty, thereby forcing the president to violate numerous immigration laws.
Judge Alsup's order was the first time that a court actually told a president not only to do something he doesn't have to do, but to do something he must not do, and applied the order to foreign nationals nationwide outside the judge's own jurisdiction.
The judge even demanded that USCIS publish quarterly data on illegal renewals and send them to the California AG! Judges cannot legislate.
Judges don't have the power to issue visas and Social Security cards; that is an executive power.
District judges don't have a power to place a nationwide injunction on a policy, nor does any judge have the power to place an injunction universally binding on non-plaintiffs who are not a party to the case.
Judge Alsup took into account Trump's political statements as a means of saying he cannot follow immigration law, a point the Supreme Court said last year is completely invalid in arguing against lawful powers of the president.
Finally, Trump should assert the ruling of the Eleventh Circuit in a recent Georgia case, where the panel said clearly that DACA recipients are not "In any way 'lawfully present' under the." Even other courts disagree with this power grab.
https://www.conservativereview.com/news/whopping-373610-illegal-aliens-received-daca-renewal-just-since-january-2018/
Judge Alsup's order was the first time that a court actually told a president not only to do something he doesn't have to do, but to do something he must not do, and applied the order to foreign nationals nationwide outside the judge's own jurisdiction.
The judge even demanded that USCIS publish quarterly data on illegal renewals and send them to the California AG! Judges cannot legislate.
Judges don't have the power to issue visas and Social Security cards; that is an executive power.
District judges don't have a power to place a nationwide injunction on a policy, nor does any judge have the power to place an injunction universally binding on non-plaintiffs who are not a party to the case.
Judge Alsup took into account Trump's political statements as a means of saying he cannot follow immigration law, a point the Supreme Court said last year is completely invalid in arguing against lawful powers of the president.
Finally, Trump should assert the ruling of the Eleventh Circuit in a recent Georgia case, where the panel said clearly that DACA recipients are not "In any way 'lawfully present' under the." Even other courts disagree with this power grab.
https://www.conservativereview.com/news/whopping-373610-illegal-aliens-received-daca-renewal-just-since-january-2018/
No comments:
Post a Comment