This
item pins the tail on the very spot that the feminist crowd is forced
to wrestle with given Tara Reade's accusation of Biden's sexual assault.
Quote: "One of the ironies at the heart of feminism is that its
increasingly strict code of conduct requires the very chivalry and
chastity it has done so much to erase. It taught men not to respect
women but to respect feminism. It pooh-poohed the manners and the morals
of the past that kept men on the straight and narrow. It sought
political power, not moral goodness. Out of that culture came feminists
like the journalist Nina Burleigh, who famously said of Bill Clinton,
“I’d be happy to give him [oral sex] just to thank him for keeping
abortion legal. The rise of male feminist pigs is the byproduct of the
union between feminism and the sexual revolution. The Bill Clintons and
the Ted Kennedys supported both. Feminism taught them to respect the
politics of feminism; the sexual revolution taught them to use women for
their own pleasure. In these Me Too times, feminists don’t talk like
that anymore. But the principle underneath Burleigh’s remark remains
valid for many feminists. That’s why they are struggling with this Tara
Reade charge. According to Reade, the feminist groups whom she hoped
would help her declined. They clearly didn’t want to participate in
taking down their preferred presidential candidate — a candidate who
brags about his 100 percent rating from NARAL. But as conservative
attention to Reade’s charge intensifies, feminists feel the need to at
least pretend to take her seriously. Hence the anxious discussions about
Biden’s tardy response. They just want Biden to deny it directly and
then they can go back to business as usual. But why should they
automatically believe him? What happened to their “women are to be
believed” commitment? The answer, of course, is that feminism’s belief
in the accused turns on his
politics." https://spectator.org/male-feminist-pigs/?
This dilemma is consequential because it strikes at the very heart of
and falsifies the left wing's narrative that they are all about
protecting the rights of their multitudes of special interest groups.
Feminists being just one of them. Their enforcement hammer is total
compliance with their political correctness speech. But protecting the
rights of special interest groups is not at the core of their belief
system. Rather political leftism is all about its left wing political
doctrines and policies. Not the people they claim they love and fight to
protect. As long as one's allegiance to their political doctrine is set
in stone anyone can violate the rights of any member of one of their
"special interest groups" or anyone else. Therefore, if the charges do
not stick Biden is home free as far as the feminists are concerned. But,
that turns Tara Reade into a victim of their political doctrine,
forsaking their fake politically correct "me too" believe everything the
woman say mantra. On the other hand when or if Biden folds and admits
guilt they will drop him like a hot rock simply because he violated
their political doctrine not because he actually harmed Reade. And,
that returns Reade to being the actual victim she most likely already
is. That is how left wing politics works. You need only to consider how
they treat defectors from their party and their doctrine to understand
that fact. For example, Trump, Republicans, Conservatives, Christians,
climate change opponents and gun owners are routine victims of that
treatment. Muslims, illegal aliens, atheists, MS13 gang members, climate
change advocates and baby killer abortionists among others are never
targeted. But if you violate their political doctrine you become an
instant enemy.
This is an example of how the far left mainstream media will go to protect their far left wing heroes. Quote: "Here’s yet another example of “if you’re a powerful Democrat, you can get away with anything.” If Joe was was conservative, the Associated Press would’ve made this report its top story in 2019." And, "The Associated Press reported on Saturday it interviewed Tara Reade Friday about her allegations that former Vice President and presumptive 2020 presidential candidate Joe Biden sexually assaulted her in the 1990s when she was an aide in his Senate office but buried that the outlet failed to report on its interviews with Reade in 2019, when she first made public her dealings with Biden. AP declined to publish details of the 2019 interviews at the time because reporters were unable to corroborate her allegations, and aspects of her story contradicted other reporting,” the report said. This is false. https://t.co/w4yXGI1DQm https://flagandcross.com/ap-interviewed-tara-reade-in-2019-about-biden-claim-then-declined-to-publish-the-report/
This is an example of how the far left mainstream media will go to protect their far left wing heroes. Quote: "Here’s yet another example of “if you’re a powerful Democrat, you can get away with anything.” If Joe was was conservative, the Associated Press would’ve made this report its top story in 2019." And, "The Associated Press reported on Saturday it interviewed Tara Reade Friday about her allegations that former Vice President and presumptive 2020 presidential candidate Joe Biden sexually assaulted her in the 1990s when she was an aide in his Senate office but buried that the outlet failed to report on its interviews with Reade in 2019, when she first made public her dealings with Biden. AP declined to publish details of the 2019 interviews at the time because reporters were unable to corroborate her allegations, and aspects of her story contradicted other reporting,” the report said. This is false. https://t.co/w4yXGI1DQm https://flagandcross.com/ap-interviewed-tara-reade-in-2019-about-biden-claim-then-declined-to-publish-the-report/
No comments:
Post a Comment