The article discusses the ongoing pattern of war initiated by the United States since World War II. It examines the influence of banking interests behind these conflicts and questions the motivations driving U. S. military interventions.
• Since World War II, there have been 248 armed conflicts worldwide, with the U. S. instigating over 80% of these wars.
• The American public typically votes for anti-war candidates, yet continues to engage in military conflicts. This indicates that systemic factors, rather than public demand, push for war.
• Wars are justified to the public with various narratives, often masking the true systemic incentives, particularly those rooted in banking interests.
• The article emphasizes a strong connection between warfare and financial motivations, asserting that “all wars are bankers' wars. ”
• A notable case is the 2003 U. S. invasion of Iraq, framed as an effort to maximize the value of oil reserves, specifically Alberta’s newly recognized bitumen reserves, by keeping Iraqi oil off the market.
• Upon the invasion's completion, the U. S. recognized these Alberta reserves as significant collateral for money creation, linking oil prices to banking profits.
• Following the Iraq invasion, oil prices surged from around $25 to over $146 per barrel by 2008, benefiting those holding significant stakes in Alberta's oil.
• Control over this oil collateral was reportedly seized by Rockefeller banking interests, contributing to the inflation of the housing bubble.
• The financial criminality surrounding these events led to the 2008 Global Financial Crisis, resulting in massive losses for ordinary Americans, while banks received bailouts.
• Independent estimates suggest the financial impact of these events could have reached as high as $29 trillion, illustrating vast wealth redistribution due to these newfound financial dynamics.
• The conventional oil market analyses during this time neglected the underlying financial conspiracies, focusing instead on surface-level price drivers without recognizing the systemic issues at play.
The article unfolds the complex relationship between U. S. foreign policy and banking interests, highlighting how wars are often driven by financial motives rather than public desire for security or democracy. The focus on Alberta oil as collateral during the Iraq war exemplifies how financial manipulation can dictate foreign policy, leading to substantial consequences for everyday citizens. Understanding these dynamics is crucial to grasping the historical and ongoing impacts of military operations.
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2025-04-23/gods-finance-and-dogs-war
No comments:
Post a Comment