About Hillary 1

As of this date Hillary's polling numbers are doing well.  The Media ignores her multitudes of problems, rife dishonesty, and regurgitates her recurring lies in the most positive way possible. More often than not truth goes by the wayside.  Meanwhile the mainstream media parses every word and action  by Trump searching vigorously to find any real or imagined smidgen with which to bludgeon him.  No wonder Hillary's numbers are good.  I'm sorry but Hillary's plans for her presidency scare me to death.  Her long record of incompetence which started (as a young attorney) on the Nixon Watergate Committee when her boss was forced to fire her for lying.  Some of her foibles include troubles at Rose Law when missing documents years later landed in the White House,- how did that happen? A miraculous investment of $1000 in cattle futures miraculously returned her a profit of nearly $100,000 in just 9 months???  And she was chief suppresser of Bill's sexual escapades hoping to keep them out of the public eye by threatening the victims to keep quiet. And everyone remembers her declaration that Bill's escapades were all a Vast Right Wing Conspiracy. She, meantime was leading the charge destroying the reputations of the women Bill abused.  Supporting facts continue to be exposed but are mostly ignored by the media. Her subsequent mission failures, dishonesty, and gross ethical lapses coupled with no notable accomplishments confirm she is incapable of successfully serving as president. Being a first lady, a senator without one single attributable accomplishment, traipsing around the world as Secretary of State with little or no discernable or lasting successes are not a resume builder. She reminds me of the parody of the Emperor With No Clothes.  For example her campaign lauds her Russian Reset initiative.  As you know it was a big flop.  Her huge support of the Arab Spring turned out to be one "giant" failure with huge long term ramifications.  And remember her vaunted Health Care Initiative that Bill assigned her in his first year as president?  It flopped. And simply being a woman is not in any discernable way justification for her candidacy.  Interestingly, early in her campaign some of her ardent supporters were asked by a reporter to name some of her accomplishments.  They could not name even one. Just recently a congressional support fell victim to the same question.  Remember when they left the White House after Bill's second term?  They took for themselves a number of items that they surely knew belonged to the White House.  Subsequently caught in the act they were forced to return all the stolen items.  And we know about all her lies, not just those dealing with Benghazi but the countless and well documented others.  Yet she actually claimed in a recentt TV interview that she never lies. Hogwash!!!  She is a world class liar.  And, maybe you recall that while Secretary of State she and Bill colluded with Russia to sell that country 20% of our uranium reserves.  Do we really want them back in the White House?  I am not the only one who thinks she did not deserve the Democrat nomination much less does she deserve being elected president.  She is neither deserving nor qualified.  This email highlights just some of the reasons.  By the way, highlighting her shortcomings does not mitigate Trump's shortcomings in any way.  It is the vast difference in degree of accomplishments and character between the two that concerns me.  Trump has many accomplishments.  She has few, if any.  Trump has managed many successful endeavors.  Hillary was a disastrous manager as Secretary of State.  Both have ethical challenges but the below record will show Hillary far outpaces Trump in that regard.  Besides, like a huge percentage of other Americans, I do not consider her to be anywhere close to being ethical or trustworthy.  While evidence reveals his questionable ethics and trustworthiness in my opinion his shortcomings do not rise to the level of Hillary's.  Anyway, those are some of my thoughts.  Below are thoughts from more qualified observers of the political scene than I.  Focus your attention on the first 12 items.  Of those the first 6 are the most important.

1)  Here is a really, really good reason why Hillary should never be elected president.  The US Communist party no longer feels the need to put up their own candidates.  You read that right!!!  They are all in for the Democrat party and Hillary!   If before now you were not convinced that both the Democrat party and Hillary possess many Socialist/Communist principles this should open your eyes!!!  Now maybe you will believe me.  This is not me talking. This is the US Communist Party "ENDORSING" Hillary.  Quote: "The Communist Party USA may not control many actual votes, but what they lack in support is made up for in enthusiasm.  That passion was in full display with a seven-person team of “reporters” covering their national political convention last month. And their convention was the Democratic National Convention that nominated Hillary Rodham Clinton as their undisputed candidate for president of the United States.  Exaggeration? Judge for yourself."  And, "The Communists, who for decades ran their own candidates for president and vice president but supported Barack Obama in 2008 and 2012, don’t just like Hillary and Bernie. The party also gave a big thumbs-up to Clinton’s running mate, Tim Kaine." And, "Hillary Clinton’s association with radical thought dates back to at least 1969, when Obama was just 8 years old, himself a protégé early on of Frank Marshall Davis, a loyal Communist Party activist.  Clinton’s 1969 Wellesley College senior thesis was titled “There Is Only the Fight … : An Analysis of the Alinsky Model.” The thesis received attention when it was released after the Bill Clinton presidency. According to reports, in early 1993, the White House requested that Wellesley keep the thesis on “Rules for Radicals” author Saul Alinsky confidential and not release any copies."   http://www.wnd.com/2016/08/communist-party-unites-behind-hillary  Over the past couple of decades the differences between the Communist party and Democrat party have been narrowing. Now their respective platforms are very much alike as evidenced by the Communist Party's endorsement of Hillary.  BTW, the Communist party also endorsed Obama and we have seen what he has done.  Hillary will continue and even expand his incoherent and largely destructive policies.

2) Several past items included discussions of the power and influence socialist billionaire George Soros has over the Democrat party generally and Obama and Hillary specifically.  This piece provides insight into those relationships.  Quote: "In the following video, I break down the article below that contains a leaked email written by George Soros and to Hillary Clinton where he is giving her instructions on what she is to do. This begs the question that both myself and countless others have been asking forever… who is a vote for Hillary Clinton REALLY for?  Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton have long been George Soros puppets, and George Soros doesn’t care about the United States. He cares about a one world governments."  Here is an example of his instructions to Hillary while she was Secretary of State.  "New evidence, courtesy of the latest WikiLeaks email dump, has allowed us to identify one member of the shadow government.  In the leaked email, titled ‘Unrest in Albania,’ George Soros instructs Secretary of State Clinton that “two things need to be done urgently” and proceeds to order the Secretary of State to “bring the full weight of the international community to bear on Prime Minister Berisha” and “appoint a senior European official as mediator.”  Soros gives Clinton three names to choose from, and the Secretary of State duly chose one, Miroslav Lajcak.  Puppet master Soros also instructs the U.S. Secretary of State that “the U.S. and European Union must work in complete harmony over this,” revealing how far and wide his puppet strings extend." And. "So what happened next? An archived BBC report from 2011 sheds some light, and shows that Soros’ wish was Clinton’s command. Three days after Soros emailed Clinton, his suggested mediator was sent to the sovereign state, and his agenda was set in motion."   http://freedomoutpost.com/shadow-government-wikileaks-exposes-george-soros-controlling-clinton/  If you don't think Soros is a bad guy, read this.  http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/george-soros-think-tank-research-radical-islam/2016/08/15/id/743664/?  Remember now he is a big time Hillary supporter and manipulator.  He is indicative of many of the associates of the Clinton clan.  And if you want to gain a feel for his backroom global involvement read this piece.  http://dailycaller.com/2016/08/15/leaked-soros-memo-refugee-crisis-new-normal-gives-new-opportunities-for-global-influence/   Her linkage with Soros extends far and wide.  http://freebeacon.com/politics/illegal-immigrant-tapped-for-clinton-campaign-tied-to-soros-effort/    Another item regarding Soros and his influence over the policies and actions of the Democrat party generally and Hillary specifically.  Bottom line.  This should bother you a great deal.  Hillary is a puppet of the ultra wealthy elite, not just Soros, who are bent on destroying the United States and installing an all powerful, unelected oligarchy to run the world with only the elites in charge.  She, he and others are working hard to bring this horrific arrangement to fruition.

3)  Hillary's record on economic matters is dismal.  During her 2008 run for the senate she promised upstate New York voters she would deliver 200,000 new jobs. Her record?  Quote: "Once safely elected, she delivered results more on par with Venezuela. According to the Washington Post: “…upstate job growth stagnated overall during her tenure, with manufacturing jobs plunging nearly 25 percent, according to jobs data.”  It gets worse:  "But, make no mistake, one of Hillary’s top economic advisors is Joseph Stiglitz, a man on-record for praising the economy of Venezuela."  Even the New York Times recognizes the disaster that is the Venezuela economy: " Venezuela’s economy is now so weak than many citizens have been reduced to working in muddy jungle mines—where they have contracted malaria—a disease the country eradicated in 1961. Depressingly, desperate times have reawakened the horrific disease as impoverished Venezuelans resort to working in extremely hazardous conditions.  You know things are bad when even the New York Times admits socialist policies have ravaged Venezuela’s economy. We don’t need a president who receives her economic council from a man who would advise her to make America more akin to a country where citizens line the streets to wait for food."  Regarding Obama's secret Trans Pacific Partnership plans, "Hillary has Recently, Hillary claimed she too opposes TPP.  However, CNN unearthed a fascinating list of 45 times Clinton publicly pushed for TPP.  Thus, Clinton’s promise to oppose TPP means very little."  Read this item to contrast Hillary's impending economic disaster with Trump's proposal.    http://townhall.com/columnists/katiekieffer/2016/08/15/standing-ovation-trumps-economic-plan-n2204938? 

 

    Her proposed economic plans portends disaster.  Quote: "A recent Wall Street Journal news headline read, "The Worst Expansion Since World War II Was Even Weaker." The story proclaimed that this lackluster economic expansion is actually getting weaker.

Another recent Journal column titled "Productivity Slump Threatens Economy's Long-Term Growth" asserted that output per hour is experiencing the longest losing streak since 1979. The U-6 unemployment rate stands twice as high as the traditional unemployment rate, the U-3. Yet Obama has continued to do the same thing over and over again. And now comes Hillary Clinton's economic plan, which will deliver more stagnant growth, falling wages, dropping productivity and depressed investment.   http://townhall.com/columnists/larrykudlow/2016/08/16/insanity-once-more-the-hillary-clinton-economic-plan-n2205359?  and this item reports that, "Clinton wants to raise the tax on pass-through small and medium businesses to 45 percent, as well as raising the capital gains tax. These are direct taxes on American employers and the risk-takers who invest in them. And if people are really successful in business and they dare get rich, the government will snatch almost half of their lifetimes' savings in taxes when they die, under Clinton's plan.  What kind of upside-down economic theory tells you that the way to get more jobs is to place higher taxes on the businesses that create the jobs?  I have invented a term for this: economic bimbo-ism. Trump needs to make this point over and over: He wants to tax businesses at 15 percent. She wants to tax them at 47 percent. Then ask the American people: Which plan will bring more jobs to America?  The Tax Foundation says that the Clinton tax and economic plan will actually reduce jobs by 300,000 and subtract from our already weakling economic growth rate."    http://townhall.com/columnists/stephenmoore/2016/08/16/hillary-clinton-tax-spend-and-recession-n2205612?