If you do not think Google is a dirty rotten organization to its
very core you need to read this piece. It will change your mind. Total
and complete adherence to left wing bias is their stock in trade.
Quote: "The word “progressive” was described as modern, liberal,
advanced, forward-looking, forward-thinking, go-ahead, enlightened,
enterprising, innovative, up-and-coming, new, dynamic, avant-garde,
modernistic, disruptive; radical, left-wing, reforming, reformist,
revolutionary, revisionist, and progressivist. The word “liberal” had similarly positive results: tolerant,
unprejudiced, unbigoted, broad-minded, open-minded, enlightened,
forbearing; permissive, free, free and easy, easygoing, laissez-faire,
libertarian, latitudinarian, unbiased, impartial, nonpartisan. The only remotely negative words were indulgent, lenient, lax, and soft. Perhaps the most offensive term on Google’s dictionary is the word “patriot.” The synonyms offered are nationalist, loyalist; chauvinist, jingoist, jingo, flag-waver, isolationist, and xenophobe. It
almost sounds like they’ve hired Colin Kaepernick to supply their
synonyms." And, "In an era obsessed with fake news and rampant
polarization, it would be nice if our supposedly unbiased resources
weren’t also trying to push their own political agenda down their users’
collective throats. In fact, being honest and unbiased during these
uncertain times would be a much-needed act of patriotism. And no, I’m
not trying to use that word as an insult. I’m using it as it’s been
used throughout the ages – as putting aside our petty differences and
doing what’s right for our
nation. https://townhall.com/columnists/markmeckler/2019/08/03/googles-dictionary-supplies-biased-terms-calls-patriots-xenophobes-n2551120?
Can anyone tell me that their Google and their so call liberal and
progressive peers fit the definitions matches anything close to their
actual behavior as liberals and progressives? Most of the words they
assign to themselves are the exact opposite of their actual behavior.
They are complete self centered frauds, liars, propagandists and
censors and worse.
More insight into the left wing bias that fills the ranks of Google from top to bottom as summarized by a former engineer. Quote: "On Friday, former Google engineer Kevin Cernekee told Fox News's Tucker Carlson that his former employer will try to prevent President Donald Trump's reelection. "Do you think that Google will attempt to influence the election outcome, attempt to prevent Trump from being reelected?" Carlson asked. "I do believe so," Cernekee replied. "I think that’s a major threat. They have openly stated that they think 2016 was a mistake. They thought Trump should have lost in 2016. They really want Trump to lose in 2020. That’s their agenda." The former engineer also said Google has "very biased people running every level of the company. They have quite a bit of control over the political process. That’s something we should really worry about." https://pjmedia.com/trending/former-google-engineer-says-google-will-try-to-prevent-trumps-reelection/?
If
this is an example of the journalist profession that is suppose to
provide us with facts, and nothing but the facts and not their opinions,
then I do not want to see, listen to or read anything they have to
say. They are not journalists. They are biased propaganda agents of
the socialist leaning Democrat party. And, that means they are
completely useless, having no morals or ethics.
https://flagandcross.com/cnn-analyst-calls-trump-a-f-ing-moron-instantly-loses-his-white-house-press-pass/
This study affirms what so many
of us have said repeatedly. No one can believe anything the mainstream
media has to say. They are dyed in the wool left wing agitators and
propagandists. Quote: "Race-baiting mainstream media majorly distorts
the truth on bigotry, new study proves. The
mainstream media wants to frighten you into watching their figureheads,
and they’re using racism to do it. Thanks to the incessant hysteria
that we see in the mainstream media, turning on the television these
days nearly requires a stiff drink and a xanax. We’re being driven to
the brink of chaos by these talking heads, all in the name of selling a
few more commercials during their coverage of the carnage. The news is always bad, and if it isn’t, they’ll tell you why you should still be worried. It’s not journalism, it’s entertainment,
and its purpose is to incite your emotions. Lately, these cable news
cretins have been aiming at a very particular piece of American culture;
the concept of racism, and their belief that hate is on the rise."
https://libertyhub.com/race-baiting-mainstream-media-majorly-distorts-the-truth-on-bigotry-new-study-proves/
If
you do not think the left wing mainstream media ignores
frightening comments from reprobate left wing politicians consider this
item. Quote: "Media Completely Ignore Ilhan Omar Endorsing Violence
Against a Senator. A member of Congress mocked the physical assault of
another member, and only conservatives recognized that was
outrageous."
https://freebeacon.com/politics/media-completely-ignores-ilhan-omar-endorsing-violence-against-a-senator/?
How about another prime example. Quote: "Media Overlook Warren’s
Comparison of Wall Street Bankers to Bloodsucking Vampires."
https://freebeacon.com/blog/warrens-vampires-hawleys-cosmopolitans-how-media-selectively-see-anti-semitism/?
Another example.
https://flagandcross.com/tlaib-poses-for-photos-meets-with-anti-israel-terror-supporting-group-msm-dead-silent/
John
Stossel has a good way of simplifying the complex reason so much of the
news is what he calls stupid news. He explains here. Quote: ""Fake
news!" shouts the president. His supporters cheer. That drives my
colleagues into a frenzy of self-absorbed handwringing: "Threats to
press freedom ... press persecution!" It's silly. American reporters are
hardly less safe because of President Donald Trump's hyperbole. (Trump is reckless
when he uses the term in other countries. Authoritarians in Russia,
China, the Philippines, Saudi Arabia, etc., now cite "fake news" while
they jail or kill reporters. He should shut up about "fake news" when
he's overseas.) But I smiled when I first heard him use the phrase, not
because news stories are "fake"-- they typically aren't (reporters who
make things up are usually caught and fired) -- but because so much of
what people call "news" is press releases and breathless exaggerations
of isolated problems. It's stupid news." https://townhall.com/columnists/johnstossel/2019/08/07/stupid-news-n2551293?
This
item reveals just how hypocritical way too many in social media jobs
really are. Google is king of the hill when it comes to being a left
wing propaganda agency yet this employee warns people of the dangers of
being on Tucker Carlson's show on FOX. He is a right wing agent. Last
time I checked Tucker is hard on people on both sides of the political
aisle if they do and say stupid things. He is fair and balanced which
people at Google cannot even come close to claiming. Recent studies of
their nefarious activities reveal that I am right and this Google
employee is dead wrong.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/08/google-employee-anyone-who-goes-on-tucker-carlson-is-complicit-in-helping-him-spread-dangerous-propaganda/?
This
is an example of precisely why no one should ever believe anything
people in the mainstream media write or say. This is an incredible
piece by the Washington Post. The people running that paper are just as
demented as most Democrats. Their misperception of reality is simple
amazing. Quote: "In arguing that Sanders and Warren are unrealistic,
grandiose ideologues, the Washington Post points to, of all people, former President Obama. The same man who, upon becoming the presumptive Democratic nominee on June 3, 2008,
told supporters in St. Paul, Minnesota, that, “we will be able to look
back and tell our children that this was the moment when we began to
provide care for the sick and good jobs to the jobless.” “This was the
moment,” Obama continued, the applause growing louder and more
enthusiastic, “when the rise of the oceans began to slow and our planet
began to heal, this was the moment when we ended a war, and secured our
nation, and restored our image as the last, best hope on Earth.” Obama,
who coasted into the White House in 2008 and 2012 on grandiose promises,
and with little to no vetting from the national press, is the person
the Washington Post editorial board has in mind when it says,
“Candidates who promise big ideas should also be pressed on how they
will realize them.” “[T]he United States is a vast, pluralistic country,
and Congress will continue to reflect its ideological range,” the
newspaper warns. “Big donors and billionaires may exercise too much
influence, but Democratic primary voters should be wary of candidates
who use that fact to explain away all opposition to their ideas. Even if
you undid Citizens United and enacted campaign finance reform,
sustainable policy in America would emerge only by means of principled
compromise.” It is almost as if the Washington Post forgets or ignores that its ideal U.S. president rather famously muscled though parts of his agenda via a “phone and a pen.” Does the newspaper believe all those executive orders overturned by President Trump
appeared out of nowhere? “The next president should have a vision of
progress for the nation that is expansive and inspiring. It also should
be grounded in mathematical and political reality,” the editorial
concludes. The Washington Post is not wrong when it says a
president should be both pragmatic and have a realistic vision that
includes compromise. But the paper’s nostalgia for Obama, who
over-promised as a candidate and gave the bird to compromise as
president, suggests the paper is really more anti-Sanders and
anti-Warren than it is concerned with strict practicality."
https://www.leapfrogamerica.com/why-cant-bernie-sanders-and-elizabeth-warren-be-as-realistic-as-the-guy-who-promised-to-slow-the-rise-of-the-oceans/
If
you do not think Google is a dirty rotten organization to its very core
you need to read this piece. It will change your mind. Total and
complete adherence to left wing bias is their stock in trade. Quote:
"The word “progressive” was described as modern, liberal, advanced,
forward-looking, forward-thinking, go-ahead, enlightened, enterprising,
innovative, up-and-coming, new, dynamic, avant-garde, modernistic,
disruptive; radical, left-wing, reforming, reformist, revolutionary,
revisionist, and progressivist. The word “liberal” had similarly positive results: tolerant,
unprejudiced, unbigoted, broad-minded, open-minded, enlightened,
forbearing; permissive, free, free and easy, easygoing, laissez-faire,
libertarian, latitudinarian, unbiased, impartial, nonpartisan. The only remotely negative words were indulgent, lenient, lax, and soft. Perhaps the most offensive term on Google’s dictionary is the word “patriot.” The synonyms offered are nationalist, loyalist; chauvinist, jingoist, jingo, flag-waver, isolationist, and xenophobe. It
almost sounds like they’ve hired Colin Kaepernick to supply their
synonyms." And, "In an era obsessed with fake news and rampant
polarization, it would be nice if our supposedly unbiased resources
weren’t also trying to push their own political agenda down their users’
collective throats. In fact, being honest and unbiased during these
uncertain times would be a much-needed act of patriotism. And no, I’m
not trying to use that word as an insult. I’m using it as it’s been
used throughout the ages – as putting aside our petty differences and
doing what’s right for our
nation. https://townhall.com/columnists/markmeckler/2019/08/03/googles-dictionary-supplies-biased-terms-calls-patriots-xenophobes-n2551120?
Can anyone tell me that their Google and their so call liberal and
progressive peers fit the definitions matches anything close to their
actual behavior as liberals and progressives? Most of the words they
assign to themselves are the exact opposite of their actual behavior.
They are complete self centered frauds, liars, propagandists and
censors and worse.
More
insight into the left wing bias that fills the ranks of Google from top
to bottom as summarized by a former engineer. Quote: "On Friday,
former Google engineer Kevin Cernekee told Fox News's Tucker Carlson
that his former employer will try to prevent President Donald Trump's
reelection. "Do you think that Google will attempt to influence the
election outcome, attempt to prevent Trump from being reelected?"
Carlson asked. "I do believe so," Cernekee replied.
"I think that’s a major threat. They have openly stated that they think
2016 was a mistake. They thought Trump should have lost in 2016. They
really want Trump to lose in 2020. That’s their agenda." The former
engineer also said Google has "very biased people running every level of
the company. They have quite a bit of control over the political
process. That’s something we should really worry about."
https://pjmedia.com/trending/former-google-engineer-says-google-will-try-to-prevent-trumps-reelection/?
If
this is an example of the journalist profession that is suppose to
provide us with facts, and nothing but the facts and not their opinions,
then I do not want to see, listen to or read anything they have to
say. They are not journalists. They are biased propaganda agents of
the socialist leaning Democrat party. And, that means they are
completely useless, having no morals or ethics.
https://flagandcross.com/cnn-analyst-calls-trump-a-f-ing-moron-instantly-loses-his-white-house-press-pass/
George Burns
No comments:
Post a Comment