5) FBI Director Comey may
not have recommended the indictment of Hillary for criminal acts but he
did, according to MSNBC's Chuck Todd indict her honesty, competence, and
irresponsibility. Quote:"... he gave her a political indictment that
under any other circumstances we would say this candidacy would be in
big trouble."
http://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2016/07/07/chuck-todd-fbi-indicted-clinton-on-her-judgment-to-be-presidentand-trump-is-botching-the-opportunity-n2189269
Yet she continues to lie through her teeth claiming "no" classified
emails passed over her illegal, unapproved and unprotected private email
system. The State Department now admits some of her emails were highly
classified and that she knew it. Quote: "The core of Hillary Clinton's
defense runs in three threads. First, and easiest to dismiss, is that
the classified information was not marked as such. This claim is not
even true but, even were that the case, Clinton knew, or should have
known, that conversations between US ambassadors and heads of state are
classified. That the names of CIA operatives are classified. Et cetera,
et cetera. The second thread is that the secret information she
scattered about the internet was not secret at the time. It is true some
of the emails were deemed classified retroactively. But even if we are
in a charitable mood and give her those we are still talking about at
least 110 emails containing classified information. What makes this
worse is that we don't know who the recipients of these "unmarked"
emails forwarded them to. And we don't know what was in the 30,000-plus
emails that Hillary's minions decided to delete because they allegedly
were "private." The third thread is that this is all a huge
misunderstanding. Sure, she says, some agencies are considering the
information to be classified but I relied on the advice of State
Department professionals and they said it wasn't. Essentially:" She was
in charge but passes clear blame on the "professionals". That is a
selfish and cowardly cop out.
http://www.redstate.com/streiff/2016/08/09/state-department-hillary-clinton-emails-classified-even-subject-cant-disclosed/
I do not believe her any more than I believe the moon is blue cheese.
She in an unapologetic liar. Should anyone this flippant with the
truth and with a propensity to deny responsibility for her
irresponsible, even unethical behavior ever be considered presidential
material? Not to me. Only the uninformed or misinformed could
ever vote for her. Unfortunately there are far too many fitting that
description populating the electorate.
7) This item is amusing because it exposes liberals for what they are. Quote: "MSNBC’s Joy Reid “went on NBC’s
Meet the Press and insulted the public claiming they were too stupid to understand Hillary’s” email trail of corruption. According to Reid, “‘
The
curse for [Hillary] is that trying to explain it, her answers are so
detailed and complicated, that when you explain you’re losing,’ she explained to the panel.” (
Source)
This is on purpose. Make it sound complicated when it’s not. Actually,
Reid didn’t insult all of the public. She was just covering for liberal
crimes and misdemeanors because most liberals are stupid when it comes
to liberal ideas and defenses for liberal crimes. For example, the
general liberal public believes that taking money from some people and
giving it to other people is a form of compassion. A constitutional
conservative knows that such political shenanigans is a form of theft
and ends up creating more unemployed people and slaves-to-the-State
voters for the Democrat Party. You see, a politician can’t be
compassionate with other people’s money. Moreover, taxing people has
never created a single job unless it’s a government job. Taking money
from productive people means that productive people no longer have that
money to spend, employ people, grow a business, invest, or lend."
http://constitution.com/liberal-admits-democrats-stupid-understand-hillarys-complicated-e-mail-scandal/
Its funny because the truth is that Hillary's email scandal is real,
real simple and not at all complicated. She screwed up big time and has
lied about it ever since. Liberals just don't or don't want
to understand what's so simple. She broke the law and has
repeatedly lied about it. The fact that others are in jail for doing
far less than what she did shows how unethical, uncaring, callous and
supremely selfish she really is.
8) Interesting isn't how
the Hillary loving mainstream media jumps on Trump every time they see a
chance to point out how horrible he is and question his ability to
serve as president? Interesting, too, isn't it how they ignore all the
far more relevant reasons to question Hillary's ability to serve. Her
laundry list of reasons far exceeds Trump's. He may not be the nicest
guy on the block and he does say some ridiculous things. But, Hillary?
Where to start? Quote: "Hillary Clinton has indeed become well known
as a serial liar, as fully two-thirds of Americans,
68 percent in a recent poll,
said she was neither honest nor trustworthy. Not only does Clinton lie
to protect herself, as she has regarding Benghazi and her private email
server, but she lies when there appears to be no benefit to doing so....
“Robert
Reich, M.D., a New York City psychiatrist and expert in
psychopathology, says compulsive lying can be associated with dementia
or brain injury,” Dr. Gina Loudon, a political psychology and behavior
expert, told WND. “Otherwise, compulsive lying can be associated with a
range of diagnoses, such as antisocial, borderline and narcissistic
personality disorders." http://www.wnd.com/2016/08/so-trumps-crazy-what-about-hillary/?
It is even worse. The left lambastes any conservative or republican
for innocuous comments while giving their liberal Democrats a pass every
time. This example shows just how hypocritical and totally dishonest
they are.
http://eaglerising.com/35843/hillary-strategist-calls-for-assassinating-julian-assange-video/
Remember now these are the people directly supporting Hillary's quest
for the White House. If a Republican or conservative said anything like
this they would be dead meat. The media would literally destroy him or
her. But said by a Democrat - no problem.
9) This case is proof
positive that Hillary has lied every time she says she has promoted
girls and women's rights all her life. Hillary defended and got a light
sentence for a man who raped a 12 year old girl. She later laughed
about how she got him a light sentence. Quote: "
Shelton
said the rape has made it difficult for her to have friendships with
men or be alone with them. She added that she is a lesbian. Indirectly
acknowledging the protection Clinton enjoys from most of the media,
Shelton commented on why the Democrats’ presidential nominee has not
addressed her defense of a sexual predator who raped a child. “If
she brought it up there would probably be some questions asked that she
wouldn't be able to answer,” said Shelton. “But if she's for women and
children, why would she defend someone knowing that a 12-year-old got
raped?” In her late 20s, Clinton
laughed as
she recalled the details of the case. She implied that she knew of her
client’s guilt as a predator of children. The audio can be heard
below."
http://www.dailywire.com/news/8221/child-rape-victim-clintons-client-speaks-robert-kraychik? And, what does the then 12 year old victim now feel about Hillary? Find out here:
http://www.wnd.com/2016/08/raped-at-12-victim-lashes-out-at-hillary-for-defending-attacker/
Hillary is not now nor has she ever been an advocate for women's
rights. She is far too egotistical and power hungry to care for anyone
other than herself. As Secretary of State she lobbied Muslim
governments for funds for the Clinton Foundation and avoided any effort
pressure them to stop their well known practice of mistreating and
abusing women and girls. She got millions for her foundation and Muslim
women and girls got nothing but her acquiescence to continued abuse.
10) If you didn't know
before you now know that Hillary has little regard for the police. She
just blew off the largest police union in the country. Quote: "Democrat
nominee Hillary Clinton has made it plain and clear that she isn’t
interested in an endorsement from the largest police union in the
country." This woman is a unhinged and very dangerous. We already
know she has little use for obeying the law. Now we know she has no
regard for those who are called upon to lay their lives on the line
every day to enforce laws passed by politicians, legitimate or not. She
will carry on Obama's practice of overt lawlessness.
http://dennismichaellynch.com/hillary-clinton-snubs-national-police-union/
12) How disingenuous is
this? Hillary's minions in the State Department do not need to be
ethical, according to, "...A State Department spokesperson clarified
Thursday that Hillary Clinton’s 2009 ethics pledge—to avoid conflicts of
interest with the Clinton Foundation—did not extend to Clinton’s top
aides at the Department." And, "At this point another reporter
interjected, “Importantly, in this case, Secretary Clinton made a pledge
that she would not personally or substantially, in any way, involve
herself with the Clinton Foundation.” He continued, “So it’s not just
any outside organization, it’s the specific organization that she said
ahead of time she wouldn’t have contact with.” “Doesn’t this then seem
to violate that pledge?” he asked." Not a good answer was provided. "
“So, again, to reiterate,
you know, Department officials are in touch with a wide range of
individuals,” Trudeau replied. She added, “I’d note that former
Secretary Clinton’s ethics agreement did not preclude other State
Department officials from having contact with Clinton Foundation
staff.” Pause a moment and consider what a slimy, Clintonian admission
this is, one that reveals how utterly hollow Clinton’s pledge was all
along. Does it matter if Clinton vowed not to be involved with the
family Foundation if her chief of staff, Cheryl Mills, and top aide,
Huma Abedin, were
free to carry on as they pleased? What kind of ethics pledge is this?"
http://hotair.com/archives/2016/08/11/state-department-hillarys-ethics-pledge-did-not-apply-to-her-top-aides/?
Ethics is not a part of any Obama administrative staff requirement.
Clearly ethics in his State Department while Hillary was there were
non-existent. Here is a footnote to that statement. Quote: "...three
separate DOJ field offices wanted to fulfill the FBI’s request to
investigate the Clinton Foundation, but the DOJ turned them down."
http://www.dailywire.com/news/8322/3-justice-department-field-offices-wanted-ben-shapiro? Do you still wonder why Obama wants Hillary instead of Trump as the next president?
