Last week, the Justice Department issued a statement: A team led by U.S. Attorney John Durham is separately exploring the extent to which a number of countries, including Ukraine, played a role in the counterintelligence investigation directed at the Trump campaign during the 2016 election.
Which is doubly outrageous considering that all these foreign countries are only muddied in this mess because the Obama Administration did just that on behalf of the Clinton campaign; i.e., sought foreign assistance to investigate a purported crime involving Trump.
In the chaotic three years that have ensued, it has been demonstrated beyond a doubt that Trump did not collude with Russia.
They are asking: How was an investigation started with no evidence? How was the fake dossier used? Why were Ukraine, England, Australia and Italy involved? Who are the treasonous bastards who misused American power to conduct a campaign dirty trick? If the answer to the last question happens to be "Trump's potential rivals in 2020," please let's avoid the through-the-looking-glass editorial position of the New York Times that Trump is trying to "Steal" the next election.
No, Trump is trying to get to the bottom of what happened in 2016 and he is oath bound to continue his hot pursuit even if potential political rivals are implicated.
Leaving aside for a moment how outrageous it is to appoint an interested party to do the hands-on investigation of election meddling under the banner of the FBI, why aren't our newshounds more interested that Trump asked the Ukrainian president last week about "CrowdStrike" by name and an unidentified wealthy person associated with it? He was referring to either CrowdStrike's chief technology officer and co-founder, Dmitri Alperovitch-a Russian expat and a senior fellow at the Atlantic Council, a think tank with an anti-Putin agenda; or to Ukrainian billionaire Victor Pinchuk, a $10 million donor to the Clinton Foundation who also funds the Atlantic Council.
The words "Deep state" are thrown around to describe the conspiracy by American spies and their counterparts in Ukraine, Italy, Great Britain and Australia to get Trump, but that is perhaps too generous.
https://www.printfriendly.com/p/g/qEUEyZ
Which is doubly outrageous considering that all these foreign countries are only muddied in this mess because the Obama Administration did just that on behalf of the Clinton campaign; i.e., sought foreign assistance to investigate a purported crime involving Trump.
In the chaotic three years that have ensued, it has been demonstrated beyond a doubt that Trump did not collude with Russia.
They are asking: How was an investigation started with no evidence? How was the fake dossier used? Why were Ukraine, England, Australia and Italy involved? Who are the treasonous bastards who misused American power to conduct a campaign dirty trick? If the answer to the last question happens to be "Trump's potential rivals in 2020," please let's avoid the through-the-looking-glass editorial position of the New York Times that Trump is trying to "Steal" the next election.
No, Trump is trying to get to the bottom of what happened in 2016 and he is oath bound to continue his hot pursuit even if potential political rivals are implicated.
Leaving aside for a moment how outrageous it is to appoint an interested party to do the hands-on investigation of election meddling under the banner of the FBI, why aren't our newshounds more interested that Trump asked the Ukrainian president last week about "CrowdStrike" by name and an unidentified wealthy person associated with it? He was referring to either CrowdStrike's chief technology officer and co-founder, Dmitri Alperovitch-a Russian expat and a senior fellow at the Atlantic Council, a think tank with an anti-Putin agenda; or to Ukrainian billionaire Victor Pinchuk, a $10 million donor to the Clinton Foundation who also funds the Atlantic Council.
The words "Deep state" are thrown around to describe the conspiracy by American spies and their counterparts in Ukraine, Italy, Great Britain and Australia to get Trump, but that is perhaps too generous.
https://www.printfriendly.com/p/g/qEUEyZ
No comments:
Post a Comment