Months ago, WND reported that Dr. Robert Malone, a well-known expert on mRNA treatments, confirmed that the Pfizer shots fully authorized by the Food and Drug Administration for use against COVID-19 is not the same Pfizer shot that Americans have been getting under an emergency use status.
"The little trick that they've done here is that they've issued two letters, separate letters for two separate vaccines. The Pfizer vaccine which is what is currently available, is still under emergency use authorization, and it still has the liability shield," he explained.
Now Just the News is reporting that the social-media corporation Twitter has punished the account of its founder, John Solomon, for sharing an article "About the legal distinctions between Pfizer's fully approved and emergency use authorization COVID-19 vaccines, which could affect the legality of vaccine mandates."
The article in question explained that Pfizer's shots against COVID-19 were approved by the FDA, "Yet the pharmaceutical giant is still providing distributors across the country with an earlier version of the vaccine that predates FDA's full approval."
The report said, "The EUA-authorized vaccine is being distributed and administered widely in Ohio, Virginia, and Pennsylvania, among other states. But while the product hasn't received FDA approval, Pfizer says it's made using the same processes as Comirnaty and no different in terms of safety and effectiveness."
"Even the FDA has admitted the Pfizer products are separate."A government vaccine information "Fact sheet" on the issue specifically lists the shots as two separate objects.
"It separately identifies"COMIRNATY" as the FDA-approved drug made by Pfizer for BioNTech and then the separate "Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine that is under emergency use authorization.
https://www.wnd.com/2021/12/truth-pfizer-covid-shots-getting-fiercely-suppressed/
No comments:
Post a Comment