Inside the Plan to Build ‘Trans Schools’ and Spread Their Lessons Nationwide

A New York education group, Trans Formative Schools, is planning to establish a trans middle school and aims to expand its educational approach to other parts of the country. The group recently received funding from a philanthropic initiative associated with MacKenzie Scott, the ex-wife of Jeff Bezos.

Goals and Vision: The organization aspires to support the creation of trans schools nationwide, training trans teachers and providing resources for their efforts. They plan to integrate traditional academics with sex education and activism.

Current Program: Trans Formative Schools runs an afterschool program for students aged 9 to 15, focusing on "Activism/Transing School." This program serves as a stepping stone toward establishing the proposed middle school.

Curricular Approach: The envisioned curriculum includes teaching "transformational resistance" to combat racism, ableism, and transphobia. It intends to challenge traditional gender norms and support gender-expansive understanding.

Outreach Strategy: The organization aims to distribute educational materials for free online and conduct workshops to train teachers in various educational areas, including gender identity.

Leadership Experience: The group’s leaders have extensive backgrounds in established schools and teacher training programs, enhancing their capability to implement their vision.

Trans Formative Schools plans to foster an educational revolution by launching a trans middle school and disseminating their curriculum and training nationwide. Their mission aims to reshape education by promoting understanding and activism surrounding gender and identity issues. 

https://nataliegwinters.substack.com/p/revealed-inside-the-plan-to-build?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=3382126&post_id=216464424&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=6dl2nb&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email

The ABCs of Kratom A mysterious substance many Americans are hearing about for the first time

Kratom is a substance many Americans are recently becoming aware of, especially following the tragic deaths of two college students. The substance has both stimulating and sedative properties, depending on the dose. This summary will outline what kratom is, its regulation, and the recent incidents associated with it.

Recent Deaths: Two University of Mississippi students, Aidan Hamilton and Robert Strang, were found dead on September 21, 2023. Both deaths are linked to products described as kratom-like. They were reportedly purchased from local stores shortly before the students' deaths.

Circumstances of Investigation: Although products were found with the students, authorities have yet to confirm a direct connection between the deaths and kratom. Two employees from a store where kratom was sold have been arrested, but officials state their arrests may not be related to the student deaths.

What is Kratom?: Kratom is derived from the leaves of the Mitragyna speciosa tree found in Southeast Asia. It can act as a stimulant at lower doses and mimic opioids at higher doses due to its main alkaloids—mitragynine and 7-hydroxymitragynine (7-OH).

Use and Regulation: Kratom is sold in various forms (powder, capsules, gummies) in convenience stores and online. While natural kratom is legal in most states, some have outright bans or regulations on its sale. The FDA does not approve kratom for any medical uses and warns of its potential dangers, including seizures and dependence.

Kratom Products: There is a distinction between natural kratom and its synthetic versions, which can be much more potent and have been implicated in dangerous side effects. The products linked to the recent deaths are allegedly synthetic variants like “Pseudo-DHM,” which have higher potency and can have opioid-like effects.

Legal Landscape: The legality of kratom is complex and varies by state. While most states allow natural kratom, around 10 outright ban it, and some cities have local regulations. Synthetic forms such as MGM-15 are being targeted for stricter control by federal agencies.

Cultural Context: Historically, kratom has been used for both energy and pain relief in Southeast Asia. Its popularity surged in the U.S. in recent years, leading to widespread use, with an estimated 1.7 million Americans having used kratom in 2021.

Kratom is a substance with varying legal status and significant health risks, especially in its synthetic forms. The recent deaths of two college students have highlighted the potential dangers of kratom, prompting investigations and discussions about its regulation. As authorities continue to look into these cases and the nature of kratom, understanding its properties and differences between its natural and synthetic forms becomes crucial for public safety. 

https://sharylattkisson.substack.com/p/the-abcs-of-kratom?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=2579146&post_id=218110602&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=6dl2nb&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email

Replace the Tax Code, Don’t Repair It

John H. Cochrane argues in his recent commentary that the current U.S. tax system is too complicated and ineffective. He believes instead of trying to fix it through small adjustments, a complete replacement is necessary to achieve a simpler and fairer tax structure.

1. Complexity of Current Tax Code: Cochrane expresses that the current tax code is riddled with deductions, exclusions, and credits that lead to high marginal tax rates and economic distortions. This complexity encourages tax avoidance and makes it difficult for individuals and businesses to make sound economic choices.

2. Proposal for a Consumption Tax: He proposes replacing the existing income tax with a broad consumption tax applied uniformly, such as a value-added tax or national sales tax. This would simplify the tax system and require everyone, including nonprofits and other tax-exempt entities, to pay the same tax rates.

3. Hidden Subsidies and Deductions: Cochrane points out that many provisions in the tax code act as hidden subsidies, benefiting specific industries and wealthy individuals. For instance, tax deductions for healthcare, home mortgages, and charitable donations are disproportionately beneficial to high-income earners, suggesting a regressive aspect of these deductions.

4. Ineffectiveness of Incremental Reforms: He criticizes the idea of reforming taxes incrementally, arguing that special interests will always lobby to maintain their benefits. Instead, a clean break from the current system is necessary to eliminate all deductions and special deals at once.

5. Transparency in Government Spending: Cochrane advocates that instead of hiding subsidies in the tax code, they should be clearly stated as government spending. This would increase transparency and allow voters to evaluate subsidizing decisions more directly.

6. Relief from High Investment Taxes: He notes that the current taxation on savings and investments is counterproductive and leads to excessive complexity with numerous tax shelters and exemptions. Reducing such taxation will encourage more productive economic activities.

Cochrane emphasizes that to achieve genuine tax reform, the United States must overhaul the tax code entirely, moving towards a consumption-based model. This approach would not only simplify the tax system but also make fiscal subsidies clear and visible, leading to greater accountability and a potential boost in economic growth. He encourages readers to consider these bold changes to enhance the efficiency and fairness of the tax system. 

https://www.thefreedomfrequency.org/p/replace-the-tax-code-dont-repair

The Contempt Case that Won’t Die

The legal issues related to Judge Jeb Boasberg's pursuit of contempt charges against the Trump administration. The situation involves immigration policy and criminal activities linked to a gang called Tren de Aragua.

1. Background on the Case: Five Venezuelan migrants, associated with the Tren de Aragua gang, were arrested for an armed robbery in Indiana. They were protected from immediate deportation due to a legal ruling regarding President Trump's Alien Enemies Act (AEA) proclamation aimed at deporting illegals tied to the gang.

2. Judicial Actions: After Trump signed the AEA to expedite the deportation of such individuals, Judge Boasberg issued a restraining order blocking this action. The case has been in the courts for 18 months, with the Supreme Court previously ruling the AEA did not guarantee due process rights for those affected.

3. Contempt Proceedings: Boasberg initiated contempt proceedings against the Trump administration, claiming officials did not comply with his orders concerning the removal of gang members. His insistence has faced pushback, including two appellate court rulings dismissing his contempt findings due to overstepping judicial boundaries.

4. Current Status: The full D.C. appellate court is set to hear the contempt case again. Legal experts have criticized Boasberg for pursuing a quasi-judicial inquiry that interferes with executive powers.

The contempt case initiated by Judge Boasberg remains unresolved, highlighting tensions between the Judicial and Executive branches. The ongoing legal battle raises concerns about judicial overreach and the impact on immigration enforcement policies. Further updates will follow after the hearing. 

https://www.declassified.live/p/the-contempt-case-that-wont-die

Sanctuary Democrats are putting Americans last

A recent report by the House Judiciary Committee reveals troubling trends in how certain jurisdictions handle law enforcement regarding immigrants. The report, focusing on Arlington County, Virginia, suggests a two-tiered justice system where immigrants may receive lighter punishments than U.S. citizens.

Two-Tiered Justice System: The House Judiciary Committee conducted a study that indicates some jurisdictions allow individuals to escape equal punishment for crimes based on immigration status.

Arlington County Findings: The county's policy instructs police to not cooperate with federal immigration authorities, leading to the release of 42 convicted criminals rather than turning them over to Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).

Discriminatory Practices: Parisa Dehghani-Tafti, the Arlington Commonwealth’s Attorney, admitted that her office considers defendants' immigration statuses, resulting in lighter sentences for immigrants to avoid deportation consequences. For example, a citizen convicted of driving under the influence (DUI) may face significant penalties, while a DACA recipient might only receive a minor ticket.

Fairfax County Similarities: A similar approach is noted in Fairfax County, where the Commonwealth’s Attorney has indicated a tendency to lessen charges against immigrants to evade immigration repercussions.

Nationwide Trends: While a comprehensive database of such policies is lacking, research shows that many jurisdictions with large immigrant populations have lenient prosecutorial practices.

The report raises serious concerns about equality before the law under the Fourteenth Amendment, as it suggests that American citizens are disproportionately punished compared to immigrants in some areas. It calls for an investigation into such discriminatory practices to ensure fair treatment and protection of American citizens. 

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/editorials/4745391/sanctuary-democrats-putting-americans-last/

Foreign influence, ideological networks, and institutional capture.

The article "Fifth Columns in America, Part One" by Stu Cvrk explores the concept of "fifth column"—originally meaning secret supporters of an enemy inside a nation. It discusses modern interpretations of the term, which reflect domestic networks opposing the U.S. constitutional order. Cvrk identifies several groups that could fit this broader definition and analyzes their potential risks to American democracy.

1. Definition of Fifth Column:

Traditionally, a "fifth column" refers to a group engaging in espionage or sabotage for enemy interests within a nation.

This article adopts a broader meaning, focusing on domestic networks aligned with foreign adversaries.

2. Types of Claims:

Subversive Claims: Target vulnerable minorities or immigrants.

Collusive Claims: Accuse elites of aligning with foreign powers.

3. Identified Clusters:

The article analyzes five groups that may exhibit fifth-column behaviors based on varying levels of evidence:

Proto-fifth columns:

Associations linked to the Muslim Brotherhood and CAIR.

Leftist organizations connected with the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), including Antifa and other groups.

Advocacy for open borders and illegal immigration.

Parallel authority from transnational cartels in U.S. border regions.

4. Evidentiary Tiers:

The claims made in this analysis are categorized into three tiers:

Documented: Claims confirmed by official records or testimony.

Credible/Contested: Claims reported but debated or unresolved.

Speculative/Analogical: Inferences drawn without established facts.

5. Historical Background:

The term "fifth column" has roots in the Spanish Civil War, where it described covert sympathizers waiting to support an invasion from within the city.

The article emphasizes that modern uses of the term often reflect anxiety and can sometimes exaggerate actual threats.

6. Detailed Examination of Categories:

Category 1: Foreign influence operations show concrete evidence of foreign states coordinating activities against the U.S. which match the original definition.

Category 2: Commentary linking immigration and NGO activities to domestic subversion lacks proof of coordination but reflects a modern analytical perspective.

Category 3: Islamist networks associated with the Muslim Brotherhood are documented as trying to exert influence in the U.S., raising concerns about long-term strategies for organizational capture.

This article emphasizes the complexity of identifying fifth-column activities within the U.S. It suggests that various groups exhibit behaviors that could threaten American foundational principles, even without direct foreign command. The exploration will continue in Part II, which will address additional categories of concern and offer recommendations for future monitoring. 

https://amgreatness.com/2026/09/30/fifth-columns-in-america-part-one/

Review Flags More Than 1,200 Potential Duplicate Voter Registrations in North Carolina

On September 30, 2026, a conservative group, the Public Interest Legal Foundation, reported over 1,200 potentially duplicate voter registrations in North Carolina. This finding has raised concerns ahead of the upcoming November election.

The foundation analyzed voter rolls in the state's ten most populous counties, flagging registrations that share the same birth year and address.

Research director Logan Churchwell noted that these duplicates may arise from name variations, typographical errors, or marital name changes.

Half of the flagged records were in Guilford and Cumberland counties.

The foundation has requested that the North Carolina State Board of Elections investigate these records and implement a pollbook verification process to confirm voter identities at polling places.

They have asked for a response by October 13, warning of a potential complaint under the Help America Vote Act if issues remain unaddressed.

The foundation acknowledged that North Carolina officials have made improvements in maintaining voter roll accuracy since a previous letter was sent last year.

The concerns regarding duplicate registrations highlight ongoing election integrity efforts in North Carolina, with hopes for further improvements to ensure fair voting practices. 

https://amgreatness.com/2026/09/30/review-flags-more-than-1200-potential-duplicate-voter-registrations-in-north-carolina/

The Mesabi Steel Plant: Trump’s Tariffs in Action

A new steel mill project in Iowa, the Mesabi Metallics, signals a positive development for the manufacturing sector in America’s heartland. This project is linked to President Trump’s tariff policies and aims to boost the local economy significantly.

Project Overview: Mesabi Metallics plans to build a $15-billion steel mill by 2030 along the Mississippi River. It will be the largest steel mill in the U.S., expected to contribute about 10% of the country’s steel production shortly after opening.

Job Creation: The construction phase is anticipated to create up to 6,000 temporary jobs, while the operational phase will provide around 1,750 permanent jobs. Additionally, there will be a rise in job opportunities at the company’s iron mines in Minnesota.

Broader Economic Impact: The project will stimulate various sectors beyond steel manufacturing:

Demand for building materials and transportation services will increase, benefiting manufacturers and workers involved in logistics.

Local businesses, including restaurants, hotels, and retail shops, will likely see increased customer traffic and revenue as the mill generates economic activity.

Community Benefits: The mill will contribute taxes and support surrounding businesses, reinforcing the local economy. It is portrayed not just as a steel initiative but as a catalyst for community growth.

Tariff Context: This development exemplifies the broader impact of Trump’s tariff policy, which aims to revive American manufacturing quickly, contrasting with more gradual approaches.

The establishment of the Mesabi steel mill is more than just a project for steel production; it represents a significant opportunity for economic growth and revitalization in rural America, driven by protective trade policies. Its successful implementation could serve as a model for future economic initiatives across the country. 

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2026/09/the-mesabi-steel-plant-trump-s-tariffs-in-action/

Obama wants the filibuster gone and speech ruled: ‘What’s going to change isn’t the change you want’

Former President Barack Obama has called for the elimination of the Senate filibuster and emphasizes the need for a new way for Americans to engage in discussions. He discussed these views during a recent event at Salem State University.

1. Elimination of the Filibuster: Obama argues that the filibuster, which is not part of the Constitution and was adopted accidentally, prevents the federal government from functioning effectively. He argues it creates obstacles for elected officials trying to implement their plans.

2. Historical Context: He alludes to the misuse of the filibuster by Southern Democrats, who employed it to block civil rights legislation, and notes that recent Senate practices now require a supermajority for passing legislation.

3. Public Cynicism: Obama expresses concern that a continuous inability to pass legislation can lead to public disillusionment, making citizens feel unheard.

4. Common Dialogue: He advocates for creating spaces, or “new town squares,” for meaningful dialogue among people with differing perspectives, particularly in a world where technology influences communication.

5. Concerns Regarding Freedom of Speech: Commentators, including BlazeTV staff, have expressed worry that such changes could threaten freedom of speech, particularly if the Democrats come to power and implement these ideas.

Obama's proposals ignite discussions about governmental reform and the importance of open dialogue, while conflicting opinions raise concerns over potential impacts on free expression and political engagement. 

https://www.theblaze.com/shows/pat-gray-unleashed/obama-wants-the-filibuster-gone-and-speech-ruled-whats-going-to-change-isnt-the-change-you-want

Sen. Ron Johnson Holds a First-Of-Its Kind Exposure of What Happened in Hospitals During COVID-19

 On Monday, Sen. Ron Johnson (R-WI) hosted a roundtable discussion focused on the failures of hospitals during the COVID-19 pandemic. The event featured patients, families, and medical professionals sharing testimonies about their experiences.

1. Testimonies of Failure:

Johnson reported collecting 583 testimonies from 46 states, with a few shared at the event.

Numerous panelists described mistreatment and negligence in hospitals, including administering unauthorized treatments and a lack of care based on vaccination status.

2. Common Issues Highlighted:

A recurring theme was the forced administration of the drug Remdesivir, referred to by nurses as “Run, Death is Near.”

Hospitals often refused to provide alternative treatments requested by patients, like Ivermectin and monoclonal antibodies.

Many patients were placed on ventilators even when improving, which led to faster deaths.

3. Personal Testimonies:

Peggy Hokett detailed her husband’s hospital experience, stating he was treated as a lost cause due to being unvaccinated, leading to his death after 24 days of care without consent for critical interventions.

Dr. James Miller, a former trauma surgeon, described misconduct he witnessed, including misleading information about treatments and exploiting mortality statistics for COVID-19.

4. Comments on Treatment Protocols:

Several doctors, including Dr. Susan Rohr, criticized rigid hospital protocols that they believed harmed patients, advocating for more flexibility to treat individuals based on their needs.

Testimonies revealed that many patients were deprived of comfort from family during their final moments, exacerbating the pain of loss.

Sen. Johnson’s roundtable was the first formal Senate discussion addressing the serious issues in hospital care during the COVID-19 pandemic. He emphasized the importance of sharing these testimonies to ensure accountability for health systems and to prevent a repetition of such failures in the future. There is a commitment to continue advocating for truth and justice for the victims of these protocols.

https://redstate.com/jenniferoo/2026/09/29/sen-ron-johnson-holds-a-first-of-its-kind-exposure-of-what-happened-in-hospitals-during-covid-19-n2207541

Nearly One-Third of College Students Say Violence Is ‘Acceptable’ to Silence Political Opponents

A recent survey conducted by the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE) highlights concerning attitudes among American college students regarding the use of violence to silence political opponents. The study surveyed 63,000 students across 262 colleges, revealing significant support for violent and disruptive tactics against opposing views.

1. Acceptance of Violence:

About 30% of college students believe that violence is acceptable in some cases to prevent opposing political views from being expressed. This is a slight decline from 34% the previous year.

3% of students said violence is "always acceptable," while 12% felt it is "sometimes acceptable." Another 15% marked it as "rarely acceptable," indicating some support for political violence.

2. Disruption of Speakers:

A larger percentage, 69%, of students consider it acceptable to disrupt a speaker without resorting to violence. Of these, 5% believe shouting down speakers is "always acceptable," and 30% said it is "sometimes acceptable."

3. Difficulty in Political Discussions:

Students reported challenges in having open discussions about political topics, notably President Donald Trump and the Israel-Hamas conflict. Opinions were evenly split on whether such discussions were difficult.

4. Campus Climate:

The survey indicates a campus environment where many students feel justified in silencing speakers they oppose. This is particularly notable in light of the recent assassination of Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk, raising concerns about escalating political hostility.

5. Views on Controversial Speakers:

A majority of respondents expressed that universities should not allow speakers who advocate for positions such as making abortion illegal. Among "very liberal" students, 72% opposed allowing such speakers.

Despite a slight decrease in outright support for political violence among college students, a significant portion still believes that silencing opposing views, whether through disruption or violence, can be justified. The findings reflect a troubling trend in attitudes toward free expression in American higher education. 

https://slaynews.com/nearly-one-third-college-students-violence-acceptable-silence-political-opponents/

Jack Smith Spying On Trump Donors Is Latest Dem Ploy To Chill Americans’ Political Speech

A recent incident involving a $10 political donation made by an Iowan to President Trump has raised significant concerns about privacy and freedom of expression. Following this donation, personal information was allegedly obtained by Special Counsel Jack Smith and shared with the Biden administration's FBI and DOJ.

Senator Chuck Grassley reported that Jack Smith's team acquired personal information from nearly 5,000 Americans who made small donations to Trump from 2019 to 2023. This included bank details and home addresses.

Grassley criticized this situation as indicative of excessive government overreach by Democrats.

The incident mirrors previous targeting of conservative groups, such as the IRS scandal during the Obama administration, where conservative organizations faced scrutiny for their political affiliations.

New Jersey's government has also faced criticism for attempting to compel donor disclosures from a pro-life nonprofit without evidence of wrongdoing.

Arizona has legislation, Proposition 211, requiring nonprofits to disclose large donations, which critics argue could lead to harassment of donors.

Legal representatives emphasize the importance of protecting citizens' rights to donate to causes freely without fear of retaliation or exposure.

The fear of being doxxed or targeted for political donations is creating a chilling effect on political participation. Citizens should be able to support their chosen causes without the risk of harassment or government scrutiny. 

https://thefederalist.com/2026/09/29/jack-smith-spying-on-trump-donors-is-latest-dem-ploy-to-chill-americans-political-speech/

Jack Smith Seized Nearly 5,000 Checks Written By Trump Donors

 Recent disclosures reveal that Special Counsel Jack Smith seized nearly 5,000 personal checks from individuals who donated to President Donald Trump. This information came to light during a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing led by Chair Chuck Grassley.

Smith's team acquired 4,782 checks from Trump donors between September 2019 and August 2023.

The checks were obtained through subpoenas and included sensitive information such as donors' bank account details, signatures, and home addresses.

The subpoenas targeted individuals across all 50 states, Washington, D.C., and Puerto Rico.

Donations collected varied in size, with some checks as small as $5 and others up to $1,000.

Grassley criticized Smith's actions as unjustified, arguing that the checks were not relevant to his investigation. He emphasized that the Justice Department and FBI now have personal information on thousands of donors.

Additionally, Smith's team allegedly gathered communications from The Federalist, a media outlet, as part of this investigation.

Sean Davis, co-founder of The Federalist, expressed concern over which journalists were targeted and emphasized that the outlet has a history of exposing what they term "Deep State corruption."

The Federalist's Editor-in-Chief, Mollie Hemingway, confirmed that her communications were also seized and denounced this as misconduct.

The actions taken by Special Counsel Jack Smith to obtain personal information from Trump donors and communications from media outlets have raised concerns over privacy and the limits of investigations. The Federalist is exploring legal options in response to these actions.

https://thefederalist.com/2026/09/29/jack-smith-seized-nearly-5000-checks-written-by-trump-donors/

Dems Will Officially Celebrate Islamic Holiday That Includes Ritual Animal Slaughter

California has officially recognized Eid al-Fitr and Eid al-Adha as state holidays, becoming the second state in the U.S. to do so.

Governor Gavin Newsom signed Assembly Bill 2017, which was authored by Assemblyman Matt Haney and co-authored by Senator Aisha Wahab.

The bill allows state and school employees to use personal leave to observe the holidays.

K-12 schools and community colleges can close for the holidays if agreed upon locally.

The measure aims to support California's large Muslim community, ensuring students and workers can celebrate without conflict.

The bill faced opposition regarding a provision for optional educational curriculum about the holidays, leading to concerns about promotion versus education.

The recognition of these Islamic holidays alongside Diwali and Lunar New Year signifies an inclusive approach to acknowledging diverse religious observances in California. 

https://www.dailywire.com/news/dems-will-officially-celebrate-islamic-holiday-that-includes-ritual-animal-slaughter

Majority Rejects EU’s Direction As Germany’s Economic Engine Sputters

A recent poll revealed that nearly 70% of people in six European countries view the European Union negatively, highlighting widespread dissatisfaction. This sentiment is particularly strong in Germany, France, and Italy, the EU’s largest economies.

Public Sentiment: A survey conducted by the European Council on Foreign Relations and the European Cultural Foundation showed that many believe the EU is in decline. Respondents pointed to issues such as the war in Ukraine, fears of a broader conflict with Russia, and economic downturns.

Leadership Trust Issues: Almost half of those surveyed couldn't identify a political leader they trust for EU progress, reflecting a significant lack of confidence in current governance.

Economic Anxiety: Concerns over the economy are rising, with many fearing a loss of prosperity. The previous trade deal with the Trump administration, criticized for favoring the U.S., sparked feelings of shame among some Europeans.

Germany’s Economic Decline: Germany, the EU’s largest economy, is experiencing significant challenges like high energy costs and a declining car production industry, leading to a political shift. The right-wing AfD party has gained support, winning 43.8% in a recent election—historically marking a significant change in German politics.

Potential EU Exit: The AfD has suggested leaving the EU if it gains more power, indicating a potential crisis for the EU’s stability, especially with Germany's pivotal role.

The EU faces mounting challenges as public dissatisfaction grows, particularly in its key member states. The economic pressures and political shifts could have lasting implications for the union's future stability and cohesion. 

https://thenewamerican.com/world-news/europe/majority-rejects-eus-direction-as-germanys-economic-engine-sputters/

Republicans Do the Work, Democrats Take the Credit

The significant improvements made to the Virginia Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) under former Governor Glenn Youngkin, highlighting issues of media bias in how these achievements are reported.

DMV Reforms: Under Glenn Youngkin, DMV wait times in Virginia decreased drastically from 37 minutes to 5.9 minutes, despite the same volume of customers. This achievement is not widely recognized in local media.

Media Coverage: A report by Virginia Mercury failed to mention Youngkin's role in the reforms, instead focusing on a two-year period excluding his administration. It also neglected to mention that Governor Abigail Spanberger fired the commissioner responsible for the improvements.

Criticism of Media: The article criticizes the media for allegedly being biased towards Democrats, suggesting they ignore Republican successes and attribute achievements to Democrats. It argues that media misrepresentation can manipulate public perception.

Democratic Strategy: It suggests that Democrats exploit this media bias to take credit for reforms and improvements made by Republicans, which could impact voter opinions favorably towards Democrats.

Broader Implications: Similar patterns are observed in other states, where Democrats deflect blame for their policy failures onto Republicans, emphasizing a troubling trend of accountability avoidance.

The article emphasizes the importance of scrutinizing media reports and recognizing the contributions of political figures like Glenn Youngkin, particularly concerning the positive changes within public services like the DMV. It warns readers about the potential impact of media narratives on political perceptions and voter behavior. 

https://townhall.com/news/amy-curtis/2026/09/29/vip-dems-take-credit-for-youngkin-dmv-reforms-n2683805

SCOTUS Issues 6-3 Ruling In Closely-Watched Case

 The U.S. Supreme Court has made a key ruling regarding the Trump Administration's policy on deporting certain immigrants to third countries. This decision affects how immigration officials can send individuals with final deportation orders.

The Court granted an emergency request that pauses lower-court orders limiting deportations to countries where individuals have no prior connections.

The policy allows detention and sending of illegal aliens to nations that agree to accept them, mainly when their home country refuses to take them back.

The ruling was made while the justices prepare for arguments in December and will eventually issue a final decision.

Justices Sotomayor, Kagan, and Jackson opposed the request, feeling it infringed on due process rights.

The initial ruling by a Massachusetts judge and the First Circuit Court required notices and the opportunity to contest deportations, now paused during the appeal.

The policy has resulted in over 25,000 removals, primarily to Mexico, since it began in 2025.

This ruling reflects ongoing debates over immigration policy and the balance between enforcement and individual rights in the U.S. legal system.

https://trendingpoliticsnews.com/just-in-scotus-issues-6-3-ruling-in-closely-watched-case-cmc/

Florida designates CAIR, Muslim Brotherhood as domestic terrorist groups

On September 29, 2026, Florida's Republican Governor Ron DeSantis and his administration designated several groups, including the Muslim Brotherhood and the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), as domestic terrorist organizations. This move follows previous actions by Texas and Florida that labeled these groups as foreign terrorist organizations.

The designation was accompanied by a 427-page document that asserts that CAIR is involved in terrorist activities and has ties to Hamas and the Palestinian Islamic Jihad.

Along with CAIR and the Muslim Brotherhood, Florida now labels al-Qaeda, the Houthis, and the Continuity Irish Republican Army as foreign terrorist organizations.

The state also recently classified the Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua, two Mexican drug cartels, and Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps as foreign terrorist organizations.

CAIR has responded by suing Florida, arguing that the designation violates the First Amendment and the due process clause of the 14th Amendment. Hina Shamsi, director of the ACLU's national security project, criticized the lack of evidence for CAIR's involvement in any violent acts.

The ACLU is representing CAIR in this lawsuit, with plans to file a motion seeking a preliminary injunction to block the designation.

The designations are set to take effect on November 5 unless they are blocked by a court.

Florida's designation of these groups as domestic terrorists has sparked significant legal challenges and public debate over civil rights and national security. The outcome of CAIR's lawsuit could impact how such designations are implemented in the future. 

https://justthenews.com/nation/states/florida-designates-cair-muslim-brotherhood-domestic-terrorist-groups?utm_source=justthenews.com&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=external-news-aggregators

Rockefeller Brothers Fund Sent Nearly $32 Million to China-Based Nonprofits, Watchdog Finds

A recent report from Americans for Public Trust reveals that the Rockefeller Brothers Fund, a prominent U.S.-based charity, has been channeling significant funds to nonprofits in China, which are criticized for supporting the Chinese Communist Party's foreign agenda. The report outlines the transformation of the Rockefeller legacy from philanthropy to what it describes as extreme activism.

1. Financial Contributions to China:

The Rockefeller Brothers Fund reportedly sent nearly $32 million to various China-based nonprofits, many linked to the Chinese government.

These grants support initiatives that align with the Chinese Communist Party's goals, including the Belt and Road Initiative.

2. Specific Grants Highlighted:

Notable grants mentioned include:

$400,000 to the Foreign Environment Cooperation Center, a segment of China's Ministry of Ecology and Environment.

Nearly $1.5 million to the China Council for International Cooperation on Environment and Development.

$200,000 to Tsinghua University, which has integrated with the Chinese Communist Party.

3. Concerns About Nonprofit Sector in China:

The report emphasizes that the Chinese nonprofit sector is heavily controlled by the government, hindering independent research or advocacy.

4. Shift in Rockefeller Charitable Focus:

The document asserts that the Rockefeller charities, which traditionally referred to philanthropy, have redirected their efforts towards leftist causes, including climate change activism and partnerships with entities in communist China.

Caitlin Sutherland, executive director of Americans for Public Trust, states that the Rockefeller name, once synonymous with charity, is now tainted by its affiliations with the far left.

5. Additional Findings:

The report outlines various concerning activities by the Rockefeller network, such as:

Continued investments in fossil fuels, despite claims of divestment.

Accusations of supporting anti-Israel causes and funding lawsuits against the fossil fuel industry.

An increasing dependency on donations from liberal philanthropists and foreign sources.

High executive compensation within the Rockefeller Foundation, inviting scrutiny.

The report from Americans for Public Trust raises alarms about the Rockefeller Brothers Fund's extensive financial investments in China and its involvement in promoting what the report calls "dangerous policies." Critics argue that this marks a dramatic shift from traditional philanthropic values to more politically charged activism, necessitating a reevaluation of the foundation's impact both domestically and globally. 

https://freebeacon.com/china/rockefeller-brothers-fund-sent-nearly-32-million-to-china-based-nonprofits-watchdog-finds/

Another fraud industry uncovered in Minnesota, losses reach tens of millions of dollars

Minnesota has uncovered another significant fraud problem involving state handouts linked to the aftermath of George Floyd's death. An audit revealed that the lack of oversight in spending has likely resulted in tens of millions of dollars in losses to taxpayers. This follows a previous scandal involving Somali childcare fraud that cost the state billions.

1. Background of Fraud Discovery:

Following George Floyd's death in police custody in 2020, Minneapolis distributed funds to various community groups as alternatives to law enforcement, resulting in a new fraud report.

The Neighborhood Safety Contract Management Audit Report revealed that over 100 contracts lacked proper oversight and management.

2. Financial Implications:

The report criticized the city for ineffective control over contracts, leading to potential losses of tens of millions of dollars.

Five significant violence-prevention programs received more than $36 million, raising concerns about the effectiveness and accountability of the groups receiving these funds.

3. Lack of Oversight:

Auditors found that many contractors submitted invoices with little supporting documentation, yet the city continued payments despite having unresolved issues.

There was no standardized process established to ensure services were actually performed as contracted.

4. Government Response:

Outgoing Governor Tim Walz expressed concerns regarding this fraud issue tarnishing his legacy but acknowledged some level of accountability.

Reports indicate he committed substantial funds to initiatives that lack proof of effectiveness in reducing violence.

5. Previous Childcare Fraud Scandal:

Minnesota has been facing significant issues regarding a Somali childcare fraud operation that reportedly cost taxpayers up to $9 billion.

Investigators revealed that businesses fabricated claims for child nutrition reimbursement without any actual services provided.

6. Statements from Officials:

A city official defended current spending practices as a source of pride but recognized the need for improved processes due to recent audits.

Critics, including Bill Glahn from the Center of the American Experiment, suggested that the city is focused on quickly disbursing funds rather than ensuring their proper use and effectiveness.

The reported fraud scandals in Minnesota highlight significant challenges in government oversight of taxpayer funds, particularly following events that create urgent calls for action. With substantial financial losses and the need for accountability in community programs, it is evident that both fraud detection and prevention measures need to be strengthened to protect citizens' interests. 

https://www.wnd.com/2026/09/another-fraud-industry-uncovered-minnesota-losses-reach-tens/

The Network Evening News Mostly OMITS Explosive Jack Smith Hearing

On September 29, 2026, the Senate Judiciary Committee held a hearing regarding Special Counsel Jack Smith, who has faced allegations of abusing his power. Coverage of this event by major news networks was minimal, raising concerns about bias in media reporting.

The Senate Judiciary Committee detailed serious allegations against Jack Smith, particularly concerning his collection of communications from various media organizations.

Despite the significance of the hearing, major networks like ABC, CBS, and NBC largely ignored the story, with ABC providing only a brief mention during their news segment.

Smith defended his prosecution of former President Trump, stating he would proceed with the same decision regardless of the president's party affiliation.

Republican committee members accused Smith of misusing his authorities.

Other than a short segment by ABC, the evening news primarily covered different, less newsworthy topics, such as celebrity trials and weather updates.

Comparatively, previous incidents involving Trump attracted extensive coverage, which highlights the perceived bias in how stories are reported based on their implications for Trump.

The lack of comprehensive media coverage on the Jack Smith hearing suggests a double standard in reporting, with significant allegations regarding media rights and abuse of power being overshadowed by less critical news events. 

https://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/jorge-bonilla/2026/09/29/network-evening-news-mostly-omits-explosive-jack-smith-hearing

Europe races to contain energy crisis with patchwork measures

European governments are urgently trying to address a significant energy crisis caused by rising fuel prices due to various geopolitical tensions, particularly the closure of the Strait of Hormuz and the ongoing war in Ukraine. With Brent crude prices remaining high, many countries are implementing different measures to provide relief.

1. High Fuel Prices and Diesel Shortages:

Brent crude oil prices have been near $100 a barrel, leading to skyrocketing diesel prices across Europe.

Diesel shortages are particularly severe in countries like Hungary, where existing stocks are depleting rapidly, putting pressure on consumers and businesses dependent on diesel fuel.

2. Government Responses:

Countries are employing a mix of strategies, such as capping retail prices, lowering excise taxes, and offering targeted aid to specific sectors like agriculture and transportation.

Some countries, like Luxembourg and Belgium, are implementing temporary price caps, while others like Germany and Spain offer subsidies or tax credits.

3. Regional Variations:

Different European nations are using varying approaches to manage the crisis, resulting in significant differences in fuel prices at the pump. For instance:

Austria has reduced its mineral-oil tax, while Croatia has cut diesel excise duty significantly.

Portugal is redirecting additional tax revenue from fuel back into relief measures.

4. Economic Implications:

The European Central Bank has noted that rising oil prices have a direct impact on retail fuel prices and warned of broader inflation effects if fuel costs remain elevated.

Over 100 countries have implemented energy-cost measures in response to the crisis, reflecting a global concern about rising energy prices and availability.

5. Long-Term Outlook:

Analysts from JPMorgan have expressed uncertainty about how and when the current disruptions will resolve, raising concerns that the current high prices could persist without a diplomatic resolution in conflict areas.

The ongoing energy crisis in Europe is prompting a diverse set of policy measures aimed at alleviating the burden on households and businesses. However, the effectiveness of these actions is uncertain due to the volatile nature of global oil markets and geopolitical tensions. As countries navigate this complex situation, the reliance on various strategies highlights the need for a coordinated approach to energy security and stability in the region. 

https://rmx.news/article/europe-races-to-contain-energy-crisis-with-patchwork-measures/

Fauci's agency backed an experiment aerosolizing lethal Ebola — then he panicked about what it exposed about vaccination

The National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), headed by Anthony Fauci, supported risky experiments involving aerosolized Ebola that raised significant safety concerns. Internal communications reveal Fauci's fears regarding these experiments and their implications for vaccinations, alongside criticisms of their execution by U.S. military researchers.

Experiment Overview: NIAID funded an experiment that aerosolized the Ebola virus, exposing nonhuman primates to it to assess a corresponding vaccine's efficacy.

Fauci's Reaction: In journal entries from 2016, Fauci expressed alarm at the damage caused to vaccinated primates, noting that despite being vaccinated, they showed more severe lung inflammation compared to unvaccinated ones. His concerns leaned more towards how the results could reflect poorly on vaccination strategies rather than the ethics or safety of the experiment itself.

Military Research Involvement: The U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases (USAMRIID) performed the overall experiment under NIAID's guidance, using techniques that pushed the virus into the lungs in unnatural ways.

Internal Critique: Fauci described the study as poorly designed and expressed frustration about the lack of confidentiality concerning its findings, suggesting that the information needed to be classified to prevent public alarm.

Conclusion About Vaccination: Fauci noted that the results implied a potential hazard associated with vaccination against Ebola, which could lead to public distrust and concern over vaccine trials planned for West Africa.

Senate Inquiry: Senator Rand Paul revealed internal documents indicating that this experiment was part of a larger pattern of questionable research funded by taxpayer dollars at NIAID, necessitating increased oversight.

Expert Commentary: Dr. Richard Ebright criticized the justifications for such experiments, labeling them redundant and cost-inefficient. He emphasized that Fauci's main worry was not public safety but rather the implications of the study's findings on policymaking and public opinion.

Fauci's support for the aerosolized Ebola experiments highlights serious ethical and safety concerns regarding funding and conducting high-risk biological research. The internal communications reveal apprehension about the implications of such research on public health and vaccination efforts, compelling the need for greater accountability in the oversight of government-funded scientific studies. 

https://www.theblaze.com/news/niaid-backed-an-experiment-aersolizing-lethal-ebola-then-fauci-panicked-about-what-it-exposed-about-vaccination

Iran publishes propaganda letter urging US voters to punish Trump in midterm elections

Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) issued a 25-page letter to Americans urging opposition to President Donald Trump in the upcoming midterm elections. The letter expresses criticism of Trump’s administration, particularly regarding its stance on Iran and foreign policy.

The IRGC blames Trump and his support for Israel for the current state of war, encouraging voters to reject him and his policies on November 3.

Spokesman Hossein Mohebbi criticizes Trump as a “liar” driven by greed, asserting that this endangers U.S. national security.

The letter claims Trump misrepresents Iran's nuclear program and insists that the IRGC has not harmed civilians.

The IRGC asserts that the war and related economic issues are damaging the U.S. economy, despite Trump’s claims of economic prosperity.

It suggests that the U.S. economy is near collapse due to high fuel prices from the conflict, which, according to the IRGC, results from Trump’s policies.

Mohebbi disputes U.S. claims about Iran’s control over the Strait of Hormuz, asserting that oil exports have not returned to prewar levels.

Through this letter, the IRGC seeks to sway American voters against Trump by highlighting negative impacts of his leadership, while also defending Iran’s actions and economic situation amidst ongoing conflict. 

https://nypost.com/2026/09/29/world-news/iran-publishes-propaganda-letter-urging-us-voters-to-punish-trump-in-midterm-elections/

Former Immigration Judges Train Lawyers to Help Clients With Criminal Records Avoid Deportation

 Former immigration judges are now training lawyers to help clients with criminal records avoid deportation. This training focuses on proper documentation and legal strategies that link criminal and immigration cases.

The training program, hosted by the National Association of Women Judges, teaches lawyers about plea language, sentencing records, and how to prevent clients' offenses from being classified as serious crimes.

Instructors include former immigration judges Mimi Tsankov, Maria Lurye, and Raisa Cohen, who previously worked for Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).

Their curriculum emphasizes the importance of managing criminal case records to protect clients from deportation, especially under the expedited immigration enforcement of the Trump administration.

Specific topics covered include documentation of ICE incidents and how to navigate encounters with federal authorities using the Fifth Amendment.

Legal precedents like Padilla v. Kentucky indicate that the handling of criminal cases can affect a client's deportation status.

After leaving their government roles, these former judges have established firms that offer consulting to defense lawyers, leveraging their experience to assist legal strategies against deportation.

Tsankov, Lurye, and Cohen provide various services, such as case strategy and document review, and highlight how their background can be an asset for attracting clients.

The transition of former immigration judges to legal consultants for deportation defense highlights the evolving landscape of immigration law, where past officials use their insights to advocate for clients at risk of removal from the U.S. 

https://nataliegwinters.substack.com/p/revealed-former-immigration-judges?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=3382126&post_id=216382348&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=6dl2nb&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email

Reality Slaps College Graduates In The Face

 The job market is showing strong opportunities for young individuals without college degrees, but college graduates are struggling to find work. Recent analyses reveal a significant mismatch between the education system and the needs of the job market, raising concerns about the effectiveness of modern college education.

1. Job Market Trends:

Unemployment rates for individuals aged 22-34 without college degrees are at a record low.

In contrast, college graduates face increasing difficulty in securing jobs.

2. AI and Job Market Dynamics:

Companies are utilizing AI to replace entry-level white-collar positions, impacting the job prospects of new graduates.

There is a surplus of college graduates entering the market at the same time there are shortages in skilled labor due to retirements.

3. Long-Standing Issues in Education:

The disconnect between college education and real-world job readiness has been a problem for many years.

An example is cited where a professor won an award for arguing that white paint is racist, highlighting how academic priorities have shifted away from practical skills.

4. Perceptions of College Graduates:

Employers are finding that many graduates lack essential workplace skills while being adept at activism and social media engagement.

There's evidence showing that students who spend more time in college are increasingly likely to adopt socialist views.

5. Market Distortions from Federal Aid:

The college market is heavily influenced by public aid, with over $155 billion in federal funding issued last year.

This aid has led to rising tuition costs that outpace inflation and encourages colleges to admit students regardless of preparedness.

6. Debt and Career Prospects:

Many students graduate with significant debt for degrees that may not lead to viable job opportunities.

The job market correction is seen as overdue, reflecting the unsustainable nature of current educational subsidies.

The current challenges facing college graduates in the job market highlight a critical need for reevaluation of higher education practices and funding. The mismatch between the skills taught at colleges and those demanded by employers raises questions about the future role of college degrees in career success. Until the issues surrounding federal aid and the structure of college education are addressed, graduates may continue to struggle in their job searches, facing a reality of diminished prospects and accumulating debt.

https://issuesinsights.com/2026/09/29/reality-slaps-college-graduates-in-the-face/

Why Observational Studies Lie to You

 Recent medical news headlines often suggest that simple solutions, like pills or screenings, can significantly decrease health risks. However, these claims can be misleading due to a phenomenon known as “Healthy User Bias.” This concept helps explain why some studies may report more favorable outcomes for certain treatments.

1. Healthy User Bias Defined: In observational studies, individuals who voluntarily use preventive drugs or supplements often have healthier lifestyles compared to those who don’t. These “healthy users” typically engage in positive health behaviors, like exercising, eating well, and regularly seeing doctors.

2. Influence of Lifestyle on Results: A 2006 analysis showed that people who consistently took their prescribed medications, even placebos, had a 44% lower mortality rate. This correlation reflects their overall healthy behaviors rather than the effectiveness of the medications themselves.

3. Impact of Hormone Replacement Therapy (HRT): For many years, observational studies claimed that HRT significantly reduced heart attack risks in menopausal women. However, these studies failed to account for Healthy User Bias, as those who used HRT were generally healthier and had better access to care. The Women’s Health Initiative randomized trial later revealed that HRT could actually increase risks for severe health issues.

4. Current Misunderstandings About Statins: Observational studies today continue to tout benefits of statins for healthy individuals. However, rigorous randomized controlled trials have shown no substantial health benefits for those without a history of heart disease.

5. Need for Randomized Trials: Observational research can be misleading due to selection biases like Healthy User Bias. Real evidence of a drug’s effectiveness comes from randomized, placebo-controlled trials that fairly compare treatment groups.

When considering drug therapies, it is crucial to remain skeptical of observational studies. Always look for evidence from well-conducted randomized trials to determine if a treatment is effective or simply benefiting from the healthy lifestyles of the patients involved. Until then, maintain a healthy lifestyle through diet and exercise. 

https://brownstone.org/articles/why-observational-studies-lie-to-you/

Failing upward: School officials who ran the bad NYC public school Nikole Hannah-Jones described get promoted

 Monica Showalter discusses the issue of promotion within the New York City public school system, particularly focusing on the alarming trend of ineffective school officials, like Kamar Samuels and Stephanie Carroll, being rewarded with promotions despite their poor performance.

1. Nikole Hannah-Jones' Experience: Nikole Hannah-Jones shared her experiences with NYC's public schools in a New York Times essay, highlighting her daughter's poor educational experience due to unqualified teachers and chaotic conditions.

2. Systematic Failures: The article suggests that educators in the NYC public school system often fail to meet basic responsibilities, such as showing up or teaching, yet still receive promotions. This reflects a culture of "failing upward" within the school administration.

3. Incompetent Leadership: Kamar Samuels, the District 13 superintendent who oversaw declining schools, was promoted to Chancellor of New York City's public schools. Carroll, once the principal at PS 307 where Hannah-Jones's daughter attended, is now the chief of literacy despite her record of ineffectiveness.

4. Lack of Accountability: The piece criticizes the lack of accountability within the system. Teachers and administrators avoid repercussions for their actions, instead acting according to political interests, which ultimately negatively affects students.

5. Response to Concerns: Hannah-Jones attempted to address poor conditions at her daughter's school but faced delays and insufficient responses from the school administration, indicating a disregard for parental concerns and student welfare.

6. Promotion over Performance: Instead of being held accountable for their failures, leaders like Samuels and Carroll are suggested to be more focused on maintaining political connections than on improving student outcomes, reinforcing a problematic hierarchy in educational management.

The article highlights the troubling dynamics within the New York City public school system, where ineffective leadership is often rewarded with promotions, perpetuating a cycle of educational failure. The situation emphasizes the need for accountability and genuine improvement in school management practices for the benefit of students. 

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2026/09/failing-upward-school-officials-who-ran-the-bad-nyc-public-school-nikole-hannah-jones-described-get-promoted/

DOJ urges SCOTUS to reinstate ban on transgender ‘medical care’ for prisoners

 The Trump administration is appealing to the U.S. Supreme Court concerning a district court's decision that halted updated policies by the Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) for prisoners with gender dysphoria.

The Department of Justice (DOJ) filed a request for SCOTUS to block the district court's ruling, arguing it did not properly assess BOP's reasoning.

A district judge had issued a preliminary injunction stating that the new policies could be unlawful and cause irreparable harm.

An executive order by President Trump led BOP to revise its policy, concluding that surgeries and hormone treatments for gender dysphoria are unjustifiable.

The BOP's decision was influenced by concerns about the reliability of guidance from the World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH) and potential security issues.

While surgeries and hormone treatments are no longer provided, mental health care for gender dysphoria will continue.

The case is ongoing, with the Trump administration seeking higher court intervention to implement its revised policies on gender dysphoria in prisons. 

https://www.oann.com/newsroom/doj-urges-scotus-to-reinstate-ban-on-transgender-medical-care-for-prisoners/

Five British Nationals Released on Bail After Alleged Terror Plot Near U.S.-Used Air Base

 Five British nationals have been released on bail after their arrest related to an alleged terrorist plot near the RAF Fairford military base, which is used by U.S. forces.

The suspects, all in their 20s and living in London, were arrested on suspicion of terrorism and explosives offenses.

British counterterrorism officials are continuing their investigation to determine if a foreign state was involved.

The men were released after extensive police interviews, but they must adhere to strict conditions regarding their movements and contacts.

The initial alert came when a local farmer reported seeing three suspicious vans and masked individuals near the base.

There is limited information about the suspects, prompting calls for transparency from British lawmakers.

Local accounts indicate the suspects had been under surveillance, which President Trump commented on.

Iran has denied any involvement, while authorities stress that the investigation is ongoing, and being released on bail does not signify innocence.

The investigation surrounding the alleged plot is still active, with authorities seeking more clarity on possible foreign connections and the details leading to the arrests.

https://amgreatness.com/2026/09/29/five-british-nationals-released-on-bail-after-alleged-terror-plot-near-u-s-used-air-base/

Morning Greatness: Trump Announces $15 Billion Iowa Steel Project

 On September 29, 2026, President Trump announced a significant plan to build a $15 billion steel mill in Iowa, which aims to revitalize domestic production and create jobs. This project aligns with his policy of protecting American industries.

Steel Mill Announcement: President Trump revealed that a Minnesota company, Mesabi Metallics, will construct the steel mill, projected to be the largest in the U.S., with the capacity to produce 10 million tons of steel annually.

Job Creation: The steel plant is expected to generate approximately 1,750 permanent jobs and thousands more during the construction phase.

Reasoning Behind the Project: The initiative is said to be a direct response to U.S. tariffs that raised costs for foreign-made steel, reiterating Trump’s commitment to protect American manufacturing, particularly in light of past reliance on foreign products highlighted by the COVID-19 pandemic.

Concerns about AI Coverage: The article criticizes media narratives around artificial intelligence, suggesting that they are exaggerated and serve corporate interests rather than provide educational content.

Vetting of Afghan Migrants: A troubling statistic revealed that 40% of asylum applications from Afghan migrants brought to the U.S. after the Biden administration's withdrawal had vetting errors, raising security concerns about these individuals.

President Trump's announcement of the steel project signals a strategic move to bolster American manufacturing and job creation in Iowa. However, the article also touches on broader issues, including media coverage of AI and serious concerns related to the vetting of Afghan migrants, reflecting ongoing challenges faced by the U.S. government. 

https://amgreatness.com/2026/09/29/morning-greatness-trump-announces-15-billion-iowa-steel-project/

California Supreme Court Tells Sheriff Bianco To Give The Ballots Back

 On September 24, 2026, the California Supreme Court made significant rulings regarding the handling of ballots in an election case involving Sheriff Chad Bianco and the custody of voted ballots from the November 2025 special election. The rulings clarified the law around election materials and the authority of state officials over local law enforcement.

1. Unlawful Seizure of Ballots: The court ruled that Sheriff Bianco’s seizure of the ballots was unlawful under the Elections Code. The ruling emphasized that voted ballots must remain with the elections official, Registrar Art Tinoco, overriding Bianco's search warrants.

2. Authority of the Attorney General: In a related case, the court stated that the Attorney General has the power to give binding directions to local law enforcement on investigations, halting Bianco's efforts while the Attorney General conducts a review.

3. Election Integrity Risks: The court expressed concerns that unrestricted handling of ballots by law enforcement could threaten election integrity. The voting materials must stay with the officials responsible for counting the ballots.

4. Recent Legislation: Just before the court's decision, Governor Newsom signed Senate Bill 1418, expanding protections around election records and enhancing restrictions on law enforcement access to these materials.

5. Media Coverage and Interpretation: The media portrayed the court's decision as a victory for voters, focusing on the ruling's implications for law enforcement oversight without addressing that it did not resolve the underlying controversies of the ballots’ legitimacy.

6. National Implications: The ruling aligns with similar disputes seen in other states, suggesting a broader strategy concerning the control of election-related investigations, potentially revealing coordinated actions by state officials to manage inquiries into election integrity.

The California Supreme Court's rulings on the custody of ballots reinforce the control of election materials by election officials, establishing a legal precedent regarding the limits of law enforcement authority in election matters. This decision reflects larger trends in how election-related investigations are managed nationwide, revealing patterns of intensified scrutiny of local authorities by state-level officials to maintain election integrity. 

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2026/09/california-supreme-court-tells-sheriff-bianco-to-give-the-ballots-back/

Fox News Under Fire for Hiring Cuomo Aide Who Admitted to COVID Nursing Home Cover-Up

 Fox News has recently announced the hiring of Melissa DeRosa, the former aide to ex-New York Governor Andrew Cuomo, as a contributor. This decision has sparked controversy due to her past involvement in significant political issues.

Role and Programming: DeRosa will contribute to various Fox News programs and join the new podcast, "The Girls," launching on October 1, alongside other notable hosts.

Political Background: The network describes her as a "veteran democratic strategist," but her history includes significant roles during the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly related to nursing home death reporting scandals.

Controversies: DeRosa was involved in discussions regarding the lack of transparency about nursing home deaths, which were allegedly underreported by up to 50%, as revealed by a 2021 investigation.

Criticism: She has faced backlash for her past actions, including allegedly undermining women who accused Cuomo of harassment. Former Fox personality Janice Dean criticized her hiring publicly.

Current Views: DeRosa has also become critical of the left-wing of the Democratic Party, expressing her disdain for socialist candidates.

The hiring of Melissa DeRosa by Fox News marks a significant development amid ongoing discussions about her controversial past and evolving political views. Fox aims to present her as a fresh voice in their new programming lineup.

https://redstate.com/kyle-becker/2026/09/28/fox-news-under-fire-for-hiring-cuomo-aide-who-admitted-to-covid-nursing-home-cover-up-n2207497 

This may be the DARKEST secret coming out of China

 In an interview with Glenn Beck, Jan Jekielek, author of "Killed to Order," reveals troubling insights about China's organ transplant system. Unlike ethical practices in other countries, China's approach involves orchestrating the deaths of individuals to provide organs quickly.

In most countries, organ transplants depend on tragic events, making the process rare and reliant on chance.

Jekielek highlights a case where a patient received an organ in just two weeks, suggesting the deaths of donors are planned.

China utilizes a history of dehumanization campaigns against certain groups to justify this practice.

The regime creates class enemies through propaganda, convincing citizens that these groups are dangerous, which strikes fear and hatred against them.

The government gathers data on these targeted individuals to match organ types and fulfill transplant requests rapidly for wealthy clients, resulting in a profit-driven system.

The interview sheds light on a grim aspect of organ donation in China, contrasting sharply with ethical standards in other parts of the world. This alarming situation raises moral questions about human rights and medical ethics in the context of organ transplants.

https://www.theblaze.com/shows/the-glenn-beck-program/this-may-be-the-darkest-secret-coming-out-of-china

Apple Watch’s New Feature Records and Stores Your Everyday Conversations

 Apple has introduced new features for the Apple Watch designed to record and store everyday conversations. These features raise significant privacy concerns about how technology intrudes into personal lives. The new features, Live Rewind and Siri Recap, will be available later this year in beta for the Apple Watch Series 12 and Ultra 4.

1. Features Overview:

Live Rewind: Allows users to view the last 15 seconds of conversation text on their watch by double-pressing the Digital Crown.

Siri Recap: Summarizes conversations for later review, enabling users to remember details without writing notes.

2. Opt-In and Privacy Considerations:

Users can choose to enable these features, but people they converse with do not have the option to opt out.

Apple claims these tools are created with privacy in mind, as raw audio is not permanently stored after processing occurs locally on the watch.

3. Functionality Details:

Live Rewind processes audio locally, producing a transcript that disappears 30 seconds after display without saving.

Siri Recap transcribes and summarizes conversations, with summaries deleted after seven days unless saved or exported by the user.

4. Technical Safeguards:

Apple uses encryption for the summaries and emphasizes that it does not have access to the cloud-stored information.

Notifications indicate when Live Rewind is in use to enhance user awareness.

5. Privacy Tension:

While the wearer consents to the recording, others involved in the conversation may be unaware and have not agreed to their words being recorded or summarized.

This reflects a growing trend in technology where AI is embedded into daily life, potentially making private conversations more vulnerable to recording without consent.

The Apple Watch's new recording features, while innovative, highlight the ongoing debate about privacy in the age of technology. With devices capable of automatically documenting conversations, there is a significant shift in how personal interactions can be recorded and stored. The implications for privacy are profound, complicating the distinction between personal choice and consent from all parties involved in a conversation.

https://slaynews.com/apple-watch-new-feature-records-stores-your-everyday-conversations/

Justice Alito Recuses Himself from Major Climate Lawsuit Against Oil Companies

 Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has decided to recuse himself from a significant climate change case involving two oil companies and local governments in Colorado. This decision was announced just a week before the court was set to hear arguments.

Case Background: The case, Suncor Energy Inc. v. County Commissioners of Boulder County, deals with a lawsuit from Boulder County and other local governments against Suncor Energy and ExxonMobil. These governments aim to seek damages for alleged contributions to climate change.

Alito's Withdrawal: Alito will not participate in the hearings scheduled for October 5. He had previously faced scrutiny over his involvement due to potential financial interests in oil and gas companies, prompting calls for a Senate investigation.

Previous Participation: Alito had previously stayed out of an earlier decision related to the same case but participated when the court agreed to hear the appeal. The court stated he had no financial interest necessitating recusal at that time.

Code of Conduct: Supreme Court guidelines suggest that a justice should recuse themselves when a reasonable person might question their impartiality, particularly concerning financial interests.

Justice Alito's unexpected withdrawal from the climate change case raises questions about potential conflicts of interest and the reasons behind his decision, which have not been explicitly stated by the court.

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2026/09/28/justice-alito-recuses-himself-major-climate-lawsuit-oil-companies/

Senate Passes College Sports Bill As It Punts On Tackling AI, National Debt And Flock Before Midterms

 On September 28, 2026, the U.S. Senate passed a significant bill known as the Protect College Sports Act of 2026, aimed at regulating college athletes' ability to profit from their name, image, and likeness (NIL). While this legislation marks progress for college athletes, other important matters like the national debt, AI regulations, and surveillance issues remain unaddressed as the midterm elections approach.

1. Legislation Overview:

The Protect College Sports Act establishes requirements for NIL agreements for college athletes.

It prohibits colleges and conferences from restricting athletes from entering NIL agreements.

The law mandates out-of-pocket medical coverage for athletes injured in Division I sports.

It grants the NCAA and member schools limited immunity from federal antitrust laws to enforce rules on transfers and caps on athlete compensation.

2. Financial and Regulatory Implications:

Athletes must disclose any NIL compensation exceeding $600.

Institutions may not provide compensation in ways that bypass revenue-sharing limits.

Colleges with over $80 million in annual revenue cannot cut support for certain sports teams for nine years.

3. Lobbying and Support:

Over $31 million was spent on lobbying for the college athletics bill.

Major universities like Notre Dame and Ohio State participated heavily in the lobbying efforts.

Republican Senator Ted Cruz and Democratic Senator Maria Cantwell played key roles in advancing the bill.

4. Political Context:

The bill passed 74-24, overcoming a filibuster and indicating bipartisan support.

Cruz is optimistic about passing the bill before the midterms to showcase it as a Republican achievement.

Critics, including labor groups and some Democratic senators, argue the bill negatively affects athlete rights and gives undue power to the NCAA and universities.

5. Opposition Concerns:

Labor organizations called the bill a "union-busting" measure that limits athlete compensation without proper representation.

Critics argue the bill protects an exploitative system and lacks necessary changes to empower athletes.

Proposed amendments that would allow athletes to organize and unionize were not accepted.

6. Unresolved Issues:

As the Senate prepared to leave for midterm campaigning, they made no progress on crucial topics such as:

National debt, which stands at $40 trillion.

AI development regulations, with concerns about its potential dangers.

Rising gas prices and the effect of the Iran war on household expenses.

Surveillance issues related to automated cameras like Flock Safety.

The passage of the Protect College Sports Act of 2026 is a notable step in empowering college athletes, but it has simultaneously highlighted several unresolved national challenges. As the country heads into the midterm elections, the lack of action on pressing issues like AI safety, national debt, and surveillance raises concerns among voters and experts alike. Lawmakers may focus more on campaigning rather than addressing these critical matters. 

https://dailycaller.com/2026/09/28/protect-college-sports-act-passes-senate-national-debt-rising-costs/

Feds Charge Two With Illegally Voting Months After 6600 Noncitizens Found On NJ Voter Rolls

 Two noncitizens from New Jersey, Patrick Terrence Reid and Danubis Bernat, have been charged with illegally voting in federal elections and making false statements while applying for U.S. citizenship.

Reid, a Jamaican national, and Bernat, a Venezuelan national, both allegedly registered to vote while falsely claiming to be U.S. citizens.

Reid is accused of voting in the 2012, 2016, and 2020 elections, while Bernat allegedly voted in person in the 2024 election.

Both claimed on their citizenship applications they had never registered to vote.

A recent report indicated approximately 6,600 noncitizens were erroneously registered to vote due to a software error in the Department of Motor Vehicles.

New Jersey Governor Mikie Sherrill mentioned that the state is working to remove noncitizens from voter rolls but has not provided comprehensive voter record information.

Republicans have proposed the SAVE America Act to amend voting registration laws, requiring proof of citizenship to prevent noncitizen voting.

The situation highlights ongoing concerns regarding noncitizen voting and calls for legislative changes to enhance election integrity in New Jersey and nationwide. 

https://thefederalist.com/2026/09/28/feds-charge-two-with-illegally-voting-months-after-6600-noncitizens-found-on-nj-voter-rolls/

Biden-Appointed Canadian-born Judge Blocks Trump Administration From Tying FEMA Anti-Terrorism Grants to Election Security Requirements

 A federal judge has ruled against the Trump administration's plan to link counterterrorism funding to election security measures. This decision allows funding to continue without requiring states to implement specific voting reforms.

Judge Amir Ali, appointed by President Biden, ruled that the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) exceeded its authority by trying to impose election security requirements to access Homeland Security Grant Program funds.

The conditions included verifying voter citizenship, checking the citizenship status of poll workers, using hand-marked paper ballots, and conducting post-election manual audits.

The ruling came as a response to a lawsuit from local governments in Texas, Tennessee, and Ohio, including cities like Nashville and Harris County.

Judge Ali stated that Congress did not authorize FEMA to withhold funds for routine election administration matters and that the conditions imposed were not related to counterterrorism preparations or responses.

The decision marks a setback for efforts to enhance election security ahead of upcoming elections.

Under the previous plan, states would have faced a 20% holdback of grant funding until they complied with the outlined security changes, affecting hundreds of millions of dollars nationwide.

Despite the ruling, a requirement remains for at least 3% of the grant to be spent on physical and cyber election security.

The judge has a history of decisions favoring more liberal stances, including previous rulings on USAID funding.

The ruling is viewed as favorable to Democrat-led cities, allowing them to avoid implementing federal election security requirements linked to grant funding. This decision underscores ongoing legal disputes over election integrity initiatives and federal funding mechanisms in relation to election administration. 

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/09/biden-appointed-canadian-born-judge-blocks-trump-administration/

SpaceX's Starship Just Reached Orbit for the First Time

 On September 28, 2026, SpaceX's Starship completed its first successful orbital flight, marking a significant milestone for the company and its ambitious space exploration goals.

The Starship rocket launched from Starbase, Texas, successfully delivering multiple Starlink satellites into orbit.

Although the mission was expected to last 10 hours, it was shortened to three hours due to an upper-stage engine failure. Despite this, Starship 14 achieved its mission goals and performed a turn maneuver before safely landing in the Pacific Ocean.

The flight demonstrated the capabilities of Starship, which has double the thrust capacity of NASA's Space Launch System used for Moon missions.

This successful orbital flight is seen as a crucial step toward future crewed lunar missions, proposed by NASA and supported by the Trump administration for completion by 2028.

The next Starship launch could happen as soon as mid-October.

SpaceX’s successful orbital flight of Starship sets the stage for future advancements in space transportation and reinforces the vehicle's potential role in upcoming human space exploration missions to the Moon. 

https://townhall.com/news/josephchalfant/2026/09/28/spacexs-starship-just-reached-orbit-for-the-first-time-n2683727

Fewer Americans Plan To Vote By Mail In 2026, Poll Finds

A recent NBC News poll indicates a decline in the number of Americans intending to vote by mail for the 2026 midterm elections. The survey, conducted among 1,000 registered voters, revealed that only 19 percent plan to vote by mail, a decrease from 25 percent in 2024 and 30 percent in 2020. Conversely, 31 percent plan to vote early in person, up from 26 percent in 2024, while 44 percent are set to vote on Election Day, similar to previous years.

The poll results varied by political affiliation. Among Democrats, 23 percent plan to vote by mail, down from 34 percent in 2024. For independents, 20 percent plan to vote by mail, compared to 28 percent previously. Republican respondents showed less change, with 16 percent planning to vote by mail. Additionally, a separate poll found that confidence in the U.S. Postal Service delivering election mail on time has fallen to 58 percent, down from 71 percent in 2024.

https://trendingpoliticsnews.com/fewer-americans-plan-to-vote-by-mail-in-2026-poll-finds-cmc/ 

Trump housing chief says new rules help Americans with mortgage costs

 Rocket Mortgage has announced a significant shift in its credit scoring practices that aims to help more Americans qualify for home loans. This change is facilitated by the introduction of VantageScore 4.0 as the preferred credit scoring model.

VantageScore 4.0 Adoption: Rocket Mortgage will use VantageScore 4.0 for mortgages to be delivered to Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and Veteran Affairs loans starting in the fourth quarter of 2026.

Benefits of New Model: Director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency, Bill Pulte, commended Rocket Mortgage for being the first lender to adopt this model, attributing it to efforts for increased competition in credit scoring, which he says is beneficial for Americans achieving homeownership.

Cost Savings: Individuals using the VantageScore 4.0 model reportedly saved an average of $1,600 on closing costs. This model allows the consideration of rent and utility payment histories, thus assisting those with limited credit histories.

Company Statements: Rocket Mortgage CEO Jay Bray emphasized the importance of competition in the mortgage industry, noting that this change will lower costs and expand access to homeownership. He thanked Director Pulte for supporting diverse credit scoring methods.

The introduction of VantageScore 4.0 by Rocket Mortgage represents a shift towards more inclusive and affordable credit scoring practices. This change aims to help more Americans qualify for mortgages and reduce costs, supporting broader access to homeownership. 

https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/finance/rocket-mortgage-becomes-first-home-lender-use-vantagescore-scoring-method?utm_source=justthenews.com&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=external-news-aggregators

Chuck Schumer’s definition of ‘antisemite’ would include Mamdani, Senate hopeful El-Sayed

 Senator Chuck Schumer made headlines by defining anti-Zionism as a form of antisemitism during an event in May 2025. This statement pertains to discussions surrounding the rights of Israel as a Jewish state, particularly in relation to figures like New York Mayor Zohran Mamdani and Michigan Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed.

Schumer stated that denying the right of Jews to have a state, while advocating for other nationalities to have their own states, is antisemitic.

Mayor Mamdani has faced criticism for not explicitly stating whether Israel should exist as a Jewish state, despite affirming Israel's right to exist with equal rights for all.

Mamdani supports the BDS (Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions) movement against Israel and has called for the arrest of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for alleged war crimes.

Abdul El-Sayed challenges the notion of Israel as an ethno-state while asserting that he doesn't dispute Israel's existence. He believes the focus should be on equal rights and the use of taxpayer money in relation to Israel.

There was mention of a recent event at the New York Public Library featuring a Jewish author critical of Israel, which has drawn attention to ongoing debates about the country’s policies and existence.

Schumer's remarks and the subsequent reactions from Mamdani and El-Sayed highlight a significant divide on views about Israel among political figures, with implications for the broader discourse on Zionism, antisemitism, and U.S. foreign policy. 

https://nypost.com/2026/09/29/us-news/chuck-schumers-definition-of-antisemite-could-include-mamdani-senate-hopeful-el-sayed/

Department of Education Officially Axes Biden's 'Illegal Title IX Rewrite'

 On Monday, the U.S. Department of Education announced it has reinstated the 2020 Title IX regulations, reversing the Biden administration’s 2024 updates. This decision aligns the law with the previous regulations established during Donald Trump's presidency.

1. Title IX Overview: Title IX, part of the Education Amendments of 1972, prohibits sex discrimination in education programs receiving federal funds. The debate has centered on whether the term "sex" includes gender identity.

2. Biden Administration’s 2024 Rule: The Biden-era rule aimed to expand protections to include gender identity but faced legal challenges, resulting in courts blocking its implementation.

3. Current Legal Context: Following several court rulings against the 2024 regulation, the Department of Education decided to enforce the 2020 Title IX rule, which does not recognize gender identity within sex discrimination protections.

4. Clarification from Education Secretary: Linda McMahon emphasized that the restoration of the 2020 rule clarifies that boys and men compete in boys’ and men’s sports, while girls compete in women’s sports, thus reducing confusion.

5. Compliance and Enforcement: Schools must now adhere to the 2020 regulations, and non-compliance could result in financial consequences, including scrutiny and funding restrictions.

6. Future Actions: Parents are advised to report any issues regarding male athletes in women’s sports to school officials. The department will investigate state policies conflicting with the reaffirmed Title IX protections.

The Department of Education's reversal to the 2020 Title IX regulations underscores a clear stance against allowing males to participate in female sports, reaffirming traditional interpretations of sex discrimination in education. 

https://www.westernjournal.com/department-education-officially-axes-bidens-illegal-title-ix-rewrite/

'Spending other people's money': Trump cancels half a billion dollars meant to benefit immigrants

 On September 28, 2026, President Donald Trump announced the cancellation of $810 million in taxpayer funds designated for immigrant services. This decision is part of a broader strategy to control federal spending and limit support for programs that aid noncitizens.

Pocket Rescission: The Office of Management and Budget used a legal process called "pocket rescission" to return the funds to Congress before the September 30 expiry date. This method is allowed under the Impoundment Control Act, which permits the executive branch to reject appropriated funds under certain conditions.

Reason for Cancellation: The Trump administration stated the funds were aimed at programs that supported illegal immigration and that the funds were no longer necessary due to the success of the president's border policies. Specific programs affected included those providing housing assistance to illegal immigrants and services for refugees and LGBTQ+ noncitizens.

Praise from Conservatives: Various conservative lawmakers applauded the rescission. They argue that it reflects responsible fiscal management, especially amid a soaring national debt. Representatives emphasized that taxpayer money should not fund services for those living in the country illegally.

Criticism from Democrats: Opponents of the move, including Senate Appropriations Chairwoman Susan Collins and Senator Jeff Merkley, labeled it an overreach of executive power and an "illegal line-item veto." They argue that the president's actions undermine Congress's authority to allocate funds.

Legal Implications: The legality of the administration's actions may be challenged and could potentially escalate to the Supreme Court, though a previous court ruling supported the president's right to withhold funds.

President Trump’s recent cancellation of immigrant support funds highlights a significant clash between the executive and legislative branches over fiscal policy and the use of taxpayer dollars. While it has garnered support from conservatives, it faces strong criticism from Democrats, raising questions about constitutional powers related to government spending. 

https://www.wnd.com/2026/09/spending-other-peoples-money-trump-cancels-half-billion/

There's a New Migrant Caravan on the Way to the US Border

 A new migrant caravan, consisting of hundreds of people mainly from Central America, has begun its journey toward the U.S.-Mexico border. This development marks the first significant caravan movement in quite some time, particularly since stricter border measures were implemented.

The caravan, named "Fe y Esperanza" (Faith and Hope), started on September 20, 2026, in San Pedro Sula, Honduras, with initial reports claiming between 200 to 400 migrants.

By September 28, the caravan had grown to over 600 migrants, including individuals from Honduras, Guatemala, El Salvador, Ecuador, and Haiti.

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has issued warnings regarding the caravan, emphasizing that under President Trump, significant efforts have been made to secure the border.

Trump's administration declared a national emergency at the southern border upon returning to office in January 2025, leading to a sharp decline in border crossings. Data from DHS reported merely 8,870 apprehensions in August 2026, marking a 94% drop from the monthly average during the Biden administration.

Migrants are primarily citing economic hardship as their reason for leaving their home countries. Many express awareness that crossing into the U.S. will be difficult, yet they remain determined.

The Trump administration's policies have reportedly reduced the backlog of immigration cases and eased the pressure on cities receiving migrants.

There are claims that the current caravan is primarily made up of economic migrants rather than legitimate asylum seekers.

As this new migrant caravan progresses toward the U.S. border, it challenges existing border policies established by the Trump administration. Although many migrants are motivated by economic needs, the strict enforcement measures have altered the landscape of migration to the United States, showing a significant decrease in unauthorized crossings.

https://hotair.com/john-s-2/2026/09/28/theres-a-new-migrant-caravan-on-the-way-to-the-us-border-n3819411

South America Chooses Economic Freedom – Is Brazil Next?

 Speaking of South America, there’s a freedom revolution going on down there that is liberating and pro-growth.

Many of our neighbors to the south are shrinking governments, opening markets, and prioritizing growth and stability. Argentina, Ecuador, Paraguay, Chile, Bolivia, Peru, and Colombia are governed by conservative leaders.

Ironically, this is all happening as the Left in America moves toward South Americanesque socialist policies.

Brazil, with its 214 million people, will decide next month if they will join this wave.  Incumbent Lula da Silva, the “last man standing” among South America’s leftist leaders, is tied in polls with Flavio Bolsonaro, the son of the nation’s last conservative president.

The new policies are showing results. Several nations have seen their bond rating upgraded. Paraguay will grow by 4.4% this year with Milei’s Argentina projected to grow 3.6%. Other countries are well ahead of the 1.1% average GDP growth rate of the European Union.

After Brazil, Cuba could be next to choose freedom over tyranny.