The article by William L. Anderson discusses how misleading information from the Biden administration contributed to the escalation of the Ukraine War, drawing parallels with past conflicts like the Vietnam War.
1. Vietnam War Reflection: The author reflects on personal experiences from the Vietnam War and how falsehoods often accompany wartime narratives.
2. Promotion of War: The media, particularly the New York Times, is criticized for initially supporting U. S. involvement in conflicts and then expressing disapproval.
3. Media Perspective: Columnist David French portrays a positive image of Ukrainian resistance but later expresses frustration with the Biden administration under new political circumstances.
4. Depth of U. S. Involvement: A New York Times investigation revealed that the U. S. was more involved in the Ukraine conflict than publicly stated, significantly aiding Ukrainian military operations.
5. Criticism of Government Lies: Journalist Matt Taibbi highlights how the Biden administration and its allies misled the public about the nature and extent of U. S. involvement in the war.
6. Risk of Escalation: The article emphasizes that U. S. actions risked nuclear conflict with Russia, underlining a lack of transparency about the administration's true objectives.
7. Proxy War Issues: The Biden administration’s claims of not engaging in a "proxy war" contradict the realities of deep military collaboration with Ukraine.
8. Consequences of War: The author concludes that the Biden administration's decisions led to unnecessary violence and loss of life, along with destruction in Ukraine.
The piece criticizes the Biden administration for perpetuating a series of lies regarding U. S. involvement in the Ukraine War, thereby expanding the conflict and risking global peace. It underscores the consequences of such misinformation, calling for accountability and a reevaluation of U. S. foreign policy.
https://mises.org/mises-wire/how-lies-biden-administration-expanded-ukraine-war
No comments:
Post a Comment