The Next Indictment Should Be Against Greg Folkers

The Department of Justice has evidence against Greg Folkers, a key advisor to Dr. Anthony Fauci, for his involvement in the censorship and coverup regarding the origins of Covid-19.

• Greg Folkers served as Chief of Staff at NIAID and was crucial in managing a $6 billion budget while allegedly participating in censorship tactics.

• In January 2020, he informed Fauci about funding for gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, warning it could be related to Covid-19's origin.

• Instead of publicly addressing the potential lab leak, Folkers and Fauci, along with Dr. Morens, chose to suppress this information.

• They produced the "Proximal Origin" article to dismiss lab leak theories while being aware that several virologists believed in its likelihood.

• Folkers and Morens also conspired to evade FOIA requests through methods like misspelling key terms and deleting emails.

• The charges against Morens include conspiracy and record falsification, stemming from evidence of similar actions by Folkers.

Folkers played a vital role in the Covid-19 response and coverup, and further accountability for other officials involved is anticipated as investigations continue. 

https://brownstone.org/articles/the-next-indictment-should-be-against-greg-folkers/

Trump’s DOJ Forcing Mexican President to Choose Between Protecting Political Party or Fighting Cartels

Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum is facing a significant dilemma as the U. S. government pressures her to combat drug cartels while protecting her political party, which has ties to these criminal organizations.

• The U. S. Department of Justice (DOJ) has unsealed an indictment against Sinaloa’s Governor Ruben Rocha Moya and others for allegedly collaborating with the Sinaloa Cartel in exchange for bribes.

• This is the first time a sitting Mexican governor has faced such charges, highlighting the accusation that the ruling MORENA party is connected to drug cartels for political gain.

• The indictment aligns with claims made by President Trump about Mexico’s corruption relating to drug cartels, asserting that the government has not adequately fought these groups.

• Following the indictment, the MORENA party issued a statement supporting Rocha Moya, indicating an intention to protect its political interests over confronting criminal activity directly.

• Sheinbaum's administration has claimed collaboration with the U. S. to combat drug trafficking but refuses to allow American agents or troops in Mexico.

• The Mexican Attorney General's Office has received the indictment but expressed skepticism about the evidence provided by the U. S. and indicated possible obstruction of the case.

• Sheinbaum is now under pressure to either cooperate with U. S. demands to combat the cartels, which could lead to sanctions, or to continue protecting her political allies amid growing scrutiny from both the U. S. and domestic critics.

President Sheinbaum's actions in response to the U. S. pressure and the indictment could shape both her political future and the ongoing fight against drug cartels in Mexico. The situation is evolving, with significant implications for Mexican governance and U. S.-Mexico relations. 

https://www.breitbart.com/border/2026/04/30/trumps-doj-forcing-mexican-president-to-choose-between-protecting-political-party-or-fighting-cartels/

Biden-Appointed Judge Orders Release of Dominican Illegal Alien Wanted for Murder by Interpol Red Notice Fugitive Now Roaming Free After ICE Arrest!

A recent legal ruling has raised concerns regarding public safety after a U. S. federal judge ordered the release of a Dominican illegal immigrant, Bryan Rafael Gomez. He is wanted for murder in his home country and had previously been detained by U. S. authorities.

• Background: Bryan Rafael Gomez, a Dominican national, was arrested by ICE Boston on April 4, 2026, after being taken into custody for domestic abuse in Massachusetts. A background check revealed that he had a homicide warrant issued by Dominican authorities in 2023.

• Judicial Ruling: U. S. District Judge Melissa DuBose, appointed during the Biden administration, ruled on April 28, 2026, that Gomez was unlawfully detained and ordered his release, despite ICE's arguments that he should be held due to the active international arrest warrant for murder.

• Deportation Order: An immigration judge had already issued a deportation order against Gomez prior to the ruling by Judge DuBose. Following her decision, ICE reported that they are unable to rearrest him due to the judge's order.

• Public Safety Concerns: The release of Gomez has alarmed officials, particularly because he is a fugitive wanted for serious crimes. This event highlights ongoing debates surrounding immigration policy and the judiciary's role in these matters.

• Government Response: The U. S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) criticized the ruling, calling it an example of an activist judge undermining efforts to remove criminal illegal aliens from the nation.

The decision to release Bryan Rafael Gomez has caused controversy, raising questions about the balance between judicial authority and public safety concerns regarding illegal immigrants with serious criminal backgrounds. The incident serves to underscore ongoing tensions in U. S. immigration policy and the related judicial processes that influence it. 

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/04/biden-appointed-judge-orders-release-dominican-illegal-alien/

Two largest teacher unions spent over $1B on on political activity and advocacy since 2015

Since 2015, the two largest teacher unions in the United States, the American Federation of Teachers (AFT) and the National Education Association (NEA), have spent over $1 billion on political activities as reported by Defending Education. This large sum has raised concerns regarding how these unions influence political agendas at various levels.

• Total Spending: The combined political spending of the AFT and NEA amounts to over $1 billion, with $669 million from federal sources and $336 million from state and local levels.

• Funding Sources: The money used for political activities comes from member dues, political action committee (PAC) contributions, and Committee on Political Education (COPE) funds. These are often collected separately from regular dues.

• Political Influence: The unions allocate funds to support political campaigns, nonprofit advocacy groups, school board elections, and to oppose school choice legislation. For instance, they spent:

• $7.2 million against school choice in Kentucky

• $4.3 million in Nebraska

• More than $4.2 million in Maine

• Local Impact: At the local level, unions have spent over $135.8 million, which often influences local educational policies and elections.

• User of Funds: The report notes that many public school districts do not refund union dues, which are deducted from teachers' salaries. This raises concerns about taxpayer dollars being used for union political activity.

• Participation in Broader Movements: Teacher unions also engage in various political and social movements, sometimes involving students in demonstrations for causes such as immigration reform, which leads to concerns about the appropriateness of using students in these contexts.

The report highlights the extensive financial and political power of teacher unions in the U. S. and raises questions about the implications of their spending and influence on education policy and local governance. The unions have a significant role beyond traditional labor issues, shaping the next generation of political allies. 

https://justthenews.com/nation/states/center-square/teacher-unions-spent-over-1b-political-causes-2015

2 Shootings in 4 Days Near Maine Somali Mosque

 Two shootings occurred within four days near a Somali mosque and a refugee services center in Lewiston, Maine. The area has seen an increase in gun violence.

• The Lewiston Police Department released surveillance footage showing a young black male gunman firing at nearby cars and the Maine Immigrant and Refugee Services building.

• Witnesses indicated that the shootings highlight growing concerns about safety in the community.

• Lewiston has a significant Somali Muslim presence, which has sparked discussions about the impact of immigrants in the area.

• Mayor Carl Sheline defended the contributions of Somali immigrants, stating they play a vital role in local business and economic growth.

• Sheline described criticisms claiming Somali immigrants contribute nothing to society as shameful and false.

The recent shootings underscore ongoing tensions surrounding immigration and safety in Lewiston, with local leaders advocating for the contributions of the Somali community amidst rising violence.

https://www.frontpagemag.com/2-shootings-in-4-days-near-maine-somali-mosque/

The Supreme Court Strikes a Blow for Voting Rights Sanity

The Supreme Court delivered a significant ruling in the case of Louisiana v. Callais, addressing the complexities of racial districting and voting rights under the Voting Rights Act (VRA). The 6–3 decision resolves a long-standing conflict regarding race-based electoral maps.

• The Court's majority decision, led by Justice Samuel Alito, is seen as a victory for those opposing the division of America into racially defined political groups.

• Previously, the Court's interpretation of Section 2 of the VRA resulted in confusion regarding the balance between enforcing voting rights and preventing racial discrimination in districting.

• The ruling emphasizes that the VRA was enacted to uphold the Fifteenth Amendment, which prohibits voting rights violations based on race, but only when motivated by intentional discrimination.

• The majority clarified that Section 2 cannot enforce the Fifteenth Amendment solely by showing that racial groups are underrepresented in electoral maps.

• The Court revised the established criteria for proving violations under Section 2, focusing on intentional discrimination rather than disparate impacts.

• The decision updates the previous four-part test from Thornburg v. Gingles, imposing new requirements, including that plaintiffs must present a fair map that does not rely on racial basis.

• It encourages consideration of various legitimate priorities in map-making, thereby reducing the risks of partisan disputes masked as racial issues.

The Callais ruling is framed as a step toward greater legal consistency and ensuring the equal protection of all Americans. By redefining the application of the VRA, the Court aims to eliminate confusion in districting law while safeguarding voting rights against manipulation. Critics of the ruling misunderstand its aim, which emphasizes fair legal principles over merely affirming the status of chosen race-based policies. 

https://www.city-journal.org/article/supreme-court-louisiana-v-callais-voting-rights-race

We Are Living in the Fourth American Republic

The original American republic established in the late 18th century no longer exists. It argues that the constitutional order of the founding fathers has been fundamentally altered through a series of revolutions and changes in governance over the years, culminating in what the author describes as the Fourth American Republic.

• Decline of the Original Constitution: The author asserts that many conservatives mistakenly believe that the original constitution is still relevant today. This idea is contrasted with the claim that the constitution as it was understood a century ago has been effectively abandoned.

• Changing Interpretations: It is stated that the meaning of the U. S. constitution has shifted dramatically over time. The current understanding, dictated by modern federal judges, bears little resemblance to the interpretation of the constitution in the early 1800s.

• Historical Revolutions: The essay outlines several revolutions that have transformed the U. S. governance structure:

1. Counterrevolution against the Articles of Confederation: Early American leaders centralized power against the decentralized system favored during the Revolutionary War.

2. Civil War's Effects: The Civil War established a principle of unity that negated the ability of states to secede, fundamentally changing the relationship between the federal government and states.

3. Progressive Era Changes: New policies established a stronger central government, including the introduction of the federal income tax and the establishment of the Federal Reserve.

4. New Deal Evolution: This era marked the rise of the administrative state, where the New Deal’s legislation expanded federal reach deeper into American life.

• Lack of Self-Recognition: The author highlights a tendency among Americans to remain unaware of these changes, often clinging to nostalgic beliefs about the founding principles of the nation.

• Modern Federal Power: Today, the author claims that there is no true member-state sovereignty and that checks and balances, originally envisioned by the founders, have been effectively dismantled.

• Four Republics Concept: The author argues that the United States has undergone four distinct republics:

1. First Republic (1776-1788)

2. Second Republic (1787-1865)

3. Third Republic (1865-1910)

4. Fourth Republic (1937-present)

The piece emphasizes that the 'American experiment' as conceived by the founders is largely an illusion today. The writer stresses that the current system operates under a massive federal administrative state that has redefined the relationship between citizens and the government. Many who claim to support the original constitution are living in an imagined past rather than confronting the realities of the present-day governance structure. The notion that the constitutional order from the founding years can or should be preserved is characterized as unrealistic given the profound changes that have taken place. 

https://mises.org/mises-wire/we-are-living-fourth-american-republic

Sen. Collins Could Lose to a Bernie Bro with a Nazi Tattoo

The Maine U. S. Senate race following Maine Governor Janet Mills' withdrawal from her campaign. It highlights her reasons for leaving and assesses the implications for her Democratic primary opponent, Graham Platner, and current Republican incumbent, Susan Collins.

• Janet Mills has suspended her U. S. Senate campaign due to a lack of financial resources, just weeks before her primary against Graham Platner.

• Despite her drive and experience, Mills expressed that political campaigns require significant funding.

• Platner, a self-identified communist and controversial candidate with a Nazi tattoo, has a history of inflammatory social media posts, including derogatory statements about white and rural Americans.

• A recent University of New Hampshire poll shows Platner leading Mills significantly, with results indicating 58% support for Platner compared to 24% for Mills among likely Democratic primary voters.

• Following Mills' exit, the competition shifts significantly in favor of Platner, raising concerns for Collins, who is considered a vulnerable Republican candidate.

• Platner has managed to raise more funds than Mills in early 2026, suggesting a strong campaign focus on anti-oligarchy themes.

Mills' withdrawal from the race has opened the door for Platner, potentially impacting Collins' chances of re-election. With Platner's controversial history and funding advantage, the race is set to become more competitive as Maine’s voters prepare for the primary. 

https://www.independentsentinel.com/sen-collins-could-lose-to-a-bernie-bro-with-a-nazi-tattoo/

Trump ends DHS' months-long nightmare that left immigration enforcement without funding

 President Donald Trump has signed a bill to restore funding to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) after a lengthy funding lapse. This bill comes after bipartisan discussions in the House of Representatives.

• Funding Restoration: Trump signed the bill on April 30, 2026, ending a 75-day funding lapse for DHS. The House approved the Senate's spending measure, which will fund most of the department through September.

• Exclusions: Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and Customs and Border Protection (CBP) remain unfunded under this legislation.

• Background of the Funding Delay: The Senate's funding bill had been stalled in the House due to House Speaker Mike Johnson's objections regarding law enforcement funding. The White House encouraged passage of the bill, leading to a change in Johnson's stance.

• Agency Impact: DHS is one of the largest federal agencies, overseeing more than 200,000 employees, including several key divisions like the Secret Service and Transportation Security Administration (TSA).

• Potential Consequences of Funding Lapse: The White House warned that if the Senate’s measure did not pass, DHS employees could stop being paid as early as May, affecting air travel and national security.

• Future Legislative Actions: Republicans are working on a separate package to fund ICE and CBP, although this will not proceed before Congress breaks for recess.

The passage of the bill to restore DHS funding is a significant step toward stabilizing national security operations after a long funding delay, although major components like ICE and CBP remain unfunded. The future legislative path for these components is still uncertain as more discussions are anticipated in Congress.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-ends-dhs-long-national-nightmare-immigration-enforcement-still-left-hanging

America, It’s Time to Pick a Side

Each election cycle is deemed vital, and the current political climate reflects heightened polarization between Democrats and Republicans. This division complicates traditional compromise, leading to a narrative of a critical choice in the upcoming election.

1. Election Stakes: The upcoming elections are seen as pivotal—voters must choose between extreme policies associated with the Democrat Party and a Republican approach focused on stability and prosperity.

2. Voter Landscape: A recent Harvard poll indicates a deadlock between the two parties in congressional preferences, with Republicans enjoying slightly higher voter engagement. A Supreme Court decision recently deemed Louisiana's Congressional map unconstitutional, possibly aiding the GOP’s chances in the upcoming elections.

3. Public Sentiment: Conversations reveal three distinct voter groups:

• Die-hard Conservatives: Some feel discouraged and believe voting is futile, given perceived injustices and negative portrayals of their candidates.

• Lifelong Liberals: Many are disillusioned by the current Democrat Party’s direction, with some secretly voting conservative, while radicalized members are enraged by perceived threats against their ideals.

• The Indifferent: This group feels overwhelmed by conflicting information and media narratives, leading to disengagement from political discourse.

4. Media Influence: The media's role has shifted from reporting facts to manipulating narratives, cultivating a polarized political environment that influences public opinion.

5. Engagement Strategies: Conversing with individuals in these groups involves:

• Asking questions to promote critical thinking rather than aiming for immediate conversion.

• Encouraging weary conservatives to commit to voting instead of sitting out.

• Validating old-school Democrats' concerns about their party's direction while inviting them to consider alternatives.

• Assisting overwhelmed independents in recognizing the importance of their vote.

The manipulation of public opinion through media narratives needs addressing. Everyone must consider who controls their information and acknowledges the significance of honest elections. Engaging in discussions and encouraging active participation in the political process is essential for defining the future of democracy. Voter turnout is crucial in steering toward accountability and integrity in governance. 

https://canadafreepress.com/article/america-its-time-to-pick-a-side

In These Divided Times, It's Important to Remember That Half the Country Once Hated Lincoln

 Stephen Kruiser reflects on the current political atmosphere in the United States in 2026, addressing the anger prevalent among citizens, particularly towards President Trump. He draws parallels between today's political climate and the era of President Abraham Lincoln, particularly concerning Democrats and their perceived threats to constitutional rights.

• Political Climate: Kruiser notes the high levels of despair and anger within the country, attributing much of it to the divisive political environment exacerbated by social media and opinion pieces.

• Historical Parallels: He compares today's Democrats with the secessionists of Lincoln's time, suggesting that while Democrats may not seek to physically secede, they are trying to dismantle traditional values and rights outlined in the Constitution.

• Trump's Leadership: Despite widespread opposition, Kruiser expresses support for President Trump, likening his resolve to that of Lincoln. He believes Trump is fighting for the country's values amidst what he terms a "hatred" directed at him.

• Electoral Dynamics: The article discusses the tendency for segments of the electorate to dislike a sitting president, referencing Lincoln's own challenges during the 1864 election. Kruiser argues that this is a recurring theme in American politics.

• Future of the Nation: He emphasizes the need for vigilance regarding the preservation of American liberties, predicting that the current political strategies of Democrats could lead to significant changes that undermine the country's foundations.

Kruiser concludes with a call to maintain support for President Trump, asserting that he is on the "right side of history. " This focus on resolve and vision reflects Kruiser's belief that strong leadership is essential in times of political turmoil, drawing a cautionary line from the past to the present about the integrity of the nation's democratic values.

https://pjmedia.com/stephen-kruiser/2026/04/30/in-these-divided-times-its-important-to-remember-that-half-the-country-once-hated-lincoln-n4952383

Big Blow to Chuck Schumer in Maine Senate Race

 The Maine Senate Democrat primary has seen significant developments that are unfavorable for Sen. Minority Leader Chuck Schumer.

• Graham Platner, a newcomer endorsed by Bernie Sanders, and Janet Mills, the state's governor backed by Schumer, were the primary candidates.

• Despite scandals surrounding Platner, including a Nazi-themed tattoo, he remained ahead in the race, leading Mills to suspend her campaign due to financial constraints.

• In her suspension statement, Mills expressed admiration for the people of Maine but did not endorse Platner.

• The Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee (DSCC) has now shifted its support to Platner, aiming to win against Sen. Susan Collins in the general election.

• Collins has already begun attacking Platner's past, using campaign ads to highlight his controversies, including his tattoo and controversial statements.

• The Maine voter base includes a significant number of independents, which will be crucial for both candidates in the upcoming election.

While Platner secured his position in the primary, the general election campaign will present new challenges as both candidates aim to win over independents and address their own vulnerabilities.

https://redstate.com/sister-toldjah/2026/04/30/janet-mills-exits-maine-democrat-senate-primary-whats-next-graham-platner-n2201870

LA City Council Socialists Launch Bid to Give Noncitizens Full Voting Rights in Local Elections

On April 30, 2026, two Los Angeles City Council members, Hugo Soto-Martínez and Ysabel Jurado, introduced a proposal to allow noncitizens to vote in city elections, including races for mayor and city council positions. This proposal is part of a larger effort to empower long-term residents who are noncitizens.

• The proposal aims to include noncitizens, such as green card holders and DACA recipients, in local voting, arguing they pay taxes and contribute to the community.

• If the full council supports the measure, it will be placed on the ballot for November 3, 2026. Voter approval would be required before amending city election laws.

• Supporters, including Angelica Salas from the Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights (CHIRLA), emphasize that many noncitizens are directly affected by local policies and deserve a voice.

• Critics argue this undermines citizenship and the idea that voting should be exclusive to citizens. Ira Mehlman from FAIR labeled it an assault on the concept of American citizenship.

• Concerns have arisen that allowing noncitizen voting could lead to risks, such as creating a list of noncitizen voters that may expose undocumented individuals to immigration enforcement.

• Previous attempts to extend voting rights to noncitizens in California have met with mixed results; Santa Ana residents rejected a similar proposal in 2024, while San Francisco's measure was struck down by a judge. However, Oakland voters approved a comparable measure in 2022, which has yet to be implemented.

The proposal by Soto-Martínez and Jurado is now set to head to the council's Rules Committee for consideration. Its success will depend on city council support and the outcome of the ballot vote. The ongoing debate reflects broader national conversations about immigration, citizenship, and voting rights, testing whether the public believes that elections should be decided by citizens alone. 

https://californiaglobe.com/fl/la-city-council-socialists-launch-bid-to-give-noncitizens-full-voting-rights-in-local-elections/

The Democrats’ race-based regime is collapsing

Daniel McCarthy discusses the implications of the recent Supreme Court decision in Louisiana v. Callais et al., which ruled against the redistricting of electoral districts along racial lines. This ruling is seen as a significant shift in American politics that may affect the success of the Democratic Party.

1. Supreme Court Ruling: The Court's decision to stop the practice of racial gerrymandering is framed as an essential correction rather than an attack on the Voting Rights Act. The ruling indicates that electoral boundaries should not be drawn primarily to ensure representation by race.

2. Impact on the Democratic Party: The decision may enhance Republican prospects in upcoming elections, particularly the midterms. The reliance on racially designed districts has been a critical part of the Democrats' strategy, ensuring they retain a certain number of Black representatives based on majority-Black districts.

3. Nature of Racial Gerrymandering: The practice of creating majority-Black districts is highlighted as a problematic method of achieving representation, leading to a "spoils system" where political gains are tied to race rather than broader geographic or demographic considerations.

4. Shift in Political Landscape: The Supreme Court's ruling signals a broader shift away from the racial policies that have supported the Democratic Party, particularly in the South. This could require Democrats to seek support from a larger, more diverse voter base, challenging their long-held practices.

5. Future Outlook: While the Republican Party may gain a short-term advantage, factors such as political dynamics, economic conditions, and population trends in various states may influence long-term outcomes. The Democratic Party may respond by pushing for changes that could offer them advantages, including court-packing and statehood for Washington, D. C., and Puerto Rico.

6. Historical Context: McCarthy notes that the current approach to racial representation was initially a response to segregation but has become a form of discrimination itself over time, illustrating the irony of using segregation to end segregation.

The Supreme Court's decision represents a critical juncture for American politics, particularly affecting the Democratic Party's foundational strategies. As traditional methods of securing electoral advantages are under scrutiny, a new political landscape may emerge, compelling parties to adapt to changing demographics and voter expectations. The decision underscores the complexity of balancing race, representation, and geography in U. S. politics as both major parties navigate a shifting context. 

https://spectator.com/article/democrats-race-based-regime-is-collapsing-supreme-court/?edition=us

The U.S. Produces More Oil Than Anyone. So Why Are Gas Prices Still Surging?

 Many Americans are confused about why gas prices are rising sharply, especially when the U. S. is the largest oil producer globally. This situation raises important questions about the broader economic implications, including inflation and consumer behavior.

1. Current Gas Prices: Gasoline prices have risen to approximately $4.26 per gallon, the highest in nearly four years, significantly influenced by geopolitical tensions, particularly in the Middle East.

2. Oil Production vs. Gasoline Availability: The U. S. leads in oil production but does not have sufficient refining capacity to convert crude oil into gasoline efficiently. This discrepancy results in higher prices despite increased oil output.

3. Refining Capacity Issues: Many U. S. refineries face challenges due to past shutdowns and regulatory hurdles, leading to a tight refining market. This situation creates a bottleneck that contributes to rising gas prices.

4. Consumer Impact: Higher gasoline prices act like a tax on consumers, reducing discretionary spending and affecting retail, travel, and overall economic behavior, particularly among lower-income households.

5. Inflation and Federal Reserve: Sustained high gas prices complicate the Federal Reserve's ability to manage inflation through interest rate adjustments, leading to tighter monetary policy.

6. Energy Market Dynamics: Investors often overlook the differences in how producers and refiners react in rising price environments. Currently, refiners may benefit more from the market conditions than crude oil producers.

7. Watch the Signals: To understand future trends, it's crucial to monitor refining utilization rates, crack spreads, inventory levels, and consumer behavior changes.

The current rise in gas prices is not merely a result of geopolitical events but reveals underlying issues in the U. S. refining system, which struggles to convert oil into fuel efficiently. This scenario highlights where pricing power is developing in the market. Until refining constraints are addressed, elevated gas prices are likely to persist and become the new norm.

https://globalmarketnews.com/the-u-s-produces-more-oil-than-anyone-so-why-are-gas-prices-still-surging/