The US Should Exit the UN

Wendy McElroy argues that the United States should withdraw from the United Nations (UN) due to its ineffectiveness and the problems it presents, particularly concerning its failure to address issues like human rights violations by member states such as Iran. She suggests that the UN's current operations contradict its original mission regarding equality and human rights.

1. Criticism of the UN: The UN is described as an ineffective bureaucracy that increasingly promotes political agendas rather than pursuing equality and human rights. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has criticized the UN for not effectively uniting member countries against human rights abuses, questioning the organization's utility.

2. Historical Context: The UN was founded on principles aimed at promoting human rights and equality, as stated in its Charter and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. However, McElroy argues that it has strayed from these founding ideals.

3. Current Policies and Ideologies: McElroy claims that the UN now embodies “woke” ideologies, focusing on social justice and equity rather than true equality. This shift is seen as leading to increasing inequities and divisions among member states and populations. For example, UN initiatives focus heavily on women’s rights without comparable support for men's issues.

4. Gender Focus of the UN: The UN Women commission emphasizes a gender-focused agenda, promoting women's rights while neglecting similar frameworks for men, despite both genders facing unique challenges. This is viewed as a clear indication of the UN’s bias, as men are generally not represented in UN discussions about gender equality.

5. Financial Issues: McElroy notes that the UN relies significantly on funding from its member states, particularly the US, which contributes about a quarter of the budget. Financial struggles within the UN have been emphasized, with suggestions that a failure to secure funding could lead to a diminished status for the organization.

6. Future Leadership Concerns: The potential appointment of Michelle Bachelet as the next UN Secretary-General raises concerns, as she is characterized as aggressively promoting woke policies. McElroy argues that this could exacerbate existing issues within the UN.

McElroy calls for the United States to exit the UN altogether, warning that if the current trends continue, the organization will become increasingly unaligned with its founding values. She highlights that funding challenges could weaken the UN's influence, suggesting that a dissolution or collapse of the UN might ultimately be beneficial.

The article encourages discussions related to the effectiveness and direction of international organizations like the UN and presents a view that advocates for significant changes in how global governance operates, particularly in its commitment to equality and human rights. 

https://brownstone.org/articles/the-us-should-exit-the-un/

SCOTUS Delivers Another Set of Back-to-Back Defeats for the All Powerful D.C. Court System

Recent rulings from the U. S. Supreme Court (SCOTUS) have once again limited the powers of the D. C. district courts, reinforcing presidential authority, particularly regarding immigration and executive decisions. This summary outlines key cases and decisions, showcasing the ongoing tension between the judiciary and executive branches.

1. Fischer v. U. S. Ruling:

● The Supreme Court criticized the D. C. district courts for their handling of cases involving January 6 protesters. The majority of judges were found to have improperly applied a corporate fraud statute, which led to severe penalties for over 300 individuals. This ruling disrupted ongoing prosecutions and required reevaluation of prior convictions.

2. Presidential Immunity Established:

● Another ruling affirmed broad presidential immunity from criminal prosecution, pushing back against D. C. judges who dismissed President Trump's immunity claims related to a Special Counsel investigation. Chief Justice Roberts remarked on the expedited and questionable processes of the local courts.

3. Refugee Status Case:

● In a recent case, the Supreme Court overturned a D. C. judge’s ruling that temporarily halted the termination of Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for Haitian refugees. Judge Ana Reyes’ decision claimed it was racially motivated; however, the Supreme Court found that the lower courts overstepped their bounds and confirmed that such executive decisions are generally not subject to judicial review.

4. Executive Authority Reinforced:

● Another significant decision involved the firing of an FTC commissioner by President Biden. The high court ruled against a lower court that supported the commissioner’s claim to remain in her position, reasserting that the president has the authority to remove appointees without needing to justify inefficiency or misconduct. This decision overruled precedent set by the 1935 Humphrey’s Executor case.

5. Ongoing Judicial Challenges:

● The outcomes show a clear pattern of the Supreme Court striving to maintain a balance of power, particularly regarding the judicial overreach observed in Washington D. C. Courts have challenged administration policies on immigration and executive appointments, causing significant delays and obstacles in the president's initiatives.

The recent Supreme Court decisions exemplify a firm pushback against judicial overreach, particularly by the D. C. courts. These rulings emphasize the necessity for courts to respect executive authority, highlighting the ongoing struggle between these two branches of government. The implications for future governance and judicial authority remain significant as both sides navigate these legal challenges. 

https://www.declassified.live/p/scotus-delivers-another-set-of-back

Land of the Free Because of the Brave

The bravery and significance of the Continental Congress's decision to declare independence from Britain in 1776. It highlights the challenges faced by the early American revolutionaries and commemorates their legacy as the United States celebrates its 250th anniversary.

● Historical Perspective: The outcomes of historical events, like battles, seem clear in hindsight, but during their occurrence, the results were uncertain. The early American victory against Britain seemed improbable in 1775.

● Roots of Independence: The desire for independence arose from increasing tyranny imposed by the British government, including taxes and a standing army in the Colonies. The Declaration of Independence listed these grievances.

● Continental Congress: In 1775, the Second Continental Congress met, forming a de facto government. They created an army, appointed George Washington as commander, and established a naval and military presence.

● Common Sense: Thomas Paine’s pamphlet, published in January 1776, advocated for independence and significantly influenced public sentiment among the delegates and Colonists.

● Risks of Declaration: Signing the Declaration symbolized a commitment to rebellion against the Crown, placing the signers at great risk. They pledged their lives, fortunes, and honor.

● Challenges Faced: The path to independence was arduous, with significant sacrifices made by Continental soldiers, who faced harsh conditions and superior British forces.

● Consequences for Signers: Many of the 56 signers suffered severe repercussions, including death, imprisonment, and loss of their homes and businesses during the war.

The courage displayed by the signers of the Declaration of Independence and their willingness to risk everything for freedom is a critical part of American history. Their actions laid the foundation for future generations, and it is now the responsibility of all Americans to uphold and cherish the freedoms they secured. 

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2026/06/land-of-the-free-because-of-the-brave/

TPS Has Always Been A Giant Scam

The Temporary Protected Status (TPS) program for Haitians in the U. S., highlighting a recent interview with Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin. This interview has raised questions about the legitimacy of the TPS program and the status of many Haitians currently living in the U. S.

1. Background of TPS for Haitians: TPS was first granted to Haitians in 2010 after a devastating earthquake. The program allows individuals from countries facing unsafe conditions to stay in the U. S. without deportation.

2. Controversy Over TPS: In June 2024, the Biden administration expanded TPS, making 300,000 additional Haitians eligible. This move has raised concerns about the program's intent, as many beneficiaries allegedly entered the U. S. illegally from Mexico.

3. Homeland Security Secretary's Defense: Mullin stated that Haitians under TPS can apply for permanent residence if they go through the proper legal channels, which contradicts the notion that they all entered lawfully.

4. Illegal Immigration Patterns: The article suggests many Haitians did not flee directly from Haiti but left stable lives in South America to seek better economic opportunities in the U. S. The influx occurred after Biden took office, as many believed they would not face deportation.

5. Claims of Asylum: To gain TPS, many individuals discarded their legal documents from South American countries, which would indicate their legal status there and undermine their asylum claims in the U. S.

6. Criticism of TPS as Temporary: The article argues that TPS has been used as a tool for indefinite residency rather than for its intended purpose. This has led to inconsistencies and prolonged residency for individuals who should have returned to their home countries once conditions improved.

7. Supreme Court Ruling: A recent Supreme Court decision allows the Trump administration's efforts to revoke TPS for Haitians, which is met with opposition from some who argue that Haiti remains unsafe.

8. Conclusion on TPS: Critics of TPS claim it has become a loophole for illegal immigrants rather than a genuine asylum program. The debate continues over the status of Haitians in the U. S. and the future of TPS as a program.

The article articulates a critical perspective on the TPS program for Haitians, highlighting its misuse as a pathway for some to gain permanent residency in the U. S., while raising important questions about immigration policy and the enforcement of federal immigration laws. This situation reflects the broader, ongoing debate surrounding immigration in the U. S. 

https://thefederalist.com/2026/06/30/tps-has-always-been-a-giant-scam/

Nation's Report Card shows further decline in literacy, GOP Rep Owens says system 'failing' students

Recent data from the Nation’s Report Card indicates that student achievement is declining across the United States, especially in reading, writing, and comprehension skills. There is a notable disparity in performance, with Black and Hispanic students scoring lower than their White and Asian peers, despite higher graduation rates.

● Many educators are concerned about the "equitable grading" practices that may inflate scores for historically disadvantaged students, creating a false sense of achievement.

● Surveys reveal that about half of teachers in urban school districts apply such grading practices, including policies that allow unlimited retakes and no penalties for late submissions.

● Utah GOP Rep. Burgess Owens argues that these ideologies harm the very students they aim to help and suggests that the education system itself is failing these students.

● Owens advocates for more "school choice," allowing parents to choose better educational environments for their children regardless of their socioeconomic status.

● Despite rising graduation rates for Black and Hispanic students, experts warn that these numbers do not reflect true preparedness, but rather a practice of social promotion.

● Noteworthy districts like Chicago and Atlanta show high graduation rates alongside low literacy proficiency, indicating a disconnect between graduation metrics and actual educational success.

● Evidence from districts that prioritize rigorous academic standards and school choice, like New Orleans, shows improvement in student performance.

Overall, the report indicates that real education reform is necessary, focusing on high academic standards and true educational opportunities for all students to close the achievement gap effectively. 

https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/education/ed-experts-lawmakers-say-school-choice-helps-black-and-hispanic-students

The New Socialists: Elite, Ungrateful, and Toxic as Ever

 The emerging influence of new socialists in America, highlighting their ideologies, tactics, and potential consequences for the Democratic Party and the nation. The author, Victor Davis Hanson, argues that the radicalism of these new socialists may ultimately alienate voters and provoke a pushback.

1. Emergence of New Socialists: The article describes how new radical socialists, often likened to Jacobins, believe they are taking over the Democratic Party. Their influence has created fear among traditional Democrats, leading to a struggle within the party.

2. Increased Radicalism: The new socialists have adopted extreme positions, including open borders, dismantling democratic structures, and supporting antisemitic sentiments. This is exemplified by Jewish American Democrats feeling threatened by the radical changes and ideologies pushed by their own party’s new members.

3. Class Division: There’s a notable divide between wealthy individuals who hope to escape harsh socialist policies and those who view these policies as beneficial. The author discusses a fear among the rich that proposed taxes and property seizures could target them.

4. Hidden Agendas: Many socialist policies lack popular support, yet the agenda includes expansive government control over various sectors like housing, health care, and education. Their true beliefs often surface through social media, revealing a radical intention beneath presented civility.

5. Cultural Shift: The new socialists engage in cultural campaigns to enforce progressive values, altering traditional societal norms. Their tactics include dismantling law enforcement and reshaping educational curricula to reflect their ideology.

6. Contradictory Views: The radical socialists express contempt toward the American middle class and the foundations of American society. This contradicts the generosity and opportunities that they, being beneficiaries of the system, have received.

7. Roots of Hatred: The article suggests that the hatred displayed by new socialists stems from envy of successful individuals and a broader disdain for the values represented by American capitalism.

8. Historical Context: The author connects the current socialist push to historical movements, likening them to past radical groups. He posits that these socialists wish to dismantle the American system and reshape it into something unrecognizable.

9. Counter-Revolutionary Forces: Mentioning Donald Trump, the author frames him as a counter-revolutionary figure who opposes the socialist agenda. Trump’s actions, according to Hanson, threaten the socialists' goals, further deepening the ideological battle.

10. Future Implications: There’s a concern about whether the Democratic Party can balance itself in light of its leftward shift while maintaining broader electoral support. The article questions whether the path the party is taking aligns with the desires of the average American.

The article critically examines the rise of new socialists in America, emphasizing their radical agendas and the implications for the future of the Democratic Party and American society. The author warns that the extreme beliefs of these factions may provoke significant counter-responses from the electorate, reshaping political dynamics in unforeseen ways.

https://amgreatness.com/2026/06/30/the-new-socialists-elite-ungrateful-and-toxic-as-ever/

When Has Negotiating With Islamic Terrorists Ever Worked?

The historical and current challenges the United States faces when negotiating with Islamic states, particularly in dealing with terrorism and hostage situations. It explores the implications of such negotiations and the lessons learned from past experiences.

1. Historical Context: Nearly 250 years ago, early American leaders, including George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, and John Adams, attempted to negotiate with Islamic pirate states to stop the capture of American ships. They discovered that these negotiations often led to broken agreements due to inherent religious justifications for war against non-Muslims.

2. Current Negotiations: The U. S. is once again negotiating with Iran regarding attacks on international shipping, despite previous failures. Critics argue that these negotiations could lead to smart diplomacy, while critics highlight that such strategies have historically resulted in increased terrorism.

3. Track Record of Negotiations: Past negotiations with Iran, as well as agreements made during different U. S. administrations, have failed, often resulting in more hostage-taking and terrorism. The publication details examples including the Algiers Accord and deals struck during the Obama and Trump administrations, which led to ongoing violations and violence.

4. Trust Issues: Historical relationships with countries like Pakistan and Saudi Arabia show a pattern of deception, with these nations harboring terrorists while professing to be allies. The U. S. continues to engage with these states despite their past actions.

5. Lessons Learned: The content emphasizes that the underlying hostility and lack of shared values make negotiations ineffective. It recalls the warnings from America's Founding Fathers, suggesting that the U. S. has repeatedly ignored these lessons.

Negotiating with Islamic terrorist states has not yielded positive results historically and is unlikely to do so in the future. Understanding the past is crucial to avoid repeating the same mistakes. 

https://www.frontpagemag.com/when-has-negotiating-with-islamic-terrorists-ever-worked/

The Hidden California Tax on Everything You Buy

The California Air Resources Board (CARB) is impacting the cost of goods across the United States through regulatory waivers. These changes are raising prices for consumers, even though many are unaware of the source.

● Rising Costs: Grocery bills and shipping costs have increased, a trend partly driven by CARB's regulations on pollution.

● De Facto National Policy: CARB's regulatory approach effectively sets national energy policy without direct approval from Congress or voters outside California.

● At-Berth Regulation: A specific regulation requires cargo ships at California ports to shut down diesel engines, which leads to penalties for non-compliance. Owners must register expensive retrofits to comply, contributing to higher freight rates.

● Financial Impact: CARB estimates this regulation will cost $2.23 billion by 2032, with costs passing from shipping companies to consumers through higher prices on goods.

● Lack of Representation: Only California voters had a say on these regulations. Citizens from other states like Texas and Ohio were not consulted, and their representatives did not vote on these measures.

● Congressional Action: Congress can review and potentially repeal waivers using the Congressional Review Act, and there is bipartisan precedent for this action.

Consumers are paying more due to California's regulatory decisions, and Congress has the power to review these waivers. With rising prices affecting many, it is essential for lawmakers to address the implications of CARB’s policies nationwide. 

https://substack.com/home/post/p-203424744

The State of Financial Markets Tells Us What Investors Really Believe

Financial markets reflect the beliefs and actions of investors, contrasting mainstream economic theories with more practical approaches that account for real-world observations. It examines the validity of these theories based on their ability to predict future events and emphasizes the importance of understanding fundamental economic principles.

1. Divergence of Theory and Reality: Mainstream economists often prioritize abstract theories over real-world observations. However, financial markets ultimately must align with actual economic conditions

2. Investor Decision-Making: Investors' decisions are influenced by popular notions rather than grounded theories. If the theories lack practical reality, market directions will also veer off course, illustrating the disconnect between investor behavior and economic fundamentals.

3. Milton Friedman's View: Friedman argued that the effectiveness of a theory hinges on its predictive power rather than its descriptive realism. This raises questions about whether forecasting is the right measure of a theory's validity.

4. Importance of Logical Consistency: The article argues that the worth of a theory should be based on its logical validity and its alignment with reality rather than just its predictive capability. For example, while demand will affect prices, it is not always predictable when these price movements will happen.

5. Critique of the Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH): The EMH suggests that past information is reflected in current asset prices, making fundamental analysis unnecessary. However, this view overlooks how individual experiences and knowledge shape future expectations and market actions.

6. Praxeology and Human Action: Ludwig von Mises introduced the concept of praxeology, which focuses on purposeful human actions rather than just numerical indicators like GDP. Understanding how humans act is essential for economic analysis and helps debunk the idea that demand drives the economy.

7. Production vs. Demand: The article emphasizes that production, saving, and capital investment are the real drivers of economic health. Consumption relies on prior production; therefore, it is essential to focus on expanding production rather than merely responding to consumer demand.

8. Market Reactions to Economic Indicators: Financial markets often react to economic indicators such as GDP. However, it is suggested that a more focused approach on production and saving would lead to a better understanding of market dynamics.

9. Temporary Market Distortions: In a free market, discrepancies between expectations and reality are corrected quickly. However, in distorted markets, such as those influenced by government policies, these corrections may be delayed, evoking a false sense of stability.

10. Reality as a Constant: Ultimately, the article concludes that the market does not possess superior knowledge; if investors cling to flawed ideas, these will only create temporary market patterns until reality prevails.

The discussions emphasize the necessity of grounding economic theory in real-world observations and human actions. Instead of relying solely on predictive measures or superficial economic indicators, understanding the essence of production and saving is fundamental for effective market analysis. The importance of clarifying concepts and recognizing that markets will eventually adjust to reality is crucial for both investors and economists.

https://mises.org/mises-wire/state-financial-markets-tells-us-what-investors-really-believe

Supreme Court Lets Trump Fire SEC and CFTC Commissioners, Shaking 91-Year Precedent

Significant developments in the cryptocurrency space, particularly regarding regulatory changes following a Supreme Court ruling, alongside key market trends and current events in digital assets.

1. Cryptocurrency Market Overview:

● Current cryptocurrency prices indicate mixed performance, with Bitcoin (BTC) at $59,454.35 (-1.25%), Ethereum (ETH) at $1,586.95 (+0.12%), and BNB at $551.97 (-0.36%).

● The market is responding to ongoing regulatory discussions and movements, which influence traders' strategies and expectations.

2. Supreme Court Ruling:

● The U. S. Supreme Court has ruled that President Trump can dismiss SEC (Securities and Exchange Commission) and CFTC (Commodity Futures Trading Commission) commissioners without cause, overturning a precedent that had been in place for 91 years.

● This change allows direct executive influence on these regulatory bodies, raising concerns about political pressure affecting financial oversight.

3. Impact on Cryptocurrency Regulation:

● The SEC and CFTC are pivotal in regulating digital assets, with the SEC traditionally taking an aggressive stance against certain cryptocurrencies, labeling them as securities, while the CFTC has been viewed as more lenient.

● The ability to quickly change commissioners may lead to altered enforcement priorities and rules affecting the cryptocurrency sector, impacting compliance and market strategies.

4. Market Reactions and Uncertainty:

● Following the ruling, there is increased uncertainty in the crypto market as no immediate changes or guidance from the administration have been announced, leading to traders and companies assessing potential regulatory risks.

● Stakeholders in the crypto industry must prepare for the possibility of swift shifts in regulation, affecting stablecoin issuers, crypto exchanges, and decentralized finance (DeFi) protocols.

5. Broader Implications for Financial Regulation:

● This ruling may create ripple effects across other financial markets beyond cryptocurrencies, as the SEC oversees equities and public company disclosures, potentially changing how these markets are regulated.

● The ruling raises questions about the balance between the need for regulatory stability and the demand for accountability from independent agencies.

The recent Supreme Court decision significantly alters the landscape of financial regulation in the U. S., especially regarding cryptocurrency oversight. As the market adjusts to this new reality, both traders and agencies are positioned on edge amid uncertainties regarding how regulatory priorities may shift under future commissioners.

https://thecurrencyanalytics.com/regulations/supreme-court-lets-trump-fire-sec-and-cftc-commissioners-shaking-91-year-precedent-271168

America's Blue Collar Workers Shouldn’t Be the Fall Guy for Everyone Else’s Prosperity

Bill Clinton's signing of the NAFTA trade agreement is viewed as a significant error that negatively affected American blue-collar workers and the Democratic Party. The effects of free trade agreements have contributed to the discontent that gave rise to Donald Trump's presidency.

● The middle class has faced job losses and stagnant wages since the 1970s, largely due to globalization and trade agreements.

● In the 2016 presidential campaign, trade agreements became a critical issue, with Trump criticizing them.

● While automation has contributed to job loss, trade agreements allow American companies to outsource jobs overseas, leading to the unemployment of American workers.

● American multinational corporations have thrived while transferring jobs abroad, resulting in increased corporate profits without wage growth for workers.

● Competitiveness with low-wage countries is often cited as a reason for stagnant wages, but profits are substantial enough to allow for wage increases without raising product prices.

The current situation where middle-class blue-collar workers bear the burden of corporate profit maximization is unsustainable. A suggested resolution is to increase wages for these workers while adjusting CEO compensation, allowing for a fairer balance without harming the economy. 

https://thefulcrum.us/economy/blue-collar-workers-impact-of-trade-agreements-corporate-profits

Arizona Supreme Court upholds dark money law, allows free speech challenge to proceed

The Arizona Supreme Court made significant decisions regarding the state’s Voters Right to Know Act, a law aimed at promoting transparency in political donations. This law was passed by voters in 2022 to combat anonymous and potentially corrupt campaign spending.

1. Dismissal of Most Challenges: The court dismissed several challenges to the anti-dark-money law but allowed one challenge to proceed, which questions if revealing political donors' identities suppresses free speech as protected by the Arizona Constitution.

2. Proposition 211: The law, known as Proposition 211, was designed to require disclosure of political spending sources, addressing the rise of anonymous spending in political campaigns. Conservative groups challenged its constitutionality, claiming it infringes on free speech.

3. Court's Opinion: In a 4-3 ruling, the court upheld most of the law, emphasizing the conflict between the protection of free speech and the necessity for transparency in political funding. The "Speak Freely Clause" of the Arizona Constitution remained a central focus.

4. Arguments from Opponents: The Arizona Free Enterprise Club, the Center for Arizona Policy, and other plaintiffs argued that forced disclosure could lead to harassment and violate rights to privacy and free association. They claimed the law represented an aspect of “cancel culture. ”

5. Historical Context: Chief Justice Ann Timmer noted that Arizona's constitution historically favors campaign finance disclosure, contrasting with the U. S. Supreme Court's stance in the Citizens United case, which treated corporate campaign contributions as protected speech.

6. Limitations of the Law: The court found that while free speech is protected, it does not extend to shielding campaign contributions from reasonable public disclosure. The ruling suggested the public has a right to know the sources of political funding.

7. Dissenting Opinions: Three justices expressed concerns about the potential for abuse of the law to suppress political speech and the implications for donors whose identities could be disclosed without consent, complicating the definition of donors' speech rights.

8. Implications for Future Cases: The case will return to Maricopa County Superior Court, where the plaintiffs can further argue against the law on similar grounds. The ruling could set important legal precedents regarding political donor transparency and free speech rights.

The Arizona Supreme Court's decision has significant implications for political spending transparency in Arizona. While most challenges to the law were dismissed, the ongoing legal battle raises essential questions about the balance between protecting free speech and ensuring transparency in campaign contributions. The case will continue to evolve as the plaintiffs seek to affirm their rights regarding political speech and donor privacy.

https://azmirror.com/2026/06/29/arizona-supreme-court-upholds-dark-money-law-allows-free-speech-challenge-to-proceed/ 

Liberals Heralding A Sovereign Canada’s Demise on Canada Day

Canada Day 2026 is approaching, and this year it comes with a sense of disappointment for many Canadians. It marks the first Canada Day during a period when the country is perceived to be moving towards a style of governance similar to the World Economic Forum's (WEF) authoritarian communism under Prime Minister Mark Carney. This reflection highlights the shift in national sentiment and the contrast between past and present leadership.

1. Loss of Sovereignty and Patriotism:

● Many Canadians feel that the country's historical sovereignty is diminishing. They lament the lack of action against a government perceived to abuse power, particularly in relation to citizens’ pensions and freedoms.

● The current government administration is criticized for their management of public funds and for prioritizing their interests over those of the citizens.

2. Economic Decline:

● Canada is experiencing a recession, defined by two consecutive quarters of negative GDP growth. The economic challenges are mainly attributed to political decisions and policies under the current leadership.

● The government's characterization of the recession as "technical" is viewed skeptically.

3. Cultural References:

● The piece expresses nostalgia for the past, contrasting historical events and leadership styles of past Prime Ministers, particularly Pierre Elliott Trudeau, with current leaders.

● It recalls lighter moments like Trudeau’s flamboyant antics, showcasing the change in political culture over the decades.

4. Media Influence and Public Sentiment:

● The mainstream media, including the taxpayer-funded CBC, is depicted as complicit in the state of affairs while citizens grow increasingly frustrated by political decisions that don't reflect their values.

● Public figures like Don Cherry and Paul Anka are highlighted as heroes representing traditional Canadian values and beliefs during these challenging times.

5. Honoring Unsung Heroes:

● On Canada Day 2026, the focus shifts from the current government to celebrate figures like Don Cherry, known for his long-term association with ‘Hockey Night in Canada’, and Paul Anka, a celebrated musician. They are seen as symbols of the values and culture that many Canadians cherish.

● Anka's candid discussions about rising crime rates in Canada as a result of political decisions underline the ongoing change in the nation's landscape.

Canada Day 2026 feels somber for many Canadians, who believe their country is straying away from the values that defined their nation. As they reflect on the changes brought by the current government and the associated economic downturn, they choose instead to celebrate unsung heroes who embody the spirit of Canada. The sentiment of “Woe Canada” resonates as they ponder the future, longing for a revival of the patriotism and sovereignty they once knew. 

https://canadafreepress.com/article/liberals-heralding-canadas-demise-on-canada-day-2026

Sen. Raphael Warnock Tells L.A. Synagogue: The Black Church Is ‘Homophobic,’ and Transphobia Is ‘Violence Against Divinity’

Senator Raphael Warnock spoke at the IKAR synagogue in Los Angeles, addressing issues of homophobia and transphobia within religious communities, including his own.

● Warnock criticized those he believes practice homophobia and transphobia, stating that transphobia is "violence against humanity and divinity. "

● During his speech, he acknowledged the presence of homophobic views within his own church and community.

● Warnock identifies as a pro-LGBTQ+ pastor, emphasizing that true freedom for all individuals is essential.

● He has previously expressed that embracing LGBTQ+ individuals is part of his personal and leadership journey.

● Warnock's activism is influenced by his Christian faith, which he claims motivates his support for transgender rights.

● He is endorsed by the Human Rights Campaign, a prominent LGBTQ+ rights organization.

Senator Warnock's remarks highlight the complexities of addressing sexuality and faith within communities, advocating for inclusion and justice for LGBTQ+ individuals. 

https://www.breitbart.com/faith/2026/06/29/sen-raphael-warnock-tells-l-a-synagogue-the-black-church-is-homophobic-and-transphobia-is-violence-against-divinity/

DOJ investigating Dem Sen. Ruben Gallego after records revealed he blew campaign cash on Super Bowl tickets, Disney trips

The Justice Department is investigating Senator Ruben Gallego (D-Ariz. ) for potentially misusing campaign funds on luxury outings and family trips. This inquiry follows a whistleblower complaint and coincides with a Senate Ethics Committee's decision to clear him of related allegations.

● Whistleblower Complaint: The investigation was triggered by a complaint from Southern California regarding Gallego's use of campaign donations for personal expenses.

● False Allegations Resolved: Just hours before the investigation broke, the Senate Ethics Committee dismissed a complaint alleging campaign finance violations and sexual misconduct against Gallego.

● Expenditures Under Scrutiny: Gallego reportedly used campaign funds for:

● Super Bowl tickets and meals amounting to over $37,000 during a fundraiser held with former Rep. Eric Swalwell.

● Approximately $18,000 on childcare costs since 2019, including $400 paid to his mother-in-law.

● Family trips to Disney World and Disneyland, costing around $1,500 for accommodations.

● Travel to locations such as St. Barts and Miami, suggesting misuse of campaign cash for personal luxury.

● Denial of Wrongdoing: Gallego has denied any wrongdoing, maintaining that his spending is within campaign finance rules as clarified by the Federal Election Commission regarding childcare reimbursement.

● Political Context: Responding to the investigation, a spokesperson for Gallego criticized politicized attacks, asserting that the investigation follows the Ethics Committee’s exoneration of the senator.

Senator Gallego faces a Justice Department investigation into his campaign spending practices, following revelations of luxury expenditures funded by campaign donations. His office maintains that there were no violations of campaign finance laws, despite the serious nature of the allegations. 

https://nypost.com/2026/06/29/us-news/doj-investigating-sen-ruben-gallego-after-records-revealed-he-blew-campaign-cash-on-super-bowl-tickets-disney-trips/

Secretary Mullin at 100-Day Mark at DHS: ‘Deportations Are Way Up,’ 2026 Stats Set to Outpace ‘Well Past’ 2025 Numbers

Secretary of Homeland Security Markwayne Mullin spoke to Breitbart News about the current immigration enforcement actions taken by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). As Mullin nears his 100-day mark in office, he shared insights on deportation rates, local law enforcement partnerships, and effective strategies employed by DHS to tackle illegal immigration.

1. Increased Deportations:

● Mullin indicated that deportation numbers in 2026 are on track to surpass those of 2025, aiming to outpace them within six weeks.

● The focus of these deportations is primarily on individuals with criminal records or those who have been ordered to leave the country by judges.

2. Targeting Criminals:

● The DHS strategy involves targeting individuals who are repeat offenders or have final deportation orders. This includes those who have been previously incarcerated and released illegally.

● Mullin highlighted that many arrests often lead to discovering other illegal immigrants, indicating the presence of multiple individuals in one location.

3. Focus on Local Law Enforcement:

● Mullin emphasized the importance of collaborating with local and state law enforcement agencies through the 287(g) program, which allows them to assist in immigration enforcement.

● He noted that local police encounter illegal immigrants regularly and could contribute to reducing illegal immigration by joining this program.

4. Sanctuary Cities and States:

● The challenges posed by sanctuary cities were discussed, where local officials may not cooperate with federal immigration enforcement, complicating efforts to deport individuals who should not be in the country.

● Mullin criticized state policies that hinder cooperation, emphasizing the need to prioritize public safety and remove criminals.

5. Border Wall Construction:

● Mullin reported that the Trump administration has resumed border wall construction and is implementing a new security system to prevent illegal crossings.

● The wall will feature advanced technology, with plans to complete primary wall construction by this time next year.

6. Addressing Border Violations and Terrorism:

● Mullin stated that the number of illegal crossings is minimal due to improved border security efforts.

● He highlighted ongoing concerns about potential terrorists entering the U. S., with over 1,900 arrests made under the current administration.

7. Efforts to Locate Missing Children:

● The Secretary mentioned that the DHS continues to search for approximately 300,000 unaccounted children, with efforts underway to find those missing since the previous administration's policies.

Secretary Markwayne Mullin's interview sheds light on the aggressive measures taken by the DHS to improve immigration enforcement and public safety. By focusing on deporting criminal individuals, collaborating with local law enforcement, and enhancing border security, the department aims to create a safer environment for all Americans. The ongoing challenges posed by sanctuary cities and the need to locate missing children underscore the importance of effective immigration policy implementation. 

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2026/06/28/exclusive-secretary-mullin-at-100-day-mark-at-dhs-deportations-are-way-up-2026-stats-set-to-outpace-well-past-2025-numbers/

Few details known on Mitch McConnell’s health 2 weeks after hospitalization

Senator Mitch McConnell's health condition has become a topic of concern following his recent hospitalization, with few details provided to the public.

● McConnell, aged 84, was hospitalized on June 14 but has not released specific information regarding his health status.

● A spokesperson confirmed he is receiving "excellent care," but no updates have been shared since then.

● During the Republican Party of Kentucky’s Lincoln Day Dinner on June 20, Rep. Andy Barr indicated that McConnell is in good spirits based on their text exchanges.

● McConnell will not vote in the Senate during the week of June 22, though he is working with his staff as he recovers.

● The Senate is in recess and will return on July 13.

● McConnell, who has served since 1985 and is currently in his seventh term, is not seeking re-election this year.

● In recent years, he has experienced health issues, including falls, a concussion, and lingering effects from childhood polio.

● This is McConnell's second hospitalization in 2025; he was previously hospitalized for flu-like symptoms in February.

The public remains uncertain about Senator McConnell's health as he deals with ongoing health challenges. The upcoming general election on November 3 will see Rep. Barr and Democratic nominee Charles Booker competing to fill his seat. 

https://www.kentucky.com/news/politics-government/article316311779.html

10 Questions Every Democrat Must Now Be Made Answer

 As the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) increasingly influence the Democratic Party, there is a growing need for clarity on what this faction stands for. An editorial highlights 10 important questions aimed at understanding Democrats' alignment with the DSA's radical platform. These questions focus on key policies and beliefs that could shape the future of the party.

1. Radical Platform of the DSA: The DSA's new platform is rooted in Marxism, portraying "the entire global system of capital" as an adversary. It promises to create an entirely new society, reflecting a significant shift to the left.

2. Public Awareness: Many members of the Democratic Party and the general public lack understanding of the DSA’s views and goals. Previous scrutiny of the DSA has been limited despite their growing rhetoric and influence.

3. Poll Results: A recent poll indicates that nearly 50% of Democrats have a favorable view of socialism, highlighting a potential shift in party ideology and its leadership dynamics.

4. Questions for Democrats:

● Support for Major Spending Initiatives: Can Democrats endorse initiatives like paid family leave, free education, and cancellation of student debt, despite the hefty financial burdens these entail?

● Universal Healthcare: Do Democrats back the DSA’s call for universal healthcare and understand its significant cost implications?

● Reparations for Slavery: Are they in favor of reparations, recognizing the economic and social impacts this would create?

5. Policing and Criminal Justice:

● Defunding the Police: Do Democrats support the idea of defunding police departments and what alternatives do they propose?

● Federal Jobs Guarantee: Would they support a federal jobs guarantee reminiscent of socialist policies, despite the financial fallout?

6. Immigration and Borders:

● Abolition of ICE: Do Democrats advocate for an open borders policy and the elimination of current immigration enforcement agencies?

7. Nationalization of Industries: Would Democrats agree to nationalizing large corporations and essential industries under a socialist agenda?

8. Military and Foreign Policy:

● Defunding the Military: Do they support the drastic reduction of military spending and closing foreign military bases?

9. Political Structure Changes:

● Abolishing Key Government Institutions: Are they in favor of abolishing the Electoral College, the Senate, and even the Supreme Court as a means to reshape governance?

10. Perception of the Party’s Direction: Lastly, do Democrats agree that the party may be moving towards communism, as stated by some of their leaders, and if they don’t agree, why is there hesitance to criticize the DSA?

The editorial calls on Democrats to clarify their positions on these pressing issues, emphasizing that they must be held accountable for their allegiance to the DSA’s socialist platform. Understanding where the party stands on these matters is vital for party members and voters alike, as the implications of these policies could significantly reshape America’s political and economic landscape. 

https://issuesinsights.com/2026/06/29/10-questions-every-democrat-must-answer/

The NIH Emails

 A collection of internal emails from the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) has revealed pre-existing pandemic planning collaborations between various organizations, including governments, foundations, and pharmaceutical companies, dating back to 2016. Dr. Francis Collins, NIH Director from 2009 to 2021, played a central role in these efforts, laying the groundwork for responses to health crises, including Covid-19.

● Historical Context: The emails, dated from at least 2016, show strategic foresight in pandemic preparedness long before Covid-19. Collins’ collaboration with the Gates Foundation, Wellcome Trust, and the World Economic Forum was aimed at strengthening health research and international coordination.

● Ebola Outbreak Influence: The response strategy saw significant momentum following the Ebola outbreak from 2014-2016, which exposed weaknesses in global preparedness. The focus shifted towards building permanent infrastructure instead of reactive measures.

● Establishment of CEPI: The Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI) was established in 2017 to prioritize vaccine development, creating a significant player in pandemic preparedness, which became pivotal during the Covid response.

● Investment in Research in Africa: Emails highlight a concerted effort to enhance research capabilities in Africa, where regulatory frameworks were often lacking. Collins emphasized the need for strong leadership in these initiatives.

● Long-term Planning by Pharmacies: By 2018, discussions among pharmaceutical leaders indicated plans for enduring investments in health infrastructure. This included planning projects like SMART Vaccines, which aimed to guide vaccine investments.

● Impact at the Onset of Covid: When Covid emerged in early 2020, multiple organizations were well-prepared, leading to coordinated roles in vaccine funding and distribution. In contrast, widespread lockdowns and mask mandates were introduced as urgent measures.

● Response to Diverging Opinions: The Great Barrington Declaration, which criticized broad lockdowns, faced significant pushback from Collins, who sought to discredit dissenting views and maintain the narrative built by his network.

● Germ Games Concept: The emails also detail a proposal for large-scale simulations, dubbed "Germ Games," inspired by military war games. These exercises aimed to improve pandemic response and garnered support from significant health organizations and the Gates Foundation.

● Collaboration with the Military: Collins and Fauci conversed about utilizing the military's experience in crisis simulations to enhance pandemic preparedness.

● Ongoing Global Health Initiatives: The 'Germ Games' idea paved the way for future simulations like Event 201, focusing on crisis management in a hypothetical pandemic scenario. This approach shaped pandemic readiness strategies, which were instrumental during the Covid-19 outbreak.

The internal NIH emails indicate that the response to Covid-19 did not arise spontaneously but was the culmination of years of planning and strategic collaborations among various influential health organizations. These findings prompt reconsideration of how pandemic preparedness was implemented, revealing potential conflicts and vested interests that shaped public health responses. The repercussions of these decisions continue to impact global health strategies today. 

https://brownstone.org/articles/the-nih-emails/

RNC Sues Colorado’s TDS-Afflicted Elections Chief For Violating State Constitution

 The lawsuit against Colorado Secretary of State Jena Griswold regarding voter eligibility rules that permit non-residents to vote in Colorado elections. The Republican National Committee (RNC) is leading the lawsuit, claiming that Griswold's guidance violates the Colorado Constitution.

1. Background of the Lawsuit: The RNC filed a lawsuit against Jena Griswold, alleging she allowed individuals who have never lived in Colorado to vote in state elections. The lawsuit argues that allowing votes based on a parent's residency violates Colorado's residency requirements.

2. Claims in the Lawsuit: The lawsuit indicates that Griswold is contradicting Colorado's constitution by issuing guidance for voting for those who have never made Colorado their home. The RNC asserts that residency cannot be inherited and that the law improperly lets non-residents register and vote.

3. Parties Involved: The lawsuit includes the RNC, Rep. Jeff Crank, and Douglas County Clerk Sheri Davis, who argues that she is caught between following Griswold's guidance and adhering to state law. Clerk Davis claims the inclusion of non-resident voters dilutes the votes of eligible Colorado residents.

4. Griswold's Role: Jena Griswold is a Democrat and has previously attempted to prevent Donald Trump from appearing on the primary ballot, leading to accusations of partisanship. The lawsuit’s timing is crucial, given the upcoming elections.

5. Federal Context: The case references the Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act (UOCAVA), which regulates voting procedures for service members and overseas citizens but also implies that states have rights to set voter requirements.

6. Prior Legal Context and Outcomes: There have been similar legal challenges in other states, including North Carolina, where courts ruled against non-residents voting in state elections. The RNC has called for Congress to address voting regulations to prevent non-residents from voting in elections where they lack a connection.

7. Impact on Local Politics: Clerk Davis and Rep. Crank are directly affected by the non-resident voting issue, as it changes electoral dynamics and undermines the integrity of elections. The lawsuit represents broader concerns about election integrity and eligibility.

The ongoing lawsuit against Secretary Jena Griswold highlights critical issues surrounding voter eligibility in Colorado, focusing on the balance between federal voting laws and state constitutional requirements. As the legal battle continues, it raises important questions about the integrity of the electoral process and the qualifications necessary for participation in elections.

https://thefederalist.com/2026/06/29/rnc-sues-colorados-tds-afflicted-elections-chief-for-violating-state-constitution/

America 250: Founding fathers, presidents point to the Bible as the anchor of liberty

 As America celebrates its 250th anniversary, there is a reflection on how the Bible has been considered a foundational element of liberty and moral guidance by various presidents and founding fathers throughout American history.

1. Historical References: Presidents like Ulysses S. Grant in 1876 emphasized the Bible as the "sheet-anchor" of American liberties, urging the youth to internalize its teachings. Calvin Coolidge in 1926 highlighted the connection between the nation’s birth and the conviction of its founders who were God-fearing and independent.

2. Influence on Founding Principles: In 1976, Gerald Ford noted that early settlers brought the Bible and principles of equality across the ocean. Franklin D. Roosevelt acknowledged the Bible’s guiding influence, citing George Washington and Thomas Jefferson as examples of founding fathers who held it in high regard for moral guidance.

3. Later Presidential Acknowledgments: Ronald Reagan pointed out the Bible's enduring influence in shaping the nation’s character and rights. He highlighted how its teachings instilled a sense of common purpose among settlers.

4. Call for Bible Education: Historical leaders like Zachary Taylor and Abraham Lincoln advocated for the Bible’s importance in education and moral development, believing it essential for a free society.

The Bible has consistently been regarded by American leaders as a vital source of moral guidance and foundational principles, shaping the nation's identity and values from its inception to the present day.

https://justthenews.com/nation/states/center-square/america-250-founding-fathers-presidents-point-bible-anchor-liberty

When the American Dream Dies, Socialism Rises

 A shift in perspective towards socialism among younger Americans is emerging, as they face significant economic challenges that differ from previous generations. This change reveals a sense of disillusionment with the traditional American Dream, leading many to view socialism as an appealing alternative.

● Changing Definitions: For many young individuals, socialism is perceived as a means to achieve economic fairness, contrasting with historical views of it as state control.

● Generational Divide: A survey indicates that 44% of voters under 40 view socialism favorably, while only 12% of older Americans share this view. This divide points to a growing acceptance of socialist ideas among younger people.

● Diminished American Dream: Many young adults believe they may be the first generation to experience a lower standard of living than their parents, challenging a long-held expectation of upward mobility.

● Economic Pressures: Rising costs of housing, education, transportation, and food create financial burdens. Young Americans struggle with high home prices, student debt, expensive childcare, and general living costs.

● Increased Financial Strain: A typical lifestyle that once required a single income now often demands two full-time incomes, leading to greater financial instability for many families.

● Distrust in Institutions: Public trust in institutions has eroded, with younger Americans observing government spending on large programs while struggling with rising personal costs. This perception fosters a belief that the current economic system does not serve them well.

● Political Resonance: Politicians advocating for expansive governmental solutions, like Bernie Sanders and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, attract significant support from younger voters seeking change.

● Dangers of Socialism: Despite its appeal, socialism has historical shortcomings, leading to economic failures in countries like Venezuela and the Soviet Union. Such warnings, however, may seem less relevant to young Americans amid their present struggles.

The attraction of socialism to younger Americans stems from frustration with an economic system that appears increasingly closed off to them. To counter this trend, real policy changes that enhance opportunity, such as affordable housing and rising wages, are essential. When opportunity is accessible, trust in the current economic model can be restored, reducing the allure of socialism as a perceived solution. 

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2026/06/when-the-american-dream-dies-socialism-rises/

Congress Is No Longer Performing Its Constitutional Function

 Congress is failing to fulfill its constitutional role in governing the United States, leading to widespread dissatisfaction among Americans. The author outlines the consequences of this decline and suggests that addressing these issues requires restoring Congress's legislative powers.

1. Loss of Governance Ability: The federal government is struggling to govern effectively, which has led to various national issues including affordability, healthcare, immigration, and national security. Congress's approval ratings are at their lowest.

2. Persistent Economic Problems: Issues like inflation, inadequate housing, and healthcare dysfunction are symptoms of deeper structural problems within the economy. Congressional inaction on these core issues has left many Americans feeling economically insecure.

3. Legislative Paralysis: Congress is increasingly unable to pass necessary legislation, leading to a reliance on executive orders and regulatory agencies to fill the gap. This departure from the intended separation of powers undermines effective governance.

4. Party Discipline Over Debate: The centralized authority within party leadership diminishes independent legislative debate. This results in members of Congress prioritizing party loyalty over legislative deliberation.

5. Challenges Faced by Presidents: Recent presidencies reveal difficulties in advancing legislative agendas due to partisan divisions. Reliance on executive orders limits the potential for lasting change.

6. Need for Institutional Reform: The article argues that for Republicans (and Congress as a whole) to create meaningful, long-term reforms, they must restore Congress's function as the primary lawmaking body. Legislation should be clear enough to withstand judicial scrutiny and to prevent agencies from overstepping.

The article concludes that protracted legislative inaction not only hampers domestic governance but also projects weakness internationally. A nation that cannot legislate effectively faces significant risks, emphasizing the importance of Congress reclaiming its role to govern effectively for the future of America. 

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2026/06/congress-is-no-longer-performing-its-constitutional-function/

The Senate’s Gutless Republican Wonders

 The Republican Party in the Senate is facing challenges in passing significant election reforms, specifically the Safeguard America voter ID bill. This situation raises questions about the effectiveness of their congressional majority.

● The article discusses how, in the United States, photo identification is required for various activities, yet many states do not require it for voting.

● Many Republicans believe that voter ID should be an easy measure to implement given its perceived necessity by those who voted for them.

● Despite their slim majority, Senate Republicans have been unable to pass the voter ID bill, which is a key priority for President Trump.

● The Democratic Party opposes this legislation, fearing it could disenfranchise parts of their voter base, including marginalized groups.

● The article indicates that the failure to pass the bill may affect the Republicans' chances in upcoming elections.

● Historically, the concept of voter ID was not necessary when identification technology didn't exist, and communities were closely-knit.

● Republicans have tools at their disposal, like extending Senate sessions to push for legislative action, but the author expresses doubt about their willingness to make sacrifices.

● The article concludes with the suggestion that if the Republican Party can successfully implement voter ID legislation, it could strengthen their position ahead of the elections.

The inability of Senate Republicans to pass the voter ID bill raises concerns about their majority's effectiveness and their potential electoral success in the near future. 

https://spectator.org/the-senates-gutless-republican-wonders/

This Is the World You Helped Create, Chuck: Schumer Mercilessly Booed at NYC Pride Parade

The Democratic Party is facing significant changes as moderate members struggle against the rise of far-left individuals and ideologies. This summary examines recent events highlighting this shift.

1. Rise of Extremist Candidates: The takeover of the party by democratic socialists is illustrated by the election of candidates like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Zohran Mamdani, who have ousted traditional Democrats in primaries.

2. Party Leadership Challenges: Leaders like Chuck Schumer and Hakeem Jeffries are facing backlash for their strategies that have allowed extreme radicalism to flourish.

3. Public Backlash: Schumer was booed at a Pride parade, demonstrating his loss of support from constituents he once engaged positively.

4. Factionalism Among Democrats: Other prominent Democrats, including Joe Biden and Scott Wiener, are experiencing criticism from their base for not aligning strictly with far-left views.

5. Consequences of Radical Policies: The ongoing focus on progressive policies over practical, everyday solutions is alienating voters and enabling socialist candidates to gain traction.

The Democratic Party's internal struggle is intensifying, with traditional members losing influence as far-left candidates gain power. This shift poses both a political challenge for established leaders and a significant change in the party's direction.

https://redstate.com/bobhoge/2026/06/28/this-is-the-world-you-helped-create-chuck-schumer-mercilessly-booed-at-nyc-pride-parade-n2203817 

Bursting Of AI Bubble, Collapse Of Circular Deals Are Among Top Risks To Global Financial System, BIS Warns

 The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) has released a report identifying significant threats to the global economy, with a focus on the potential collapse of the artificial intelligence (AI) sector, inflation, and high fiscal stress levels.

1. Major Risks Identified:

● The BIS highlighted three primary threats: the AI bubble burst, ongoing inflation, and fiscal challenges stemming from high sovereign debts.

● These risks could amplify financial vulnerabilities and disrupt market stability.

2. AI Sector Vulnerabilities:

● If returns on investments in AI are disappointing, this could lead to a sudden decrease in funding, negatively impacting capital expenditures and financial conditions.

● Complex financial arrangements in the AI market, such as circular financing, pose significant risks, where the same asset may be leveraged multiple times.

3. Concerns Over Inflation:

● Despite some optimism about recent reductions in oil prices, the BIS warned that inflation remains a persistent concern, particularly in the euro-zone, where rates are still above target.

● High inflation can trigger second-round effects, as experienced during the cost-of-living crisis of 2022.

4. Fiscal and Bond Market Pressures:

● High levels of sovereign debt, coupled with hedge funds' leveraged strategies, create risks of rapid sell-offs and financial instability.

● The BIS noted that market reactions can arise unpredictably, emphasizing the importance of reducing financial vulnerabilities.

5. Monetary and Fiscal Discipline Needed:

● The BIS advocates for stringent monetary policies to maintain credibility and stabilize inflation expectations, even if such measures may slow short-term economic growth.

● Effective regulation is crucial for enhancing market resilience and ensuring long-term financial security.

The BIS's report underscores the pressing need for global policymakers to address these potential risks to ensure financial stability and resilience in the face of evolving economic challenges. 

https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/bursting-ai-bubble-collapse-circular-deals-are-among-top-risks-global-financial-system-bis

250 Years Ago: South Carolina Defeats the British Empire

 The morning of June 28, 1776, was significant for two major events in American history: the presentation of the Declaration of Independence draft by Thomas Jefferson and the Battle of Sullivan’s Island in South Carolina. While the declaration was displayed with ceremony, the battle marked a crucial military encounter between British forces and American defenders.

1. Historical Context:

● On June 28, 1776, John Hancock received Jefferson's draft of the Declaration of Independence.

● Meanwhile, a British invasion force of about 3,000 troops aimed to suppress the independence movement in the southern colonies.

2. Preparation for Battle:

● Col. William Moultrie and Col. William Thomson were inspecting defenses on Sullivan’s Island when British ships were spotted approaching.

● Moultrie quickly organized his troops at Fort Sullivan, signaling them with drums to prepare for battle.

3. Mobilization in South Carolina:

● In late 1775, Patriots intercepted British plans for an attack on the southern colonies.

● Extensive defensive measures were taken in Charles Town, including the construction of barriers and artillery positions.

4. Strategic Importance of Fort Sullivan:

● Fort Sullivan, built with palmetto logs and sand, was essential for defending the harbor entrance and preventing British ships from accessing Charles Town.

5. British Arrival and Initial Plans:

● The British fleet arrived in early June 1776, and after delays due to bad weather and logistical issues, they prepared for an assault on June 28.

6. The Battle Commences:

● British warships began their bombardment, but the fort's unique construction absorbed much of the cannon fire.

● American forces carefully aimed their weapons, causing substantial damage to the British ships.

7. Key Moments of the Battle:

● Sgt. William Jasper’s heroic act of raising the fort's colors after the flagstaff was shot down became symbolic of American resilience.

● After nearly ten hours of fighting, the British forces were forced to withdraw, suffering heavy casualties.

8. Outcome and Aftermath:

● The Americans suffered 37 casualties compared to about 220 for the British.

● The victory at Sullivan’s Island was celebrated in Charles Town and boosted Patriot morale.

● Fort Sullivan was renamed Fort Moultrie after its commander, and the palmetto tree became a state symbol for South Carolina.

● The success delayed British military operations in the South until late 1778.

● Six days later, Congress formally adopted the Declaration of Independence.

The Battle of Sullivan’s Island on the same day the Declaration of Independence was presented marked a pivotal moment in the American Revolution. The victory strengthened the Patriot cause, reinforced defenses in the South, and symbolized the commitment of Americans to their fight for independence. 

https://www.theepochtimes.com/us/250-years-ago-south-carolina-defeats-the-british-empire-6052672?utm_source=partner&utm_campaign=ZeroHedge

News roundup:

 Mamdani: Democratic socialists ‘can get elected anywhere across this country’

U.S.-Iran ceasefire could go up in flames

The GOP is souring on Israel

Supreme Court’s blockbuster week will put Trump’s power to the test

Buffalo Bills Exclude OJ Simpson from Hall of Fame at New Stadium

Tillis Demands Blanche ‘Get Rid’ of 1776 Fund Before Confirmation as AG

12 Sheriffs, 17 Prosecutors Who Will Not Enforce Virginia AR-15 Ban

Silicon Valley Investor Declares ‘Gross Abuse’ in the H-1B Program

Planned Parenthood Launches $2 Million Campaign to Target Vulnerable House Republicans

House speaker says Trump will receive housing bill Monday

DOJ chronicles religious persecution, offers a dozen ideas to bolster Trump’s bid to protect faith

France says death toll will rise as record heatwave rages in Europe

HHS Secretary RFK Jr. reveals 1 million people were enrolled in Obamacare without SS numbers

Health insurers are looking for MAHA wins

About 1,000 deaths in France attributable to heat wave

Joe Biden Shouts, Stumbles, And Mumbles His Way Through Pre-Midterm Hype Speech

Trump sets Sept. 1 start for overhaul of “run down” D.C. golf course

Pro-Israel Democrat California state senator heckled at Trans March over Gaza, ‘We f—ing hate you’

‘You’re Next!’: Democrats Discover the Mob has a Mind of its Own

 The challenges faced by the Democratic establishment, particularly House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, as they encounter backlash from the far-left factions of their party. It highlights the consequences of their past political strategies that leveraged leftist anger, only for them to realize they are not in control of the mob they helped cultivate.

1. Threats from the Far Left: The article begins with a chant directed at Jeffries during a Democratic Socialists event, signaling that even established leaders are not safe from progressive challengers.

2. Historical Parallels: The author draws parallels between current Democratic leaders and historical revolutions, particularly highlighting how past leaders like Maximilien Robespierre became victims of the mob they initially controlled.

3. Behavior of Democratic Leaders: Jeffries and Schumer have fueled leftist rage with inflammatory statements and actions, aiming to resonate with the base for political gain, like Jeffries promoting street fighting against perceived enemies and Schumer threatening Supreme Court justices.

4. Failed Use of the Mob: The article argues that these leaders miscalculated their ability to manage the mob's anger, as progressive activists turned on established candidates who were viewed as emblematic of the problem, such as Rep. Dan Goldman.

5. Historical Precedents of Revolutions: The author refers to the French Revolution, noting how leaders who used radical movements for political advantage eventually fell victim to the same movements, drawing a parallel to the current Democratic leadership.

6. Panic Among Establishment Figures: Recent electoral setbacks have instilled fear in Democratic leaders as they witness the rise of more radical socialist candidates who threaten their positions.

7. Examples of Radical Politicians: The article cites newly elected officials like Darializa Avila Chevalier and candidates like Abdul El-Sayed, who are pushing a radical agenda that often involves dismantling core institutions.

8. Rise of Socialism: There is a noted increase in support for socialism among Democratic voters, marking a significant shift in political dynamics within the party.

9. Consequences of Inciting Rage: The outcry and violence from the left, including threats against individuals and calls for radical changes, have created an environment where even mainstream figures feeling the heat of the extremity.

The article underscores the perilous situation that Democratic leaders find themselves in, having ignited a movement that they can no longer control. As support for radical socialism grows, and the electorate increasingly backs candidates that advocate for extreme policies, established leaders might be at risk of being sidelined or removed altogether by those they once sought to utilize for their advantage. The narrative warns of the consequences of allowing mob mentality to emerge within political frameworks, suggesting that history may repeat itself with leaders falling victim to their political machinations. 

https://jonathanturley.org/2026/06/29/youre-next-democrats-discover-the-mob-has-a-mind-of-its-own/

Let New York Suffer

 The opinion piece expresses dissatisfaction with the current state of New York City, suggesting that the city's problems arise from poor policies and governance. It argues that the residents have largely accepted these conditions through their voting choices.

● Deteriorating Conditions: The author describes New York City as a place that has lost its former appeal, with crime increasing and public spaces becoming unpleasant.

● Security in Stores: There is a notable lack of security for non-food items in stores; however, food items are left unsecured, contradicting claims of widespread food insecurity among residents.

● Myth of Food Insecurity: The piece argues that the concept of 'food insecurity' is a false narrative used to justify theft and mismanagement, highlighting that malnutrition in the US is often driven by criminal behavior rather than true scarcity.

● Political Commentary: The author criticizes New Yorkers for electing and tolerating politicians who implement harmful policies, suggesting that there is a broader trend of leftist governance leading to dissatisfaction.

● Consequences of Poor Governance: The piece posits that New York City will face economic decline as a direct result of its political choices, paralleling concerns about California’s economic struggles due to welfare policies for illegal immigrants.

● Federal Funding Recommendations: There is a call for reduced federal financial support for New York City, suggesting that the city should face the consequences of its decisions without relying on outside help.

● Radical Left Policies: The author believes that the effects of leftist policies should be fully experienced by those who support them, implying that this might lead to a change in perspective among residents.

● Self-Inflicted Pain: There's a metaphorical comparison made to a child touching a hot stove; some people, the author suggests, need to experience the negative outcomes of leftist policies firsthand to understand their consequences.

The overall tone is one of tough love, suggesting that New Yorkers must face the repercussions of their political decisions, as the author expresses little sympathy for the city’s current plight. The piece ultimately invites readers to reflect on the effectiveness of their governance and the societal impacts of their electoral choices.

https://townhall.com/columnists/derekhunter/2026/06/28/let-new-york-suffer-n2678421

Endowed by Our Creator: How Science Points to the Truths of the Declaration of Independence

 As America prepares to celebrate the 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence, the concept that all individuals are created equal and endowed with unalienable rights is under discussion. The belief in a Creator is emphasized, contrasting modern views with historical perspectives.

1. Historical Belief in a Creator: The Founding Fathers and preceding thinkers believed that evidence of a Creator was objective rather than subjective. Ancient Greek and Roman philosophers like Cicero argued that the ordered universe implies intelligence.

2. Biblical Foundations: The Bible supports the claim of a Creator, stating that nature reveals God's glory and attributes. This idea was echoed by early Christian thinkers and has been a part of Christian thought throughout history.

3. Scientific Support: The development of natural sciences since the 16th and 17th centuries reinforced the argument for a Creator. Notable figures like Sir Isaac Newton and botanist John Ray argued that the complexity of nature points to divine intelligence.

4. Founding Fathers' Views: Figures such as John Witherspoon and Thomas Jefferson believed that observation of the universe provided convincing evidence for God. Jefferson claimed that the design in nature is undeniable.

5. Modern Science and Faith: Recent scientific discoveries about the fine-tuning of the universe echo the Founders’ beliefs, suggesting that understanding nature leads to recognition of a Creator. The alignment of modern findings with historical perspectives supports the idea that belief in God is rational.

The article suggests a strong connection between scientific exploration and belief in a Creator, reflecting sentiments from the time of America's Founders. The anniversary of the Declaration of Independence serves as a reminder of the enduring belief in God, with science continuing to provide support for this view.

https://townhall.com/columnists/john-g-west/2026/06/28/endowed-by-our-creator-how-science-points-to-the-truths-of-the-declaration-of-independence-n2678331