It is just another example of a barrier - a fence, a wall, whatever - providing real border security.
In California, the migrants are targeting a part of the border where there is a barrier.
It required the federal government to build reinforced fencing, at least two layers deep, along about 700 miles of the border.
If the law had been followed, many vulnerable parts of the border would now be secured.
In 2006, an election year, there was a bipartisan consensus to pass a law requiring the construction of a border fence.
So any fight on a border barrier would be uphill for the president.
There is a law on the books that could strengthen border security.
https://townhall.com/columnists/byronyork/2018/11/28/why-not-build-a-border-barrier--its-the-law-n2536607
In California, the migrants are targeting a part of the border where there is a barrier.
It required the federal government to build reinforced fencing, at least two layers deep, along about 700 miles of the border.
If the law had been followed, many vulnerable parts of the border would now be secured.
In 2006, an election year, there was a bipartisan consensus to pass a law requiring the construction of a border fence.
So any fight on a border barrier would be uphill for the president.
There is a law on the books that could strengthen border security.
https://townhall.com/columnists/byronyork/2018/11/28/why-not-build-a-border-barrier--its-the-law-n2536607
No comments:
Post a Comment