Wednesday, March 11, 2015

UN Official Admits Climate Change Efforts Are Really About Changing The Global Economy

As indicated in my recent note announcing the suspension of daily items I will occasionally share items particularly noteworthy.  This is the first.  Please read it.  The United Nations now admits that what we have been told about Global Warming/Climate Change has been a deception.  The next two paragraphs summarizes what the head of the UN's Climate Change apparatus says its real intentions are.  I have checked it out.  It is legitimate.  I do not make up this stuff. 

In a surprising move the UN now admits their purpose in pushing Global Warming is more about changing the course of global economics than saving the planet.  Nonetheless, efforts to curb global warming despite its dubious scientific foundation will continue to be the UN's stalking horse.  Quote:  At a recent news conference in Brussels Christiana Figueres, the executive secretary of the United Nation’s Framework Convention on Climate Change, "... made a devastating admission… the goal of environmental activism is not to save the world from terrifying environmental calamity, but to end capitalism."  This is what so many of us have maintained based on the unfounded and enormously expensive actions governments have repeatedly undertaken based on global warming alarmism predictions that have subsequently failed to materialize.  Now, for some reason, the UN admits its real purpose for all the climate alarmism hype is not about saving the planet.  Instead, under the sanctioning of the UN and cooperative governments around the globe Ms. Figueres and her collaborators intend to replace capitalism and presumably install some form of centralized worldwide socialistic based governmental and economic systems.  Please read this link from the UN.  http://www.unric.org/en/latest-un-buzz/29623-figueres-first-time-the-world-economy-is-transformed-intentionally 

Here is what Ms. Figueres said 3 February 2015:  "This is the first time in the history of mankind that we are setting ourselves the task of intentionally, within a defined period of time to change the economic development model that has been reigning for at least 150 years, since the industrial revolution. That will not happen overnight and it will not happen at a single conference on climate change, be it COP 15, 21, 40 - you choose the number. It just does not occur like that. It is a process, because of the depth of the transformation." (From the UN link)  



Note the sentiments of the participants in this demonstration supporting the concept of human caused climate change.  http://pjmedia.com/zombie/2014/09/23/climate-movement-drops-mask-admits-communist-agenda/ 

If this is established as fact, and it seems that it is, there can be no argument that we have been duped by global elitists who for their own self-serving purposes have fostered scientific fraud at horrendous costs to both the public treasury and the efficacy of science in order to promote their political/economic objectives.  My overall point, as many others such as Walter Williams, is that climate change has occurred throughout history without human involvement.  That human generated CO2 emissions is the current culprit causing global warming has not been scientifically proven.  Some scientists seem to "believe" it is so but many other equally qualified scientists "do not" subscribe to that belief.  Science is not a belief system.  It is the pursuit of knowledge.  The fact is that noting in science is ever settled.  History has proven many times over the folly of declaring anything settled science.  Moreover, at this juncture the UN Climate Change Guru's recent revelation regarding the real purpose of their Climate Change efforts is now a matter of record.  We all should be concerned that an institution that does not have a single elected official from anywhere in the world is engaged in an attempt to overturn economic order.  

Have you heard the mainstream media or our government officials say anything at all about the UN Climate Guru's open admission?  Not likely.  Seemingly they agree with it.  This note was held until today to see if someone of consequence would address it.  To my knowledge no one other than the alternative media has done so.  It gets ignored even though the proclamation came from Ms. Figueres, the top climate change scientist at the UN and presumably the most important climate scientist in the world.  Why?   
  
George Burns

No comments: