Media Madness 2

Want to see another reason why nobody with an ounce of intelligence never believes what the mainstream tells us?  Quote: "Despite these indisputable facts, the nation’s gatekeepers, the mainstream media, conveniently omits Obama’s name in connection with Clinton’s “illegal” acts. After the former FBI Director James Comey declared Clinton free of any charges in 2016, NewsBusters did a Google search to see how often Barack Obama’s name appeared in mainstream stories. The search showed nothing relevant. The Washington Post only included Obama’s name in one sentence about Jeff Sessions. In another, he appears with Peter Strzok and a desire to “know everything we are doing.” The New York Times only mentioned Obama’s name four times and none of those occasions concerned lies and illegal activity. Now, imagine the Times had even a hint that a Republican or conservative president was complicit in such actions. That’s how you know this is a big story."    https://www.americanlibertyreport.com/articles/overwhelming-evidence-proves-obama-lied-about-knowledge-of-hillarys-illegal-email-server/

Who would have "thunk" this?   https://godfatherpolitics.com/chart-shows-that-google-only-promotes-far-left-news-organizations/

More disgusting mainstream media messing in the political campaigns.  Idiot fanatics never learn from past mistakes.   https://rawconservativeopinions.com/2019/05/17/cnn-msnbc-caught-meddling-in-us-democracy/

Here is an example of just how far left Facebook is.  Conservative pundit Michelle Malkin is targeted by the organization while hate filled and violent Antifa gets a pass.  Quote: "And there they go again. Facebook has censored Michelle Malkin — for protesting censorship. Meanwhile, as noted in this space just last week, Facebook has no problem with the pro-fascist and deliberately misnamed “Antifa” — the pro-fascist group that pretends its use of hooded faces and clubs is somehow “anti-fascist.” Here is the link to AntifaUSA and their masked faces as they appear on Facebook. Take a good look at Antifa’s favored appearance of black ski masks and recall another leftist group — this one that historians describe as the “terrorist arm of the Democratic Party.” Ahh, the more things change the more they stay the same — from the Klan to Antifa the far-left specializes in hiding its faces to enable its acts of hatred and violence."    https://spectator.org/facebook-targets-michelle-malkin-gives-pass-to-antifa/?

I admit I am not a big fan of PBS but less so of CNN. I have in the past listened to and watched their programing and suspect nothing has changed. I admit too that I occasionally watch history or nature items on PBS. When I do I notice amidts the good they throw in their left wing bias in subtle but certain ways. They are a left wing propaganda machine.  This is but one example of a hard leftist trying to get a conservative Hollywood personality to bad mouth Trump. People like her are bad for freedom, justice, civil debate and decency and certainly cannot be trusted to represent the truth on any meaningful subject.  Quote: "Christine Amanpour works for CNN and PBS. She had on Hollywood conservative Kelsey Grammer an interview and tried to bait him into trashing Trump. He silenced her with high praise instead. The elites want us to forget what they have done and try to use Trump’s foibles to trash the voters for rising up and undoing their damage. It won’t work. Trump may not be perfect and much more needs to be done but without fixing the problems the elites created, the whole system will crash from its own hubris. Trump is actually doing them a favor but they are too blind to see it."    https://explainlife.com/kelsey-grammer-silences-cnn-reporter-with-high-praise-for-trump-14513/?

This is a twist to the social media leftists and their motivations.  Everyone by now knows that social media is guilty of censoring those they do not like and that means anyone who speaks badly about anything or anyone the left wing loves. But unfortunately the left wing tycoons of industry are playing that game too and social media tycoons are paying attention and accordingly because their income depends on them. This item explains.   https://www.libertyguard.org/the-lords-of-social-media-jump-when-ad-dollars-are-threatened/   Way too many big business people seek social change for their respective bottom lines, caring little or nothing about ethics, decency and serving the interests of ALL people regardless of ideology.    https://www.libertyguard.org/the-lords-of-social-media-jump-when-ad-dollars-are-threatened/   This is what our country is coming to thanks to the growth over the past 100 years of progressivism ideology based on cultural Marxist doctrine. People in all parts of our society have bought into insane nonsense

It is a really sad, sad state of affairs when the New York Times sees everything through a racial lens. Does that make them a racist newspaper.  The author of this piece and Andrew Klaven seem to think so.  Here is the assessment as rationale to support such a notion. Quote: "Novelist, screenwriter, podcaster, and all-around sage Andrew Klavan has taken to referring to the New York Times as a “former newspaper.” The Times, he says, clings to the pretense of news reporting while pursuing other ends, to wit, the advancement of the leftist ideology shared by the paper’s writers, editors, and management. Seldom does a week go by that Klavan, in his writing or on his podcast, doesn’t provide justification for his low opinion of what once was known as America’s Newspaper of Record. And, he admonishes, while it’s important to pay attention to what’s included in the paper’s stories, it’s often more important to ask what’s been left out."

Do you ever wonder why the mainstream media no longer has any respect as an honorable institution??  This is just one of many more reasons.  Quote: "Media That Once Accused 47 Republicans of Violating the Logan Act Now Says John Kerry Is In the Clear."    https://www.redstate.com/bonchie/2019/05/12/media-accused-47-republicans-violating-logan-act-now-say-john-kerry-clear/?     

When Trump's 30 years old tax returns are big front page news you know they are scraping the bottom of the barrel in their mission to destroy the President.  It is disgusting how evil and I do mean that word that the left wing media and politicians have become while suffering Trump Dementia Syndrome.  It is a sign of their panic from being exposed for the reprobates they have become.  Quote: "New York Times proves that no news is BIG news."  Quote: "After an exhaustive investigation, the NYT published a report on President Trump’s financial situation in the late 1980s and early 1990s – some thirty years ago.  They garnered the information from the financial figures associated with Trump’s tax returns of that era. This is where it gets interesting.  The writers said that they never had possession or even seen actual copies of the President’s returns but got the information from IRS computers – where such information is uploaded so that taxpayers can review old tax information.  At least that is their story. The Times said it used those particular years because that was the only period to which they gained access.  They will not, however, tell how they gained that access.  It is difficult to imagine that they had done so legally, but it is a mystery.  It is also the only question that seems to have actual news value – something worth investigating. What the tax information revealed, according to the Times, was that Donald Trump went through a very bad financial period.  As a major real estate developer, he suffered big time when the real estate market took a dive.  You could even say he was on the ropes – possibly down to his last millions.  (Wouldn’t we all like to be on those “ropes?”.    http://punchingbagpost.com/2019/05/09/horist-new-york-times-proves-that-no-news-is-big-news/?