The recent Newtown tragedy has
prompted many to consider the merits of gun ownership. Some have
determined they are dangerous and must go or be severely restricted.
New York has with great fanfare enacted the strictest gun laws in the
nation. Other states are looking to beef up their laws. President Obama
has signed 23 Executive Orders dealing with the issue and directed
Congress to enact more laws.
Without question the death of
anyone by any cause is a tragedy but why all of this frantic activity
following Newtown aimed at removing guns from law abiding citizens,
especially rifles. Is it warranted? Let's look at a few
facts. Department of Justice survey data show that in 2008 roughly
5,340,000 violent crimes were committed in the United States. These
include simple/aggravated assaults, robberies, sexual assaults, rapes,
and murders. Of these, about 436,000 or 8% were committed by offenders
visibly armed with a gun. According to the FBI, in 2011, 1,694 people
were murdered with knives, 726 with hands or feet, 496 with clubs or
hammers, 356 with shotguns and 323 with rifles. Handguns were
responsible for 6,222 murders.
An article in the 16 Jan 2013 edition of frontpagemag.com reports
that "Not only is gang violence dramatically higher in cities compared
to surrounding areas, but 60 percent of U.S. firearm homicides happen in
the 62 cities of the country's 50 largest metro areas." The vast
majority if not all of these weapons are either stolen or purchased on
the black market. Does anyone think more laws impacting legal gun
ownership will fix that problem? Consider these facts from the same
article, "...83% of those murdered in Chicago last year had criminal
records. In Philly it's 75%. In Milwaukee it’s 77% percent. In New
Orleans, it’s 64%. In Baltimore, it’s 91%. Many were felons who had
served time. And as many as 80% of the homicides were gang related."
From these data it is obvious
that most murders and other violent crimes are perpetrated by criminals
and gang members. And, while frequent the majority of these murders
have few victims at any one time so they are limited to local newscasts
and do not garner the national coverage like the one at Newtown. This
distorts reality and results in politicians crawling out of the woodwork
with quick-fix and mostly misguided solutions. The current situation
is just such a case as politicians are, for all the wrong reasons,
focused on infringing the Constitutional rights of the vast majority of
law abiding gun owners based on infrequent events such as Newtown and
not on the more frequent actions of criminals and gangs using their
illegal weapons to which politicians pay little or no attention.
With respect to mass murders like
the one at Newtown, Northeastern University professors Jack Levin and
James Allen Fox have "...studied dozens upon dozens of mass murderers
over the past few decades, and...Although serious mental illness can be
identified in some cases, most mass murderers are clear-headed and
deliberate. Contrary to popular stereotype, they don’t just suddenly
snap and go berserk, killing indiscriminately. The road to mass murder
typically involves years of disappointment and failure that produce a
mix of profound hopelessness and deep-seated resentment. Socially or
psychologically isolated, mass murderers lack emotional support and
encouragement from confidants. Moreover, they have no one around to help
provide a much needed reality check on their warped perception of
constantly being the victim of injustice. Tending to externalizing
blame, they seek to punish those whom they hold responsible for their
miserable life.
Most often, the mass murderer’s
rage is directed at specific targets, such as family members or
co-workers. Sometimes their grudge implicates an entire class of people,
such as feminists, minorities or immigrants who are believed to be
stealing all the good job opportunities. Occasionally and when the
perpetrator’s perceptions are twisted by mental illness, the entire
society is held as blameworthy. In such cases, the mass killer may
randomly target strangers in some public place."
Local, state and federal
governments, instead of seeking to control guns owned by law abiding
citizens, should focus on the societal problems that promote
criminal/gang activities and on mental health programs aimed at helping
those in distress before they commit acts of mass murder.
George Burns
No comments:
Post a Comment