Social Security Administration Confirms: Illegal Aliens To Begin Collecting Benefits In 2017

I’m old enough to remember when amnesty shills were promising that illegal aliens would become a fabulous source of tax revenue as soon as they were legalized.
We were sternly commanded to ignore all those studies showing the legalized alien population would be a staggering drain on our immense welfare state. The authors of such studies were torn to shreds for their alleged short-sightedness and xenophobia.
The amnesty shills, who spent years telling us illegal aliens were a poor and oppressed minority eking out a sparse existence from predatory employers while living miserably “in the shadows,” have recently spun on a dime and said to forget all that jive and believe their new party line that these “Americans-in-waiting” are far more productive than existing American citizens, including the chumps who waited in line for years to immigrate properly. Jeb Bush, to name a prominent example, often speaks as if he considers illegals qualitatively superior to Americans in their sense of family responsibility and work ethic, gingerly leaving the subject of their respect for the law to discuss another day.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/03/10/social-security-administration-confirms-illegal-aliens-to-begin-collecting-benefits-in-2017/ 

The First Two Lies from Hillary’s Press Conference

All over Twitter you can find negative reactions to Hillary Clinton’s just-concluded press conference. To me, the most important part of her press conference was her statement that was an obvious, flat-out lie: She said the e-mail server was initially set up for use by former president Bill Clinton. Hillary Clinton insisted that there were “numerous safeguards” in place, adding there were “no security breaches.” One hacker broke into Hillary’s account in 2013 and leaked several messages to Kremlin-funded RT. Beyond that example, if her server is being privately managed, there’s no way for, say, State Department security professionals or the NSA or CIA or any other intelligence agencies to know if there was a security breach. Can we agree that the woman who said she couldn’t carry two phones because it would be too inconvenient is in no position to assess cybersecurity?

http://www.nationalreview.com/campaign-spot/415188/first-two-lies-hillarys-press-conference-jim-geraghty

Proposed ozone regulations may cost triple environmental agency projections

Environmental Protection Agency officials are moving forward with proposed emissions regulations despite critics' claims that the new rules could be the costliest in U.S. history.
The regulations would require ground-level ozone to decrease from present levels nationwide from 75 parts per billion to between 65 and 70 as early as 2020. The pollutant levels decreased by 23 percent from 1990 to 2013, according to the environmental agency.
The additional processes needed to reduce ground-level ozone are estimated to cost $1.7 trillion from 2017 to 2040 and could slash the nation's gross domestic product by $140 billion each year, according to a recent study conducted by National Economic Research Associates, an independent group that conducts economic analyses.

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/proposed-ozone-regulations-may-cost-triple-environmental-agency-projections/article/2561335

White House: Hillary Sent Classified Emails Despite Her Claim to the Contrary

Before Hillary Clinton’s news conference yesterday, Jen Psaki, the spokesperson for the United States Department of State, stated that the White House could not immediately released the former Secretary of State’s emails because “it will take several months” to redact all the classified things she sent.
Despite this, Ms. Clinton then stated in her press conference, “I did not email any classified material to anyone on my email. I’m certainly well aware of the classification requirements and did not send classified material.”
Someone is not telling the truth. Either Ms. Psaki lied in order to prevent the immediate release of Ms. Clinton’s emails, or Ms. Clinton lied to prevent further fallout. Either way, the White House and Ms. Clinton are not on the same page with their talking points.

http://thepunditpress.com/2015/03/11/white-house-hillary-sent-classified-emails-despite-claim-to-the-contrary/ 

Here's why mass deportation isn't a financially viable option

A new study by the American Action Forum estimates that deporting every illegal immigrant, and keeping new ones from entering the country would take 20 years and cost taxpayers between $420 billion and $619 billion total. Averaging those lower and upper estimates, deporting every illegal immigrant and enforcing current immigration laws would cost about $26 billion annually.
For comparison, the Department of State had a budget of $27 billion in 2014. NASA, the Environmental Protection Agency and welfare for needy families (TANF) all receive less than $20 billion in the federal budget. Food stamps cost almost three times more than what complete deportation and enforcement would cost, while the Department of Veterans Affairs budget is almost six times higher.

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/heres-why-mass-deportation-isnt-a-financially-viable-option/article/2561316

DOW LOSES OVER 330 POINTS: Here's what you need to know

US stocks tanked through the trading day on Tuesday, erasing all their gains for the year, and the dollar rallied to a 12-year high versus the euro.

First, the scoreboard:

• Dow: 17,662.94 -332.78 (-1.85%)
• S&P 500:  2,044.17 -35.26 (-1.70%)
• Nasdaq:  4,859.79 -82.64 (-1.67%)

And now, the top stories on Tuesday:

1. The euro plunged to a 12-year low against the US dollar. It fell below $1.07 for the first time since 2003 to as low as $1.0698. The market was focused on the European Central Bank’s quantitative easing program, which kicked off on Monday. With the US Federal Reserve expected to raise interest rates later this year, there is increased demand for the dollar. And according to Deutsche Bank, the Euro could reach parity with the dollar by the end of this year.

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/dow-loses-over-330-points-200000838.html 

UN Official Admits Climate Change Efforts Are Really About Changing The Global Economy

As indicated in my recent note announcing the suspension of daily items I will occasionally share items particularly noteworthy.  This is the first.  Please read it.  The United Nations now admits that what we have been told about Global Warming/Climate Change has been a deception.  The next two paragraphs summarizes what the head of the UN's Climate Change apparatus says its real intentions are.  I have checked it out.  It is legitimate.  I do not make up this stuff. 

In a surprising move the UN now admits their purpose in pushing Global Warming is more about changing the course of global economics than saving the planet.  Nonetheless, efforts to curb global warming despite its dubious scientific foundation will continue to be the UN's stalking horse.  Quote:  At a recent news conference in Brussels Christiana Figueres, the executive secretary of the United Nation’s Framework Convention on Climate Change, "... made a devastating admission… the goal of environmental activism is not to save the world from terrifying environmental calamity, but to end capitalism."  This is what so many of us have maintained based on the unfounded and enormously expensive actions governments have repeatedly undertaken based on global warming alarmism predictions that have subsequently failed to materialize.  Now, for some reason, the UN admits its real purpose for all the climate alarmism hype is not about saving the planet.  Instead, under the sanctioning of the UN and cooperative governments around the globe Ms. Figueres and her collaborators intend to replace capitalism and presumably install some form of centralized worldwide socialistic based governmental and economic systems.  Please read this link from the UN.  http://www.unric.org/en/latest-un-buzz/29623-figueres-first-time-the-world-economy-is-transformed-intentionally 

Here is what Ms. Figueres said 3 February 2015:  "This is the first time in the history of mankind that we are setting ourselves the task of intentionally, within a defined period of time to change the economic development model that has been reigning for at least 150 years, since the industrial revolution. That will not happen overnight and it will not happen at a single conference on climate change, be it COP 15, 21, 40 - you choose the number. It just does not occur like that. It is a process, because of the depth of the transformation." (From the UN link)  

This is Walter Williams' considered assessment of the situation.  http://townhall.com/columnists/walterewilliams/2015/03/11/global-warming-n1967847/page/full    These also deal with the issue. The first one is particularly good.  http://townhall.com/columnists/pauldriessen/2015/02/21/the-climate-con-goes-on-n1960093/page/full  and, http://politicaloutcast.com/2015/02/un-official-admits-using-climate-change-change-economy/   and,  http://www.aircrap.org/2015/02/12/true-purpose-of-the-climate-change-lies/  and here is another, http://mail.centurylink.net/zimbra/mail

Other links.  http://news.investors.com/ibd-editorials/021015-738779-climate-change-scare-tool-to-destroy-capitalism.htm (see internal link); and, http://eaglerising.com/15250/united-nations-executive-secretary-says-climate-alarmism-economics-not-environment/  and this one addresses, at least in part, how the US's active involvement got started.  http://wattsupwiththat.com/2015/02/18/jim-hansens-99-surety-on-global-warming-doesnt-hold-up/  

Note the sentiments of the participants in this demonstration supporting the concept of human caused climate change.  http://pjmedia.com/zombie/2014/09/23/climate-movement-drops-mask-admits-communist-agenda/ 

If this is established as fact, and it seems that it is, there can be no argument that we have been duped by global elitists who for their own self-serving purposes have fostered scientific fraud at horrendous costs to both the public treasury and the efficacy of science in order to promote their political/economic objectives.  My overall point, as many others such as Walter Williams, is that climate change has occurred throughout history without human involvement.  That human generated CO2 emissions is the current culprit causing global warming has not been scientifically proven.  Some scientists seem to "believe" it is so but many other equally qualified scientists "do not" subscribe to that belief.  Science is not a belief system.  It is the pursuit of knowledge.  The fact is that noting in science is ever settled.  History has proven many times over the folly of declaring anything settled science.  Moreover, at this juncture the UN Climate Change Guru's recent revelation regarding the real purpose of their Climate Change efforts is now a matter of record.  We all should be concerned that an institution that does not have a single elected official from anywhere in the world is engaged in an attempt to overturn economic order.  

Have you heard the mainstream media or our government officials say anything at all about the UN Climate Guru's open admission?  Not likely.  Seemingly they agree with it.  This note was held until today to see if someone of consequence would address it.  To my knowledge no one other than the alternative media has done so.  It gets ignored even though the proclamation came from Ms. Figueres, the top climate change scientist at the UN and presumably the most important climate scientist in the world.  Why?   

  

George Burns