This text criticizes electric vehicle (EV) mandates and transportation policies that aim to decrease individual car use in favor of public transit or bicycles. The author argues these measures are not solely for environmental protection but rather a form of control.
• The push to reduce greenhouse gas emissions has made the transportation sector a main target, with calls to replace fossil fuel vehicles with EVs, public transport, and non-motorized options.
• Massachusetts Senate Majority Leader Cynthia Stone Creem has proposed a bill to limit statewide vehicle miles traveled by 2030, introducing a system for tracking and potentially fining excessive mileage.
• Critics argue this is a move towards extreme policymaking that disconnects people from their cars, labeling it a “war on cars. ”
• The article mentions various similar policies in other states, such as California’s EV mandates and road restrictions, portraying a pattern of social engineering in favor of “sustainability. ”
• It raises concerns that government officials will not face the same restrictions as ordinary citizens, highlighting a perceived inequality in enforcement.
• The overall message emphasizes that the freedom to drive is fundamental to individual choice, and current policies threaten this freedom.
The author contends that the attempts to limit car use are signs of authoritarianism and an infringement on personal liberty, intending to challenge the narrative that these initiatives are purely environmental.
https://issuesinsights.com/2025/05/29/take-a-hike-driving-will-be-verboten/
No comments:
Post a Comment