Second, Democrats suggested that Jackson's sentencing record in child pornography cases mirrored that of judges appointed by President Donald Trump.
Durbin returned to the topic that afternoon, but used the same lone example of a Trump-appointed judge imposing a sentence for possession of child porn that was below the sentencing guidelines' recommendation.
In stark contrast to Jackson, 45% of their sentences for child pornography were within or above the range recommended by the guidelines.
So one thing that we know is that, using either standard demanded by Judiciary Committee Democrats, Jackson's sentences in all three categories of child pornography crimes were significantly more lenient than those of other federal judges.
In more than half of her cases of child pornography distribution, Jackson didn't add a single day to the mandatory minimum sentence already imposed by Congress.
The other thing we know is that Jackson's record regarding child porn is longer than her sentences in these cases.
A child who has posed for a camera must go through life knowing that the recording is circulating within the mass distribution system for child pornography.
It's becoming increasingly difficult to discern fact from fiction, and unfortunately the media has a strong bias. They spin stories to make conservatives look bad and will go to great lengths to avoid reporting on the good that comes from conservative policies. There are a few shining lights in the media landscape-brave conservative outlets that report the truth and offer a different perspective. We must support conservative outlets like this one and ensure that our voices are heard.
Saturday, April 2, 2022
What We Know About Judge Jackson's Record in Child Porn Sentences
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment