If it’s any consolation the $400 million Obama recently smuggled to terror-sponsoring Iran wasn’t (directly) extorted from the American taxpayer. Instead it was money the Shah (Iran’s ruler in 1979) paid for U.S. military equipment shortly before he was deposed by the terror-sponsoring maniacs still running Iran (i.e. sold down the river by President Jimmy Carter.)
Amazingly the U.S. never delivered the arms to the Shah’s “successors,” who still claim rightful ownership of U.S. jets, tanks, etc. The recently smuggled $400 million, as rationalized by Obama and some in the media, is simply a way of making good on that transaction-- a harmless money-back policy, similar to Wal-Mart’s.
Above I wrote “amazingly” because delivery of sophisticated U.S. Military equipment to Islamic maniacs seems like business-as-usual for Democratic Presidents lately. Just ask the jumble of Islamic maniacs shooting, blasting and hacking each other to pieces in Syria lately.
If delivering (a probably unconstitutional) $400 million to terror-sponsoring, hostage-taking Iran strikes many of us as foolish—or shameful, outrageous and dangerous-- what about $4 billion (annually) to Iran’s closest ally in the Western Hemisphere: terror-sponsoring Cuba?
http://townhall.com/columnists/humbertofontova/2016/08/13/whats-worse-400-million-for-iran-or-4-billion-for-irans-terrorsponsoring-ally-on-our-doorstep-n2204311
Amazingly the U.S. never delivered the arms to the Shah’s “successors,” who still claim rightful ownership of U.S. jets, tanks, etc. The recently smuggled $400 million, as rationalized by Obama and some in the media, is simply a way of making good on that transaction-- a harmless money-back policy, similar to Wal-Mart’s.
Above I wrote “amazingly” because delivery of sophisticated U.S. Military equipment to Islamic maniacs seems like business-as-usual for Democratic Presidents lately. Just ask the jumble of Islamic maniacs shooting, blasting and hacking each other to pieces in Syria lately.
If delivering (a probably unconstitutional) $400 million to terror-sponsoring, hostage-taking Iran strikes many of us as foolish—or shameful, outrageous and dangerous-- what about $4 billion (annually) to Iran’s closest ally in the Western Hemisphere: terror-sponsoring Cuba?
http://townhall.com/columnists/humbertofontova/2016/08/13/whats-worse-400-million-for-iran-or-4-billion-for-irans-terrorsponsoring-ally-on-our-doorstep-n2204311
No comments:
Post a Comment