The United States has not conducted a nuclear explosive test since 1992, when the administration of President Bill Clinton initiated a voluntary moratorium on nuclear tests in an effort to help pave the way toward the passage of a comprehensive nuclear test ban treaty that would ban all such tests.
The policies of successive administrations since then have sought to keep open the possibility of resumed nuclear testing while continuing to abide by a moratorium on nuclear testing which has been in place since 1992.
The dual nature of this policy is perhaps best captured in a letter to Senator Pete Dominici, dated June 25, 2007, from Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice., noting that the policies being pursued by the administration of President George W. Bush made it "More likely that the United States would be able to continue its voluntary nuclear testing moratorium. We cannot provide guarantees regarding the voluntary moratorium. We may find at some future time that we cannot diagnose or remedy a problem in a warhead critical to the U.S. nuclear deterrent without conducting a nuclear test."
That modernized the U.S. nuclear arsenal and "Develop a responsive nuclear infrastructure to support further reductions in the number of deployed and non-deployed weapons." This was done "Without introducing new nuclear weapons for new missions into the U.S. arsenal" and "Without relying on nuclear explosive testing for stockpile maintenance."
Computers don't understand thisthe slightest change-in any direction-may cause total failure to detonate", something nuclear weapons designers call "Falling off the cliff." Moreover, according to Moore, "During the testing era, key design changes made at the last minute were often not recorded, nor were the drawings updated, because of the Cold War's pressure of time. Thus, today's computer codes, built on old test data, may be fatally incorrect." Moore, and other experts like him, advocate for the resumption of underground nuclear testing "Without question."
"At the steady degradation of U.S. nuclear test readiness-that is, the capability of the United States to test its nuclear weapons should the need to do so arise," noting that a review "Of assessments made by the Department of Energy of U.S. nuclear test readiness leads me to question whether the DOE has, after almost 25 years of being out of the testing business, any realistic appreciation for what nuclear testing involves or how to stay prepared to do it again within 24-36 months, as legally required by Presidential Decision Directive 15.".
Since the time of the Clinton administration, the United States has spent millions of dollars every year maintaining nuclear testing capability so that testing could resume.
The policies of successive administrations since then have sought to keep open the possibility of resumed nuclear testing while continuing to abide by a moratorium on nuclear testing which has been in place since 1992.
The dual nature of this policy is perhaps best captured in a letter to Senator Pete Dominici, dated June 25, 2007, from Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice., noting that the policies being pursued by the administration of President George W. Bush made it "More likely that the United States would be able to continue its voluntary nuclear testing moratorium. We cannot provide guarantees regarding the voluntary moratorium. We may find at some future time that we cannot diagnose or remedy a problem in a warhead critical to the U.S. nuclear deterrent without conducting a nuclear test."
That modernized the U.S. nuclear arsenal and "Develop a responsive nuclear infrastructure to support further reductions in the number of deployed and non-deployed weapons." This was done "Without introducing new nuclear weapons for new missions into the U.S. arsenal" and "Without relying on nuclear explosive testing for stockpile maintenance."
Computers don't understand thisthe slightest change-in any direction-may cause total failure to detonate", something nuclear weapons designers call "Falling off the cliff." Moreover, according to Moore, "During the testing era, key design changes made at the last minute were often not recorded, nor were the drawings updated, because of the Cold War's pressure of time. Thus, today's computer codes, built on old test data, may be fatally incorrect." Moore, and other experts like him, advocate for the resumption of underground nuclear testing "Without question."
"At the steady degradation of U.S. nuclear test readiness-that is, the capability of the United States to test its nuclear weapons should the need to do so arise," noting that a review "Of assessments made by the Department of Energy of U.S. nuclear test readiness leads me to question whether the DOE has, after almost 25 years of being out of the testing business, any realistic appreciation for what nuclear testing involves or how to stay prepared to do it again within 24-36 months, as legally required by Presidential Decision Directive 15.".
Since the time of the Clinton administration, the United States has spent millions of dollars every year maintaining nuclear testing capability so that testing could resume.
No comments:
Post a Comment