The Media Ignored the Parliamentary Debate on Vaccine Safety

 On Monday, there was a debate in the UK Parliament on Covid vaccine safety.

• In the UK, the scale of adverse reactions from the COVID-19 vaccine is bitterly contested.
• The official line is that serious adverse events are “incredibly rare.”
• Other data sets put risks much higher than the 12 reports per 1 million doses reported by the Pfizer-suspected myocarditis rate, and one in 500 children under five years of age who received the vaccine were hospitalized with a vaccine injury within a few days of receiving the vaccine.
• Sir Christopher Chope pointed out that other data sets have put risks much higher than the "12 reports per 1 million doses" pinpointed by Colburn as the Pfizer-suspected myocarditis reporting rate - "The Paul Ehrlich Institute is the German regulator responsible for vaccine safety," he explained, before noting that on 20 July 2022, "The institute confirmed that one in 5,000 people was seriously affected after a vaccination." The study showed that one in 500 children under five years of age who received a Pfizer mRNAcovid vaccine were hospitalised with a vaccine injury, and one in 200 had symptoms ongoing for weeks or months afterwards. The significance of these comments cannot be overstated: Parliamentarians from the governing Conservative Party are now expressly acknowledging that the Government's authoritarian policy on the Covid vaccine rollout, combatting of vaccine hesitancy, and suppression of legitimate dissenting voices may have breached key tenets of medical ethics. Yet during this week's Parliamentary debate, elected representatives appeared guilty of the same ideological laziness, Elliot Colburn dismissing out of hand Sir Christopher Chope's question as to whether he had seen Oracle Film's "Safe and Effective: A Second Opinion." Many would maintain that in the context of a debate specifically on vaccine safety, Chope's was an eminently reasonable question, and yet Colburn's answer -. At many points during the debate the degree of Establishment disinterest, bordering on wilful blindness, underlined: "The Government seems to be in denial about the risks of these vaccines," noted Chope, with Kruger adding, "I am a member of the all-party parliamentary group on covid-19 vaccine damageThe APPG looks at vaccine injuries, and we had what I think was our first meeting last week in a Committee room in Portcullis House. I am afraid there were only a tiny handful of colleagues there, but well over a hundred members of the public attended, which is not the usual story for an APPG.". The Covid Public Inquiry in the UK will consider the vaccine rollout process, but it is not apparent that it will question vaccine safety - this seems unlikely in the current climate of suppression - and in any case the timescales for that inquiry run into years.
• 
  

https://brownstone.org/articles/the-media-ignored-the-parliamentary-debate-on-vaccine-safety/