I
hate harping on this but it reinforces so much of what I have stressed
in notes over the past several years. The point is that the President
and Democrats have constantly complained that Republicans are the
obstructionist that cause nothing to get done in Washington. The truth
is that the REAL obstructionists are Democrats. The two key players in
the obstructionist game were Obama and Reid. With both of these guys
you cannot go by what they say. You must go by what they do. And for
them the two things are definitely different. http://townhall.com/tipsheet/kevinglass/2015/01/23/2015-gop-senate-already-has-surpassed-all-of-2014-in-amendment-votes-n1947250?
This item provides a disturbing
video of Ferguson looters at work but "What makes the situation even
crazier (if possible) is that liberals are actually complaining about
the police decision to release this video." http://eaglerising.com/14265/blockbuster-new-ferguson-looting-video-shows-sheer-lunacy-rioters/
Liberal policies prompted this disaster and now that the evidence of
those policies is clear they don't want people to know their
consequences.
This is what a Democrat has to say about Obama's policies towards Iran. http://eaglerising.com/14297/democrat-leader-says-obamas-view-iran-sounds-like-talking-points-straight-tehran/ Note the friendliness displayed in the picture at the end of the piece. That says it all.
Hopefully the Supreme Court gets
it right this time. This item provides an excellent summary of the
Obamacare illegalities committed by the president multiple times. http://www.wnd.com/2015/01/supremes-alerted-to-obamas-pattern-of-lawless-behavior/
Obama's rule is do as I say. Not
as I do. He walks all over Congress, ignore them, writes his own laws,
conducts business in secret, etc. but they, according to him, cannot
act as an equal but separate branch of government as detailed in the
Constitution. His view is that they must get his permission before
inviting a foreign leader to speak in Congressional chambers. White
House insiders say "...the administration is fuming over the Israeli
leader’s plans to go before U.S. lawmakers in March regarding the
possibility of stepping up sanctions against Iran. In fact, one unnamed
Obama official has reportedly threatened retaliation, saying Netanyahu
will pay “a price” if he dares to appeal directly to the senators and
representatives." What childish behavior. http://www.westernjournalism.com/the-administration-is-fuming-over-the-israeli-leaders-plans-to/
This is a really good use of tax payer money don't you think? http://www.fixthisnation.com/conservative-breaking-news/feds-spend-432000-to-study-gay-hookup-apps/ and more.
Talk
about hubris..."The irony here is that Pelosi was in a similar position
in 2007 when she met with Syrian President Bashar Assad. "We came in
friendship, hope, and determined that the road to Damascus is a road to
peace," Pelosi told reporters." And, "Given that insurgents were
crossing from Syria into Iraq to fight U.S. troops, President George W.
Bush considered Pelosi's adventure in diplomacy "counterproductive." But
with public approval of the Iraq War in the toilet, the San Francisco
Democrat's visit was popular with the liberal base. Pelosi's Damascus
sit-down was good politics, if dubious policy." http://townhall.com/columnists/debrajsaunders/2015/01/25/pelosis-syriana-versus-boehners-bibi-invitation-n1947456/page/full
George Burns
No comments:
Post a Comment