Corporate Media Disregards Russia Hoax Revelations

 Poll Results on Belief in Collusion

- 60% of Democrats believe in the debunked Russia collusion claim against Trump.

- The belief is reinforced by continued reliance on legacy media.

Tulsi Gabbard's Revelations

- Gabbard claims Obama initiated the Russia collusion hoax to weaken Trump's administration.

- Gabbard has declassified over 100 pages of evidence proving Obama directed fraudulent intelligence reports.

- She released a timeline showing the Obama administration's knowledge that Russian interference did not change election outcomes.

Criminal Referral to Justice Department

- Gabbard plans to make a criminal referral to the DOJ and FBI regarding the evidence uncovered.

- Whistleblowers from the intelligence community are coming forward, expressing their disgust over the actions taken.

Responses from Media Outlets

- Major outlets like The Washington Post and The New York Times have minimized Gabbard's disclosures.

- Politico and CNN framed the disclosures within a narrative of a Trump administration plot.

- Fox News and New York Post provided more balanced coverage of Gabbard's statements.

Concerns About Media Coverage

- There is a prominent lack of coverage or dismissal of Gabbard's evidence by mainstream media.

- Independent journalists like Julie Kelly highlight the flaws in the intelligence community's narrative and the actions of former FBI director James Comey.

Key Events Leading to the Hoax

- A crucial meeting occurred on December 9, 2016, involving key intelligence figures, hinting at coordinated efforts against Trump.

- Leaks began around the same time, with unsubstantiated claims about Russian interference dominating news cycles.

Public Belief in Collusion

- The persistence of the belief among Democrats raises questions about how misinformation persists.

- Many uninformed individuals are influenced by the corporate media's omissions and biases. 

https://spectator.org/corporate-media-disregards-russia-hoax-revelations/