Evette Faces New Attack Ad, Campaign and Reporting Offer Conflicting Accounts

 

By Staff

With less than three weeks until South Carolina’s June 9, 2026 partisan primaries, Lieutenant Governor Pamela Evette is the target of a new attack advertisement that accuses her of being a habitual liar, reigniting questions about past campaign messaging, her company’s ties to diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) work, and the activities of allied dark money groups.

The ad, described in local reporting, opens with a staged polygraph scene and the line, “In South Carolina, a lie is a betrayal,” before declaring that “with Pamela Evette, it’s a habit.” It alleges Evette ran and then pulled an advertisement claiming an endorsement from former President Donald Trump. The spot also criticizes Evette for profiting from DEI training through the Upstate firm she founded, Quality Business Solutions (QBS), and accuses Evette and allied groups of dishonest tactics directed at four‑term Attorney General Alan Wilson.

The ad says Evette ran an ad claiming Trump endorsed her and subsequently removed it after being caught.

It accuses Evette and QBS of promoting and selling DEI programming, including marketing services that could be used to meet diversity spending goals.

The spot further alleges Evette aligned dark money groups have misled the public and targeted Attorney General Alan Wilson with falsehoods.

Reporting and documentary record

Local reporting reproduces the ad’s text and describes its polygraph imagery and concluding tag line, “Pamela Evette just broke the lie detector.”

A prior investigative article documents QBS’s history of offering DEI‑related services and marketing material cited by critics. That piece also outlines timelines of ownership and promotional activity for the company.

Separately, local outlets reported that Patriots for South Carolina, a political group supporting Evette, was the subject of an IRS complaint alleging the organization had claimed qualified state or local political organization status and had not filed certain South Carolina reports it said it would file. Public confirmation or IRS action on that complaint was not available in the reporting.

Campaign response and disputes

Evette’s campaign pushed back strongly. Campaign manager Megan Finnern said opponents specifically supporters of Attorney General Alan Wilson are responsible for the misleading advertising, and denied that Evette ever claimed Trump’s endorsement or pulled any ad about it. The campaign also asserted Evette has opposed DEI initiatives.

Independent local coverage noted contention over ads that implied endorsements by Gov. Henry McMaster and Trump, local reporting indicates at least one ad was removed after criticism, though sources differ on who produced or authorized the ads and on whether explicit endorsement claims were made by Evette’s campaign.

Points of corroboration and evidentiary gaps

The contents of the attack ad and the campaign response are documented in multiple local reports, including visual descriptions and quoted lines from the spot.

QBS material referencing DEI programming and related services appears in archived marketing and in reporting, but there is dispute over whether those materials reflect Evette’s actions or the practices of QBS after she divested control; timelines of ownership and when specific materials were posted are consequential and contested.

The IRS complaint concerning Patriots for South Carolina is reported by local outlets, however, public IRS confirmation or additional independent reporting on the complaint’s status or outcome was not found in available sources.

Major national fact checking organizations had not published rulings on the specific claims as of this reporting; independent verification of a pulled ad explicitly claiming a Trump endorsement is limited to state and local coverage and statements from involved campaigns and groups.

What remains unresolved

Whether Evette herself authorized or ran an ad that explicitly claimed a Trump endorsement, and whether such an ad was later pulled, cannot be independently confirmed from available public archives; Evette’s campaign denies the allegation.

The extent to which DEI related marketing by QBS should be attributed to Evette personally depends on the timing of postings and the date she transferred ownership; reporting shows pro DEI material associated with QBS but includes campaign claims that she divested before some content appeared.

The status and implications of the IRS complaint against Patriots for South Carolina remain unclear in public records cited by local reporting.

The ad adds intensity to a crowded GOP primary in South Carolina, where questions about endorsements, outside spending and political messaging have become central political flash points. As the June 9 primary approaches, voters and watchdogs will be watching for additional documentation archived ads, campaign disclosures, PAC filings and any regulatory actions that could confirm or refute the competing claims.

If you’d like, I can attempt to locate archived video of the contested ads, pull QBS marketing snapshots with dates, or search for state PAC filings and IRS records to pursue the unresolved items.

Sources:

https://www.live5news.com/2025/09/26/sc-lt-gov-pamela-evettes-campaign-responds-calls-take-down-ads/

https://www.fitsnews.com/2025/09/29/pamela-evettes-pac-pulled-henry-mcmaster-endorsement/

https://www.fitsnews.com/2026/05/20/crossroads-2026-pamela-evette-blasted-in-new-lie-detector-ad/

Dirty Brad Raffensperger Loses GOP Gubernatorial Primary in Peach Tree State Shellacking!

Brad Raffensperger, the Georgia Secretary of State, lost significantly in the Republican gubernatorial primary, finishing third and failing to advance to the runoff. His political career in Georgia is effectively over as he faces scrutiny over his actions during the 2020 elections.

1. Election Results:

• Brad Raffensperger ranked third in the Republican primary, losing to Burt Jones and Rick Jackson, who will proceed to the runoff.

• This marks a significant defeat for Raffensperger and signals a shift in support among Republican voters in Georgia.

2. Controversies:

• Raffensperger became a controversial figure after accusations of lying regarding a phone call with President Trump after the 2020 election, leading him to receive praise from liberal media.

• A report indicated that Raffensperger's office illegally recorded a conversation with Trump in January 2021 without proper consent, violating Florida's two-party consent law.

3. Illegal Activities:

• Jordan Fuchs, Georgia’s Deputy Secretary of State at the time, improperly recorded the call and later deleted the audio, which was later recovered from the "trash" folder on her computer.

• The contents of the call were allegedly misrepresented when a leaked version was provided to the Washington Post, containing false quotes attributed to Trump.

4. Impact of Actions:

• Following the unauthorized leak, the Washington Post identified Fuchs as their anonymous source for the misleading story about Trump, further damaging Raffensperger's reputation.

• Voter backlash culminated in Raffensperger's primary loss, and predictions suggest he may seek a role within Democratic circles after leaving office.

Brad Raffensperger's political career suffered a major blow with his defeat in the GOP primary in Georgia. His previous controversies concerning the 2020 election, particularly the unauthorized recording and misrepresentation of his interactions with President Trump, contributed to his diminished support. As he exits the political stage in Georgia, speculation surrounds his potential future alignment with Democratic groups. 

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/05/dirty-brad-raffensperger-loses-gop-gubernatorial-primary-peach/

This Midterm Season, the American Dream is on the Line

The 2026 midterm elections are crucial for the future of the American Dream. The Joint Economic Report from Congress reveals serious financial issues that could affect working families, retirees, and younger generations. This report exposes the consequences of current political management and emphasizes the need for responsible economic reforms.

1. Economic Challenges:

• The U. S. faces significant demographic and fiscal challenges, including a national debt of $39 trillion and peacetime deficits around 6% of GDP.

• Rising national debt leads to higher borrowing costs and threatens financial security for households and businesses.

2. Democratic Leadership Critique:

• The report criticizes Democratic policies for increasing unsustainable spending and ignoring the fiscal consequences.

• Democratic spending patterns are seen as prioritizing transfers from working-age individuals to the growing elderly population, exacerbating economic inequality.

3. Healthcare Spending Crisis:

• Healthcare spending is a major factor in the fiscal crisis, making up over 28% of federal expenditures.

• This unsustainable model is causing severe financial strain on families, with taxpayers and patients losing out under current policies.

4. Medicare's Imminent Crisis:

• Medicare is at high risk due to an aging population, with one trust fund expected to run out in a decade.

• Policymakers must seek reforms that balance affordability for seniors with financial sustainability.

5. Labor Force and Immigration Needs:

• A decline in birth rates has stalled population growth, putting further pressure on the economy.

• Attracting skilled immigrants is essential to boost the economy and provide a balanced workforce.

6. Call for Economic Growth:

• The report suggests that expanding the tax base and encouraging innovation are key to addressing fiscal issues.

• Republican candidates are urged to focus on economic solutions rather than traditional tax-and-spend policies.

The 2026 Joint Economic Report serves as a critical reminder of the impending consequences of current practices in governance and economics. With the American Dream at stake, it is essential for voters and lawmakers to confront these issues directly. Ignoring the realities presented in the report could lead to diminished living standards and broken promises for future generations. Leaders and candidates must advocate for economic growth and sustainable policies to restore hope for a brighter future. 

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2026/05/this_midterm_season_the_american_dream_is_on_the_line.html

Data Center Animosity Reflects Legit Concerns AI-Mongers Don’t Care About Humanity’s Interests

 The debate about artificial intelligence (AI) is intensifying, particularly concerning its impact on society and the role of AI data centers. Recent events, especially among young graduates and community opposition, reflect a rising fear about the future implications of AI.

1. Graduates' Reactions to AI:

• Graduates from various universities have expressed strong opposition to AI during commencement speeches. For instance, Eric Schmidt, a former CEO of Google, faced boos when praising AI at the University of Arizona, showing a reluctance among young people to embrace an AI-dominated future.

• This backlash indicates a deeper fear among graduates that their newly acquired skills may soon become obsolete due to AI advancements.

2. Community Opposition to AI Data Centers:

• A Gallup survey revealed that 70% of Americans oppose local AI data centers, indicating a noticeable distrust towards these massive facilities controlled by large corporations.

• Local residents are concerned about the environmental and financial impacts of these data centers, often subsidized by local governments. Recent reports show that 48 projects involving substantial investments have been delayed or blocked due to community opposition.

3. AI's Ethical and Moral Implications:

• The debate raises concerns about the future of humanity in an AI-positive landscape. People fear that the advancements in AI may benefit the wealthy and powerful, leaving ordinary individuals worse off.

• Pope Leo XIV plans to address these critical issues in his upcoming encyclical, focusing on AI's effect on human dignity, societal structures, and the labor force, akin to his predecessor's concerns during the Industrial Revolution.

4. Potential Risks in Warfare:

• AI's role in military applications raises significant ethical questions. Pope Leo XIV recently warned against using AI in warfare, citing a tragic incident during the Iran war where AI-operated targeting led to civilian casualties.

• He emphasizes the need for accountability to ensure that technology does not absolve humans of responsibility for decisions made in combat situations.

5. Vatican's Approach to AI:

• The Vatican has established a study group on AI to evaluate its potential risks and implications for humanity.

• Pope Leo XIV argues for the view of AI as a tool, not as an independent entity, highlighting the ongoing struggles to comprehend AI's challenges and the necessity to control it effectively.

The growing skepticism towards AI reflects deep-seated fears about its potential impact on society and individual human dignity. With communities increasingly resisting AI developments and the Vatican emphasizing the preservation of human integrity amid technological advancements, it is evident that a widespread discourse on the ethical and moral implications of AI is crucial. As we navigate this uncharted territory, the focus remains on ensuring that technology serves humanity and does not overshadow it.

https://thefederalist.com/2026/05/19/data-center-animosity-reflects-legit-concerns-ai-mongers-dont-care-about-humanitys-interests/

Michigan Senate leader asks DOJ to investigate Whitmer over $20 million fraud scheme

Michigan Senate leader Aric Nesbitt has requested the U. S. Justice Department to investigate Governor Gretchen Whitmer regarding her possible involvement in a significant fraud case connected to a $20 million grant.

• Charges Filed: Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel announced 16 felony charges against Fay Beydoun, 62, who is accused of misusing a grant intended for a business accelerator.

• Political Connections: Beydoun is described as a close ally and political donor to Governor Whitmer. Nessel also shares a close friendship with Beydoun.

• Senate Leader's Statement: Nesbitt criticized Whitmer's connections, arguing that such relationships potentially bias the investigation. He stressed the need for accountability, stating if Whitmer is found complicit, she must face legal consequences.

• Call for Independence: Nesbitt urged acting Attorney General Todd Blanche to seek an independent investigation into the matter, citing a unique crisis of oversight in Michigan that undermines trust in state-level authorities.

• Current Status: As of now, Governor Whitmer has not commented on the investigation request or the allegations against Beydoun.

The request for federal inquiry highlights concerns over transparency and accountability within Michigan’s government, especially regarding the governor’s potential involvement in the fraud scheme linked to her ally. 

https://justthenews.com/government/state-houses/michigan-senate-leader-asks-doj-investigate-whitmer-over-20-million-fraud

Will Spencer Pratt Realign California?

California is facing significant governance challenges under its current political leadership. Spencer Pratt, a new candidate in the Los Angeles mayoral race, has emerged as a disruptor, bringing a different approach to campaigning and addressing voter concerns.

• Governance Failures: California's elected officials have contributed to widespread chaos, unsafe neighborhoods, and business decline. The state suffers from chronic budget deficits despite high taxes. Issues such as homelessness and drug addiction plague communities without effective government intervention.

• Status Quo Candidates: The major candidates for mayor, including incumbent Karen Bass and challenger Nithya Raman, propose similar strategies that have failed in the past, perpetuating a cycle of decline. Their policies focus on providing resources without demanding accountability or sobriety from those receiving assistance, leading to public frustration.

• Spencer Pratt's Campaign: Spencer Pratt's candidacy introduces a new dynamic to the election, as his campaign is distinguished by creative, viral video content that addresses these urgent issues in a direct manner. His ads utilize shock value while conveying a deeper message about political indifference among California's leaders.

• Viral Video Impact: Videos created in support of Pratt highlight the disconnect of politicians from the realities faced by everyday Californians. They portray elected officials, such as Bass and Newsom, as out-of-touch elites enjoying a lavish lifestyle while the public struggles with basic safety and well-being.

• The Role of Independent Creators: Many of the impactful ads did not originate from Pratt's official campaign but were instead developed by independent creators who resonate with Pratt's message. This grassroots support has magnified his campaign’s reach and effectiveness.

• Contrasting Campaign Strategies: Compared to wealthy candidates like Tom Steyer, who employs traditional, high-budget campaign strategies, Pratt’s low-cost, innovative approach stands out. His ads challenge the norm and promote a clear message: California's leadership priorities need to change or the state will continue to deteriorate.

Though it remains uncertain whether Spencer Pratt can win the mayoral race or whether candidates aligned with the established political order will continue to dominate, his campaign signals a potential shift in California's political discourse. Pratt has effectively utilized new campaigning tools and strategies, which may redefine how political messages resonate with voters in the future. Whether or not immediate change happens, his presence in the race indicates that the current political climate in California may be evolving. 

https://amgreatness.com/2026/05/20/will-spencer-pratt-realign-california/

17,000 Homes Evacuated Due to Fire Risk as LA Mayor Bass Leads Race

The current political landscape regarding the Los Angeles mayoral race, particularly focusing on Mayor Karen Bass amidst ongoing issues such as wildfires and public opinion.

• Recently, 17,000 homes were evacuated due to the Sandy Fire, while Mayor Bass faces criticism for her handling of the situation.

• Polls indicate that only 31% of voters view Bass favorably, with 56% holding an unfavorable opinion of her.

• Bass, despite her low approval ratings, may still win due to a lack of viable opposition and established voting patterns among her supporters.

• Her main challenger, Nithya Raman, struggles to gain traction against the backdrop of Bass’s incumbency and recent endorsements.

• On the Republican side, Spencer Pratt is making headlines with viral ads, though he is up against a limited Republican base in LA.

• Historical patterns suggest that voters often stick with familiar politicians, leading to the possibility of Bass retaining her position even with public discontent.

Overall, while public sentiment towards Mayor Bass appears largely negative, traditional voting habits may hinder her opponents, potentially allowing her to win the upcoming election despite substantial criticism. 

https://www.frontpagemag.com/17000-homes-evacuated-due-to-fire-risk-as-la-mayor-bass-leads-race/

A Bill Gone Rogue

Pennsylvania’s House Bill 2103, which recently passed with a close vote of 101 to 100, has evolved from a minor anti-discrimination proposal into a significant overhaul of the state's anti-discrimination laws. This change has raised serious concerns among lawmakers and advocacy groups.

• The bill includes language from the previously stalled "Fairness Act," leading to widespread criticism regarding transparency in legislative processes.

• Critics argue the amended bill could severely limit freedom of speech, conscience, and religious practices in Pennsylvania.

• Hallmarked by vague definitions, particularly in the term "public accommodation," the bill is seen as a tool for the government to regulate various institutions, including churches and schools.

• Concerns include potential legal repercussions for religious organizations, enforced conformity of employees to state-sanctioned viewpoints, and possible impacts on women's sports and privacy.

• Representative Jesse Topper highlights concerns about religious rights being compromised and the government's overreach into personal beliefs and institutional operations.

• The bill is now headed to the Pennsylvania Senate, where the Republican majority will decide its future.

The passage of HB 2103 has alarmed many Pennsylvania residents who believe it undermines clear legal standards and constitutional freedoms. As the bill moves to the Senate, citizens are encouraged to express their concerns and seek legislation that promotes transparency and respects individual rights. 

https://spectator.org/a-bill-gone-rogue/

Another Walgreens Is Closing in Chicago—Blame Criminals, Not the Company

 Walgreens is shutting down another store in Chicago's South Side, specifically in the Chatham neighborhood, due to persistent crime issues. This marks the seventh Walgreens closure in this area over the past year.

• Alderman William Hall of Ward 6 blames Walgreens for the closure, accusing the company of “corporate abandonment. ” He claims this has created a “medicine drought” for residents.

• Hall's criticism comes despite previous opposition to Walgreens opening due to concern for local businesses.

• Walgreens executives reported significant losses, including more than $1 million last year from shoplifting and declining prescription sales at the Chatham store.

• The store faced a theft rate of 16%—four times higher than the company's average—leading to high security costs and further challenges.

• Criminal activity in the area, rather than corporate decisions, is primarily responsible for the store's closure.

• The company is trying to assist local customers by offering prescription delivery services and enabling employee transfers to other stores for safety.

• Alderman Raymond Lopez pointed out that the real issue is the ongoing crime that affects local businesses, questioning where the outrage was when stores faced years of crime.

• Despite a slight citywide decline in crime, challenges remain on the South Side, indicating a need for improved policing and prosecution.

Alderman Hall's focus on blaming Walgreens detracts from addressing the real problem of crime affecting the community. For businesses to return, stronger measures against theft and violence are necessary.

https://www.city-journal.org/article/walgreens-chicago-closure-crime-retail-theft

The United Arab Emirates Is Playing Its Own Game

The United Arab Emirates (UAE) has made significant moves in the energy sector, marking a departure from traditional oil cartel practices and asserting its position as a key player in the global energy landscape. This summary discusses the implications of the UAE's recent decisions, particularly its exit from OPEC and its strategic investments in energy projects.

1. Exit from OPEC

• The UAE has officially withdrawn from the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC).

• This decision is seen as a pivotal moment in OPEC’s history, as the UAE accounted for around 14% of its total capacity.

• The UAE’s focus has shifted from being just an oil exporter to becoming a global energy influencer.

2. New Geopolitical Landscape

• The UAE’s exit signals a transformation in the geopolitical dynamics of energy, where national control over hydrocarbon resources is more crucial than adherence to cartel regulations.

• By stepping away from OPEC, the UAE aims to increase its oil production and maintain high revenue amidst shifting global energy demands.

3. Energy Addition over Transition

• The UAE emphasizes “energy addition” rather than a complete transition away from fossil fuels.

• Currently, fossil fuels constitute 87% of global energy demand, while wind and solar energy account for only 3%.

4. Strategic Investments

• The UAE has invested significantly in energy projects, including a stake in an LNG export terminal in Texas, enhancing its role in the global gas market.

• This investment reflects the UAE's strategy to diversify its energy portfolio and reinforce its position in international energy markets.

5. Security and Regional Alliances

• The UAE has faced several drone and missile attacks, particularly from Iran, indicating a growing strain in its regional security landscape.

• The UAE’s participation in the Abraham Accords represents a shift towards economic collaboration over ideological concerns, focusing on shared interests in security and energy with allies like Israel.

6. Impact on European Energy Policy

• The UAE’s approach contradicts European Union (EU) energy policies that prioritize decarbonization and a rapid transition to renewable energy sources.

• The EU's Green Deal may appear outdated in light of the UAE's pragmatic energy strategy, which emphasizes stability and economic prosperity.

The UAE's departure from OPEC and its proactive stance in energy investment mark a new chapter in global energy politics. By prioritizing structural energy frameworks that ensure revenue maximization and regional alliances, the UAE is leading a shift towards realism in energy policy. As the country navigates this complex landscape, it underscores the necessity for energy strategies grounded in current realities rather than idealistic transitions. The UAE serves as a case study for other nations, especially in Europe, to reconsider their approaches to energy governance and geopolitical alignment in an evolving global context. 

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2026/05/19/the-united-arab-emirates-is-playing-its-own-game/

A Rothbardian Case Against Bad Data Center Policy

 Data centers have become a major issue due to the rising demand for AI computing power. Communities are opposing the establishment of these centers nearby, fearing negative impacts. This article presents a Rothbardian perspective, suggesting a property-rights framework instead of outright support or opposition.

• Increased Demand for Data Centers: Advances in AI technology have surged the need for data centers, which house numerous servers for processing and storing data. They are often large and require electricity and water, leading to community pushback regarding their location.

• Community Opposition: Many Americans oppose data centers in their neighborhoods due to concerns about aesthetics, noise, and increased electricity costs. A Gallup poll indicated that 71% of people dislike close proximity to data centers.

• Site Selection Challenges: Ideally, data centers could be placed in remote areas, but many such locations are already facing environmental pressures, particularly regarding water resources. For example, a proposed large data center in Utah is facing opposition over its potential impact on water supplies.

• Environmental and Societal Concerns: Environmentalists oppose data centers for their energy demands and aesthetic impact on natural landscapes. Groups worried about AI's effects on the job market and society join the fight to limit data center construction.

• Libertarian Property Rights Framework: The article suggests that instead of government intervention, a system based on property rights could be effective. An argument made by economist Murray Rothbard, emphasizes that while property owners can use their property, they should also be accountable for the impact their properties have on neighbors.

• Noise and Light Pollution: Rothbard’s essays argue that while absolute silence and darkness cannot be guaranteed, excessive noise and light can infringe on property enjoyment, presenting grounds for legitimate complaint.

• Homesteading Principle: The article discusses the homesteading principle, where prior rights are granted to noise emissions by a facility that existed before nearby properties. If a new facility increased noise levels significantly beyond acceptable limits, it would be liable for harm.

• Government's Role: Many disputes over data centers arise from government intervention distorting true market conditions. The current legal framework can unjustly favor special interests, leading to inefficient outcomes.

• Market Forces and Consumer Preferences: The demand for AI processing implies a need for data centers. Consumers prefer these facilities to be hidden, and the market should ideally regulate their placement away from residential areas based on property values and utility.

• Zoning Issues: Current zoning laws can inhibit efficient land use. In a free market, property developers might avoid residential areas for data centers due to higher opportunity costs.

• Resource Management Problems: The article identifies that constraints on water and electricity supplies stem from government control rather than from data centers themselves. A true market-driven approach to resource allocation would help resolve many issues.

The article contends that the opposition to data centers is justified in many instances due to their impact on local communities and the environment, particularly through excessive noise and light pollution. It advocates for a property-rights framework informed by Rothbardian principles, emphasizing that a free market could more effectively address the demand for data centers while respecting local property rights and environmental concerns. The root problems of data center disputes largely arise from government-induced market distortions rather than from the facilities themselves.

https://mises.org/mises-wire/rothbardian-case-against-bad-data-center-policy

Senate Votes to Limit President Trump’s War Powers with Iran: Thune Moves Against Trump

On May 19, 2026, the U. S. Senate voted to restrict President Trump’s war powers concerning Iran, achieving this on their eighth attempt.

• The resolution passed with a vote of 50-47, with four Republicans—Bill Cassidy, Susan Collins, Lisa Murkowski, and Rand Paul—supporting the limitation.

• Cassidy voted for the resolution for the first time after losing his primary election.

• Senators Tuberville, Tillis, and Cornyn did not participate in the vote.

• The vote is largely seen as a move against Trump, especially by Senator Thune, due to his lack of support for Senator Cornyn.

• John Fetterman, a Democrat from Pennsylvania, voted against limiting Trump’s powers.

• Concerns were raised about the implications of the vote, including feelings among voters regarding certain Republican Senators.

• The resolution aims to end unauthorized U. S. military action against Iran and will be debated further in the Senate.

The Senate’s decision to limit President Trump’s authority regarding Iran marks a significant development in U. S. foreign policy discussions, reflecting growing tensions within the party and Congress. 

https://www.independentsentinel.com/senate-votes-to-limit-president-trumps-war-powers-with-iran/

Canadian Anti-America Activist Prime Minister Mark Carney Doomed To Fail

The political landscape in Canada under Prime Minister Mark Carney. It portrays Carney as a figure destined for failure due to misleading claims and questionable alliances, particularly in relation to his opinions about the United States and defense matters.

1. Rise to Power: Mark Carney became Prime Minister amid controversy, with claims of deceitful practices influencing his election. His campaign was allegedly supported by celebrity Mike Myers, leading to an awkward public image.

2. Criticism of U. S. Relations: Carney has openly criticized the U. S. in a speech at the World Economic Forum, suggesting that the U. S. has disrupted the global order. This has caused tension, especially as the U. S. pauses its defense collaboration with Canada due to concerns about Canada not meeting defense commitments.

3. Defensive Measures: The U. S. has indicated Canada must boost its defense spending, which has recently been adjusted upwards in response to NATO requirements. There are concerns over Canada’s military capability, particularly regarding the procurement of F-35 fighter jets.

4. Political Fortunes: The article suggests that Carney's attempts to reshape Canada’s international alignments, including forming closer ties with China, are likely to fail. His policies and alliances are critiqued as leading Canada towards failure in addressing major global challenges.

The text concludes with a strong assertion that Mark Carney's leadership is doomed to fail, positioning him as an ineffective globalist figure. It expresses a hopeful message that the destiny of Canada lies in divine hands rather than in Carney’s control, urging freedom supporters to maintain their morale. 

https://canadafreepress.com/article/canadian-anti-america-activist-prime-minister-mark-carney-doomed-to-fail

Social Media Is the New Battleground for Economic Warfare

 Information dissemination has significantly changed, affecting how people receive news and understand global events. This shift has implications for national security and societal trust.

1. Old vs. New Information Flow: Previously, information was funneled through few major TV networks. Now, various digital platforms have opened the flow, allowing anyone to influence public opinion.

2. Subversive Content: Examples like Iranian animated videos on platforms like TikTok and YouTube illustrate how adversarial content can blend with entertainment and reach wide audiences, impacting perceptions.

3. Impact on Society: A survey shows that alongside traditional media, social media is a primary source of news; particularly among Gen Z, with many trusting it more than others do.

4. Consequences of Misinformation: Increased online exposure can lead to economic and geopolitical repercussions, as seen with the public following conflicts like that in Iran.

5. Need for Strategy: Governments need to acknowledge the information war as a national security threat. They should develop robust strategies to track and counter adversarial narratives.

To secure its position in this new information landscape, the U. S. must treat information flow as a critical aspect of national and economic security, using advanced technology and proactive strategies.

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2026/05/19/social_media_is_the_new_battleground_for_economic_warfare_154138.html

Three Georgia candidates sue Raffensperger seeking public election reporting for primary

Staff Writer 

Three Georgia candidates filed a writ of mandamus in Fulton County Superior Court on Monday seeking to force Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger to carry out statutorily required public duties for Tuesday’s May 19 primary, and to allow State Election Board members to observe Election Night results aggregation at the state Emergency Operations Center.

Plaintiffs in the petition are congressional hopeful Chris Mora (11th District), State Senator Greg Dolezal, who is running for lieutenant governor, and Cobb County Commission candidate Keli Gambrill. They are represented by attorney David Oles. The petition asks the court to compel Raffensperger to perform his duties publicly under Georgia law, and includes an emergency motion for a temporary injunction to permit members of the State Election Board to be present during results aggregation conducted at the Emergency Operations Center, which plaintiffs describe as a secret bunker. The complaint cites O.C.G.A. 21-2-406.

The filing was submitted in Fulton County, where state election matters are required to be heard. The candidates said delays in resolving the issue would cause irreparable harm. Their counsel indicated he may seek an ex parte ruling from Chief Judge Ural Glanville after the assigned judge, Melynee Leftridge, said she would be unavailable Monday and counsel for Raffensperger requested five days to respond.

The action drew support from 14th District Congressman Clay Fuller, who wrote to House Administration Committee Chairman Bryan Steil asking for designated congressional election observers to monitor all elements of the Secretary of State’s election reporting process, including the Election Night Reporting Room, invoking the Confirmation of Congressional Observers Access Act, 52 U.S.C. 21083a.

Raffensperger, who is running for governor, pushed back in an interview with Atlanta’s 11Alive, saying votes are not counted in the Secretary of State’s Emergency Operations Center. Plaintiffs and outside election integrity advocates disputed that characterization. Garland Favorito, co‑founder of VoterGA, said statewide votes are verified, aggregated, and reported from a secret bunker and urged immediate Department of Justice intervention to protect voting rights and enforce election laws.

The lawsuit asks the court to order public access and strict compliance with state statutes governing how and where election reporting and aggregation are observed and carried out. A hearing date and any court action on the emergency motion had not been announced as of Monday.

https://voterga.org/news/

Reparations Set for J6ers

There is potential for financial compensation for individuals involved in the January 6 Capitol protests, often referred to as "J6ers. " This follows the president's actions to drop a lawsuit against the IRS and to instead focus on creating a fund for those harmed by the government's response to the protests.

1. Dismissal of Lawsuit: The president's attorneys have voluntarily dismissed a $10 billion lawsuit against the IRS regarding the unlawful disclosure of tax documents. This was tied to a past incident where tax records were leaked to the media, allegedly impacting the 2020 election.

2. Creation of the Anti-Weaponization Fund: Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche announced an “Anti-Weaponization Fund” worth approximately $1.76 billion, aiming to provide relief to victims who believe they were unfairly targeted by the government. This fund seeks to address grievances from various groups, including J6ers.

3. J6 Prosecutions: The Biden administration has faced criticism for aggressively prosecuting nearly 1,600 individuals involved in the Capitol protests, with many receiving severe charges and long prison sentences. Nearly 300 were felony indicted under a controversial law, which the Supreme Court later ruled was improperly applied.

4. Impact on Families: The repercussions of these prosecutions have been severe for J6ers and their families, leading to job losses, family stresses, and in some tragic cases, suicides among individuals facing legal and public vilification.

5. Support from Victims: Individuals who suffered due to the events surrounding January 6 express mixed feelings about the fund. Some, like Christopher Kuehne, view it as a starting point for addressing the wrongs done to many, though they believe much more is needed for full restitution.

6. Future Measures: The fund will be managed by a five-member commission appointed to handle claims and ensure victims can speak out and seek justice. There are calls for accountability from those who believe government actions against J6ers were unjust.

The establishment of the Anti-Weaponization Fund marks a significant shift towards acknowledging the hardships faced by individuals involved in the January 6 protests. While it represents an initial step towards restitution, many feel that further actions and financial support are necessary to properly compensate those who have suffered due to government actions. 

https://www.declassified.live/p/reparations-set-for-j6ers

RNC Chair Joe Gruters Announces 130 LAWSUITS Filed Across 32 States to Stop Democrat Election Shenanigans — as President Trump Deploys ARMY of Election Lawyers to STOP THE STEAL

The Republican National Committee (RNC), led by Chairman Joe Gruters, is taking significant legal action to address concerns over election integrity ahead of the 2026 midterm elections.

• Lawsuit Initiative: The RNC has filed 130 lawsuits across 32 states. These lawsuits aim to prevent what they perceive as Democratic efforts to undermine election integrity.

• Trump's Support: Former President Donald Trump has declared his support for this initiative, planning to deploy a larger team of election lawyers than in 2024 to ensure fair electoral practices.

• Focus on Election Integrity: Gruters emphasized the importance of secure elections and criticized Democrats for allegedly attempting to "cheat every single day." This reflects a broader belief among Republicans in the need for strict measures to guarantee trust in the election process.

• Staffing Efforts: The RNC has already hired personnel in 17 states to strengthen their legal and on-ground efforts related to election procedures and security.

• Ongoing Concerns: The RNC's actions are described as a response to long-standing concerns over election fraud and manipulation, with Gruters asserting that various tactics, including manipulation of redistricting and voter registration, are being utilized by Democrats.

The RNC's aggressive legal strategy highlights its commitment to preserving what it views as the integrity of U. S. elections. With substantial lawsuits filed and support from Trump, Republicans are gearing up for a rigorous defense against perceived electoral fraud efforts as the midterm elections approach. 

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/05/rnc-chair-joe-gruters-announces-130-lawsuits-filed/

Software CEO Convicted In Massive $1 Billion Medicare Fraud Scheme Targeting Seniors

Brett Blackman, the CEO of HealthSplash, has been convicted of major health care fraud in Florida. His scheme defrauded Medicare and other programs out of over $1 billion, targeting vulnerable seniors.

• Conviction Details: A jury found Blackman guilty on multiple conspiracy charges, including health care fraud and making false statements. He faces up to 20 years in prison, with sentencing set for August 26, 2026.

• Background: Blackman marketed himself as a healthcare innovator, claiming HealthSplash used advanced technology to improve care. However, evidence showed his platform was used to produce fake medical orders for unnecessary equipment.

• Fraud Operation: Blackman and his team targeted Medicare beneficiaries through foreign call centers and telemarketing, pressuring them into accepting uncivilized equipment. Orders were signed by telemedicine doctors with little patient interaction, leading to massive billing to Medicare.

• Financial Outcomes: The scheme resulted in $450 million in payments on fraudulent claims. Co-defendant Gary Cox was previously convicted and sentenced to 15 years in prison.

• Lifestyle Accusations: Blackman flaunted wealth through luxury displays, contrasting sharply with his fraudulent activities.

This case highlights a significant health care fraud operation, with federal officials emphasizing the exploitation of seniors and the scale of the misconduct. The Department of Justice continues to address such illegal activities aggressively. 

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/software-ceo-convicted-massive-1-billion-medicare-fraud-scheme-targeting-seniors

The Politicization of Everything

Politics used to be just one part of life, with citizens engaging in voting and public discussions before returning to their daily routines. However, this balance has shifted significantly.

1. Pervasiveness of Politics: Politics has expanded beyond government and elections, infiltrating various aspects of life such as entertainment, education, and personal beliefs.

2. Loss of Non-Political Life: Almost everything now carries political weight, compelling individuals to justify their existence politically.

3. Increased Control: Modern societies are filled with mechanisms of state control that encroach on personal privacy, making individuals dependent on political ideologies for meaning.

4. Similarity in Political Systems: Philosophers note that both communism and liberal democracy promote ideological conformity and dismiss historical obligations.

5. Impact on Culture: Art, education, and even humor are evaluated based on political alignment rather than intrinsic value.

6. The New Citizen: The ideal of an independent citizen is fading, replaced by a regulated individual who perceives dependency as freedom.

7. Cultural Heritage at Risk: The connection to classical civilization is diminishing, with political leaders often lacking knowledge of historical influences.

Although there is a concerning trend of politics overshadowing all aspects of life, there are still pockets of society, such as churches and independent journals, that uphold elements of civilization untouched by political ideology. Without these, our cultural heritage risks disappearing under the weight of political dominance. 

https://www.theepochtimes.com/opinion/the-politicization-of-everything-6026417?utm_source=partner&utm_campaign=ZeroHedge

This Midterm Season, the American Dream is on the Line

The 2026 midterm elections are critical for America as economic challenges threaten the American Dream for working families and future generations. The 2026 Joint Economic Report highlights key issues impacting the economy, providing insights essential for voters.

1. Economic State: The Joint Economic Committee (JEC) report presents a worrying picture of the economy, citing that Democratic policies have led to national debt at $39 trillion and rising deficits around 6% of GDP. This financial state impacts everyday expenses and future economic stability.

2. Impact of Debt: Nearly 20% of all tax dollars go to paying interest on the national debt, which is expected to increase significantly. This growth means higher borrowing costs for families and businesses and threatens financial security, particularly for seniors and young workers.

3. Government Spending: The report argues that government spending has shifted from security and infrastructure to transferring money between generations, primarily from a shrinking workforce to a growing elderly population. This poses sustainability issues for programs like Medicare.

4. Healthcare Spending Crisis: Federal healthcare spending has risen sharply, accounting for more than 28% of total federal outlays. Many policies intended to control costs have instead led to inefficiencies and increased premiums for families.

5. Demographic Challenges: America's low fertility rates have stalled population growth, complicating fiscal policies. The country needs to attract talent through immigration systems that support economic growth.

6. Call for Policy Reform: The report suggests that tax policies must incentivize innovation rather than protect established interests. Republicans must highlight the risks of Democratic spending and present alternatives that focus on economic growth.

7. Need for Accountability: With the impending crisis in Medicare and other financial obligations, voters need clear answers from their representatives regarding accountability and reforms.

The 2026 Joint Economic Report serves as a crucial warning about America's economic trajectory, emphasizing that current policies could compromise the American Dream. Voters are urged to pay attention to its findings, as the decisions made during this midterm season could significantly affect the nation’s fiscal future. By embracing the report's message, policymakers can work towards solutions that secure prosperity for future generations while addressing the dire economic challenges at hand. 

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2026/05/this_midterm_season_the_american_dream_is_on_the_line.html

Covid Dissenter Alex Berenson’s Free Speech Victory Might Be The First Of Many

 Independent journalist Alex Berenson recently achieved a legal victory in his ongoing fight for free speech after settling a lawsuit against the federal government. This lawsuit revolves around the claim that the government pressured social media platforms like Twitter to suppress Berenson's views on COVID-19 and related policies.

1. Background of the Case

• Berenson gained popularity on Twitter by challenging COVID-19 policies and vaccine effectiveness.

• He was permanently banned from Twitter after what he alleges was coercion from members of the Biden administration and Pfizer representatives.

2. Initial Lawsuits

• Berenson first filed a lawsuit against Twitter, claiming it breached its own terms by banning him.

• During the legal process, he uncovered internal communications that suggested government involvement in his suspension.

3. Settlement with Twitter

• Twitter eventually settled, reinstating Berenson’s account and acknowledging the unjust nature of the ban.

4. Lawsuits Against Government Officials

• Following the Twitter settlement, Berenson filed claims against several high-profile officials, including President Biden. These claims include:

• A violation of First Amendment rights (Count I).

• A conspiracy to violate those rights (Count II).

• Tortious interference by Pfizer officials (Count III).

5. Focus on First Amendment Rights

• The case highlights the government’s role in suppressing speech, with the administration allegedly pushing Twitter to ban Berenson soon after Biden took office.

6. Settlement Outcome

• Recently, Berenson settled his claims against the government, receiving $150,000 and an acknowledgment that the government violated his First Amendment rights.

• He will continue his lawsuit against Pfizer executives for their alleged roles in the conspiracy to silence him.

7. Legal Complexities

• The lawsuit distinguishes between claims made against officials in their official versus individual capacities, impacting how the government defendants can be held accountable.

• Berenson’s victory against the government strengthens his claims against private actors, shifting the focus to whether “unvaccinated Americans” constitute an identifiable class under civil rights laws.

8. Impact on Public Perception

• The acknowledgment by the Trump administration regarding governmental overreach lends weight to Berenson’s argument that such actions undermine civil rights.

• This acknowledgment may also pressure defendants, including Pfizer, to reconsider their stance and possibly settle.

9. Next Steps in Legal Proceedings

• Berenson’s ongoing appeal will address whether the issue of unvaccinated Americans can be protected under Section 1985(3) from discrimination.

• The appellate court's decision will be pivotal in determining future protections for similar claims of discrimination.

Alex Berenson's legal battle serves as a significant case regarding First Amendment rights, especially in the context of social media. The settlement with the federal government recognizes violations of free speech, while the ongoing litigation against Pfizer executives highlights broader questions of accountability and civil rights for groups perceived as controversial. The outcome could set important legal precedents regarding the treatment of speech, especially in cases involving public health narratives and government actions.

https://thefederalist.com/2026/05/18/covid-dissenter-alex-berensons-free-speech-victory-might-be-the-first-of-many/

Left’s election fraud denials crumble as DOJ exposes two-decade-long California cheating scheme

Recently, the Department of Justice (DOJ) has exposed a significant election fraud scheme in California, involving illegal activities that date back two decades. This revelation challenges previous narratives from liberal voting activists who have downplayed concerns about election cheating, now under scrutiny due to new indictments and investigations into electoral misconduct.

1. Discovery of Fraudulent Activities:

• Brenda Lee Brown Armstrong, a voting activist, pleaded guilty to charges of paying homeless individuals to sign election petitions and register to vote, highlighting how California’s mail-in voting system was exploited.

• The DOJ reported that Armstrong targeted homeless people to collect signatures, sometimes allowing them to use her address for voter registration.

2. Legal Initiatives and Investigations:

• Armstrong’s case is part of a broader effort led by the DOJ to investigate election fraud across various states, focusing on noncitizen voting and other illegal activities.

• The DOJ has sought access to California’s voter registration databases to uncover further instances of fraud.

3. Increase in Fraud Cases:

• Over the past 18 months, numerous cases of election fraud have been investigated by federal authorities, including instances of noncitizens voting illegally and fraudulent voter registrations.

• Notable cases include charges against four green-card residents in New Jersey and a Zimbabwean living in Pennsylvania who allegedly voted in several federal elections.

4. Election Integrity Concerns:

• A recent poll revealed declining public trust in election management, with only two-thirds of Americans confident in their local election officials to conduct fair elections.

• Assistant Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon mentioned that states have been resistant to turning over voter rolls for scrutiny, complicating the federal government's efforts.

5. Legal Actions Following Fraud Discoveries:

• Several elections have been overturned due to identified voting irregularities since 2020, including cases in Kansas and Connecticut involving voter fraud by local officials.

• Other cases highlighted include a Wisconsin man who was convicted of requesting ballots using others' identities to expose vulnerabilities in the election system.

6. Membership of Individuals in Fraud Cases:

• While many cases involve Democratic figures, there have been instances of Republicans committing voter fraud, indicating that the problem spans across party lines.

The DOJ’s recent actions reveal a concerning trend of election fraud that undermines public confidence in the electoral process. As investigations continue, the department aims to hold individuals accountable and ensure the integrity of future elections. The exposure of these fraudulent activities and the subsequent legal proceedings indicate a significant shift in how election fraud is perceived and addressed in the United States. 

https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/elections/lefts-election-fraud-denials-crumble-doj-exposes-two-decade-long

America: The Real Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon

The narrative that America is a declining power while China is on the rise. However, historical data and current statistics indicate that the United States maintains significant advantages over China in various areas such as economy, military, and technology.

1. China's Status vs. U. S. Power:

• There is a growing belief that China will surpass the U. S. as a dominant global power, particularly among critics of former President Trump. This view suggests that China’s advancements in food production and industrial output signify its rise.

• However, despite China's impressive growth over three decades, it does not equate to matching America's power.

2. Economic Discrepancies:

• The U. S. economy is significantly larger than China's, with the U. S. GDP per capita around $95,000 compared to China’s approximately $15,000. This indicates that one American produces more than four Chinese citizens.

3. Military Strength:

• The U. S. invests almost three times more in defense than China and has a much larger nuclear arsenal and naval fleet, including 11 aircraft carriers compared to China’s 3.

• U. S. military capabilities also benefit from over a century of experience in naval warfare, while China has only 15 years.

4. Technological Superiority:

• American universities lead in global rankings in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). Eight of the world's top ten companies by market capitalization are American.

• The U. S. has reclaimed a leadership position in space exploration and is making strides in artificial intelligence, robotics, and bioengineering.

5. Demographic Challenges:

• While the U. S. fertility rate is low, China's is even lower at 1.0, leading to a declining and aging population.

6. Geopolitical Landscape:

• The U. S. benefits from its geographical advantages, being flanked by two oceans and having stable alliances with Canada and Mexico.

• In contrast, China shares borders with potentially hostile nuclear nations and faces challenges in its relationships with its neighbors.

7. Failed Chinese Initiatives:

• China's Belt and Road Initiative has met challenges, evidenced by losing influence in Latin America and setbacks with oil supplies.

• Attempts to dominate rare-earth mineral supplies are being countered with U. S. investments in mining and resource extraction.

8. Regional Alliances Against China:

• Nations in the Pacific, including Australia, Japan, and South Korea, are increasing their military cooperation with the U. S. in response to perceived Chinese aggression.

• The U. S. has a potential advantage if it chooses to adjust visa policies for Chinese students, disrupting China’s efforts to absorb U. S. technologies.

9. Historical Context of Predictions:

• Throughout history, America has faced challenges from various rivals—Nazi Germany, the Soviet Union, and, more recently, Japan and the European Union—yet has consistently emerged stronger.

• The lesson from history illustrates that despite current narratives of decline, the U. S. often rises to confront threats effectively.

Despite the narrative that suggests China's rise will lead to America's fall, various statistics and historical precedents paint a different picture. The U. S. remains a dominant force due to its economic power, military might, technological advances, and favorable geographic position. The past shows that America has proven resilient against threats and rivals, and there is no compelling evidence to suggest that this pattern has changed in relation to China. Thus, the notion of an inevitable Chinese ascendance should be approached with caution. 

https://amgreatness.com/2026/05/19/america-the-real-crouching-tiger-hidden-dragon/

Pelosi Picks Chinese Communist Linked Immigrant to Succeed Her

Former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has endorsed Connie Chan, a progressive member of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors, as her successor. This decision has raised concerns about Chan's political affiliations and connections.

• Connie Chan, an immigrant from Hong Kong, is considered far-left and has faced scrutiny regarding her ties to communist propaganda.

• In 2022, as District 1 Supervisor, Chan designated Sing Tao Daily, a Chinese-language newspaper with known links to the Beijing government, as a key outreach venue for the Chinese-speaking community.

• This decision has gained relevance amid U. S. intelligence warnings about the Chinese Communist Party's influence operations in American cities.

• Sing Tao Daily registered under the Foreign Agents Registration Act in 2021 due to its role in promoting pro-China political narratives.

• Pelosi's options for endorsement were limited to Chan, Scott Weiner, and Saikat Chakrabarti, all considered linked to undesirable political views.

Pelosi's legacy is reflected in her choice, as she backs Chan amidst ongoing issues regarding foreign influence in local politics. This situation highlights the broader implications of political affiliations and strategies in San Francisco, raising questions about the future direction of the city’s leadership. 

https://www.frontpagemag.com/pelosi-picks-chinese-communist-linked-immigrant-to-succeed-her/

Western Michigan Medical Ethics Professor Has Plot to Secretly Spread Tick-Borne Disease, Inject Everyone With Drugs

 Parker Crutchfield, a medical ethics professor at Western Michigan University, has sparked controversy with his extreme proposals on moral enhancement through covert means. His ideas suggest administering substances to individuals without their consent to make them morally better, particularly through disease propagation.

1. Covert Moral Enhancement:

Crutchfield argues in his book, Moral Enhancement and the Public Good, that everyone should be injected with substances to improve moral behavior. He believes this should be done secretly, as people would be more likely to accept the intervention without knowledge of it.

2. Inspiration from Dystopia:

Crutchfield’s ideas mirror narratives found in dystopian literature, such as The Giver, where citizens unknowingly take medication that affects their emotions and behavior. He thinks covert methods are necessary to ensure widespread acceptance of moral enhancements.

3. Propositions for Administration:

He has suggested various methods for administering these substances, including vaccines, public water supplies, and air systems in buildings. He claims this would reduce the likelihood of people opting out of receiving the drugs essential for moral improvement.

4. Disease as a Tool for Moral Enhancement:

In a contentious paper, Crutchfield proposes spreading ticks that cause a disease (alpha-gal syndrome) that results in meat allergies. He considers this a solution to the moral dilemma of meat consumption, citing ethical grounds for reducing meat intake through illness.

5. Arguments and Responses:

While he promotes these ideas as moral obligations for scientists, Crutchfield does not address significant ethical concerns, such as infecting people with a harmful disease. Instead, he emphasizes the covert nature of the intervention as beneficial for moral development.

6. Cultural Insensitivity:

Crutchfield claims that most cultures do not have a special right to practice meat-eating while proposing that some indigenous groups should be exempt for cultural reasons. This has raised questions about his understanding of cultural practices and ethics.

7. Defense of Theories:

When challenged on his proposals, Crutchfield dismissed them as theoretical, claiming his papers were meant for discussion rather than action. Ironically, he continues to consume meat himself, contradicting the strict moral stance he promotes.

Parker Crutchfield's radical views on moral enhancement through covert drug administration and disease propagation present unsettling ethical dilemmas. His theories encourage discussions around the limits of academic discourse and the moral implications of enforced behavior modification. The ethical concerns raised by his proposals illustrate a troubling trend in discussions surrounding autonomy and individual rights in academic settings.

https://spectator.org/western-michigan-medical-ethics-professor-has-plot-to-secretly-spread-tick-borne-disease-inject-everyone-with-drugs/

The “Pipeline” Problem That Medical Schools Don’t Want to Discuss

 Recent findings by the U. S. Department of Justice have highlighted racial discrimination in medical school admissions, particularly at institutions like Yale and UCLA. This has sparked an important debate about how to understand and address the gaps in medical education representation.

• Department of Justice Findings: The DOJ concluded that black and Hispanic applicants to Yale School of Medicine had lower MCAT scores and GPAs compared to white and Asian applicants but were admitted at higher rates.

• Criticism of Diversity Initiatives: Critics of diversity and equity initiatives argue that elite universities continue racial preferences despite legal restrictions. Admissions officials counter that they are misunderstood in their holistic approach to admissions.

• The Pipeline Problem: Disparities in medical admissions stem from earlier stages in education. The process of becoming a competitive medical candidate begins long before college applications, particularly in high school.

• Advanced Placement (AP) Coursework: A significant discrepancy exists in AP Chemistry participation: black students make up 14% of high schoolers but only 5% of AP Chemistry examinees. In comparison, Asian students are 5% of the population but 27% of AP Chemistry examinees.

• Performance Differences: Among those who take the AP Chemistry exam, only a small percentage of black students achieve high scores compared to their white and Asian peers. Similar trends are seen in AP Biology and AP Physics.

• Implications for Admissions: If there are fewer academically prepared candidates from certain demographic groups, admissions practices incorporating factors beyond academic performance could contribute to the perceived disparities.

The disparities observed in medical school admissions are rooted in educational preparation that begins long before the application process. Addressing these gaps requires looking at earlier forms of preparation rather than only at admissions policies. Understanding and acting on these issues could enhance both the quality and representation in the medical profession.

https://www.city-journal.org/article/medical-school-disparities-dei-manipulation

Causes of Uncontrollable US Public Spending and Debt

US public spending has been exceeding its income for many years, leading to increasing national debt. This situation is unsustainable, but the exact tipping point at which the markets will lose faith in the dollar is unknown. Unlike the US, countries like China and Russia have managed their public spending better, using gold as a guiding principle.

1. Abandoning the Gold Standard:

• The US moved away from the gold standard, which historically helped control inflation and government spending.

• Many other nations are accumulating gold in preparation for possibly reinstating a gold standard, indicating they have more respect for gold as a currency anchor compared to the US.

2. Historical Context:

• Nations typically returned to the gold standard after wartime spending; however, the US did not follow this pattern after World War I.

• The UK faced severe economic consequences when attempting to return to the gold standard under unfavorable conditions, and the myth of Roosevelt’s New Deal saving the economy persists despite it being based on misunderstandings of economic causation.

3. Shift in Welfare Responsibility:

• The creation of Social Security marked a shift in government responsibility for personal welfare, undermining individual financial responsibility.

• Although designed as a supplement, Social Security has become the primary income source for many retirees, contributing to growing dependency on government welfare.

4. Lyndon Johnson’s Great Society:

• Johnson expanded welfare programs, further entrenching the belief that the government is responsible for personal financial security.

• Traditional values around individual financial responsibility have weakened, as reliance on government support has increased.

5. Monetary Policy Failures:

• In the early 1970s, spending on the Vietnam War and welfare programs led to gold reserves being depleted.

• Rather than devalue the dollar, Nixon suspended gold redemption, allowing unchecked money printing. This dramatically increased the monetary base and led to significant increases in federal budget deficits.

6. Soaring National Debt:

• US national debt grew from $424 billion in 1971 to an estimated $38.5 trillion, demonstrating a lack of financial restraint and accountability.

• The ongoing increase in annual budget deficits exacerbates the financial instability faced by the US.

The relentless growth of US public spending is driven primarily by the abandonment of the gold standard and a cultural shift toward government dependence for welfare. Early legislation like Social Security replaced personal responsibility with a sense of entitlement, creating a systemic issue of massive deficits fueled by excessive money printing. The statistics illustrate a troubling trend toward unsustainable debt that poses serious risks to the US economy. 

https://mises.org/mises-wire/causes-uncontrollable-us-public-spending-and-debt

Georgia Election Watchdog Alleges Secret Bunker for 2026 Results; Candidates File Suits Seeking Access

 By Staff Writer

Georgia election watchdog Garland Favorito and the advocacy group VoterGA have raised alarms over what they describe as a secret bunker where Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger’s office plans to aggregate statewide election results for the 2026 cycle a secured Emergency Operations Center (EOC) that critics say is closed to the public, candidates and even some members of the State Election Board.

Favorito, a longtime election integrity activist who leads VoterGA, says the facility is off limits for canvass observation and that the state’s planned procedures amount to secret aggregation that violates state transparency laws. Multiple candidates have filed lawsuits seeking emergency court orders to compel the Secretary of State to allow observers and board members meaningful access to the aggregation process ahead of the 2026 elections, VoterGA says.

The Secretary of State’s office has described the EOC model as a standard continuity and security practice. EOCs are designed to centralize critical operations during emergencies and to provide hardened infrastructure redundant power, controlled network access and physical security intended to protect systems from cyber attacks, tampering or other disruptions. State officials argue that protecting the integrity and availability of state wide reporting systems requires limiting physical access to essential personnel and operating from secured facilities.

Favorito and the plaintiffs argue that aggregating statewide totals in a restricted EOC without public, in person observation violates Georgia election law and long standing expectations of transparency during canvassing and aggregation. Complaints filed by candidates and parties and public statements from VoterGA contend that even members of Georgia’s State Election Board, who have statutory oversight responsibilities, have been denied adequate access to watch the aggregation process, which undercuts official oversight and voter confidence.

Legal issues at stake include whether Georgia’s election code requires physical public observation of every step of canvass and aggregation, whether remote or limited observation meets statutory requirements, and whether emergency authority procedures can lawfully override regular transparency obligations. Plaintiffs are seeking emergency injunctive relief that would compel the Secretary of State to permit in person observation or, at a minimum, live remote observation that is functionally equivalent to being present.

The lawsuits could move quickly if courts view plaintiffs’ claims as raising imminent harm to transparency before the 2026 cycle. Judges may consider ordering temporary measures such as in person access for observers, live video feeds of aggregation activities, audited logs or other transparency protocols while litigation proceeds. The State Election Board’s role could be pivotal, if board members demand access and issue formal findings, that may affect judicial scrutiny and public pressure.

Legal disputes over access often hinge on whether the state has implemented technical and procedural safeguards that provide the same level of verifying ability as in person observation. Measures that officials cite to balance security and transparency include.

Controlled public viewing windows or observation rooms that do not permit direct access to equipment.

Audit logs, chain of custody documentation, and cryptographic hashing of result files to allow,

Formal observer accreditation and scheduled, supervised viewing times.

Risk limiting audits and robust post election audits with public reporting.

Critics say such measures are often insufficient if observers cannot watch the hands on steps of canvass and aggregation or independently verify that procedures were followed in real time. Plaintiffs are arguing that only direct observation or functionally equivalent live feeds and unfiltered access for board members will satisfy statutory transparency requirements.

The dispute arrives amid heightened politicization of election administration in Georgia, a state that has been the focus of election related litigation and intense public scrutiny since the 2020 cycle. For candidates and parties, access to aggregation procedures is not only a matter of principle but also one of competitive fairness. The timing, handling and reconciliation of precinct and county data can affect public confidence in reported outcomes. For election administrators, the concern is balancing transparency with the need to protect systems against real cyber security threats.

Plaintiffs are seeking emergency relief, courts could impose access rules or require the state to publish detailed observation protocols before the next elections.

The Secretary of State could publish or refine written procedures for observation, auditing, or remote access to address transparency claims.

Lawmakers concerned about clarity in the law could move to revise statutes or rules outlining where and how aggregation and canvassing must be observable.

Independent post election audits and public reporting could help restore confidence if paired with clear observation procedures.

Sources;

Georgia Election Integrity Series: https://voterga.org/news/

• Atlanta Journal-Constitution — “Meet Garland Favorito, Georgia’s most influential conspiracy theorist” (Jan 5, 2026): https://www.ajc.com/politics/2026/01/meet-georgias-most-influential-conspiracy-theorist/ AJC

• Atlanta Journal-Constitution — “Judge dismisses claims in lawsuit that sought Fulton County 2020 ballots” (Feb 5, 2026): https://www.ajc.com/politics/2026/02/judge-dismisses-claims-in-lawsuit-that-sought-fulton-county-2020-ballots/ AJC

• VoterGA — Legal / court filings and statements (VoterGA legal-action page, includes petitions, motions, and other filings by Garland Favorito and VoterGA): https://voterga.org/legal-action/ voterga.org