A recent ruling by Judge Indira Talwani has sparked controversy regarding immigration policy and the role of the judiciary in determining public interest. The judge's decision is seen by some as an overreach of judicial power.
• Daniel Greenfield criticizes the current state of judicial rulings, particularly those made by Obama and Biden judges, arguing they undermine presidential authority.
• Judge Talwani ruled that illegal aliens brought into the U. S. by the Biden administration under 'parole' must remain in the country for the 'public interest. '
• Talwani argues that it is not in the public interest for these individuals to become unlawfully present and unable to support themselves.
• The author contends that the Constitution does not allow judges to decide what constitutes public interest; this responsibility lies with elected officials.
• He labels Talwani's action as a coup against executive authority, claiming it disrupts the lawful execution of policies enacted by the previous Trump administration.
The ruling has raised concerns about judicial authority and the implications for immigration policy, highlighting a struggle over power between the judiciary and the executive branch. Critics argue that such decisions should remain with elected officials, not judges.
No comments:
Post a Comment