A Biased Reuters Makes It Personal-and Gets Election Fraud Completely Wrong

The mainstream media has shown no interest in reporting any of these problems, which can lead to election fraud or administrative errors and mistakes by election officials.

Play for the other team, the side that denies election fraud and hides breakdowns in the election process.

As for what Reuters gets wrong, let's start where the reporters start, by repeating the old canard that the presidential advisory panel commissioned to research problems in our voter registration and election systems "Disbanded after less than a year without finding evidence of significant fraud."

Conveniently fails to mention is that these thousands of illegally registered noncitizens were not detected by state election officials; in fact, they illegally cast thousands of votes before they voluntarily came forward to admit they were not U.S. citizens and should be taken off the rolls.

As both the U.S. Supreme Court and the Carter-Baker Commission on Election Reform said, fraud could make a difference in a close election.

That found over 144,000 potential cases of election fraud by individuals voting twice, voting after they're dead, or casting votes after registering at commercial addresses like UPS stores? The answer is no.

About how dozens of left-wing groups pour huge amounts of money into pushing the myth of "Voter suppression" and opposing every effort and every reform intended to secure the integrity of the election process? Probably about the same time we can expect an unbiased, accurate story about our efforts to ensure that every eligible American citizen is able to vote and that vote is not diluted or stolen through fraud or administrative errors by election officials.

https://pjmedia.com/columns/hans-a-von-spakovsky-and-j-christian-adams/2020/09/22/a-biased-reuters-makes-it-personal-and-gets-election-fraud-completely-wrong-n954838