This is an example of how serious Democrats are about protecting illegal immigrants from harm. Quote: "House Democrats spent two years in the minority last Congress admonishing Republicans for not doing enough to protect and care for migrant children crossing the nation’s southern border. Now in the majority with control over the House floor, Speaker Nancy Pelosi
and her conference are poised to let funding for the Unaccompanied
Alien Children (UAC) program run out. Why? They never cared in the first
place. White House OMB Director Russ Vought sent congressional
leadership a letter May 1 requesting $4.5 billion in emergency funding,
citing an unfolding “humanitarian and security crisis” that is becoming
“more dire each day.” While Vought’s request included funding for
additional ICE beds, resources to care for migrants, including mothers
and children, who are apprehended by law enforcement, the majority was
for humanitarian aid, which includes the care and placement of
unaccompanied alien children, otherwise known as the UAC program." Now
get this. " Democratic leaders have no intention of responding to the
Trump administration’s request. The truth is they never cared about the
children in the first place. It was all pure politics. They have zero
interest in securing the border. They want open borders and have shown a
blatant disregard for the rule of law. Pelosi claimed in 2018 that,
“Democrats have taken full responsibility for the border.” Now, as
Speaker, while she controls the House floor, Pelosi can lead and take
responsibility. What has that ‘leadership’ gotten us? A paltry $1.375
billion for less than adequate border security funding, two-consecutive
months of over 100,000 apprehensions at the southern border, hundreds of
pounds of dangerous narcotics flowing across our border, and cartels
remain in operational control of our immigration system. First, Pelosi
and Democrats denied the existence of the national emergency. Now, they
are willing to let federal agencies run out of money to care for migrant
children. How bad does it have to get for Pelosi to care? It is
Democrats who are not funding the care required by law to protect
illegals." https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/reps-roy-jordan-biggs-cloud-pelosi-democrats-immigration-migrant-children
When things get really bad these reprobates will blame Trump for the
very problems they cause. And, That is the truth and nothing but the
truth.
This item is something I suspect
most of us either did not know or fully understand, before now. The Roe
v. Wade court decision was based on a series of lies. Quote: "Of course,
Norma McCorvey was the Jane Roe of Roe v. Wade. After
converting to Christ and the pro-life position (about 15 years after the
Supreme Court decision), she proclaimed to the world that the whole
case had been based on a lie (a few lies, really). Chief among the lies
was that she was raped (gang-raped at that), and that was why she needed
an abortion. By the time, Roe v. Wade was decided on January
22, 1973, Norma had already had her baby (a girl), whom she gave up for
adoption. Justice William Rehnquist, one of two dissenters in the
decision, voted against it because it was a moot point. Roe’s baby had
already been born. The opinion of Roe of Roe v. Wade is
significant for the abortion debate, including the Alabama law, because
abortion was accepted on a wide scale throughout the country, only by judicial fiat.
It was not something “we the people” voted on. Look at how divided the
country continues to be on the subject of abortion. Well, why not? We
the people did not decide that case on that fateful Monday. Dissenting
Justice Byron White, the only Justice appointed by JFK, said that Roe was
an “act of raw judicial power.” No wonder the pro-abortion crowd is up
in arms. It was as Justice White said an "...an act of raw judicial
power", indeed, an act of judicial activism not within the power of the
Supreme Court to determine. It has all along been an unconstitutional
law. The political left elitists must know the history and are now
concerned that Roe v. Wade will be overturned. It should be. The matter
should be resolved by Congress the only branch of government authorized
to write the nation's laws.
https://www.christianheadlines.com/columnists/guest-commentary/a-forgotten-voice-in-the-alabama-abortion-debate.html?
This is a prime example of the consequences of judicial activism gone
wrong, a method long used by Democrats to get what they want in
violation of the very words in the Constitution.
Nancy
and Chuck are you and your fellow Democrats listening? Of course not.
Do they care? Of course not. Quote: "The United States has been dealing
with the problem of illegal immigration and lax border security for
some time now. Thanks to laws that incentivize illegal immigration
rather than discourage it as well as an abysmal lack of funding for
border security, though, the situation at the border has become steadily
worse over the years. Now, there is reason to believe that we have lost
all control of the border crisis entirely. In an interview on Fox News,
vice-president of the National Border Patrol Council Hector Garza said,
“We’ve lost control of the border, as we are right now.” When pressed
on what he meant, Garza elaborated, saying, “Our Border Patrol chief has
mentioned that over 50 percent of our agents are not securing the
border and they’re now actually processing, transporting, and carrying
for some of these asylum seekers. But I would challenge that percentage.
I would put that percentage somewhere in the range of 75 percent.”
Garza went on to say, “What we’re seeing is that we’re not securing the
border. We’re not out there catching those drug dealers, or those drug
smugglers, or human smugglers.” Do Democrats care? Of course not. But
why? Because they care more about illegals who break our laws and their
future votes than American citizens who pay their salaries and obey the
law.
https://www.freedomnewsreport.com/2019/05/23/border-patrol-council-vp-we-have-lost-control-of-the-border/ Yet,
Nancy Pelosi, a wise, caring and all knowing political operative, has
the audacity to claim there is no crisis at the border. That is either
another one of her many lies or she is truly a demented human being.
Yes,
Nancy there is a crisis at the border. Consider this illegal and
irresponsible behavior you and your party incentivizes. Are you proud
of yourself? If so, you shouldn't be. Quote: "Aside from the stray dogs
that now outnumber humans, the only people left in Santa Rosa de Lima
are the ones who are too old or too sick to make the journey to our
southern border. Everyone who was healthy enough ponied up thousands of
dollars to the drug cartels to traffic them across our southern border.
Witnesses near the border say the cartels are now shooting any civilians
who attempt to cross on their own. You pay the cartel’s fee to get
across, or you ain’t getting across. No one even knows how many villages
like Santa Rosa de Lima have been gutted similarly. We do know that 1%
of Guatemala’s entire population has showed up at our southern border in
the past four months, as well as 1% of Honduras’. The villagers
remaining in Guatemala say that pretty girls and young women who pay the
cartel fees just disappear. They’re never heard from again, and they
don’t end up at our southern border. We can all guess the unspeakable
outcome. Now that the cartels have emptied the villages of paying
customers, new criminals who are even worse are showing up. These new
thieves offer to traffic the villagers to America for just $400 – a
steal compared to the $11,000 demanded by the cartels. The thieves then
take the money from the poorest Guatemalans of all and ditch them in the
desert with no food or water."
https://www.americanlibertyreport.com/articles/turn-your-central-american-village-into-a-ghost-town-with-one-simple-trick/
Anyone who thinks Nancy and her fellow Democrats care about the
devastation and criminal activities they in effect sponsor need to know
they do not care because they really don't. Otherwise, they would change
their behavior. Playing politics and gaining power and control is all
they care about. Whoever suffers and whatever the consequences is just
the price they are willing to accept to get their way. They are truly
cold hearted self serving reprobates.
The Illogic of
Democrat logic is an incredible thing to behold. They say that if a
member of Congress can be caught with a DUI and survive the
incident then illegals who do so should be able to become permanent
residents. Maybe a better bit of logic would be to not vote for members
of congress who have a propensity to disobey our nation's laws.
Illegals who disobey the nation's laws are no better or worse than
Democrats who routinely flaunt the law themselves and by coddling and
encouraging illegals to do so, too. To Democrats being a lawful citizen
is not a high priority. The same goes, they seem to think, for those who
illegally enter the United
States. https://www.libertyheadlines.com/permanent-residency-dui-dreamers/
Here is another example of left wingers/Democrats respect for law and order and our nation's Constitution. Quote: "Even before the investigation had ended, powerful Democrats in the House of Representatives had declared their intention to continue investigating, spending countless tax dollars on subpoenas while clogging both the legislative and executive branches of government with specious innuendo and fishing expeditions. However, several Congressional Republicans who have access to intelligence reports, including Senate Judiciary Chair Lindsey Graham, R-SC, and ranking House Intelligence minority member Devin Nunes, R-Calif., have strongly encouraged the Justice Department to pursue its investigation of collusion between members of the Obama intelligence community—many of whom were ousted in disgrace—and the Hillary Clinton campaign. Sensing that Barr’s investigations could yield immense political fallout, Democrats already have already attacked the attorney general’s credibility in a litany of ways, without evidence." And, "Rep. Liz Cheney of Wyoming, interviewed on ABC’s “This Week,” said the origins of Mueller’s investigation were suspect because statements by FBI agents during the 2016 campaign sounded “a whole lot like a coup.” She was referring in part to texts critical of Trump that were exchanged by two bureau officials, including former agent Peter Strzok, who was removed from the Mueller probe when the messages came to light and subsequently forced out, and lawyer Lisa Page, who has also left the FBI. “It could well be treason,” said Cheney. Cheney’s comments drew an irate riposte on Sunday from Preet Bharara, who was fired by Trump as U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York. Legal experts have pointed out that the Constitution says treason consists of “levying war against” the United States or giving “aid and comfort” to its enemies. “Elected officials keep making casual, ignorant, idiotic accusations of ‘treason’. …Just saw Liz Cheney do it,” Bharara wrote on Twitter. “Read the Constitution.” https://www.libertyheadlines.com/dems-freak-declassified-barr/ My advice for left wing reprobates like Preet Bharara is that they are in bad need of a refresher as to what the Constitution actually says. It is he and his fellow Democrats who need to "Read the Constitution" and take heed of what it actually says.
No comments:
Post a Comment