The Fallacy of Stable Prices

The Federal Reserve's focus on maintaining "stable prices" and how this approach has contributed to an unstable economy over the last century. It critiques prominent economists who supported this notion and highlights the consequences of their views on economic policy.

1. Historical Context:

Herbert Hoover sought government intervention during the Great Depression, supported by economists advocating stable prices as essential for prosperity.

Common sense suggests that lower prices increase purchasing power, yet economists like Irving Fisher and John Maynard Keynes had a flawed understanding of economic stability.

2. Economic Theories:

The notion of stable prices is misleading since it can cause harm by preventing natural fluctuations in pricing that reflect productivity increases.

The emphasis on maintaining price stability came from fears of falling prices during economic downturns, seen as a primary cause of depressions.

3. Prominent Economists' Failures:

Fisher and other economists displayed over-optimism during the 1920s, predicting continued growth while ignoring signs of an economic bubble.

Fisher lost significant wealth during the Great Depression, as his predictions failed to materialize, demonstrating the risks of relying on such economic forecasts.

4. Austrian Economic Perspective:

Ludwig von Mises and F. A. Hayek attributed economic crises to the artificial expansion of credit, suggesting that booms from cheap money eventually lead to busts.

They argued that credit expansion distorts capital allocation, causing market misallocations and unsustainable investments, leading to economic downturns.

5. Misunderstanding of Inflation:

Inflation is often viewed as a necessary strategy to promote economic growth, which Mises pointed out creates an illusion of profit while discouraging savings.

The Austrian perspective teaches that managing inflation and price levels incorrectly can exacerbate economic issues instead of solving them.

6. Consequences of Policies:

Attempts to maintain a stable price level can lead to the erosion of market signals, creating worse economic conditions in the long term.

There is a need to correct the misallocations caused by previous credit expansion instead of treating inflation as a fix.

The focus on stable prices by the Federal Reserve and influential economists like Fisher and Keynes has led to repeated cycles of economic boom and bust, driven by artificial credit expansions. The Austrian economic perspective places emphasis on the dangers of these practices, advocating for a more realistic approach to economic management that allows natural price changes reflecting true market conditions. Addressing the root causes of inflation, rather than attempting to maintain static price levels, is crucial for fostering a stable economy in the long run. 

https://mises.org/mises-wire/fallacy-stable-prices

Secret Chinese Buyer Purchased Farmland Near U.S. Navy’s Pacific Fighter Jet Hub

In November 2024, a corporation labeled as Chinese-owned, Long Feng International, Inc., bought over 1,500 acres of farmland in Kings County, California, for $21.2 million. This land is located approximately 16 miles from the U.S. Navy's main Pacific fighter jet base, Naval Air Station (NAS) Lemoore, which supports critical military air operations including F-35C Lightning II squadrons.

The USDA's foreign-landholding database classifies Long Feng as a U.S. corporation with a primary Chinese owner.

The farmland features productive agricultural areas and an established water supply.

Long Feng has recently acquired an additional 315 acres, bringing its total to nearly 1,829 acres, with some of this land now even closer to the Navy base.

There is no public information about the individual who owns Long Feng, as U.S. regulations currently do not mandate disclosure of corporate owners.

Crucial questions remain unanswered:

1. Who is the true owner of Long Feng?

2. What happened with the additional 315 acres secured in 2026?

3. Was the original farmland purchase reviewed for security implications?

4. Why is NAS Lemoore not included on the federal list of sites monitored for foreign purchases? 

https://nataliegwinters.substack.com/p/exc-secret-chinese-buyer-purchased?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=3382126&post_id=213041192&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=6dl2nb&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email

American Kids Attended A Camp In Xinjiang Run By A Sanctioned Paramilitary Group Abusing Uyghurs

A recent report reveals that American children participated in a summer camp in Xinjiang, organized by the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps (XPCC), a sanctioned paramilitary group known for human rights abuses against Uyghurs.

The Atlanta-based Chinese American Youth Association (CAYA) was involved in an August camp that brought together 50 youth from the U.S., Germany, and Belgium.

The XPCC is a Chinese Communist Party-controlled group sanctioned by the U.S. Treasury for implementing a harsh surveillance and indoctrination program against minorities.

At the camp, attendees learned about "Corps spirit" and were encouraged to promote the XPCC's narratives to others back home.

The camp included tours of military sites and glorified narratives about the XPCC's role in border defense, without addressing the group's controversial history.

CAYA acknowledges receiving funding from Chinese government offices to support its activities, although details remain vague regarding financial sources for the camp trip.

This camp aimed to shape the perspectives of American youth about the XPCC and its activities in Xinjiang. The children's involvement is seen as part of a broader effort to spread pro-CCP propaganda overseas, raising concerns about indoctrination and the narrative around China's treatment of Uyghurs. 

https://nataliegwinters.substack.com/p/exclusive-american-kids-attended?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=3382126&post_id=213074611&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=6dl2nb&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email

New UNICEF Data Exposes the Gaza Starvation Farce

Recent findings from a UNICEF survey challenge longstanding claims about famine and malnutrition in Gaza amid ongoing conflict. This survey highlights a more complex reality, revealing that Gaza is dealing with issues of obesity rather than widespread starvation.

1. Contradicting Famine Claims:

Since the onset of the IDF-Hamas war, predictions of severe famine and malnutrition in Gaza were frequently made by UN officials and experts.

Notably, situations worsened following a suspension of food deliveries in 2025, leading many media outlets to portray Israel negatively.

2. UNICEF Findings (2026):

The UNICEF report revealed minimal levels of acute malnutrition in children, contradicting the earlier dire predictions.

It reported that the rate of acute child malnutrition in Gaza is at 0.5%, the lowest in the region.

Approximately 12% of children experience stunted growth, substantially lower than the regional average of 26%.

3. Emerging Issues of Obesity:

Alarmingly, the UNICEF report also indicated that 4% of children under five are affected by obesity, suggesting a shift from undernutrition to overnutrition.

This trend is unprecedented in a region previously described as experiencing famine.

4. Nutritional Context in Gaza:

Prior to the conflict, Gaza benefitted from foreign aid, allowing many families to enjoy a middle-class lifestyle.

A large portion of their consumption included locally-produced fruits and vegetables, helping to sustain nutritional standards.

5. Criticism of Misinformation:

The article criticizes the Western media and academia for spreading unfounded claims about starvation in Gaza.

It underscores the tendency to ignore evidence that counters the narrative of suffering, instead accepting claims from biased sources.

The new evidence presented by UNICEF highlights that, contrary to claims of famine, Gaza's food security situation involves distinct challenges, including rising obesity rates. Increased awareness of this data may help counter the narrative of acute malnutrition and starvation that has dominated discussions about Gaza in the international arena. 

https://spectator.org/new-unicef-data-exposes-the-gaza-starvation-farce/

The Political Violence Double Standard

 The double standard in how political violence is portrayed in the media, particularly contrasting left-wing and right-wing violence. It argues that left-wing violence is often downplayed or justified, while right-wing violence is exaggerated and condemned.

1. Different Responses to Violence:

When violence occurs among leftists, it often receives some justification or backing from scholars and politicians.

Conversely, violence associated with the right is portrayed as a more significant threat, despite data that some say misrepresents the reality.

2. Statistical Manipulation:

The statistics used to claim right-wing violence is more prevalent tend to exclude incidents of left-wing violence.

Examples include the George Floyd riots and various attacks on religious and political institutions attributed to left-wing groups.

3. Historical Context:

Political violence has roots dating back to the French Revolution, with leftist movements using violence as a tactic for political gain.

The article points out that the legacy media tends to uphold the narrative of right-wing violence being worse than left-wing.

4. Lack of Organization on the Right:

There is no organized mass of right-wing protestors comparable to the extensive network of leftist movements like Black Lives Matter or Occupy Wall Street.

Rightist protests often lack the professional structure and funding seen in leftist demonstrations.

5. The Role of Media and Academia:

Left-wing narratives dominate academic and media discourse, painting right-wing violence in a particularly negative light.

Right-wing activists and movements often do not receive similar media attention or support.

6. Rhetoric and Demonization:

The left has been known to demonize its opponents, leading to a culture where violent actions can be rationalized.

This rhetoric leads some individuals to commit acts of violence against perceived opponents, motivated by the belief in a higher moral cause.

7. Comparative Violence Statistics:

Historical analyses suggest that leftist regimes have been responsible for far more casualties than right-wing regimes.

Citing specific statistics, the article challenges the notion that right-wing violence is more pervasive, arguing that the truth is often misconstrued or ignored.

8. Examples of Media Double Standards:

Incidents like the Tea Party rallies, which were peaceful, were compared to violent protests by the left.

Information from the media often highlights leftist protests' peaceful nature while ignoring or downplaying violence during these events.

9. Methodological Flaws in Violence Counts:

Studies analyzing political violence rely heavily on biased media reports to classify incidents.

There is evidence that many leftist actions resulting in violence are underreported or classified differently, leading to imbalanced interpretations of violence.

The article asserts that there is a prevalent bias in how political violence is reported, favoring the left and framing right-wing movements as more dangerous. This narrative is sustained by a combination of selective statistics, media representation, and the historical context of political violence, which often ignores the broader implications of leftist aggression. The author encourages a reassessment of the data that influences public perception of political violence.

https://www.city-journal.org/article/political-violence-right-left

Dems push Hochul to block staggering 72% tax rate slapped on NYC’s first full casino

Local lawmakers in New York City are urging Governor Kathy Hochul to intervene in a situation regarding the tax rate for the city’s first full casino, Resorts World New York City. The proposed tax rate of 72% on slot revenues is being criticized as excessively high.

1. High Tax Rate Concern: A letter from local Democrats calls for Hochul to block the 72% tax rate imposed on slot revenues, which lawmakers argue would be detrimental to the casino.

2. Legislators' Stance: State Senator Joe Addabbo expressed that the tax rate is unreasonable and emphasized the need for urgent action from the governor's office as the Gaming Commission reports to her.

3. Resorts World Background: Resorts World initially began as a slot parlor in 2011 and is now offering live table games after receiving a full state license. They had proposed a 56% tax rate while applying for their license.

4. Tax Structure Disputes: The Gaming Commission states that the 56% tax rate does not include separate obligations for the horse racing industry, which adds another 16%, leading to the proposed 72%.

5. Comparison with Other States: The current tax rate for Resorts World is significantly higher than rates in other states, like New Jersey (9.25%) and Michigan (19%).

6. Job and Investment Impact: Lawmakers, including Rep. Gregory Meeks, are concerned that the uncertainty around the tax rate could affect billions of dollars in private investments and thousands of jobs, undermining local businesses.

7. Call for Accountability: The lawmakers argue that while the casino should meet its commitments, the state should honor the original terms under which these commitments were made.

8. State's Position: A spokesperson for Hochul has declared that tax rates have always been distinct from payments needed for racing support, stressing the priority of generating revenue for public services such as education.

The debate over the high casino tax rate for Resorts World New York City continues, with local lawmakers requesting immediate action from Governor Hochul. They argue that a resolution is crucial for the casino's future operations, job creation, and economic impact in the region. Both lawmakers and the Gaming Commission are maintaining their positions, leading to a challenging situation as stakeholders await a decision. 

https://nypost.com/2026/08/31/us-news/dems-push-hochul-to-block-staggering-72-tax-rate-slapped-on-nycs-first-full-casino/

Fauci memos expose instructions to delete emails, steer spy agencies during COVID-19 pandemic

 Recent evidence from Dr. Anthony Fauci's tenure in government has emerged, highlighting a culture of secrecy regarding email communications and his interactions with U.S. intelligence agencies during the COVID-19 pandemic. This summary outlines key points from the findings presented by Senate Homeland Security Committee Chairman Rand Paul.

1. Email Deletion Requests:

Dr. Fauci requested recipients to delete specific emails after reading them on at least five occasions throughout his career. This practice raises concerns over compliance with the Federal Records Act, which mandates the preservation of government work records, including emails.

2. Interactions with Intelligence Agencies:

Fauci's emails highlight efforts to influence U.S. intelligence agencies, like the CIA, towards scientists advocating for the theory that COVID-19 had a natural origin, despite evidence suggesting it could have been artificially created and leaked from a lab.

3. Specific Instances of Influence:

A CIA memo indicates Fauci encouraged the agency to consult with scientists Robert Garry, Kristian Andersen, and Eddie Holmes, who supported the natural origin theory. Another email from July 2021 showed Fauci emphasizing the significance of a scientific article aligned with this view.

4. Contracts for Bioterrorism Research:

The CIA entered into a contract with Fauci's agency, the National Institute of Infectious Diseases and Allergy, focused on bioterrorism research. This involved unclassified but restricted funds for analyzing how certain viruses mutate and spread.

5. Federal Records Act Compliance:

The Federal Records Act necessitates that federal agencies manage email records effectively, preserving them adequately. The Obama administration mandated the archiving of email systems for this purpose.

6. Legal Troubles Ahead:

Fauci received a pardon at the end of the Biden presidency but faces potential state investigations. During a committee session, he invoked the Fifth Amendment repeatedly to avoid answering questions and was held in contempt of Congress, which has led to a referral for potential prosecution.

7. Legal Defense Fund:

In response to his legal challenges, Fauci has established a legal defense fund. Additionally, a former adviser has pleaded guilty to conspiracy for evading Freedom of Information Act requests, indicating further investigations into the mishandling of government communications.

The recently released memos provide a troubling insight into Dr. Fauci's email practices and interactions with intelligence agencies during critical periods of the COVID-19 pandemic. These developments suggest ongoing legal and ethical questions regarding his actions in government.

https://justthenews.com/accountability/political-ethics/monfauci-memos-expose-instructions-delete-emails-steer-spy-agencies?utm_source=justthenews.com&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=external-news-aggregators

Troy Jackson Cosponsored Bill Sending Millions of Taxpayer Dollars to His Son's Lobbying Client

Troy Jackson, the Democratic nominee for U.S. Senate in Maine, is under scrutiny for cosponsoring a bill that allocated millions to a state academy where his son, Chace Jackson, served as a lobbyist. This report discusses the implications of their relationship and the perceptions of favoritism.

1. Bill Sponsorship:

Troy Jackson, as Maine Senate President, supported a bill providing $13.4 million in funding to the Maine Maritime Academy during his presidency, overlapping with his son’s lobbying role.

Chace Jackson was appointed as the academy's "legislative designee" while also lobbying for corporate clients.

2. Public Concerns:

His son’s dual roles raised questions about compliance with state regulations on lobbying.

It was noted that other legislative designees in Maine are typically full-time employees, unlike Chace, who was simultaneously lobbying for external clients.

3. Family Connections:

Chace Jackson started his role in December 2022, in a position described as “legislative affairs coordinator” but had associations with a lobbying firm run by a former staff member of Troy Jackson.

The arrangement hinted at possible preferential treatment, as mentioned by a long-time legislative staffer.

4. Funding Context:

The Maine Maritime Academy had requested further funding due to "rising costs," and Jackson's bill aimed to address this need but ultimately did not pass.

5. Past Lobbying Activities:

Chace Jackson also lobbied for various clients, including companies with interests opposed to Troy Jackson’s legislative preferences.

Allegations of hypocrisy arose as Troy positioned himself against “special interests” while his son was financially benefiting from such ties.

6. Future Uncertainty:

It remains unclear if Chace Jackson continues to work for the academy as departmental disclosures ceased being mandatory in 2025, sparking further questions about the continuation of his lobbying roles.

The intertwining roles of Troy and Chace Jackson highlight significant concerns regarding potential conflicts of interest in politics. As Troy Jackson campaigns to uproot what he claims is a rigged system, these allegations may impact public perception and his electoral candidacy. 

https://freebeacon.com/democrats/troy-jackson-cosponsored-bill-sending-millions-of-taxpayer-dollars-to-his-sons-lobbying-client/

Trump Confirms Plan To Refill Strategic Petroleum Reserve With Venezuelan Oil

 President Donald Trump announced his plan to refill the U.S. Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR) using oil from a recent agreement with Venezuela. This plan comes in response to low oil levels in the reserve, which have decreased under previous administrations.

The deal involves U.S. interests gaining majority control over over 65 billion barrels of proven Venezuelan oil reserves, with U.S. ownership of about 55% of the output.

Venezuelan interim President Delcy Rodríguez stated that the 25-year agreement could bring significant investments and tax revenue to Venezuela.

Currently, the SPR is at about 40.6% of its authorized capacity, holding 289.7 million barrels, the lowest since the early 1980s.

Both Biden and Trump administrations have released oil from the SPR due to global disruptions, including the conflict with Ukraine and ongoing tensions with Iran.

It remains uncertain how soon the Venezuelan oil can be used to refill the U.S. reserve, as significant investments and repairs are needed in Venezuela's oil infrastructure.

The proposed oil deal aims to enhance the U.S. emergency oil reserves, but logistical challenges could delay this process for several years.

https://trendingpoliticsnews.com/trump-confirms-plan-to-refill-strategic-petroleum-reserve-with-venezuelan-oil-cmc/

Ex-Defense Intelligence Agency Insider Threat Officer Pleads Guilty to Espionage

Nathan Vilas Laatsch, a former IT specialist for the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), pleaded guilty to transmitting national defense information to a foreign government. This case highlights serious concerns regarding national security and the responsibilities of government employees.

Background: Laatsch, 29, from Alexandria, Virginia, worked for the DIA's Insider Threat Division and possessed a Top Secret security clearance since starting in 2019.

Criminal Activity: In March 2025, the FBI learned he was attempting to pass classified information to what he thought was a friendly foreign government, which turned out to be an undercover FBI agent. Over three days, he transcribed classified information at work and then hid it on a thumb drive.

Execution of Espionage: Laatsch dropped off the thumb drive at a public park for the purported foreign government to collect. He included various typed documents, stressing he provided a "decent sample size" to demonstrate his access to classified materials.

Motivation and Intent: During communication with the undercover agent, Laatsch expressed interest in gaining "citizenship" in the foreign country and mentioned potential compensation, though he claimed he did not require financial gain.

Legal Consequences: Laatsch's actions were described by officials as a severe violation of trust. He was arrested after he delivered additional classified documents in May 2025. He faces a maximum prison sentence of life and is scheduled for sentencing on January 27, 2027.

Official Statements: Officials condemned Laatsch's actions, emphasizing that political disagreements do not justify risking national security and that anyone who unlawfully discloses classified information will be prosecuted.

Nathan Vilas Laatsch's case serves as a significant reminder of the consequences of espionage and the importance of safeguarding national security. The collaboration between various investigative units illustrates the commitment to holding accountable those who violate the trust placed in them as government employees. 

https://townhall.com/news/scott-mcclallen/2026/08/30/ex-defense-intelligence-agency-insider-threat-officer-pleads-guilty-to-espionage-n2682144

Belief in Gender Ideology Often Translates to Support for Political Violence

A recent study commissioned by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) suggests that individuals who believe in gender ideology are more likely to hold authoritarian views and support political violence. This study attempts to address a gap in research regarding the motivations behind support for gender ideology.

1. Study Overview: Conducted by researchers from Rutgers University and other institutions, the study aimed to explore what influences people to support gender ideology instead of focusing solely on resistance to it.

2. Authoritarian Mindset: The study identifies a group called "left-wing authoritarians" (LWA), characterized by aggressive attitudes towards perceived oppressors, support for censorship, and hostility towards traditional institutions. The research posits that gender ideology aligns with these tendencies.

3. Clinical Framework: The findings indicate that clinical guidelines related to gender health, though presented as scientific, are primarily based on "minority stress theory." This theory suggests that individuals identifying as transgender experience harm from societal stigma, making a case for gender affirmation as key to health.

4. Research Methodologies: The researchers surveyed 1,208 Americans to measure support for gender ideology and political violence, creating the Clinical Gender Affirmation Scale (CGAS). This scale measures endorsement of practices like using preferred pronouns and supporting parental transitions for children.

5. Results: The survey revealed a correlation where support for gender ideology (as measured by CGAS) predicts LWA, and both predict support for political violence. Importantly, the findings indicate that support for gender ideology is influenced by moral beliefs rather than just political affiliation.

6. Causality Challenges: The study notes that while there is a strong relationship between CGAS and LWA, it cannot definitively determine whether one causes the other or if both are influenced by a third factor.

7. Implications for Public Safety: The authors warn that addressing radicalization pathways is essential for understanding political violence, especially when clinical guidance appears to promote ideological beliefs.

8. Future Research Recommendations: HHS Assistant Secretary for Health expressed the need for rigorous research to assess the relationship between gender ideology, authoritarian attitudes, and political violence, emphasizing that clinical recommendations should prioritize evidence over ideology.

The study raises critical questions about the intersection of ideology and medicine, particularly in how gender-related clinical guidelines are interpreted. It underscores a need for further research to rigorously evaluate these relationships to better inform public health and safety. 

https://thenewamerican.com/us/belief-in-gender-ideology-often-translates-to-support-for-political-violence-study/

How Democrats Botched The Rules To Rig The Election Maps

Virginia Democrats faced setbacks earlier this year in their attempt to change redistricting rules, learning the importance of following constitutional procedures. Maryland Democrats are now facing a similar legal challenge regarding their proposed congressional redistricting amendment.

A Maryland judge, Robert Thompson, ruled that state lawmakers illegally placed a constitutional amendment on the November ballot because they missed the deadline and provided misleading ballot language.

The amendment aimed to remove certain redistricting standards and give the Maryland Supreme Court authority over congressional map challenges.

Similarly, Virginia Democrats attempted to change redistricting rules without adhering to constitutional procedures, leading to their proposal being invalidated by the Virginia Supreme Court.

Both states encountered obstacles due to their constitutions' requirements, which lawmakers attempted to bypass.

The judge criticized the misleading language that described the amendment as merely “clarifying” Maryland’s Constitution and noted that altering different subjects together violated single-subject rules.

The Maryland Supreme Court will review this case after the judge's ruling temporarily removed the amendment from the ballot while an appeal is in process.

These situations in Virginia and Maryland highlight that lawmakers cannot disregard constitutional rules to achieve their political goals. The importance of adhering to established procedures remains crucial, reminding officials that they cannot "break the rules to rewrite the rules." 

https://www.dailywire.com/news/how-democrats-botched-the-rules-to-rig-the-election-maps

Leftists Will Never Self-Reflect, And They Will Never Apologize For The Horrors They Inflict

Michael Shellenberger's recent article discusses the perceived failures of the political left, expressing that progressives will not recognize the consequences of their actions. He argues that the left is unlikely to experience a change of heart regarding their ideology and actions.

1. Lack of Remorse: Shellenberger contends that leftists do not feel remorse or atonement for their actions, particularly those that have harmed society, which they often justify.

2. Perception of Actions: Leftists tend to downplay past abuses, claiming that their intentions were good and that any negative outcomes are exaggerated or misrepresented.

3. Historical Context: He parallels contemporary leftism with the behavior of citizens in the Soviet Union, suggesting that recognition of wrongdoings often occurs only when the consequences of those ideologies directly impact individuals.

4. Tools to Avoid Accountability: The left uses methods to deny historical failures, leveraging control over media and institutions to reshape narratives, avoiding accountability for past actions.

5. Ingrained Ideology: Many leftists are unlikely to abandon their beliefs because they find personal gain in them, whether through power or financial benefits.

6. Political Future: Shellenberger expresses skepticism that the electorate will hold leftists accountable for their actions, implying that memories in politics are short-lived.

In conclusion, the article posits that many leftists are too deeply entrenched in their beliefs to change. Shellenberger believes that their ideologies pose significant risks to society, which he characterizes as needing to be contained to prevent further societal harm. 

https://thefederalist.com/2026/08/28/leftists-will-never-self-reflect-and-they-will-never-apologize-for-the-horrors-they-inflict/

Health Insurance Costs Are Soaring. Here’s Why

Health insurance costs in the U.S. are projected to rise by 9.5% next year, following increases of 9% this year and 6% in 2025. Since 2000, these costs have grown significantly, with consumer insurance expenses more than quadrupling over the past 25 years, largely due to the influence of third-party payers and a lack of market competition.

1. Significant Cost Increases: Health insurance costs have consistently grown at a rate of 6-9% annually, while inflation has remained much lower. The average family of four is expected to spend approximately $37,824 on healthcare this year, highlighting the burden of rising premiums.

2. Impact of Government Policy: Initiatives like the Affordable Care Act (ACA) did not reduce costs as intended. Despite promises of savings, insurance costs have continued to rise, with taxpayers shouldering the burden through subsidies and administrative costs.

3. Loss of Employment and Health Coverage: The COVID-19 pandemic led to job losses, which in turn caused many to lose their employer-sponsored insurance. Extended ACA subsidies temporarily alleviated the financial impact but masked the ongoing rise in insurance prices.

4. Market Dynamics: In traditional markets, consumers directly pay for goods and services, which fosters competition and keeps prices low. In healthcare, third-party payers (often using taxpayer money) insulate consumers from costs, disrupting normal market forces and allowing for continuous price increases.

5. Lack of Competition: With 84 million Americans obtaining insurance through their employers, individual consumer choice is minimized, leading to less pressure on insurers to control costs.

6. Potential Solutions: To lower insurance costs and revitalize competition, it is necessary to remove third-party payers from the equation, essentially returning the control of healthcare spending to consumers. This would promote price consciousness and competition among healthcare providers.

The ongoing rise in health insurance costs highlights critical flaws in the current healthcare financing system. Without drastic changes, such as empowering consumers and reducing the role of third-party payers, costs are likely to continue their upward trend, creating long-term financial burdens for American families. 

https://spectator.org/health-insurance-costs-are-soaring-heres-why/

Clyburn: SCOTUS Seeking to Return to Dred Scott Era When ‘No Black Man Has Any Rights that a White Man Must Respect’

Rep. James Clyburn (D-SC) expressed serious concerns about the current U.S. Supreme Court during an appearance on NBC’s “Meet the Press.” He believes the court is trying to revert to the discriminatory ideas from the 1857 Dred Scott v. Sandford case.

Clyburn stated that the Supreme Court's actions resemble former Chief Justice Roger Taney's opinion, which claimed that black individuals had no rights that white individuals needed to respect.

He is advocating for the expansion of the Supreme Court from nine justices to thirteen, aligning with calls from figures like former Vice President Kamala Harris.

Clyburn argues that significant changes in Congress are necessary to protect civil rights and uphold the Constitution, particularly regarding the interpretations of the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments.

He criticized Justice Clarence Thomas for straying from modern interpretations of the Constitution, suggesting that Thomas has moved from a liberal to a conservative stance.

Clyburn’s comments highlight his belief that the Supreme Court is reversing progress in civil rights and his support for expanding the court to better represent civil rights and constitutional values. 

https://www.breitbart.com/clips/2026/08/30/clyburn-scotus-seeking-to-return-to-dred-scott-era-when-no-black-man-has-any-rights-that-a-white-man-must-respect/

Remarks From Whitehouse and Raskin in Iowa Just Provided an Even Bigger Reason to Vote for the GOP

Senator Sheldon Whitehouse and Representative Jamie Raskin recently spoke at the Polk County Steak Fry in Des Moines, Iowa, to support Democratic candidates for the upcoming elections.

Whitehouse emphasized the need to address issues at the Supreme Court, calling for investigations and retroactive term limits.

He indicated plans for investigations against conservative justices if Democrats gain control, claiming Republican obstruction could be countered with Raskin's assistance.

Raskin positioned the Democrats as champions of voting rights and constitutional democracy while criticizing the Supreme Court as "gerrymandered."

Whitehouse and Raskin's comments suggest a focus on Supreme Court scrutiny rather than productive governance.

The discussion reflects a call to action for Democratic voters, despite accusations of using inflammatory language for political gain.

The statements from Whitehouse and Raskin underscore their intention to address perceived Supreme Court issues while rallying support for the Democratic agenda, reflecting a broader political strategy ahead of the November elections. 

https://redstate.com/nick-arama/2026/08/30/whitehouse-and-raskin-remarks-n2206265

Gavin Newsom set to sign bill making 2 Muslim holy days official state holidays

California lawmakers are close to a final vote on a bill that would make two important Muslim holidays, Eid al-Fitr and Eid al-Adha, official state holidays.

Bill Details: Assembly Bill 2017 proposes that state employees can take holiday credits for these days off. The bill has passed the California Assembly with a 64-1 vote and is waiting for a vote in the Senate.

Support and Purpose: Assemblymember Matt Haney, the bill's author, emphasizes its significance in recognizing the state's large Muslim community and ensuring they are treated equally.

Impact on Education: The bill would also allow schools and community colleges to recognize these holidays and educate students about them, addressing concerns for Muslim students facing conflicts between attending school and participating in religious practices.

Opposition: The California Family Council has raised concerns about schools teaching the meaning of these holidays, arguing that it creates an imbalance with other religious holidays like Christmas and Easter.

If passed, this measure would add Eid al-Fitr and Eid al-Adha to California's list of recognized holidays, joining others like Diwali and Lunar New Year, acknowledging the state's diverse population of over one million Muslims. 

https://thepostmillennial.com/california-moves-closer-to-making-two-muslim-holy-days-official-state-holidays

Whatever Happened to 'When in Rome'?

 A recent guide published by the U.K. Home Office titled “Understanding Behaviours and Expectations in the UK: A Guide for Asylum Seekers” raises important questions about the expectations placed on newcomers to adapt to British customs and laws. This guide aims to educate asylum seekers about various rights and societal norms in the U.K., sparking a wider discussion about immigration and assimilation.

1. Cultural Adaptation: The guide emphasizes that newcomers should understand and respect British laws and customs, commonly summarized by the phrase, “When in Rome, do as the Romans do.”

2. Rights of Women: It highlights that women in Britain have the autonomy to work, attend university, and make personal decisions without needing approval from male relatives. This directive stresses gender equality and women's rights.

3. Violence and Consent: The booklet outlines that physical and verbal abuse is unacceptable, sexual contact requires consent, and establishes legal parameters regarding consent and the protection of children.

4. Perception of Assimilation: The author contrasts this guide with personal experiences in other countries, questioning why such fundamental values need to be explicitly stated for asylum seekers. This suggests a failure of assumed shared values among immigrants.

5. Historical Context: The author reflects on the American immigrant experience, noting that past immigrants adapted to their new society without needing explicit instructions about basic societal norms. This brings up a broader issue of whether current immigrant policies in Britain and Europe promote assimilation.

6. Cultural Challenges: The text discusses the implications of large numbers of immigrants from differing cultural backgrounds and the potential difficulties in achieving effective integration without mutual respect for local laws and customs.

7. Expectations from Immigrants: There are concerns about the balance between welcoming newcomers and expecting them to respect and adapt to the host country’s legal framework. The discussion raises a critical question: what should a host nation rightfully expect from those who come to live within its borders?

The guide for asylum seekers by the U.K. Home Office underscores the ongoing debate about immigration and assimilation in Western societies. While many newcomers seek safety and better opportunities, the expectation that they must understand and respect the laws and values of the host country is vital for a functional society. Countries can set rightful terms for immigration, emphasizing the importance of adaptation from newcomers. Ultimately, the responsibility of assimilation should not solely fall on the host country but should be a mutual process of understanding and respect between immigrants and their new environment.

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2026/08/whatever-happened-to-when-in-rome/

Trump pledges to replenish U.S. Strategic Petroleum Reserve following landmark Venezuela deal

President Donald Trump has announced plans to replenish the United States Strategic Petroleum Reserve using oil obtained from Venezuela. This initiative comes after securing a significant deal involving access to Venezuela's extensive oil reserves.

Trump stated he will quickly refill the Strategic Petroleum Reserve, which he claims has been nearly depleted under President Biden.

He referred to the deal with Venezuela as a massive achievement, acquiring access to over 65 billion barrels of proven oil reserves, described as the "biggest oil deal in world history."

The agreement involves cooperation with Venezuelan Interim President Delcy Rodríguez and private-sector partners, supported by Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth.

Venezuela is reported to have the world's largest oil reserves, containing over 300 billion barrels of crude oil, surpassing Saudi Arabia's total.

Trump believes this move will enhance U.S. energy security and potentially reduce fuel costs for Americans. 

https://www.oann.com/newsroom/trump-pledges-to-replenish-u-s-strategic-petroleum-reserve-following-landmark-venezuela-deal/

Healthcare Data Breach Exposes Medical, Financial Records of 3.75 Million Americans

A significant data breach has occurred at CareCloud, a healthcare technology company, affecting the personal, financial, and medical information of over 3.75 million Americans.

The breach was detected on March 16, 2026, when CareCloud noticed a disruption in its network.

An unauthorized third party accessed CareCloud's Amazon Web Services environment between March 10 and March 16.

Initially, it was believed that hundreds of thousands of people were impacted, but this number later rose to over 3.75 million, making it one of the largest healthcare data breaches of the year.

The exposed information could include names, addresses, Social Security numbers, driver’s license and passport information, banking details, and health records.

Victims may face risks of financial fraud and identity theft, particularly because critical information like Social Security numbers and medical histories cannot be easily changed.

Stolen healthcare information may lead to medical identity theft, where unauthorized treatments or insurance claims are made under someone else's identity.

Following the breach, CareCloud reported the incident to law enforcement, secured the compromised environment, and engaged outside cybersecurity experts to address the situation.

This breach highlights the ongoing vulnerabilities within healthcare technology systems and the potential long-term consequences for individuals whose sensitive information may have been stolen. Victims may need to take precautions to protect themselves from potential fraud and identity theft. 

https://amgreatness.com/2026/08/31/healthcare-data-breach-exposes-medical-financial-records-of-3-75-million-americans/

U.S. Visa Restrictions, Reviews and Applicant Suspensions Create Massive Anxiety in India – Millions Pour into DC Lobbyists

CTH focuses on two main policies: Maganomics and immigration enforcement. They argue that effective immigration enforcement is crucial for the U.S. economy.

1. Immigration Enforcement: Strong immigration enforcement is seen as essential for achieving desired economic outcomes for the American people.

2. DHS and Visa Restrictions: The Department of Homeland Security is slow in deportation processes, while Secretary of State Marco is actively restricting visa entries, facing opposition from groups seen as harmful to U.S. nationalism.

3. NASSCOM's Role: NASSCOM, a key Indian tech advocacy group, is influencing U.S. immigration policy to protect the interests of Indian IT companies that rely on work visas like H-1B.

4. Impact of New Immigration Bill: The proposed immigration bill could make it harder for Indian companies to obtain work visas, forcing them to hire more expensive local Americans or shift work offshore, potentially harming their competitiveness.

Concerns are raised that immigration policies favor companies hiring visa workers over American employees, ultimately disadvantaging the U.S. worker. The debate continues on the implications of these visa programs for the American labor market. 

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2026/08/30/u-s-visa-restrictions-reviews-and-applicant-suspensions-create-massive-anxiety-in-india-millions-pour-into-dc-lobbyists/

Homeschool Kids Outperformed National Averages Across Five Subjects

A recent study published in the Peabody Journal of Education shows that homeschooled students in the United States performed significantly better than the national averages in various subjects, including reading, language, mathematics, social studies, and science. This study, the first of its kind in about 15 years, highlights the academic achievements of the homeschooling population, which has increased since the pandemic.

Study Overview: The study analyzed standardized test scores of homeschool students across the U.S. comparing them to national norms, with the findings showing that homeschool students scored considerably above the 50th percentile benchmark in all five subjects assessed.

Average Score Increases: Homeschooled students scored 29 points higher in reading, 25 in language, 25 in mathematics, 26 in social studies, and 27 in science.

Limitations of Findings: The researchers emphasized that the data reflects an association between homeschooling and higher test scores but does not prove that homeschooling itself caused this success. The study is observational, meaning it cannot definitively establish a causal relationship.

Additional Findings: The researchers found that factors like family income, parents' education, or state teacher certification did not noticeably affect the students' scores.

Current Homeschooling Trends: The percentage of homeschooled students has increased to 3.4% from 3.7% in 2018-2019. Concerns over school environments (safety, discipline issues, etc.) are the primary reasons parents choose to homeschool.

Texas Homeschooling Landscape: Texas has seen a significant rise in homeschooling post-COVID, with public financial assistance now available for qualifying homeschool families, allowing them to receive funds for educational materials.

Flexibility and Responsibilities: While homeschooling offers flexibility in learning, it also places substantial responsibilities on parents, who must manage curricula, track progress, and finance education.

The study provides valuable insights into the academic performance of homeschooled students but highlights the need for further research to connect these findings with specific educational practices and outcomes. Overall, homeschooling continues to trend upwards, reflecting changing educational preferences among families. 

https://dallasexpress.com/education/study-homeschool-kids-outperformed-national-averages-across-five-subjects/

The Biden administration investigated traditional Catholic groups as if they were terrorists

A recent report from the U.S. Department of Justice reveals that the FBI improperly targeted traditional Catholic groups, treating members as potential terrorists. This investigation began under the Biden administration and has raised significant concerns about civil liberties and religious discrimination.

1. FBI's Targeting of Traditional Catholics:

The FBI opened investigations into two priests associated with the Priestly Fraternity of Saint Pius X (FSSPX), monitoring their travel and activities. This surveillance found no evidence of wrongdoing, leading to the closure of both cases shortly after investigations began.

2. Flawed Origins of the Investigation:

The FBI's suspicions were partly based on an unrelated crime involving a violent individual linked to the FSSPX. However, church officials clarified that the individual was not a Catholic or parish member, undermining the FBI's rationale for the investigation.

3. Mischaracterization of Traditional Catholicism:

An internal memo categorized traditional Catholic values as potentially dangerous, drawing unsupported parallels between traditional Catholics and extremist ideologies. This was influenced by biased organizations like the Southern Poverty Law Center.

4. Informant Strategy Proposal:

The FBI proposed to use church leaders as informants to report on the activities of their congregants, targeting specific parishes for this initiative without considering the ethical implications.

5. Response to the Leak:

After the memo's existence was revealed, the FBI leadership downplayed the situation publicly while internally promoting and defending the involved analysts. Positive evaluations and support were given to those who wrote the memo, raising questions about accountability.

6. Change in Administration's Stance:

A new executive order from President Trump has led to the dismissal of those responsible for the memo. The current leadership emphasized a commitment to upholding First Amendment rights and preventing misuse of government agencies against religious groups.

The report highlights a troubling instance where federal oversight failed, revealing a systemic issue within part of the FBI regarding the treatment of traditional Catholic groups. This incident underscores the importance of protecting religious freedoms and ensuring accountability within government agencies. 

https://infovaticana.com/en/2026/08/29/the-biden-administration-investigated-traditional-catholic-groups-as-if-they-were-terrorists/

Florida’s Curriculum on Communism — Every State Should Follow Suit

Florida's education system is set to implement a new curriculum on communism for middle and high school students starting in the 2026-2027 school year. This initiative, spearheaded by Governor Ron DeSantis, aims to educate students about the dangers of communism and prepare them against indoctrination in higher education.

Florida's Board of Education approved new standards for teaching about communism in November 2022.

The legislation, passed in 2024, mandates schools to highlight the "evils and dangers of Communism."

One objective of the curriculum is to prepare students to resist indoctrination at colleges.

Critics claim this move is akin to McCarthyism and argue it promotes a biased view of history, emphasizing anti-communism over a balanced understanding of political repression.

Some educators express concerns about the potential downplaying of historical events like McCarthyism.

There is a growing movement among young Americans who view socialism favorably, which the author argues results from a lack of historical knowledge about communist regimes.

The article suggests that better educational outcomes would ensure significant historical events and figures related to communism are widely recognized.

It emphasizes that the curriculum is not about teaching students what to think but about presenting the historical consequences of communism, which the author views as a significant threat to American values and security.

Florida's new anti-communist curriculum seeks to inform students about the historical implications of communism as a reaction to the increasing positive perceptions of socialism among youth. While it is faced with criticism, proponents claim it is necessary for an informed and free society. 

https://spectator.org/floridas-curriculum-on-communism-every-state-should-follow-suit/

The Scientific and Ethical Arguments for Ending Food Stamps

In 21st century America, a significant change has occurred where many impoverished individuals resemble the wealthy from earlier times. They tend to be sedentary and face health issues commonly associated with affluence, such as obesity and diabetes. This situation has emerged as an unintended effect of the government's efforts to combat poverty.

1. Historical Context: Traditionally, the rich were well-fed and less active, while the poor worked hard but were undernourished. Today, the poorest Americans often do not work and are unhealthy due to excess food provisions.

2. Public Health Consequences: The government’s provision of ‘free food’ to those who do not work is a misguided approach that has led to increased healthcare costs and health issues like obesity, diabetes, and heart disease. Instead of helping, this policy has contributed to a public health crisis.

3. Research Findings: Studies reveal that a sedentary lifestyle and high-calorie diets lead to weight gain and health problems. A striking example is Cuba's experience during an economic crisis, where reduced food and increased physical activity led to improved health outcomes.

4. Economic Implications: Food Stamp recipients tend to have a higher prevalence of obesity compared to those eligible but not participating in the program. This results in significant medical costs related to treating diseases related to poor diet and inactivity, ultimately harming both individual and national economic health.

5. Ethical Considerations: There is a moral obligation to avoid funding habits that contribute to health issues among the most vulnerable populations. The cycle of providing excess calories through food assistance only perpetuates obesity and related diseases across generations.

6. Counter-Arguments: Opponents of ending food assistance argue that recipients would face nutritional deficiencies. However, studies have indicated no significant differences in nutritional intake between those who do and do not receive assistance. Additionally, behaviors such as intermittent fasting could be beneficial to health.

The 'War on Poverty' in the U.S. has inadvertently caused more harm than good regarding the health of low-income individuals. To genuinely assist the poorest citizens and improve public health, the government should reconsider the structure of food assistance programs. Ending Food Stamps and instituting work requirements could lead to healthier lifestyles and reduce the burden of chronic diseases, marking a more effective approach to improving health outcomes among the impoverished populations. 

https://www.realclearscience.com/articles/2026/08/29/the_scientific_and_ethical_arguments_for_ending_food_stamps_1202446.html

Top US data companies supplying data to Chinese AI — while also working for Pentagon, GOP rep warns

A recent report reveals that several major American data companies involved in artificial intelligence (AI) are simultaneously providing data to both the US military and Chinese AI labs. This situation raises national security concerns amid the escalating technological race between the US and China.

1. Dual Contracts: Companies like SurgeAI, Mercor, AfterQuery, and Turing are working for both US entities like the Pentagon and Chinese firms, which may be linked to the Chinese military. Congressman Michael McCaul emphasizes that US companies should choose sides if they wish to receive government contracts.

2. Financial Links: Chinese AI labs reportedly spend about $500 million annually on American data services. These companies are essential for sorting, labeling, and packaging vast amounts of training data needed to develop effective AI models.

3. Concerns Raised: McCaul warns that if US firms continue to assist Chinese military associates, it jeopardizes America's technological advantages. He urges that cooperation with US government contracts should cease if they also support Chinese military AI efforts.

4. Importance of Data: High-quality, accurately labeled data is crucial for training AI models. Companies like SurgeAI have previously collaborated with Tencent, a company designated by the US as having military ties. Despite some contracts with US military branches, their dealings with firms like Tencent raise concerns.

5. Ongoing Competition: The competitive landscape highlights the potential risks to national security as the US and China attempt to outpace each other in AI technological advancements. The US has previously tried to restrict China's access to advanced technology and chips, but access to high-quality American AI training data remains a critical issue.

The involvement of US data companies with Chinese AI firms poses significant national security risks. As the US faces an AI arms race with China, the government may need to enforce stricter policies regarding these business relationships to protect its technological edge. The implications of these contracts could shape the future of both military and commercial AI developments. 

https://nypost.com/2026/08/30/us-news/us-data-companies-are-feeding-info-to-chinese-ai-while-also-working-for-pentagon-rep/

Prosecutor in NY AG Letitia James’ office says he was ordered to dig up dirt on Trump allies: report

 A significant controversy has arisen within New York Attorney General Letitia James' office, as a veteran prosecutor publicly accused her of instructing staff to focus on inquiries that may politically undermine allies of former President Donald Trump.

1. Whistleblower Allegations: Daniel Wiesenfeld, who works in James’ Investor Protection Bureau, claimed in a now-deleted email that he was directed to investigate crimes related to Trump and associated organizations without credible reasons for doing so.

2. Specific Targets Mentioned: Wiesenfeld stated that Bureau Chief Shamiso Maswoswe ordered him to pursue investigations against Trump himself, Truth Social, and a recent merger between Hewlett-Packard and Juniper Networks.

3. Concerns About Political Agendas: In his email, Wiesenfeld expressed concern that the attorney general's office was behaving similarly to what he accused Trump of — using governmental power to target political opponents. He urged his colleagues to focus on genuine crimes, such as fraud and antisemitic activities.

4. Paid Leave for Wiesenfeld: Following the allegations, Wiesenfeld was placed on paid administrative leave, with the AG’s office labeling the situation a personnel matter.

5. Reactions from Political Leaders: New York State Republican leaders criticized James, claiming she misused her position for political gain, contrasting her actions with expectations of impartial enforcement of the law.

6. James' History with Trump: Letitia James has been a long-time opponent of Trump, famously vowing during her campaign to take legal actions against him for alleged crimes in New York. This ongoing dispute includes various legal challenges against Trump and his businesses.

7. Future Political Implications: The fallout from Wiesenfeld's accusations raises questions about the integrity and political motivations behind the actions of James' office. Republican spokespersons have suggested that if James' office cannot act fairly, it should be reconstructed to prioritize genuine judicial responsibilities.

The allegations against Letitia James expose a potentially troubling dynamic in the conduct of legal proceedings that involve high-profile political figures. As the situation unfolds, the implications for James’ office, as well as her political future, remain uncertain. The debate about the role of prosecutors in politically-charged cases is likely to continue, with calls for a focus on accountability and justice free from partisanship.

https://nypost.com/2026/08/30/us-news/prosecutor-in-ag-letitia-james-office-says-he-was-ordered-to-dig-up-dirt-on-trump-allies-report/

Leading Famine Expert Largely Silent as Catastrophic Predictions for Gaza Fail to Materialize

The recent claims by famine expert Alex de Waal regarding the hunger crisis in Gaza, contrasting his dire predictions with new evidence from UNICEF suggesting lower malnutrition rates than anticipated.

1. De Waal's Predictions:

Alex de Waal, an expert on famine, previously warned of a catastrophic situation in Gaza, predicting approximately 10,000 deaths per day due to starvation.

He described conditions in Gaza as potentially leading to the most severe famine since World War II.

2. New UNICEF Data:

Recent UNICEF data has revealed that malnutrition rates in Gaza are significantly lower than in many neighboring regions and comparable to several European countries.

Acute malnutrition was reported as low as 0.2% in some areas, contradicting earlier claims of mass starvation.

3. Public Reaction:

Despite the new data, de Waal stated that it does not challenge his previous claims and insists that children can recover quickly from acute malnutrition.

He suggested that the health crisis had its own momentum, meaning recovery from the crisis could still take time.

4. Famine Classification Changes:

The Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC) had declared famine conditions in Gaza, but this classification was later withdrawn in December 2025 after improvements due to increased food deliveries.

Only a portion of the population experienced famine for a short period, contrasting de Waal’s earlier predictions of widespread disaster.

5. Historical Context:

De Waal has previously argued that Israel's actions contributed to the humanitarian crisis in Gaza, accusing it of using food as a weapon and not complying with international obligations to prevent genocide.

Alex de Waal's stark warnings about famine levels in Gaza have come under scrutiny following new data indicating less severe malnutrition. The situation, while still involving food insecurity, differs markedly from the catastrophic outcomes initially predicted, highlighting the complexity of humanitarian crises in conflict zones. The IPC's withdrawal of the famine classification emphasizes the need for careful interpretation of data and forecasts in ongoing humanitarian discussions. 

https://www.algemeiner.com/2026/08/28/leading-famine-expert-largely-silent-catastrophic-predictions-gaza-fail-materialize/

Virginia Attorney General creates unit to challenge federal actions

Virginia’s Attorney General, Jay Jones, has established a new unit aimed at challenging federal government actions that may overstep legal boundaries and negatively impact Virginia's interests.

Formation of the Unit: The Federal Accountability Unit will consist of four attorneys and is intended to provide permanent staff for tackling federal actions deemed inappropriate.

Leadership: The unit will be led by Deputy Solicitor General Megan Keenan and will operate within both the Office of the Solicitor General and the Civil Litigation Division.

Scope of Work: The unit will focus on various issues, including federal funding, elections, health care, immigration policies, environmental protection, consumer rights, tariffs, and economic policies. They may also address federal workforce reductions associated with the Department of Government Efficiency.

Legal Actions: The unit is empowered to pursue legal action on behalf of Virginia, advocate for the state’s interests, and collaborate with attorneys general from other states on broader litigation against federal policies.

Recruitment: Job postings for hiring attorneys for the unit have been released, with salaries ranging from $105,000 to $148,000. The application deadline is September 8, and positions allow for remote work in various locations in Virginia.

Attorney General's Focus: Since taking office in January, Jones has prioritized challenging federal actions, participating in cases related to tariffs and election oversight among others, and emphasizing the importance of defending Virginians against federal overreach.

The creation of the Federal Accountability Unit reflects Attorney General Jay Jones's commitment to protecting Virginia's interests by actively responding to federal actions and taking legal measures when necessary. 

https://justthenews.com/nation/states/center-square/virginia-attorney-general-creates-unit-challenge-federal-actions?utm_source=mux&utm_medium=social-media&utm_campaign=social-media-autopost

Meet The Republican Lobbyists Getting Paid To Help China Buy American Farmland

 Despite Republicans publicly opposing Chinese ownership of American farmland, some within the party are lobbying on behalf of Smithfield Foods, a major agricultural firm controlled by a Chinese company. This situation raises concerns regarding national security and foreign influence on U.S. land.

Former Republican aides are employed by Smithfield Foods to influence legislation aimed at restricting foreign ownership of U.S. farmland.

Smithfield is primarily owned by the Hong Kong-based WH Group, which holds about 87% of the company and oversees approximately 87,000 acres of American land.

Lobbying efforts include contracts with firms like Holland & Knight, which were paid $270,000 for issues related to foreign ownership of agricultural land, including the Promoting Agriculture Safeguards and Security Act (S.903).

Key lobbyists working on these efforts include Christopher DeLacy, a former aide to Republican Senator John Warner, and Molly Ross, a former aide to Senator Susan Collins.

Republican officials have declared Chinese access to U.S. farmland a national security risk, with some stating that foreign adversaries should not control American agricultural assets.

Washington Republicans are actively campaigning against foreign ownership, while Smithfield is leveraging connections with former government officials to navigate this political landscape.

As Republicans push back against Chinese ownership of agricultural land, the involvement of former GOP insiders in lobbying for Chinese-controlled Smithfield Foods raises questions about the integrity of their position and the potential influence of foreign entities in U.S. agriculture. 

https://nataliegwinters.substack.com/p/meet-the-republican-lobbyists-getting?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=3382126&post_id=210678325&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=6dl2nb&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email

Who Owns America’s Farmland?

American farmland is vital for national sovereignty, food security, and economic stability. However, changes in ownership and control of this land pose significant challenges. This summary explores who owns America's farmland, the implications of foreign ownership, the trend of agricultural consolidation, and the barriers faced by young Americans wanting to enter farming.

1. Importance of Farmland: Farmland is essential for food supply, economic health, and rural communities. Control over this land directly impacts national sovereignty and readiness.

2. Foreign Ownership Statistics: As of 2024, foreign interests own about 46 million acres of American farmland, up from 35.2 million acres in 2019. This includes various land types such as forestland and agricultural lands used for energy projects. The increase raises concerns about national security, especially if land ownership involves entities linked to foreign adversaries.

3. Need for Transparency: The U.S. government struggles to verify foreign ownership accurately. The current system lacks the necessary data to assess risks and protect sovereignty effectively. Efforts are underway to improve reporting and coordination among government agencies.

4. Consolidation in Agriculture: The number of farms has decreased, and agricultural operations have become larger. In 2024, America had about 1.9 million farms, down 8% from 2017. The shift towards bigger farms has diminished the number of mid-sized farms, which are crucial for a balanced agricultural economy.

5. Impact of Consolidation: As more farms operate within markets dominated by a few processing and supply companies, small farmers have less control over production costs and profit margins. The concentration of land ownership can harm rural economies by reducing local businesses dependent on farm families.

6. Barriers for Young Farmers: The average farmer in the U.S. is 58 years old, with only 9% under 35. High land prices, which rose approximately 79% since 2012, make it challenging for young people to invest in farming. Farmland prices can exceed $3 million for substantial parcels, making entry into agriculture financially burdensome.

7. Transition of Agricultural Land: An aging population of landowners is set to transition their land, presenting a critical juncture for American agriculture. Decisions made during this period will significantly shape its future, whether land is passed to young farmers, sold for development, or acquired by large investors.

8. National Security Considerations: Ownership and control of farmland relate closely to national security. The U.S. should limit foreign purchases that create risks to critical infrastructure. Legislative measures could ensure that farmland remains under American control while balancing property rights.

9. Role of Congress: There are calls for Congress to enhance loan programs for young farmers, reduce barriers to entry, and support measures that keep farmland in productive use. This includes strengthening antitrust regulations in agricultural markets and promoting local processing capacities.

American farmland is more than a resource; it symbolizes heritage, responsibility, and national strength. The future of agriculture in the U.S. depends on who owns the land and the ability of young farmers to participate in farming. A commitment to maintaining farmland control, ensuring market fairness, and empowering the next generation of farmers is critical for national security and the vitality of American communities. Addressing these issues will determine whether America can sustain its agricultural independence and sovereignty. 

https://genflynn.substack.com/p/who-owns-americas-farmland?utm_campaign=email-half-post&r=6dl2nb&utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email

What Do “Capitalism” and “Socialism” Really Mean?

 The debate between capitalism and socialism has resurfaced, drawing attention to the need for clear definitions of both systems. Understanding what these terms signify is crucial to addressing current economic discussions and beliefs.

1. Historical Context:

The decline of socialism was notable after the failures of Soviet-style economies, which led many to question the viability of government control over production.

Historically, socialism was viewed as opposing private ownership, which was believed to only benefit the capitalist class.

2. Education and Ideology:

Current educational narratives often depict capitalism negatively, attributing social injustices to its profit-driven motives while not addressing the failures of socialism.

Young people are frequently educated to believe that socialism is the answer to societal issues, despite historical failures.

3. Vague Definitions:

Socialists often vaguely define socialism to avoid association with its historical failures. This leads to a broad interpretation that lacks specificity.

Capitalism is sometimes misrepresented as a system devoid of moral underpinnings due to the interference of state interventions that distort market operations.

4. Mises's Definitions:

Economist Ludwig von Mises provides distinct definitions:

Capitalism: A system based on voluntary, private ownership and free market principles.

Socialism: Centralized control over production, whether or not ownership is formalized.

Interventionism: A hybrid system where the government interferes selectively in the market.

5. Understanding Economic Principles:

A clear understanding of economic theories is necessary to comprehend how different systems operate and their outcomes.

Historically, the performance of economic systems cannot be assessed solely based on outcomes; rather, it requires theoretical frameworks to contextualize results.

6. Debate Focus:

The current critical focus should be on addressing economic decline, especially concerning the weakening of the American manufacturing base and the economic struggles of the working class.

Blaming specific groups or ideologies does not address the systemic issues that have evolved over time.

7. Need for Reform:

The prevailing mixed system, which includes elements of both capitalism and socialism, does not represent true capitalist principles as defined by Mises.

A return to foundational capitalist principles is suggested as a means to foster economic growth, individual liberty, and prosperity.

The ongoing discourse about capitalism and socialism requires clarity and specificity in definitions. Mises's classifications provide a framework that allows for a more informed debate about economic systems and their respective outcomes. Effective discussions should focus on understanding and resolving economic challenges, rather than reverting to broad and often misleading generalizations. The goal should be to articulate a vision that embraces individual autonomy and economic vitality, recognizing the historical lessons learned from both systems.

https://mises.org/mises-wire/what-do-capitalism-and-socialism-really-mean

Trump v. California: Election Order Survives the Lawfare

 The Supreme Court recently ruled in favor of the Trump administration’s election-integrity efforts, allowing the continued implementation of an executive order aimed at ensuring the security of elections. This decision stands as a significant victory for Trump amid ongoing legal challenges from Democratic states, particularly California.

The Supreme Court issued a 6-3 decision to stay a lower-court injunction that blocked Trump's election-integrity order, signaling a potential boost for the administration ahead of the midterm elections.

The lawsuit brought forth by California and other Democratic attorneys general was not about constitutional overreach, but rather a response to the president guiding federal agencies to ensure election integrity.

Trump's Executive Order 14399 directs agencies such as Homeland Security and Justice to compile lists of confirmed citizens and enhance scrutiny of mail-in voting processes.

The Democratic Party's legal strategies are viewed as attempts to protect existing, less stringent voting processes, which some consider vulnerable to fraud.

Evidence has surfaced showing irregularities in voter rolls, with hundreds of thousands of deceased individuals and non-citizens listed as voters across 25 states.

This ongoing debate touches on broader international practices, where many countries mandate voter identification to prevent election fraud.

Critics argue that the Democratic resistance to stricter voting measures suggests they may benefit from the current system, which lacks stringent controls.

The Supreme Court's ruling allows the Trump administration to continue its efforts to clean voter rolls and re-establish confidence in the electoral process.

The Supreme Court's stay of the injunction marks a noteworthy moment in the ongoing debate about election integrity in the U.S. The ruling enables the Trump administration to push forward with measures aimed at cleaning voter rolls and ensuring only eligible citizens participate in elections. This decision may have lasting implications for the future of voting practices in the country, continuing the conversation over the balance between accessibility and security in elections.

https://spectator.org/trump-v-california-election-order-survives-the-lawfare/

Let's stop letting in ungrateful immigrants

Victor Davis Hanson discusses the challenges associated with recent immigration trends in the United States, emphasizing the importance of legal immigration that fosters assimilation and economic independence. He expresses concern over the increase of immigrants who may not share traditional American values and who potentially view their new home with ungratefulness.

1. Support for Legal Immigration:

Americans generally support legal immigration when it involves diversity, skills, and the potential for assimilation.

There is concern that the current system allows too many immigrants, both legal and illegal, leading to over 53 million people not born in the U.S.

2. Historical Perspective:

The early 20th-century immigration wave brought many people who did not integrate well, creating a backlash against immigration.

Currently, a similar effect is seen due to high immigration rates and the nature of some new immigrants.

3. Changing Nature of Immigrants:

The new wave consists of people from "failed states," often influenced by detrimental ideologies like socialism and communism.

These immigrants are sometimes wealthy and often bring ideas that conflict with American traditions and values.

4. Concern Over Radical Ideas:

Some newly arrived immigrants and their descendants are pushing for significant changes to the American political system, such as abolishing the Senate or implementing reparations.

This contrasts sharply with the traditional immigrant ethos that aimed to embrace and adapt to American values.

5. The “Victim” Narrative:

Many of these immigrants adopt a victim mentality, asserting that the American system oppresses them despite their new opportunities.

There is a suggestion that they receive preferential treatment, reinforcing their grievances and loyalty to their ethnic identities over their American identity.

6. Imposition of Foreign Ideals:

Instead of assimilating, some immigrants want to import foreign socialist ideals into the U.S. system, challenging the foundations of American society.

This has the effect of alienating the native-supporting population and challenges the concept of what it means to be an American.

Hanson raises alarms about the risks posed by certain immigrant groups who, rather than integrating and contributing positively, seem to challenge the American way of life. His argument underscores a shifting narrative in which recent immigrants may not be embracing the prosperity and freedom America offers, potentially sowing divisions rather than fostering unity. The future of U.S. immigration policy may hinge on addressing these complex dynamics. 

https://www.wnd.com/2026/08/lets-stop-letting-ungrateful-immigrants/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=lets-stop-letting-ungrateful-immigrants

Chinese Fake Accounts Push Anti-Data Center Drive

Recent reports indicate that a significant network of fake social media accounts based in China is promoting anti-data center messages, raising concerns among U.S. lawmakers about foreign influence on American opinions and public discourse related to energy policy and artificial intelligence (AI).

Fake Accounts Identified: The social media platform X (formerly Twitter) has reported the existence of a "bot farm" consisting of about 200,000 fake accounts. These accounts are involved in spreading false narratives about the impact of AI data centers on electricity prices and public welfare.

Political Concerns: Members of Congress, including Representative Jared Moskowitz, have expressed alarm about these operations, suggesting they are psychological tactics used by China to create division among Americans. Senator Ted Cruz supported this viewpoint.

Influence on Public Debate: Reports suggest that the issue of data centers has become a pivotal topic in the 2026 midterm elections, with media coverage often framing the concerns as genuine grassroots movements rather than influenced by external forces.

Reactions from Business Leaders: Prominent figures in the business sector, such as Joe Lonsdale from Palantir and Shaun Maguire from Sequoia, noted that foreign operations aim to destabilize U.S. industrial growth in the AI sector, with Lyman stressing that the anti-data center movement is fundamentally against manufacturing in the U.S.

China's Goals: Analysts argue that China is leveraging these fake accounts to stoke fears around data centers, as America is seeking to expand its production capabilities in AI technology, which China perceives as a threat to its ambitions.

No Connection to Actual Content Creators: The publisher of the Southern Maryland Chronicle clarified that they neither authorized nor were aware of the promotion of their articles by the identified fake accounts, emphasizing they do not control how their content is shared.

Media Coverage of the Issue: While some news outlets have reported on the influence of Chinese propaganda, there are claims that mainstream media may be underplaying the extent of foreign influence in this domestic debate.

The discovery of a large network of Chinese fake accounts manipulating U.S. discussions about data centers highlights a concerning trend of foreign interference in domestic policy matters. It raises important questions about the authenticity of grassroots movements and the need for vigilance against foreign psychological operations aimed at provoking division within the U.S. 

https://freebeacon.com/china/chinese-fake-accounts-push-anti-data-center-drive/

CIA obtained germs used by Fauci’s institute, which provided cover for its involvement in biodefense

 Reports reveal that the CIA collaborated with the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), formerly directed by Anthony Fauci, to advance biodefense research. This partnership reportedly allowed the CIA to access sensitive germ research under the guise of civilian efforts.

The CIA used funds to leverage existing civilian research to benefit both the CIA and NIAID.

An undated agreement indicated the establishment of the CIA’s Biological Technology Center, focused on bioterrorism research.

The collaboration involved studying "forensic microbiology" related to bioterrorism agents for intelligence purposes.

Research was classified as sensitive but not officially classified, with the CIA controlling access to information.

The CIA aimed to enhance its existing capabilities in detecting and identifying viruses, thereby offering support to NIAID in obtaining necessary germs.

The Biological Technology Center also partnered with the Intelligence Technology Innovation Center and a private nonprofit located near NIH headquarters.

This partnership illustrates a blending of government intelligence and civilian research efforts, aimed at improving national security against biochemical threats. The details of this collaboration reflect ongoing efforts to enhance biodefense mechanisms through strategic governmental partnerships.

https://justthenews.com/government/security/cia-obtained-germs-used-faucis-institute-which-provided-cover-its-involvement?utm_source=justthenews.com&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=external-news-aggregators

US Military Announces Major Development In Strait Of Hormuz: ‘Got The Job Done’

The U.S. military has announced a significant achievement in the Strait of Hormuz, where American forces have successfully removed Iranian sea mines from key shipping lanes, enhancing safety for commercial vessels in this crucial oil passage.

Milestone Achieved: Adm. Brad Cooper from U.S. Central Command reported that American forces cleared sea mines placed by Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps months earlier. This development aims to restore safe navigation through the strait, vital for global oil transportation.

Impact on Shipping and Energy: The Strait of Hormuz is a critical route for oil and gas shipments. The removal of mines could lead to increased shipping traffic and stabilization of fuel prices, which had risen due to previous restrictions.

Context of Military Action: This naval operation coincides with the Trump administration's broader campaign against Iran, which includes economic sanctions aimed at isolating Tehran. Clearing the mines represents both a military victory and a strategic move amid rising oil prices affecting American consumers.

Future Considerations: While the mines' removal is a significant step, it does not guarantee an immediate restoration of normal shipping volumes through the strait.

The clearing of Iranian sea mines in the Strait of Hormuz marks a crucial development for international shipping and energy markets, potentially easing concerns over fuel prices and commercial traffic in the region, while supporting U.S. efforts to economically isolate Iran. 

https://trendingpoliticsnews.com/just-in-us-military-announces-major-development-in-strait-of-hormuz-got-the-job-done-trin/

Education Department Finally Confronts Sex-abuse Epidemic in Government Schools

The U.S. Department of Education, under Secretary Linda McMahon, is acknowledging long-standing issues of sexual abuse in government schools, marking a shift towards active prevention and accountability. This comes after decades of secrecy, union protectionism, and indifference towards the victims.

1. Acknowledgment of the Problem: Secretary McMahon's statements during a CNN interview reveal a serious commitment to addressing the "epidemic" of sexual abuse in schools. The Department recognizes that past efforts to ignore or cover up these abuses must end.

2. Statistics and Findings: The Shakeshaft Report, dating back to 2004, indicated that about 10% of students reported sexual misconduct by educators. More recent research suggests that the figure may now be closer to 17%, signifying a worsening situation over the years. Approximately 8 million students may have been affected.

3. Systemic Issues: The report highlights systemic flaws that allow abuse to go unchecked. Investigative expert John Manly has identified a culture within schools that often protects offenders and facilitates the continuation of abusive practices.

4. Federal Action and Accountability: McMahon has vowed to enforce federal laws against schools that tolerate misconduct, threatening to withhold federal funds if necessary. This is a critical step toward holding schools accountable for the safety of their students.

5. Criticism of the Education System: The article criticizes the long-standing practices within the education system that have perpetuated this culture of abuse, describing it not only as an issue of training but of a broader moral failing within a system that has often disregarded students' welfare.

6. Concealment and Protection: Problems persist with administrators and unions often prioritizing the careers of teachers over the safety of children. Many accused individuals remain in the classroom, often due to lax reporting laws and ineffective accountability mechanisms.

7. Call to Action for Parents: Parents are encouraged to take proactive measures to ensure their children’s safety rather than relying exclusively on government institutions that have historically failed them. The narrative stresses the importance of parental involvement in protecting children from potential abuses.

The recognition by the U.S. Department of Education of sexual abuse in schools is a crucial step toward addressing a chronic issue that has long been overlooked. While Secretary McMahon's promise to enforce change is welcomed, the underlying systemic failures that allowed such abuse to continue need a comprehensive overhaul. Parents are urged to remain vigilant and not solely depend on educational institutions to safeguard their children. Ultimately, true safety for students demands a transformation in the approach to safeguarding education against misconduct and abuse. 

https://thenewamerican.com/us/education/education-department-finally-confronts-sex-abuse-epidemic-in-government-schools/

US Military Uses Laser At Border To Shoot Down Drug Cartel Drones

The U.S. military recently employed advanced laser technology to disable drones operated by drug cartels near the border. This operation highlights the military's commitment to improving border security and responding to threats.

The Joint Task Force-Border Security (JTF-SB) announced that laser technology was used to take down three drones identified as threats.

These drones were deemed dangerous for military personnel and Customs and Border Protection (CBP) partners.

Major General Curtis Taylor emphasized the successful operation as evidence of the task force’s readiness and technological superiority.

The military employed the Army Multipurpose High Energy Laser (AMP-HEL) system to defeat the hostile unmanned aircraft.

Cartel organizations are increasingly using drones for illegal activities, including human smuggling and surveillance of law enforcement.

The JTF-SB has implemented additional security measures, including physical barriers along the southern border and extensive surveillance operations with the help of the Mexican military.

The task force was established by President Donald Trump on January 22, 2025, to support Homeland Security's goal of achieving complete control over the southern border.

General Taylor reaffirmed that the military remains committed to collaborating with CBP to secure the border and confront criminal organizations.

The use of laser technology by the U.S. military to combat cartel drones marks a significant step in border security. By integrating advanced systems and reinforcing border defenses, the JTF-SB aims to enhance safety for both military personnel and law enforcement agencies working to deter criminal activities. 

https://dailycaller.com/2026/08/28/us-military-laser-border-shoot-down-drug-cartel-drones-joint-task-force-border-security/

Federal Judge: Child Sex Abuse Images Are OK As Long As They’re Made With AI

A federal judge has made a ruling regarding images of child sexual abuse material (CSAM) produced by artificial intelligence. The decision has raised concerns about the intersection of technology and the law.

Ruling Details: Seventh Circuit Appeals Judge John Z. Lee determined that the possession of AI-generated CSAM is protected by the First Amendment if it does not involve real children.

Case Background: The ruling arose from charges against Steven Anderegg, who was found in possession of over 13,000 photorealistic AI-generated images depicting child abuse.

Precedent Consideration: Judge Lee referenced previous Supreme Court cases like Stanley v. Georgia (1969) and Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition (2002) that allowed for the possession of virtual child pornography, suggesting the legal precedent needs reevaluation due to advancements in AI.

Concerns Raised: The judge expressed concerns that AI technology creates images indistinguishable from actual child abuse, complicating legal interpretations of obscenity and protection of virtual materials.

Legal Insights: Lee highlighted that while the government has significant power to regulate obscenity, possession in private homes remains protected under the First Amendment.

Future Implications: The ruling indicates a need for the Supreme Court to reassess its stance on CSAM, especially considering that advance AI technology may challenge current regulations.

The ruling underscores the complexities of constitutional protections surrounding obscenity in the context of rapidly evolving technology, prompting potential future legal reassessments regarding the production and possession of AI-generated CSAM. 

https://thefederalist.com/2026/08/28/federal-judge-child-sex-abuse-images-are-ok-as-long-as-theyre-made-with-ai/

Pennsylvania Officials ‘Fabricated’ Measles Deaths

Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has raised concerns following Pennsylvania's announcement of two deaths associated with measles, which he claims were fabricated. The announcement has led to confusion regarding the circumstances of the deaths and the state's public health communications.

1. Announcement of Deaths: Pennsylvania health officials stated they recorded two "measles-associated" deaths, marking the first such fatalities in 35 years. However, local coroner's office records do not support this claim.

2. Coroner's Statement: Lancaster County Coroner Steve Diamantoni confirmed his office has no record of any measles-related deaths, including an infant whose death was attributed to a ruptured spleen rather than measles.

3. Measles-Associated Defined: The Pennsylvania Department of Health used the term "measles-associated" for individuals who tested positive for measles but may not have died from the disease directly. This has resulted in further ambiguity regarding the actual causes of death.

4. Defense from Officials: Pennsylvania Health Secretary Dr. Debra Bogen defended the state’s classification of deaths, asserting that investigations confirmed two recent measles-associated deaths. She stated that this information was shared with the CDC.

5. Further Investigation Needed: The lack of specific details surrounding the second case has garnered criticism from local officials demanding transparency. Republican Commissioner Josh Parsons emphasized the need for clarity regarding the deaths to maintain public trust.

6. Vaccination Advocacy: Following the announcement, Pennsylvania officials recommended the MMR (measles, mumps, rubella) vaccine, stressing that such illnesses and deaths are preventable with vaccination.

7. Prior Controversy: There have been previous debates regarding measles deaths in the state, where Kennedy argued that other health issues contributed to fatalities attributed to measles.

The controversy surrounding the reported measles-associated deaths in Pennsylvania highlights significant discrepancies between state health officials and local coroner assessments. Kennedy's demands for further transparency reflect a broader concern regarding the accuracy of public health information and the importance of vaccination. The situation remains fluid as additional information is sought regarding both deaths. 

https://slaynews.com/rfk-jr-pennsylvania-officials-fabricated-measles-deaths/

Trump DOJ Announces First Arrest in Major Election Fraud Crackdown

The Trump administration has made its first arrest in a new initiative to address election fraud. A Honduran national has been charged with illegally registering to vote and falsely claiming U.S. citizenship. This arrest is part of broader efforts to ensure the integrity of the electoral process.

First Arrest: Darwin Jonathan Rivera-Flores, a 30-year-old Honduran national, was arrested for fraudulently registering to vote in California by claiming he was a U.S. citizen.

Charges: Rivera-Flores faces two felony counts but has not cast a vote in any election, according to the Justice Department.

Background: He had entered the U.S. during President George W. Bush’s administration and secured lawful permanent resident status, but he is not a U.S. citizen. If convicted, he could be deported.

Past Incidents: Rivera-Flores previously faced charges for disrupting immigration law enforcement and sent disrespectful text messages to a Homeland Security Investigations agent.

Government Response: First Assistant U.S. Attorney Bill Essayli emphasized that this arrest is just the start of a larger crackdown on non-citizen voter registration in California. He also reiterated the request for California to audit its voter rolls to boost electoral confidence.

White House Comments: A White House spokeswoman stated that non-citizen voter registration is a serious issue and those found violating voting laws will be prosecuted.

Future Enforcement: Essayli stated the Justice Department will continue to push for compliance from California regarding audits, warning non-citizens about the consequences of illegally voting.

The arrest of Rivera-Flores marks a significant step in the Trump administration's efforts to combat election fraud, particularly in California. As more actions are anticipated, there will also be a push for new voter identification measures in the upcoming elections. 

https://slaynews.com/trump-doj-announces-first-arrest-election-fraud-crackdown/