Friday, January 28, 2022

Why The Wall Street Journal Is Wrong About The 2020 Election

A Wall Street Journal editorial appeared on Tuesday entitled, "The Best Summary of the 2020 Election: Rules were bent, GOP voters defected, and real fraud hasn't turned up." This conveys the position of many establishment conservatives concerning the 2020 election: There were some slight "Problems" with the election that were overshadowed by normal political phenomena such as controversies about Donald Trump and GOP voters switching sides.

There is another side of the argument regarding the legitimacy of the 2020 election that The Wall Street Journal has relentlessly ignored.

The hypothesis is that a deeply corrupted corporate media, Big Tech censorship, legally questionable intervention by the courts, and infiltration of key election offices by lavishly funded Democratic activists resulted in "Heavy-handed election interference of a kind we have never seen before" that decisively "Rigged" the 2020 election in favor of Joe Biden.

All of these studies present indisputable evidence of a "Rigged election" in Wisconsin and in other key swing states, where the highly partisan distribution of big Center for Tech and Civic Life money, and obvious election interference by CTCL-funded election offices, was more than sufficient to flip those states toward Biden.

The merger of public election offices with partisan private funding that we witnessed in 2020 involved an unprecedented type of election interference that poses an acute threat to the perceived legitimacy of elections.

Credible claims supported by growing mountains of evidence of a "Rigged election" have largely been ignored by the corporate media in favor of the occasional report that seeks to exonerate an election system that radically failed in November 2020.

The 2020 election was not even remotely "Fair," and mainstream conservatives should not be afraid to say so.
 

https://thefederalist.com/2022/01/28/why-the-wall-street-journal-is-wrong-about-the-2020-election/ 

No comments: