Keeping You Informed

Quote: "CDC Accused of Bias Over New Omicron Guidance. With the CDC now cutting the recommended quarantine time for those infected with Covid-19 down to five days from the previously recommended ten, some are now claiming that the change is driven more by the desire to help struggling businesses than science.  The Details: Industries across America are seeing major disruptions due to employees calling out en masse due to a wave of new infections from the Omicron variant of the Coronavirus. The airline industry, in particular, was hard hit, with call outs being responsible for the cancellation of thousands of flights over the busy holiday weekend. The CDC changed its quarantine guidelines for asymptomatic individuals on Monday, reducing it from 10 days to 5. When later asked to provide a reason for the change, Dr. Anthony Fauci claimed that the changes were designed to help people get back to work more quickly. Several organizations representing workers, including both the Nurse’s and Flight Attendants’ union, pushed back against the new guidelines, arguing that they didn’t provide enough time for workers to recover from potentially serious infections."  CDC Accused of Bias Over New Omicron Guidance | American Briefing   Anyone who believes these so called scientists have any idea of what they are doing has joined the ranks of the uninformed. 

Quote: "New COVID at-home test dangerous and misleading: but everybody’s doing it, so who cares, right? Recently, I’ve been writing fiction, satire, parody, to expose the insanity of the pandemic scam. This article is not that. This article is fact. Buckle up. Since the beginning of the so-called pandemic, I’ve been attacking the value of the PCR diagnostic test from many angles. The primary angle, as my readers know, is: SARS-CoV-2 was never isolated, never proved to exist. However, I’ve also ventured into the bubble world where a few billion people blindly accept the existence of the virus—and I’ve shown that even within that world, the internal contradictions and lies abound.

        One again, now, I’m entering that bubble world, since the powers-that-be are widely promoting the use of an at-home test for the “virus.” This test is self-administered. No doctor, nurse, or technician is present. What could possibly go wrong, as millions of people perform the test on themselves? Well, let’s lead off with DANGER. The reference is an undated FDA document titled, “BinaxNOWTM COVID-19 Antigen Self TEST.” The Binax test kit is manufactured by Abbott. Here is the key quote: “The Reagent Solution [included in the test kit] contains a harmful chemical (see table below). If the solution contacts the skin or eye, flush with copious amounts of water. If irritation persists, seek medical advice…”

Then the FDA document lists that harmful chemical: sodium azide. Just how harmful is it?

        For an answer, let’s look at a CDC document titled, “Facts About Sodium Azide.” We find this statement: “Sodium azide is a rapidly acting, potentially deadly chemical that exists as an odorless white solid.” Then there is this: “Sodium azide prevents the cells of the body from using oxygen. When this happens, the cells die. Sodium azide is more harmful to the heart and the brain than to other organs, because the heart and the brain use a lot of oxygen.” Yes, as with all poisons, the degree of damage depends on the dosage, but you decide whether “potentially deadly,” as the CDC describes sodium azide, signifies a significant risk.

       If you read the FDA document I referenced above, you’ll see that the reagent containing sodium azide is involved in the self-administered COVID test, and the whole test procedure is complex enough to allow fumbles and mistakes—such as a spill of the “deadly chemical.” Don’t believe me? Try this FDA quote on for size: “To perform the test, an anterior nasal swab specimen is collected by the patient, then 6 drops of extraction reagent from a dropper bottle are added to the top hole of the swab well. The patient sample is inserted into the test card through the bottom hole of the swab well, and firmly pushed upwards until the swab tip is visible through the top hole. The swab is rotated 3 times clockwise and the card is closed, bringing the extracted sample into contact with the test strip. Test results are interpreted visually at 15 minutes based on the presence or absence of visually detectable pink/purple colored lines.” 

       See what I mean? Good luck. Now let’s move on to the second problem with this at-home self-performed COVID test: it’s grossly misleading. The results are ambiguous."   Read on...   New COVID at-home test dangerous and misleading: but everybody’s doing it, so who cares, right? « Jon Rappoport's Blog (nomorefakenews.com)

      One has to wonder if our elitist health care betters are trying their best to kill us... think about that...

Quote: "Blocked by Twitter, Vaccine Pioneer Malone Says He'll Keep 'Telling the Truth'. Dr. Robert Malone, a contributor to mRNA vaccine technology, told Newsmax on Thursday that he is focused on ''telling the truth'' after being booted from Twitter a day before. Malone, appearing on ''Stinchfield,'' also mentioned that he is actively being fact-checked by Reuters, who he says ''has links'' through ''inboard relationships'' with the vaccine producer Pfizer. ''They went absolutely ballistic that you called the spike proteins that ... these mRNA vaccines produce ... toxic and can cause birth defects. They said, 'It's misinformation. Totally fake news.' What do you say to them?'' host Grant Stinchfield asked the vaccine innovator. ''The data are the data. I'm sorry,'' Malone replied. Malone, who amassed more than 500,000 followers on Twitter, was permanently suspended from the social media site on Wednesday for alleged ''misinformation,'' The Epoch Times reported. The scientist confirmed his account was suspended on his Substack later in the day. ''We all knew it would happen eventually,'' Malone said. ''Over a half million followers gone in a blink of an eye. That means I must have been on the mark, so to speak. Over the target. ''It also means we lost a critical component in our fight to stop these vaccines being mandated for children and to stop the corruption in our governments, as well as the medical-industrial complex and pharmaceutical industries,'' he said."    Blocked by Twitter, Vaccine Pioneer Malone Says He'll Keep 'Telling the Truth' | Newsmax.com  

Quote: "The moment of truth for masks in schools. Dr. Fauci used to wear a cloth mask yet now the ‘experts’ say they won’t protect our kids? “Wearing a cloth mask to keep safe from a virus is like installing a chain link fence to keep mosquitoes out of your backyard.” That’s what a doctor friend joked to me in the early days of the pandemic. On 60 Minutes on March 8, 2020, Dr. Anthony Fauci said, “There’s no reason to be walking around with a mask. When you’re in the middle of an outbreak, wearing a mask might make people feel a little bit better and it might even block a droplet, but it’s not providing the perfect protection that people think that it is. And often there are unintended consequences — people keep fiddling with the mask and they keep touching their face.” Just a month later, the CDC guidance changed. But very little messaging has been devoted to promoting the kinds of masks that work and discouraging those that don’t. Instead, blanket recommendations about “protective face coverings” run the gamut from T-shirt material to those found on hospital employees working directly with sick patients. From the outset, we’ve been sold the notion that masks are the magic forcefield keeping Covid at bay. Fauci was photographed last July wearing a cloth Washington Nationals mask during a House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Crisis hearing. On CNN earlier this month, Dr. Leana Wen advised New Yorkers about how to stay safe on New Years Eve amid the Omicron surge. She recommended wearing a three-ply medical mask and warned, “Don’t wear a cloth mask. Cloth masks are little more than facial decoration.”     The moment of truth for masks in schools - The Spectator World

Quote: "Just about two years into the COVID “pandemic,” the credibility of our nation’s supposed health officials is borderline non-existent. This lack of trust is inevitable when the people who claim to be experts repeatedly change their tune and allow politics to sway their guidance. Health officials condemned 2020 protests against lockdowns and stay-at-home orders. However, they did not charge the people who gathered to burn down businesses during the 2020 summer riots. Health officials were also conveniently silent when leftists gathered in the streets to cheer the election of Joe Biden as president.

        At this point, it’s par for the course for health officials to change their tune on COVID. It is not a pattern they’re breaking as we approach the new year. TheBlaze confirms that health officials are now trying to pivot away from a heavy emphasis on COVID case numbers. Over the weekend, health officials declared that deaths and hospitalizations from COVID should be the metrics used to assess the virus rather than the mere number of cases across the nation.According to Dr. Ashish Jha, omicron’s less severe nature prompts a shift in how the pandemic is viewed and measured. Jha also declared that while COVID infections were previously reliable indicators of future events to come, omicron’s mild nature marks a turning point. Instead, claimed Jha, the most brilliant move in the future is to track the numbers of unvaccinated individuals who COVID is infecting, rather than merely following COVID infections in the general population. 

       The health official also claimed that vaccinated (and boosted) people who come down with COVID have the most substantial likelihood of undergoing mild symptoms but making a relatively quick comeback health-wise. Unfortunately, health officials have been known to change their claims and statements in matters of days and weeks. Therefore, there’s honestly no telling whether this will be the standard as we advance or if Jha and other “experts” will say something different during the first or second week of January. lready, the push is happening to change the term “fully vaccinated” to mean having booster shots in addition to the regular COVID vaccines. Over the past several days, there have also been whispers about yet another booster shot to come.

       We know what the health officials are saying today. However, as proven by past behavior, the guidance is subject to change at literally any moment."     Health Officials Now Pivoting Away from COVID Case Numbers | American Watchdog