We've gone from having election results on the same night or in the early hours to prolonged counts of sketchy ballots behind closed doors, with the winner remaining unknown for days on end.
Certain blue districts in the United States, using machine ballots, take days to count a fraction of that number.
How does one reconcile this? End Wokeness: Argentina: 25-30 million paper ballots Maricopa: 1.9 million ballots Milwaukee: 460k ballots Detroit: 250k ballots Fulton: 523k ballots Explain to me how Argentina hand-counted all of their ballots in a few hours, but the big blue areas in our swing states take several days with machines? The voting process in Argentina was streamlined and efficient.
Voting is conducted with paper ballots, making the count unpredictable, but initial results were expected around three hours after polls close.
Concerned about the possibility of unreliable elections similar to those in the U.S., officials in Argentina closely monitored the voting process.
Experts say such irregularities cannot swing an election, and that his assertions are partly aimed at firing up his base and motivating his supporters to become monitors of voting stations.
Perhaps it's worth considering the idea of outsourcing our elections to Argentina's capable hands? That might ensure we learn the results within a day and alleviate concerns about Democrats cheating.
No comments:
Post a Comment