Last Thursday, the Food and Drug Administration permanently did away with requiring women to have an in-person visit to acquire drugs for a chemical abortion.
As Patrick Hauf reported for The Washington Free Beacon on Thursday, "FDA Used Incomplete Data To Justify Deregulation of Chemical Abortion Pills, Studies Show," which entailed failure to properly look to the accurate number of medical emergencies following this method.
The reporting system relies on data submitted by the makers of chemical abortion pills, who in turn gather data from doctors who prescribe the drugs.
Such efforts to mislead women about this method look to be a pattern, not merely from the federal government, but from abortion advocates.
On December 15, shortly before the FDA announced its decision, Novielli wrote a piece for Live Action News, "ER doctors should falsify records to hide abortion pill complications in a post-Roe era, suggests media's favorite abortionist."
As Dr. Daniel Grossman of the University of California at San Francisco told Salon, "Online sites that are making the pills available" with "Accurate information" and "Good quality medication" allow for self-managed abortion to "Be very safe and effective...".
On the contrary, countries that ban abortion tend to have higher abortion rates than countries where it is legal.
Friday, December 24, 2021
As If FDA's Move Last Week on Abortion Wasn't Bad Enough, Advocates Are Promoting Falsifying Medical Records
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment