The explosive developments surrounding newly declassified documents that allege senior Obama-era officials—including John Brennan and James Comey—fabricated the Trump–Russia collusion narrative. A Justice Department “strike force” has launched criminal investigations into the misuse of intelligence to damage Donald Trump politically during and after the 2016 election. According to these revelations, top Obama officials admitted under oath that they lacked empirical evidence of collusion but advanced the narrative anyway, largely relying on the discredited Steele dossier. The article frames this scandal as a historic abuse of power with significant implications for American democracy and the credibility of U.S. intelligence agencies.
DOJ Strike Force Launched
A new DOJ unit is investigating former intelligence officials—including Brennan and Comey—for potential fraud, obstruction, and conspiracy.
This effort follows declassified materials revealing no factual basis for the Trump–Russia collusion allegations that shaped national politics for years.
No Evidence, But a Narrative Advanced
CIA, FBI, and DOJ officials—including Clapper, Lynch, and Brennan—testified under oath that they had “no empirical evidence” of Trump–Russia coordination.
Despite this, they helped drive the public narrative of collusion, allegedly to distract from the Clinton email scandal and health concerns.
Steele Dossier’s Role and Fabrications
The Clinton-funded Steele dossier, featuring lurid and unverified claims, was included in official intelligence assessments at Brennan’s urging, despite being flagged as “highly problematic.”
Comey briefed Trump on the dossier in 2016 while allegedly working behind the scenes with Obama aides to sustain the investigation.
The ICA Was Politicized
The 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA), which claimed Russia aimed to help Trump, is now under fire for being rushed and lacking supporting evidence.
Putin reportedly expected Clinton to win and sought to exploit her weaknesses post-election—not to boost Trump.
House Intel Report & Clinton Campaign Strategy
A 2020 House Intelligence report, newly declassified, shows Russia collected damaging data on Clinton’s health and finances but chose not to release it.
Brennan’s notes reference a Clinton campaign plan to “vilify Trump with a Russia scandal.”
Other Officials Under Scrutiny
The investigation may expand to include Susan Rice, John Kerry, and Andrew McCabe, all of whom relied on the discredited dossier to justify surveillance of Trump associates.
Political and Institutional Fallout
Democrats label the new revelations a “right-wing conspiracy,” but critics argue the weaponization of intelligence is now undeniable.
The scandal further erodes public trust in the intelligence community, especially in the wake of other high-profile security failures and alleged partisanship.
Tulsi Gabbard’s Role and Warning
As Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard has overseen declassifications and called this scandal a betrayal of democratic norms.
Gabbard warns that politicized intelligence threatens U.S. democracy and must be reformed to prevent future abuses.
Framing and Takeaway
Conservative perspective: Vindicates Trump, confirms years of claims about a “deep state” conspiracy.
Liberal perspective: Seen as an overblown distraction from foreign threats like China and a politically motivated effort to relitigate 2016.
Larger implication: Raises critical questions about the integrity of U.S. intelligence institutions, the limits of executive power, and whether accountability for past abuses is possible.
https://www.naturalnews.com/2025-07-26-docs-show-obama-aides-orchestrated-russia-hoax.html
No comments:
Post a Comment