Who Wants To Ride California’s Bullet Buses?

 California is exploring a new public transportation option: a high-speed bus system that aims to connect Los Angeles and San Francisco. This initiative emerges amidst continued delays in the much-anticipated high-speed rail project, which has faced numerous challenges for nearly two decades.

● High-Speed Bus Project: The proposed bus system would operate at speeds of up to 140 mph. CalTrans, California's transportation agency, supports this idea as a potential improvement to the state's transit options.

● Senate Support: Senator Dave Cortese highlighted the concept as “not a bad idea” and a valid alternative to rail, indicating political backing for the project.

● Infrastructure Concerns: The proposal suggests that high-speed buses would need dedicated lanes, redesigned vehicles, and advanced technologies to ensure safety and efficiency. However, experts believe achieving the proposed speeds may require significant changes to the landscape, including flattening hills and smoothing curves.

● Skepticism: Critics compare the ambitious bus plans to fictional scenarios, indicating doubts about the feasibility of such high speeds on existing roadways without substantial modifications.

The high-speed bus initiative represents a shift in California's transportation strategy as it grapples with the slow progress of its high-speed rail project. While it has garnered some political support, challenges remain regarding infrastructure and implementation feasibility. The proposal serves as an alternative for enhancing public transportation, but skepticism persists about its practicalities. 

https://issuesinsights.com/2026/07/01/who-wants-to-ride-californias-bullet-buses/

Countries Building the Most Small Modular Nuclear Reactors

 The development of small modular nuclear reactors (SMRs) is advancing rapidly, with the U. S. leading the world in this area.

● The U. S. has announced 28 siting plans for SMRs, significantly outpacing the next countries: Canada with 9 and the UK with 7.

● The U. S. has more SMR projects in development than the next four countries combined.

● In total, 129 SMR designs are tracked, but only 78 are publicly reported; others are excluded or not being developed actively.

● U. S. national laboratories lead with 7 siting announcements, alongside utilities, universities, and SMR developers, each with 5.

● SMRs can produce up to 300 MWe, making them cheaper and more flexible than traditional reactors.

● Their modular design allows for reduced costs and faster construction, suitable for remote locations or specific applications.

As electricity needs grow, SMRs are increasingly vital for discussion around energy security and grid reliability. It's important for utilities and policymakers to monitor these developments for effective planning and strategy.

https://www.visualcapitalist.com/sp/npuc26-ranked-countries-building-the-most-small-modular-nuclear-reactors/

AI Hallucinations Are Exploding In U.S. Courts, New Study Finds

 A recent study conducted by Laine AI reveals that errors related to artificial intelligence (AI) in U. S. court documents are increasing significantly. This issue is affecting both lawyers and individuals representing themselves in legal matters.

● The number of documented AI-related errors in court filings has surged from 25 cases in early 2025 to 249 by the end of that year, with the trend continuing into 2026.

● California has the most errors, followed by New York, Texas, Florida, and Illinois, which together account for approximately 40% of all incidents.

● Florida, in particular, saw a dramatic increase in AI-related errors, jumping from one reported case in 2024 to 28 in 2025.

● Over 60% of the incidents involved self-represented litigants, highlighting that those without formal legal training are more prone to errors when using AI tools.

● ChatGPT was the most frequently mentioned AI tool, appearing in 48 cases, although most filings did not specify which AI was used.

● Common errors included fabricated cases and citations, with over half of the mistakes involving nonexistent legal references.

While AI can aid legal research, it is crucial for all citations and legal authorities to be verified independently to avoid undermining courtroom credibility and facing potential sanctions. 

https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/ai-hallucinations-are-exploding-us-courts-new-study-finds

Crafting America’s Birth Certificate 250

 In 1776, the American colonies, in conflict with Great Britain, sought independence. Influential works like Thomas Paine’s Common Sense shifted public opinion in favor of independence, leading to actions that culminated in the drafting of the Declaration of Independence.

● Background to Independence: By the summer of 1776, the relationships between the colonies and Great Britain had deteriorated, and the desire for independence was strong across several colonial governments.

● The Resolution: On June 7, Richard Henry Lee proposed that the colonies should be free and independent states.

● Committee of Five: A group called the Committee of Five, consisting of Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, Benjamin Franklin, Roger Sherman, and Robert R. Livingston, was formed to create the Declaration.

● Jefferson's Role: Jefferson was chosen to write the first draft due to his writing skills and Southern heritage, which aided in garnering broader acceptance.

● Drafting Process: Jefferson meticulously crafted the document over nearly two weeks, using influences from English law and philosophy, notably articulating ideas of equality and unalienable rights.

● Key Principles: Jefferson asserted that rights come from a Creator, not from the government, framing government as a protector of these rights.

● Controversial Sections: An original part of Jefferson's draft condemned the transatlantic slave trade; however, this was removed due to concerns from Southern delegates who relied on slavery for their economies.

● Congressional Revisions: Between July 1 and 4, Congress extensively debated and revised the draft, making about 86 changes but preserving its fundamental principles regarding rights and government.

● Adoption and Signing: Independence was formally declared on July 2, with the final wording of the Declaration approved on July 4. Signing the document was a bold act of treason against Britain, emphasizing the signers' commitment to their cause.

● Legacy: The Declaration of Independence established universal values that have inspired global movements for liberty for nearly 250 years. It outlined that rights are inherent and that government derives its power from the governed, principles that remain core to American democracy.

The Declaration of Independence goes beyond a mere statement of separation from Britain; it encapsulates profound values about human rights and government that continue to resonate today. The collaborative effort of the Committee of Five and Congress crafted a historical document that laid the groundwork for the United States and its ideals of liberty and equality. 

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2026/07/crafting-america-s-birth-certificate-250/

SCOTUS Says Babies Of Illegal Aliens, CCP Birth Tourists Are US Citizens Because Of Magic Dirt

 The U. S. Supreme Court recently made a significant ruling regarding citizenship for children born to illegal aliens and foreign "birth tourists. " This decision has sparked considerable debate and dissent among the justices.

1. Majority Ruling: Chief Justice John Roberts, along with other justices, ruled that children born in the U. S. to parents who are unlawfully present are citizens under the 14th Amendment. He argued this interpretation fulfills the constitutional promise of citizenship to every person born on U. S. soil.

2. Dissenting Opinions: Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito, among others, dissented from this ruling. Thomas criticized the majority for failing to accurately reflect historical intent regarding the 14th Amendment. He expressed concern that the ruling could dilute the value of U. S. citizenship.

3. Concurring Opinions: Justice Brett Kavanaugh concurred with the judgment but expressed that the executive order signed by Trump aimed at restricting recognition of these citizenships was in violation of federal law. He suggested that Congress could amend citizenship laws regarding children born to parents who are not legally present.

4. Concerns of Future Implications: Dissenting opinions highlighted concerns that this ruling would incentivize illegal immigration and create a significant precedent for birthright citizenship in the U. S. Former Justice Alito cautioned that this decision could lead to the U. S. being one of the few affluent countries to grant citizenship based solely on birthplace.

5. Background: The case, known as Trump v. Barbara, followed an executive order from Trump which aimed to halt documentation of citizenship for children of illegal aliens but was challenged in court.

The Supreme Court's ruling on citizenship for the children of illegal aliens is a landmark decision raising questions about the interpretation of the Constitution and its historical context. With varied opinions among justices, this ruling may influence future discussions on immigration and citizenship laws in the United States.

https://thefederalist.com/2026/06/30/scotus-says-babies-of-illegal-aliens-ccp-birth-tourists-are-us-citizens-because-of-magic-dirt/

Many Democratic Socialist leaders are self-professed communists, DSA caucus statements show

Recent primary elections in New York City saw the rise of several Democratic Socialist candidates, prompting President Donald Trump to label them as “hardcore Godless communists. ” This statement has been contested, particularly by news media representatives.

1. Understanding Democratic Socialism: CNN's Kaitlan Collins emphasized that democratic socialism differs from communism. However, many leaders within the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) identify as Marxist or Communist.

2. Leadership Composition: A review shows that a significant number of officials in the DSA's National Political Council are members of factions advocating for communism. Notably, 10 out of 25 council members belong to groups that explicitly support Marxist ideologies.

3. Notable Proposals: Figures such as Mayor Zohran Mamdani have proposed radical changes, including abolishing prisons and creating universal healthcare.

4. Red Star Caucus: This faction aims to overthrow capitalism and establish communism in the U. S. It defines Marxism not as a dogma but as a theoretical lens to critique capitalism and encourages forming an organized party to drive revolutionary change.

5. Influence of Other Caucuses: Other groups within the DSA, like the Bread & Roses and Marxist Unity Group, also openly advocate for communist ideologies and strategies, demonstrating a shared goal of significant socio-political transformation.

The DSA, despite some members' claims of socialism, has significant factions dedicated to Marxism and communism. The party's leadership actively engages in ideologies that aim to reshape American capitalism through radical means, raising concerns reflected in the current political landscape. 

https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/elections/many-democratic-socialist-leaders-are-self-professed-communists-caucus 

The Economics of Reconciliation on America’s 250th Birthday

 As America approaches its 250th anniversary, there is a prevailing belief that the nation is deeply fragmented. However, this view overlooks a crucial aspect: the economic struggles faced by many Americans. The need for economic rebuilding is emphasized as a key to restoring hope and unity.

1. Disillusionment and Economic Struggles: Many Americans feel disillusioned due to economic difficulties. Reports show that half of American households live paycheck to paycheck, and skyrocketing costs have made it increasingly challenging to purchase homes and secure financial stability.

2. Historical Context: Economic hardship has historically made populations vulnerable to extreme political ideologies. While the 1930s saw the rise of dangerous political movements worldwide, Franklin D. Roosevelt's presidency offered a way forward through public works projects that provided jobs and revitalized the economy.

3. Infrastructure Investment: Advocating for similar large-scale infrastructure projects today could rejuvenate the economy. These projects have the potential to create millions of jobs and produce long-term benefits. Successful programs from the past, such as the Tennessee Valley Authority and various public works, serve as examples of how investment in infrastructure can alleviate financial stress for many.

4. Rethinking Current Projects: Many current infrastructure projects do not yield enough benefits relative to their costs. For instance, investments in environmentally contentious projects, like offshore wind installations or high-speed rail systems, may not be the best use of federal money. The focus should instead be on projects that enhance efficiency and address critical needs.

5. Regulatory Reform: Current regulations often impede infrastructure development. For example, excessive environmental mitigation requirements can hinder necessary projects like dredging channels essential for water supply. Simplifying and reforming these regulations could facilitate crucial improvements.

6. Economic Trade-offs: There needs to be a balance between investing in public infrastructure and providing government benefits. Investment in infrastructure can stimulate the economy, allowing for job creation and improved living conditions, while excessive government spending on subsidies often stifles growth.

7. A Call to Action: Americans are urged to embrace a path towards restorative economic policies rather than approaches focused on wealth redistribution. By prioritizing infrastructure and creating jobs, the nation can escape its current economic malaise and foster a culture of hope and prosperity.

On the brink of its 250th birthday, America has a unique opportunity to realign its economic priorities and heal divisions. Moving forward with significant infrastructure projects, reforming regulations, and redefining economic strategies can restore hope to millions. The future lies not in the division of wealth but in the collective rebuilding of the nation. 

https://amgreatness.com/2026/07/01/the-economics-of-reconciliation-on-americas-250th-birthday/

It’s Long Past Time to Give Up the ‘Moderate Muslim’ Fantasies

 The concept of "moderate Muslims" and their promises of a peaceful Islam has been widely accepted for over 25 years. However, these claims have failed to materialize into tangible changes regarding the threat of jihad.

1. False Promises: Self-proclaimed moderate Muslims have assured the public that Islam is inherently peaceful. This narrative gained traction after 9/11, despite the lack of substantial evidence or support from the wider Muslim community.

2. Media Influence: These moderate voices, supported by media and prominent figures, portrayed Islam as one of tolerance and respect for science, claiming that only a small group of terrorists misrepresent the faith.

3. Lack of Action: Despite the claims that moderate Muslims would rise against terrorism, significant time has passed without the expected collective action or repudiation of violent extremism from Muslim communities.

4. Distinction Among Muslims: While many Muslims are not terrorists, they may not actively oppose jihadist ideologies either. Some Muslims do not follow all tenets of Islam, but this does not reflect a distinct or separate interpretation of the religion.

5. Absence of Reform Movements: The anticipated large-scale movements against terrorism among Muslims have not occurred, leading to doubts about the claims of moderation and peace within Islam.

The portrayal of moderate Muslims is seen as misleading, contributing to complacency about the jihad threat. This perspective suggests that so-called moderate Muslims may inadvertently or deliberately weaken defenses against extremism by fostering a false sense of security. 

https://www.frontpagemag.com/its-long-past-time-to-give-up-the-moderate-muslim-fantasies/

Debunking the American Left’s Favorite Lie

 J. T. Young argues that a popular claim among the American Left—that Nazis and Fascists are conservatives—is historically inaccurate. Instead, it contends that these ideologies stem from socialism, which also mirrors the Left's broader objectives.

1. Mischaracterization of Ideologies:

● The article asserts that characterizing Nazis and Fascists as conservatives serves the American Left's political agenda. Young emphasizes that Nazis and Fascists were socialists, pointing to the etymology of "Nazi" as short for "National Socialist. "

2. Historical Evidence:

● Ludwig von Mises, an economist, is cited, stating that both Nazism and Fascism are forms of socialism, rejecting capitalism and aiming for state control over production. He highlights their similarity to Marxism, noting that their goals are to establish a socialist state.

3. Contrast with Conservatism:

● The piece contrasts socialists with conservatives, emphasizing that conservatives typically advocate for reduced state power, while contemporary liberals seek to expand it. This distinction is crucial to understanding why the Left labels their opponents inaccurately.

4. Need for a Common Enemy:

● The article posits that the American Left requires the image of Nazism and Fascism as right-wing ideologies to justify increasing state power and radical actions. It argues this helps them create an enemy that appears more extreme than they are.

5. Radicalization of the Left:

● Young discusses the rise of militant actions among some Leftist groups like Antifa and the Democratic Socialists of America, which he contends reflects their increasing adoption of non-democratic means to achieve their objectives.

6. Socialism's Perception:

● The author argues that socialism, when isolated from its negative connotations, is opposed by the majority of Americans. He argues that socialists, by needing to control the state, inadvertently showcase their alignment with dictatorial practices.

7. Projection of Guilt:

● Young argues that the Left's tendency to accuse others of fascism stems from a desire to obscure their own actions and guilt. He uses the example of a Democratic Senate nominee with a Nazi tattoo but who has received little criticism from the Left.

The article claims that the American Left's characterization of Nazis and Fascists as conservatives is a strategic misrepresentation. By understanding the true origins and goals of these ideologies, the discussion around socialism and its place in modern politics becomes clearer. Young warns that this distortion of facts serves to deflect attention from the Left's own actions and aims. 

https://spectator.org/debunking-the-american-lefts-favorite-lie/

HUD Rejects Failed “Housing First” Strategy

 The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) has announced significant changes to its homelessness strategy, aiming to address the ongoing crisis more effectively. The transition comes after many years of reliance on the controversial “Housing First” approach, which advocates argue has not yielded satisfactory results.

● New Approach: HUD's recent overhaul aims to tackle homelessness as a complex issue involving addiction, mental illness, and crime, rather than just a lack of housing. This marks a shift from the long-held belief that "housing solves homelessness. "

● Failures of Previous Strategy: The “Housing First” strategy led to a rise in the unsheltered homeless population, with reports highlighting alarming mortality rates among participants and a failure to promote self-sufficiency.

● Grant Renewal Changes: The traditional practice of automatically renewing homelessness grants is ending. HUD plans to deny funding to Continuums of Care (CoCs) that do not demonstrate proper governance, transparency, and effective program results.

● State Initiatives: Recent movements, particularly in Utah, have called for state-level discretion in addressing homelessness, a demand that HUD's new guidelines seem to acknowledge.

● Activist Response: In reaction to HUD's changes, many homelessness advocates are attempting legal action to block the new policy, and some are advising CoCs on how to circumvent these new requirements. Critics argue these efforts detract from improving services.

● Immediate Consequences: HUD has already suspended funding for Los Angeles's Homelessness Services Authority due to concerns about its effectiveness. This emphasizes HUD's commitment to ensuring grantees can demonstrate accountability.

HUD's renewed focus aims to shift towards a more structured and effective response to the homelessness crisis, emphasizing treatment and self-sufficiency over unconditional housing support. As changes unfold, it remains crucial for service providers to align with new federal directives to secure funding and improve outcomes for homeless individuals. 

https://www.city-journal.org/article/hud-homelessness-program-housing-first

The Economic Reasons Why Oil Consumers Need to be “Gouged”

 President Trump's criticism of oil companies for allegedly "price gouging," arguing that he lacks understanding of how prices are set and the effects of economic policies. It defends price increases during supply shocks and explains the complexities involved in oil production and pricing.

1. Political Motivations: Trump's public outcry against rising gas prices serves his political interests. He aims to divert blame from his own actions, which contributed to a global oil supply shock and increased gasoline prices.

2. Understanding Price Gouging:

● Price gouging, often condemned politically, can actually have beneficial effects economically.

● Higher prices signal scarcity in supply chains and can help to manage demand.

3. Production Process:

● Oil production involves multiple stages, from extraction to refining and transporting to retail.

● The complexity of the supply chain necessitates time and resources, meaning prices do not adjust instantaneously to changes in supply or demand.

4. Inventory Management:

● Companies maintain inventories to buffer against supply fluctuations, impacting how quickly prices can adjust following a supply shock.

● Drawing down inventories during a supply shock helps meet urgent consumer needs and mitigates dramatic price increases.

5. Delayed Price Adjustments:

● When supply shocks occur, prices for consumer goods may not immediately drop once the supply chain stabilizes.

● Producers need to replenish inventories, and this process can slow the decrease in prices for retail products even after the underlying cause of the shock is resolved.

6. Regulatory Implications:

● Using government intervention to reduce prices can hinder producers' ability to rebuild inventories, potentially leading to greater shortages and a more significant negative effect on consumers.

The article emphasizes that price increases during supply shocks can aid in economic adjustment and consumer benefit. It critiques political leaders who use threats of intervention without considering the complexities of market dynamics. The essential message is that accountability for rising prices should focus on political decisions that disrupt production rather than on oil companies, which are often unjustly blamed. Understanding how markets function is crucial to recognizing the implications of price changes.

https://mises.org/mises-wire/economic-reasons-why-oil-consumers-need-be-gouged

Electricity Was a Luxury under Communist Rule

 The struggles and hardships experienced under a Communist regime, particularly in Romania. It describes the impact of limited electricity and resources on daily life, illustrating the oppressive environment experienced by the population.

● Dim Lighting and Nostalgia: The author feels transported back to a depressing communist past when entering poorly lit public spaces, recalling childhood memories of a life with limited electricity.

● Living Conditions: The author's grandmother’s home had inadequate lighting and no modern amenities like running water, illustrating a lack of basic resources.

● Desire to Escape: Despite leaving behind loved ones, the author considers themselves lucky to have escaped the harsh conditions prevalent during the late 1970s and beyond, when many sought to flee but few succeeded.

● Energy Restrictions: Under dictator Ceausescu, stringent energy rationing was introduced in 1981, with severe restrictions on electricity usage. Apartments could only have minimal lighting, TVs had limited usage, and energy inspectors monitored compliance.

● Everyday Struggles: Life became exceedingly difficult, especially in winter, with residents using candles to navigate in darkness and coping with freezing temperatures. The government's propaganda claimed socialist achievements while the reality was starkly different.

● Food and Menu Limitations: Restaurants had restricted menus, further emphasizing the scarcity faced by citizens who lived under constant rationing of basic necessities.

The author argues that the experiences under communism serve as a cautionary tale against systems that promise free resources, emphasizing that such promises lead to hardship and disappointment. The message is clear: political ideologies like socialism and communism can perpetuate misery and poverty, contradicting the ideal of providing for all.

https://canadafreepress.com/article/electricity-was-a-luxury-under-communist-rule

Mamdani’s $126B budget soars nearly 10% from last year, leaving NYC on verge of fiscal crisis

 New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani has presented a record-setting budget of nearly $126 billion, marking an increase of more than $10 billion from the previous year. This budget has raised concerns regarding the city’s financial stability due to its size and the methods used to balance it.

● Budget Overview: The budget totals $125.8 billion, reflecting an approximate 8.5% increase from last year's budget of $116 billion. It notably passed late, with a vote of 45-6 in the City Council, primarily along party lines.

● Controversial Funding: Despite the increase, the budget does not include significant cuts. It was noted that $6.1 billion of the budget balance relies on temporary solutions, which highlights ongoing structural issues within the city's finances.

● Projected Financial Shortfall: The city is expected to face an $8.8 billion shortfall in the next budget year, indicating potential challenges ahead for future fiscal planning.

● Political Dynamics: The budget negotiation process was tense, with dissatisfaction among some progressives over changes to housing voucher funding. While Mamdani did pledge to maintain some funding for housing, it came after he backtracked on campaign promises, causing discontent among his progressive supporters.

● Funding Allocations: The budget includes notable increases in several departments:

● NYPD: $6.6 billion, a $300 million increase.

● Department of Education: $38 billion, up by $3 billion.

● Department of Homeless Services: $4.2 billion, a $662 million increase.

● Department of Health and Mental Hygiene: $2.6 billion, an increase of $203 million.

● Reserves: The budget includes $350 million for general reserves, intended to act as a cushion if necessary.

● Financial Critique: Experts have commented that while there are efforts to restrain spending growth, many of the new recurring expenses lack corresponding savings. This has raised concerns about the sustainability of the budget and the risk of a fiscal crisis.

● Tax Proposals: Mamdani has pushed for various tax initiatives aimed at wealthier citizens to address the budget deficit. However, many of these proposals have not been enacted fully yet, apart from a luxury tax that could generate significant revenue.

The approval of Mayor Mamdani's budget reflects both a significant increase in spending and an ongoing struggle to address New York City's financial challenges. Future budgets may face greater difficulties due to anticipated shortfalls and unresolved structural issues. The political landscape remains divided, with various factions expressing differing levels of satisfaction regarding the budget's contents and implications. 

https://nypost.com/2026/06/30/us-news/mamdanis-126b-budget-soars-nearly-10-from-last-year-leaving-nyc-on-verge-of-fiscal-crisis/

Billionaire dumps NYC property empire as Mamdani's rent freeze sparks investor exodus

 Sergey Brin, co-founder of Google, has decided to sell his entire stake in the New York City real estate market due to frustrations with unfavorable regulations and rising costs.

● Brin sold his investment through his company, Amphitheatre LLC, back to A&E Real Estate, facing a loss of approximately 94% of his initial equity investment, valued at $79 million.

● The sale highlights deep issues within NYC's property market, exacerbated by strict rent control laws, high maintenance expenses, and a backlog of unpaid rent from the pandemic.

● New York City’s increased regulations, particularly under Mayor Zohran Mamdani, have made it difficult for property owners, prompting a broader trend of wealthy investors leaving the city.

● A&E Real Estate confirmed the transaction, noting Brin’s willingness to accept significant loss to exit the troubled multi-family sector.

● The city’s Rent Guidelines Board recently voted to freeze rent increases, increasing financial pressure on landlords.

● Brin's decision mirrors the actions of other prominent investors, including the University of California, which also cut the value of its investment in A&E significantly.

Brin's departure from NYC real estate illustrates the negative impact of stringent regulations and rising costs, contributing to a larger trend of affluent individuals relocating away from the city. 

https://www.dailymail.com/real-estate/article-15942133/sergey-brin-google-nyc-real-estate-exit.html

Heartbreak for Hakeem Jeffries: Another 'Democratic' Socialist Topples an Incumbent—This Time in Colorado

 The Democratic primary in Colorado's 1st Congressional District drew significant attention recently, especially following two Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) wins in New York. Longtime incumbent Rep. Diana DeGette faced challenger Melat Kiros from the DSA.

● Melat Kiros, a 29-year-old lawyer who gained DSA support, won the primary against DeGette, marking a significant upset in the Democratic establishment.

● DeGette has served since 1997 and represents a heavily Democratic district.

● Kiros has stirred controversy with her views, including her responses to events related to Israel and Hamas, stating the Oct 7 attacks were a consequence of apartheid and failing to label an attack against Jews as anti-Semitism.

● Her campaign has faced backlash for insensitive language and criticism over her positions on U. S. foreign policy, especially concerning aid to Israel.

● Despite facing a Republican opponent, Kiros is favored to win in the general election due to the district's strong Democratic lean.

This primary outcome illustrates the ongoing struggle between progressive and establishment factions within the Democratic Party, with potential implications for future elections. Kiros's victory could signal a shifting political landscape in Democratic primaries. 

https://redstate.com/sister-toldjah/2026/06/30/winner-of-colorado-first-congressional-district-democrat-primary-n2203881

One fact people get wrong about the Boston Tea Party

 A common misconception about the Boston Tea Party is that it predominantly involved black tea. However, historical insights reveal that green tea was also popular among the Founding Fathers and colonists.

1. Variety of Teas: Both black and green teas were consumed in colonial America. Bruce Richardson, a tea historian, explains that there were five types of tea available from China during this period: three black (Bohea, Souchong, and Congou) and two green (Hyson and Singlo).

2. Importance of Bohea: Bohea, the most common black tea, was widely consumed. It was viewed similarly to how we refer to all facial tissues as "Kleenex" today. People would often ask for a "cup of Bohea" without needing to specify further.

3. Storage Practices: Colonial Americans distinguished between green and black tea, storing them in separate compartments of ornamental tea caddies to maintain their tea rituals despite boycotting British products.

4. Merchant Preferences: Merchants preferred black tea because it was more resilient during the lengthy transportation from China, causing it to be more widely available in America.

5. Substitutes for British Tea: Even after rejecting British tea, many colonists continued the tradition of tea drinking. They created “Liberty Teas” using local ingredients like dried fruits and herbs to substitute traditional tea.

In conclusion, the Boston Tea Party involved both black and green teas, reflecting a diverse tea culture among the Founding Fathers and colonists. Although many distanced themselves from British tea, they maintained the ritual of tea drinking with creative alternatives.

https://nypost.com/2026/06/30/lifestyle/one-of-the-biggest-myths-about-the-boston-tea-party-revealed-by-historian/