Since he has taken office, the president has had over 25 injunctions leveled against his actions by various courts.
Injunctions serve the purpose of making certain that a particular action either stops or continues while the litigation process around which it is centered plays out through the courts.
Provisions for injunctions are commonly found in business agreements, particularly in non-disclosure agreements, where one party concedes that if the agreement is violated, the disclosing side could suffer "Irreparable harm" between the time a claim is filed and when it ultimately is adjudicated.
As a practical rule, injunctions are supposed to be issued when a judge sees the potential irreparable harm and estimates that the case has a reasonable chance of being heard without being thrown out early or having no chance of success.
No matter what he does, you can be certain it will be challenged immediately in court - in a venue where the plaintiff knows a judge likely will grant injunctive relief.
This cadre of activist judges is causing many people to seriously question both.
Where do citizens turn to be granted an injunction against injunctions while the case for America's future is being heard by the people?
https://thehill.com/opinion/judiciary/418837-americans-need-relief-from-activist-judges-injunctions
Injunctions serve the purpose of making certain that a particular action either stops or continues while the litigation process around which it is centered plays out through the courts.
Provisions for injunctions are commonly found in business agreements, particularly in non-disclosure agreements, where one party concedes that if the agreement is violated, the disclosing side could suffer "Irreparable harm" between the time a claim is filed and when it ultimately is adjudicated.
As a practical rule, injunctions are supposed to be issued when a judge sees the potential irreparable harm and estimates that the case has a reasonable chance of being heard without being thrown out early or having no chance of success.
No matter what he does, you can be certain it will be challenged immediately in court - in a venue where the plaintiff knows a judge likely will grant injunctive relief.
This cadre of activist judges is causing many people to seriously question both.
Where do citizens turn to be granted an injunction against injunctions while the case for America's future is being heard by the people?
https://thehill.com/opinion/judiciary/418837-americans-need-relief-from-activist-judges-injunctions
No comments:
Post a Comment