Greenpeace
founder's speech challenged by Amherst College students. His point?
Solid record of history and knowledge of science. Their point?
Intolerance of an opposing point of view based on ignorance (or denial)
of the facts. http://finance.townhall.com/columnists/johnransom/2014/10/23/greenpeace-founder-no-risk-in-global-warming-n1908719?
This climate expert provides logic to the Climate Change debate. http://personalliberty.com/climate-change-another-excuse-tax-us/
This expert explains why 2014 will not be the warmest ever. http://www.cfact.org/2014/10/24/why-2014-wont-be-the-warmest-year-on-record/
What's up with this? The EPA is
now going after Argon. "There’s more Argon in our atmosphere than
anything other than molecular Nitrogen and Oxygen, and then Water." Yet
the EPA wants to ban it. http://www.redstate.com/2014/10/29/epa-ban-argon-one-largest-components-atmosphere/
Medical science has some flaws in it. http://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2014/11/04/the-invention-of-virus-reality/
Quote: "What about the claim
that the debate is over and the conclusions are settled? As an
atmospheric scientist working in the field since the 1970s, I know there
never was a rigorous “debate” over whether humans are substantially
responsible for long-term global climate change, so the debate can’t be
over. Furthermore, the science is still very much in a developing stage,
so it certainly can’t be “settled.” http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2014/10/climate_predictions_and_wishful_thinking_.html
And here's what astronaut and scientist Walt Cunningham has to say about global warming. http://www.cfact.org/2014/10/31/watch-apollo-astronaut-walt-cunningham-blast-global-warming/?
George Burns
No comments:
Post a Comment