The judge, who rejected the Department of Justice dismissal of the case, must now consider documents Flynn's attorneys filed with the court on Thursday.
"General Flynn has a Sixth Amendment right to a public exoneration regarding the proceedings against him," the documents state, "And the American people have a right to know the truth about the nefarious conduct and the people who committed it. The defense objects to any redactions and demands that the Government file these documents unredacted on the public record."
According to the documents, the "Investigation" of General Flynn was first closed by November 8, 2016.
The "Concern when we got it was that there was a big leak at DOJ and the NYT among others was going to do a piece." Further, "The new AG might have some questionsthen yada yada yadawe all get screwed." On January 13, 2017, FBI employees messaged that "Someone leaked the Flynn calls with Kislyak to the WSJ." In a response reeking with sarcasm, an FBI employee messaged "I'm so sorry to hear that. I'll resume my duties as Chief Morale Officer and rectify that."
Newly produced notes of Peter Strzok show that Strzok met with Bruce Swartz, Lisa, and George at DOJ on March 28, 2017, where he noted Flynn Intel Group "Satisfied the registration obligation" and "No evidence of any willfulness." Nonetheless, "Bruce" decided to issue subpoenas to Flynn Intel Group "And more."
"According to exhibits C and D:"The new Strzok-Page text messages show that Strzok played games with the FBI Sentinel serialization system and entry of 302s, Strzok and Page were pulling talking points from a Lawfare article, and "F'in Pamela Brown knows there were two phone call memos." Further, "These text message reinforce how zealously Strzok and Page were working to oppose Trump's election and subvert the peaceful transfer of power."
They were trying very hard to pin something on General Flynn.
Friday, September 25, 2020
New Flynn Document Dump Poses Huge Trouble for Dems
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment