We actually know that there were "Links" between a presidential campaign and Russians who likely were associated with Putin's regime.
Hillary Clinton's campaign went looking for Russians who could serve up dirt on Donald Trump.
In a futile attempt to avoid illegality, the campaign told its lawyers at the Perkins Coie firm to contract with Fusion GPS, run by fervent Democrat Glenn Simpson, who in turn contracted with Christopher Steele to try to find Russians who had useful information on Trump.
Christopher Steele obliged the Clinton campaign by finding several Russians who, based on the information they pretended to have, almost certainly were associated with Putin's regime.
If we assume Steele didn't fabricate the whole thing, then he colluded on behalf of the Clinton campaign with Russian officials or insiders who told him lies.
If Mueller's charge was to investigate "Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election[including] investigating any links or coordination between the Russian government and individuals associated with the Trump campaign," why didn't he look into the possibility that the false information fed by alleged Russian insiders to an agent of the Clinton campaign was a disinformation effort by the Russian government, meant to interfere in the 2016 presidential election-an effort in which the Clinton campaign colluded?
There is strong circumstantial evidence that the Steele dossier was exactly that, while there never was any evidence at all that the Trump campaign colluded in any way with Russians.
https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2019/05/robert-mueller-partisan-fraud.php
Hillary Clinton's campaign went looking for Russians who could serve up dirt on Donald Trump.
In a futile attempt to avoid illegality, the campaign told its lawyers at the Perkins Coie firm to contract with Fusion GPS, run by fervent Democrat Glenn Simpson, who in turn contracted with Christopher Steele to try to find Russians who had useful information on Trump.
Christopher Steele obliged the Clinton campaign by finding several Russians who, based on the information they pretended to have, almost certainly were associated with Putin's regime.
If we assume Steele didn't fabricate the whole thing, then he colluded on behalf of the Clinton campaign with Russian officials or insiders who told him lies.
If Mueller's charge was to investigate "Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election[including] investigating any links or coordination between the Russian government and individuals associated with the Trump campaign," why didn't he look into the possibility that the false information fed by alleged Russian insiders to an agent of the Clinton campaign was a disinformation effort by the Russian government, meant to interfere in the 2016 presidential election-an effort in which the Clinton campaign colluded?
There is strong circumstantial evidence that the Steele dossier was exactly that, while there never was any evidence at all that the Trump campaign colluded in any way with Russians.
https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2019/05/robert-mueller-partisan-fraud.php
No comments:
Post a Comment