Scientific American published a hit piece blasting the late E. O. Wilson for allegedly espousing "Racist" ideas with his work in genetics.
Wilson wrote numerous books on sociobiology, a field that aims to explain social behavior based on evolution and genetics.
One of Wilson's most influential texts, "Sociobiology: The New Synthesis," really upset the writer of the Scientific American hit piece, who claims that Wilson "Contributed to the false dichotomy of nature versus nurture and spawned an entire field of behavioral psychology grounded in the notion that differences among humans could be explained by genetics, inheritance and other biological mechanisms."
The author of the Scientific American piece went on to claim that the entire study of genetics is "Racist," providing no evidence of this other than her feelings on the matter.
As you may recall, back in the summer of 2019, Scientific American published an article pushing a "Gender-free" future.
Now, Scientific American is a joke of a periodical that no longer has any basis in science.
"It doesn't do justice to any marginalized community to drag E. O. Wilson through the mud like this. Wilson was not only an expert in biology, but he made great contributions in the fight to save the planet," the Medium report explains.
It's becoming increasingly difficult to discern fact from fiction, and unfortunately the media has a strong bias. They spin stories to make conservatives look bad and will go to great lengths to avoid reporting on the good that comes from conservative policies. There are a few shining lights in the media landscape-brave conservative outlets that report the truth and offer a different perspective. We must support conservative outlets like this one and ensure that our voices are heard.
Monday, January 24, 2022
Woke Scientific American loses all remaining credibility, declares field of genetics to be RACIST, drags dead scientists through mud
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment